ML20196B927
| ML20196B927 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/08/1988 |
| From: | Gwinn R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00778, 53FR16435-778, NUDOCS 8806300407 | |
| Download: ML20196B927 (1) | |
Text
Qp"f g y6D 55 Fil l{,135)
D X 4 ili UWC 13 Sunshine Drive Kingston, New Hampshire 18 JN 20 A9:30 aune e, 19ea OFHCL... I'vtf
.:.at 00CXi h.'.
l BR AN 'L f
Secretary U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
l Attention: Chief Docketing and Services Branch l
1 Gentlemen:
As an interested person in c'tters relating to Seabrook Station I am requesting that the Commission change the requirements coupling the off site emergency response plan with initial criticality and low power testing less than 250 Mw thermal. These continuing delays associated with the start of Seabrook Station not only delays the eventual plant operation but provides addition justification to intervener groups and out of state officials to press on to create further financial problems for the utility. This kind of political 1
delaying provides for only increased costs without substantive improvement on the plant design or operation. It is within the l
Commi ssi ons ability to expedite the process and expend efforts to allow Seabrook Station to operate.
The licensing of Seabrook Station can be delayed until there are no more questions to be asked, but we in New England cannot wait forever.
We have the means to produce needed power by the operction of Seabrook Station, but are held at bay by a handful of self proclaimed experts of plant operation and safety.' 1 ask you where has common sense gone?
There are plants similar in design.already in full power operation.
There is however, a big difference in the political environment between Connecticut, Georgia, and ourselves here in New England.
Sincerely, odest--
Robert A.
Gwinn 8806300407 080600 PDR HH 50 D3VR1hA35 UDR
[3 -/0 5
-