ML20196D002
| ML20196D002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Sanborn G AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00822, 53FR16435-822, NUDOCS 8807010284 | |
| Download: ML20196D002 (1) | |
Text
.
,4
(
(
PROPOSED R\\lLE N 50 ', f[
',/
007ET' NUMBER i
q (6 3 FR IW35)
YN ca.n iu.
05NRC i
I H
'8B JN 20 P4 :55 l
(
\\
<s j
OFFICE 0! nu uat. <
.t DOCKETINfi A '.!f ylff l
~
Mk k,_1988 Samuel J. Chilk f
3ecretary of the Commission Attention: Docketing U.S. Naclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.U.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Dear S'tra
's h
On May h, 1988,'the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published 3
a pecposed ccange to its emergency plannino requirements for fuel i
loading and Icw power operation of nuc t,Nar f tlower plants.
l l
't The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including the following:
offsite I
emergency response plans, any public notification systems j
'l (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency y
I response personnel.
I f
Ai a resident of the Geabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously-oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requiren ants.
/ >
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's irterests in mind.
The NRC is once again moving to place the g
puolic at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to'obtain a low power license, even though its ability to be granted a full power licenne is seriously in doubt.
iin the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency response plant,.> g requirements must be in place before allowing any degreA of r'im; t o the public, including risks from low power operation..
't Sincerely, & % '
h v w )
[
Name and.Vdress:
t
}
l
~
T$ Churchy yJeg ))eu)M,./)O.
h701 234 800606 l
50 53FR16A35 PDR j
l t
s l; 5
f
-l0
, --