ML20196C752
| ML20196C752 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Olson B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00911, 53FR16435-911, ACTG-88-371, NUDOCS 8807010217 | |
| Download: ML20196C752 (1) | |
Text
ACToasmi N
DOCKET l10MSER no PROPOSED R E En n
63PA.I&Y38 XMi I!.i t'i Ni!"
'88 JN 23 P 1 52 0FF!a
, s,.c
.,u.
June 22,198p0CKE ? I r e,1ct.
Secretary of the Commission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sir:
As an employee of New Hampshire Yankee,I am writing to express my opinion as to why a 5% power license should be granted to Seabrook Station.
First and foremost is that New England needs the power. I have lived in this area for the past 6 years. The growth over that period of time has been tremendous. If this development is to continue, Seabrook must go on line.
Second, as a resident of Hampton Beach and with the Plant "in my backyard",I am confident of the many safety features of Seabrook Station. I am a member of the New Hampshire Yankee Emergency Response Team and see first hand the dedication of all participants to the safety of the residents in this area. I fe6
,ongly that the members of this team have a commitment to insure the success of the evacuation plan.
Thank you for this opportunity to express my opinion.
Sincerely, mp BA Bobbi Jo Olson 8807010217 88062a PDR PH SO D3FR16435 PDR g
.