ML20196B113

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Util Rev 9 to Shoreham...Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan. Requests Findings on Whether Plan Meets Interim Criteria.W/O Encl
ML20196B113
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date: 01/27/1988
From: Congel F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Krimm R
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Shared Package
ML20151S553 List:
References
FOIA-88-280, RTR-NUREG-0654 NUDOCS 8802090155
Download: ML20196B113 (2)


Text

\\

ves g#o, o

UNITED STATES

~,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c.

wAswiNoToN, D. C. 20555 January 27, 1988

+

MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard W. Krimm Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Federal Emergency Management Agency 1

FROM:

Frank J. Congel, Director Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

FEMA SUPPORT FOR NRC LICENSING OF SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION l

1 Enclosed is a long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) letter transmitting the offsite plan for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) which LILCO has provided to you separately. The plan, "SNPS Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan" J

Revision 9, is further described in the licensee's transmittal letter of January 22, 1988.

)

i Under the provisions of the April 9,1985 NRC/ FEMA Memorandum of Understanding, we request that FEMA review the SNPS plan. As you are aware, the NRC and FEMA have jointly developed an interim-use document entitled:

Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (Criteria for Utility Offsite Planning and Preparedness).

The document has been published as Supplement I to NUREG-0654/FCMA-REP-1, Rev.1.

The guidance contained in thi! document is to be used for the development, review and evaluation of offsite utility radiological emergency planning and preparedness for accidents at commercial nuclear plants.

In reviewing and evaluating utility offsite plans and preparedness, FEMA should assume that in an actual radiological emergency, State and local officials that have declined to participate in emergency planning wil'd :

(1) Exercise their best efforts to protect the hesith and safety of the public; (2) Cooperate with the utility and follow the utility offsite plan; and (3) Have the resources sufficient to implement those portions of the utility offsite plan where State and 1ccal response is necessary.

r f hSk 0 N$$

ofy

Rivna7tf W. Krimm.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.47(.a), the NRC must make a finding on whether the state of emergency preapredness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.

It is therefore requested that FEMA provide findings on whether the SNPS plan meets the interim criteria described above. We understand that FEMA will provide its findings on a mutually agreeable schedule consistent with the hearing schedule for Shoreham. A specific request as to the FEMA finding date will be coordinated by our staffs.

If you have any questions, please call me at 492-1088.

Frank J. Congel, Director Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regalation

Enclosure:

DISTRIBUTION w/o

Enclosure:

LILC0 Ltr. dtd. 1/22/88 VStello, EDO JLBlaha, NRR JMTaylor, E00 WTRussell, RI TRehm, EDO TTMartin, RI JPMurray, 0GC RRBellamy, RI W0lmstead, OGC FJCongel, NRR GEJohnson, OGC DBMatthews, NRR EReis OGC RJBarrett, NRR TEMurley, NRR LJCunningham, NRR JHSniezek, NRR CRVan Niel, NRR l

FJMiraglia, NRR FKantor, NRR j

FPGillespie, NRR IHusar, FEMA RTHogan. NRR MLawless, FEMA SWBrown, NRR ED0 R/F Central Files PDR R/F PEPB R/F PEPB/NRR SC

/NRR

/NRR D/DREP/NR d

RTHogan:sc F

r D

tthews FJCongel wv* *D 1/J.7/88 1/d/88 1/p/88 1/gq/88 1$/88 RM

...