ML20196E561
| ML20196E561 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Bergeron R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00881, 53FR16435-881, NUDOCS 8807010644 | |
| Download: ML20196E561 (1) | |
Text
-_ __ - -__
N/
- e.nin
-- 4 R..._
W' 53Sk/G y3g
'88 JH 23 P1 :42 June 22,1988 CP r;:. u D.<
i 1 00CKlien a '-E4'Cf B k t. HC'-
Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sir,
I am. writing to give my support to the proposed clarification for low-power testing, that it is not necessary for a plant to have the same full-scale public notification system in place that is required for full-power operation.
For Seabrook, specifically, the proposed rule will not decrease public safety in any way.
Seabrook has already gone the extra mile to build the safest nuclear plant ever constructed.
It,has met every regulatory requirement.
It has installed a public notification system very early on, and saw it delibera-tely removed by Commonwealth of Massachusetts in their attempt to block Seabrook's opening.
It has designated and submitted a new system to take the place of the original system. The proposed rule, when approved, will clear up any confusion over.the public-notification system requirements for low-power testing.
I support any effort to reduce misunderstanding.
New England needs the power l
Seabrook will provide.
I Sincerely yours, N
Roland C. Bergeron 2 Woods Drive Newmarket, NH 03857 l
l t
I i
4 8807010644 00062D PDR PH 50 53FR16435 PDR:
b ')
-