ML20196A360
| ML20196A360 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000371 |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1988 |
| From: | Kaufman N UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.) |
| To: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NIS-88-1-11, NUDOCS 8802050006 | |
| Download: ML20196A360 (2) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
W g, e e u m 67 Sandy Desert Road uiwNavalProducts n:L--,
nWYit'Ei4T**"se=22 In Reply Please Refer Tot NIS-88-1-11 January 15, 1988 Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards U.
- 8. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Subjects USNRC Inspection 70-371/87-08 Reft Letter T. T. Martin to N.
C.
Kaufman dated December 18, 1987
Dear Sir,
This letter is in response to the referenced letter, which presented the results of the subject inspection.
As can be seen from the details in the attachment to this letter, we have taken prompt, effective action to address the items of NRC concern presented.
Very trul
- 96rs, Ac7 N.
C.
KA MAN President NCK/jmp cci R.
J.
Gregg W.
F.
Kirk Attachment 8802050006 880115 i
PDR ADOCA 07000371 C
___f"*"
N SS * '
Attaohnentofo Letter N.C. Rauf0an to T.To Martin Reply To NRC Inspection No. 70-371/87-08 ADDendiX A and IteE 3 of Details, Health Physics Procedures - Lack of Formal ADDroval.
1.
Corrective SteDs which have been taken and the results achieved 4
l Upon NRC notification of this violation, the procedures were formally approved by the Manager, Nuclear and Industrial safety on November 16, 1987.
Runoff and distribution was completed by November 17, 1987.
The NRC was immediately notified of our corrective action on November 17, 1987 Although undocumented, the H.P. procedures which were is use 1
had been concurred in by the H.P. Specialist and the NIS Manager.
2.
Corrective Steps which will be taken to avoid further violationst UNC will respond promptly to inspection observations.
3.
The date when full conD11ance will be achieved:
1 We are currently in full compliance.
Item 3 of Details - HEPA Filter Testinq Maintenance work records were immediately checked for each of the ventilation systems in question.
The records, completed at the time of the testing, stated that the DOP test was acceptable.
However, to assure that the systems were functioning as tested, each system was ratested to verify the required efficiency.
Based on this test and an observed differential pressure increase, one system's filters were changed.
All HP technicians have been reinstructed on the necessity for proper documentation of compliance to the 99.95%
efficiency requirement in HEPA filter acceptance testing.
Item 3 of Details v Coacial Work Permit As noted, when additional information is obtained from the SWP originator by phone or direct contact, the H.P.
personnel will add the information to the SWP form.
Item 4 of Details - Bioassav SDiked SanDles The split sample cross comparison program between Idaho National Labs and our current urinalysis / water analysis
)
vendor is currently in process.
Vendor review of the factor difference of 100x resulted in correction of the data.
Laboratory data was based on i
analysis of a 10ml sample which was not corrected to the 1 liter reporting basis.
Health Physics personnel have been reminded of their responsibility for prompt review of vendor data, and investigation and resolution of discrepant blind sample I
results.
- o