ML20196D596

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196D596
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/22/1988
From: Taylor K
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00938, 53FR16435-938, NUDOCS 8807010412
Download: ML20196D596 (1)


Text

i DOCKET NUMBER PROPOSED RULE k SD 3h

'3 Ek / W3h.'>

h ni
i:

03fH

'88 Jim 23 P1 :54 June 22. 1988 Of8 u o.

t, 00CnfIp6 i 9,c,g,,g' cRANCH Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

Once again it appears that the function of the NRC is being impaired by those who would rather see us increase the national debt and fill the pockets of foreign countries, be they friend or foe.

Clearly, the NRC is the appropriate agency to decide how nuclear plants should be licensed and what procedures must be followed.

It is totally inappropriate to allow any ambitious politician (s) to dictate what path the NRC should follow.

It is equally inappropriate to allow anything but fact and conformance to NRC procedures and guidelines to determine the fate of nuclear power plants and Seabroo's Station, in particular.

3 Xma gentlemen are the experts and governing agency; ymi decide what needs to be done and how the country may best be served.

I, for one, who!

treedly support the licensing of Seabrook Station; I unfounded assertions and opinions of those solely urge you to disrega.

te interested in furtherit

. air own political aspirations.

s Very t

yours, K.C. Taylor L

81 Seaverns Bridge Road Amherst, NH 03031 t

8807010412 80062P PDR pH PDR 50 53FR1643b O s-/b

- -