ML20196C566
| ML20196C566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00752, 53FR16435-752, NUDOCS 8807010155 | |
| Download: ML20196C566 (1) | |
Text
/
ll DOCXET NUMBER REPOSED RULE ?O SO
[S 3 FR Ib$ssf r x :c:r:
u p.
Ju N 6 MIN 8P12:37 Samuel J. Chilk QFJ !cE.. : t,,,,,
Secretary of the Commission At t ent ionWCB6'qhp t fVigv'CF.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Efhtich 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate niany existing low power s) licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification cystems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabroox Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I u. (ie the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
Sincerely, W '
m/
~
Name and Address:
)
gh este-Ad arm 8907010105 000606 PDR PR SO S3FR16435 PDH OS-ID 1