ML20196E256

Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

ML20196E256
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	06/22/1988
From:	Martel R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00897, 53FR16435-897, NUDOCS 8807010579
Download: ML20196E256 (1)

Text

67 June 22, 1988 Robert E. Martel

• ggy,'

358 York St.

~

York Harbor, ME 03911 18 JW 23 P1 :52 DOCKET NUMBER )J -

Sncretary of the Commis on PR0o0 SED RULE 0

"p Attn: Docketing and Se omg;,prgncK'/j:7-sgiof g3g jgy U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, DC 20555 Daar Sir, I am writing in support of the clarification of Emergency Planning Raquirements for low power testing.

As a resident of Maine within the ingestion pathway, I am very concerned where my future power needs are coming from.

Maine and new Hampshire needs more power and should not be left dependent on unreliable Canadian hydro power and politicians against nuclear power.

Electrical sales grew last year by 4.5% from the year before, about double the Department of Energy's estimates. This year it is double that.

Nuclear power is a reliable source of energy which New England no,eds. It is time for a sound U.S. Fnergy Policy. I hope tc see Seabrocl< on line very soon and swift passage of the proposed rule.

Sincerely, eh Robert E. Martel III Professional Engineer fjj701,jD79000622 7

50 53FnisA35 pon

,, (

.,