ML20196E770

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Vendor 871130 Submittal of Amend 12,Chapter 10 of Sys 80+ CESSAR-DC.Response Requested within 90 Days of Ltr Date
ML20196E770
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/25/1988
From: Vissing G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Scherer A
ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY
References
PROJECT-675A NUDOCS 8803010289
Download: ML20196E770 (5)


Text

_

- February 25, 1988 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 1000 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500

Dear Mr. Scherer:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1. CESSAR-DC, CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH Our chemical Engineering Branch has reviewed Amendment 12 Chapter 10 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your letter dated November 30, 1987, and has identified the need for additional information in order to continue the review. The enclosed Request For Additional Information describes the needed information. Our schedule calls for the Lfomation to be received within 00 days from the date of this letter.

Sincerely, Dricint 03:2d E7 8 Guy S. Vissing, Project llanager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation F.nclosure:

As :tated cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION; TCentral File?

EHylton NRC & Local PDRs LRubenstein PDSNP Reading CMcCracken (DEST /CEB)

GVissing FWitt (DEST /CEB) i f

b PDt MT PDNSP P

g l

GV1

1s E
on LRube tein Cr en g,

Oumn 0 iyia Ouys8 Ou a

02 a

8803010299 880225 6

A PDR 1

i

/

UMTED STATES

^

[

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

.a wwumnow. o. c. rous l

%,,,,,+#

FEB 2 51933 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering i

1000 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Conr cticut 06095-0500

Dear Mr. Scherer:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1. CESSAR-DC, i

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH Our chemical Engineering Branch has revicwed Amendment 12, Chapter 10 of

^

System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your letter dated November 30, 1987, and has identified the need for additional information in order to continue the review. The anclosed Request For Additional Information describe: the needed q

information. Our schedule calls for the information to be received within 90 days from the date of this letter.

l Sincerely.

uy S.

sing, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power i

Reactor Project Directorate i

Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, i

Y and Special Projects i

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page i

4

,_m-,-

-i Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Project No. 675 r

)

cc: Mr. C. B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.

7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1310 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 I

l l

[

i i

o 4

d i

4 L

4 l

t a

i) r i

)

4 t

i

7 l

4 ENCLOSURE l

l w I

REQUEST FOR AD0!TIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING i

i CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH REVIEW 0F CHAPTER 10 0F AMENDMENT NO. 12 0F COM8USTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ DESIGN, CESSAR - DC l

i j

PROJECT NO. 675

~

281-8 The EPRI ALWR Requirements Document, Chapter 3 Paragraph 4.27, 4

requires a plant design which provides system features which t

i facilitate compliance with EPRI NP-5056-SR. PWR Secondary Water i

Chemistry Guidelines. Section 10.3.5 does not reference the EPRI i

Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines. A generic secondary water chemistry program that conforms with SRP Section 5.4.2.1. Branch Technical Position MTEB 5.3 should be provided.

{'

281-9 '

Section 10.3.5 provides operating chemistry limits for secondary l

steam generator water, feedwater and condensate. Normal and Abrorwal l

limits are provided for secondary water. However, the three action levels and corrective actions to be considered (as recosmended by the EPRI PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines) are not provided.

t I

281-10 Section 10.3.5 does not provide guideline parameters and corresponding normal and action values for:

]

a, cold shutdown / wet layup steam generator sample, 1

b.

heat-up ( 200'F to 55 power)steamgeneratorblowdownsample,

)

c.

feedwater - during fill, i

j d.

heat-up feedwater sasple, and l

I e.

power operation condensate sample, as recoupended in the EPRI PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines i

power operation condensate sample.

t i

281-11 Section 10.3.6.2 does not include materials selection recesmendations in EPRI ALWR Requirements Document (Chapter 1, Section 5.3.5) regarding prohibition of copper alloys and design considerations 4

identified in EPPI NP-2294. "Guide to the Design of Secondary Systems and Their Components to Minimize Oxygen-Induced Corrosion" for the steam and feedwater system.

281-12 Section 10.4.6.2, item 4. the purpose of the resin traps should be included (i.e., to remove resin fines).

Item 5 should include the i

requirement that the minimum flow rate of the condensate polisher should be specified by the manufacturer to prevent channeling.

i I

i I

i

.:. 3 381-13 i

Section 10.4.6.2 does not meet the EPAI ALWR Requirements Document regarding utilization of a side stream condensate which contains deep bed mixed bed ion exchangers. iniiaher system j

?

I f

I t

t l

1 4

h I

5 t

I i

i r

a h

i 5

f i

l i-i i

I i'

n i

i l

1 i

I l

1 i

l i

i 1

I 1

i l

1 i

--