ML20196B409

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of CRGR Meeting 125 on 871125 Re Development Status of Licensee Guidance & Plans for Implementation of Individual Plant Exams & RES Proposed Exception from CRGR Review of Two Reg Guides Listing Current ASME Code Cases
ML20196B409
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/14/1988
From: Jordan E
Committee To Review Generic Requirements
To: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
NUDOCS 8802110228
Download: ML20196B409 (2)


Text

  1. Y UNITED STATES g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r,

y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20665

%,.....,/

January 14, 1988 MEMOPANDUM FOR:

Victor Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations FROM:

Edward L. Jordan, Chaiman Cossnittee to Review Generic Requirements

SUBJECT:

MINUTES OF CRGR MEETING NUMBER 125 The Comittee to Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) met on Wednesday, November 25, 1987 from 1-4 p.m.

A list of attendees for this meeting is enclosed (Enclosure 1). The following items were addressed at the meeting:

1.

T. Murley, NRR; T. Speis, RES; B. Sheron, RES; and F. Coffman, RES briefed the Comittee on the status of development of licensee guidance and plans for the implementation of the Individual Plant Examinations called for in the Comission's Severe Accident Policy Statement.

The Comittee provided a number of comments for improvement of the IPE package. This matter is discussed in Enclosure 2.

2.

The Committee considered a proposal by RES for exception from CRGR review of two Reg. Guides listing and/or endorsing current ASME Code Cases and a request for review by the Committee of the CRGR Charter to detemine whether the CRGR Chairman has the discretion to waive review of all such Reg. Guides in the future. The Cossaittee directed the CRGR staff to prepare a memorandum providing the basis for EDO consultation with the l

NRC Chaiman on this matter. This matter is discussed in Enclosure 3.

In accordance with the E00's July 18, 1983 directive concerning "Feedback and Closure on CRGR Reviews," a written response is required from the cognizant office to report agreement or disagreement with CRGR recomendations in these minutes.

The response, which is required within five working days after receipt of these meeting minutes, is to be forwarded to the CRGR Chairman and if there is disagreement with the CRGR recomendations, to the EDO for decisionmaking, d

l ' /)

I 08 y e800110D00 000114 PDR i< FNGl2 NRCC

7 6.e~s '

2-Questions concerning these meefing minutes should be referred to Jim..Conran (492-9855).

erWI r,e.a e L D Wden Edward L. Jordan, Chairman-Committee to Review Generic Requirements

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/ enclosures:

Commission (5)

SECY t

Office Directors l

Regional Administrators CRGR Members W. Parler B. Sheron G. Arlotto F. Coffman Distribution: w/o encl.

s:Caent.reiiFITs PDR (NRC/CRGR)

5. Treby W. Little M. Lesar CRGR SF (w/ enc.)

CRGR CF (w/ enc.)

J. Jnhnson (w/ enc.)

B. Coolittle (w/ enc.)

J. Conran (w/ enc.)

J. Heltemes (w/onc.)

C. Sakenas (w/ enc.)

0FC :CJ Q AE00 AE00:DD

C/ G D:

NAME :,dCo f,an:cg : CJHeltemes -

, an

.........y.g'.,1 g..............,j. 3..,.................:.....................................

9 DATE : 13/.J47

12/ /87

./ W /['f/8 N :

F J

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

<