ML20195G554
| ML20195G554 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/23/1988 |
| From: | Wastler S NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Fliegel M NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| References | |
| REF-WM-68 NUDOCS 8806280046 | |
| Download: ML20195G554 (2) | |
Text
_
l j
$Nh SW/05/18/88 OUP MEMORANDUM FOR: Myron Fliegel, Section Leader Uranium Recovery Projects Section FROM:
Sandra L. Wastler, Project Manager Uranium Recovery Projects Section
SUBJECT:
MEETING MINUTES OF ThE DOE /NRC MEETING ON THE GREEN RIVER PRELIMILARY FINAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAl' Date/ Time:
April 21, 1988 - 9:00 am Location:
HRC, White Flint North, Rockville, MD Attendees:
00E/HQ 00E/AL TAC NRC D. Mathes D. Leske P.K. Chen S. Wastler K. Westbrook R. Richey L. Coons M. Fliegel D. Gillen M. Mathews R. Rogers T. Johnson J. Kane L. Harris R. Peel M. Young J. Grim F. Titus J. Starmar M. Tokar B. Jagannath M. Weber J. Surmeier
Background:
Early in the expedited review of the Green River preliminary final RAP and Design, DOE requested a meeting with the NRC.
The purpose of this meeting was to facilitate a clear understanding of the NRC's concerns resulting from our review of these documents. While the NRC was preparing a draft Technical Evaluation Report (dTER) based on the revlew of the preliminary final Design and RAP, draft coments were transmitted to DOE by letter dated April 13, 1988.
These comments were provided to DOE, for information only, in order to help expedite the Green River Review process. Just prior to the meeting, the NRC completed and issued the dTER. As a result, after providing DOE scme time to review the dTER, the DOE /NRC meeting comenced with the focus on the dTER open items.
Discussion:
As stated above, the DOE /NRC meeting focused on NRC's open items as identified in Table 1.1 of the dTER. As a result of the NRC/00E discussions on these open items, DOE gained a clear understanding of the open items including the draft coment upon which they were based and 00E briefly described information they presently have or will have available on these open items.
8806280046 880523 PDR WASTE WM-68 DCD hfy]2ob
^/LF/.
n SW/05/18/88 DUP
~2~
WAY : 3 1993 The open items were also discussed to make DOE aware of their significance in the on-going review process. We explained that the open items were based on our evaluation of DOE Green River documents and that these open items repre-sented the only remaining concerns regarding remedial action at the Green River site. DOE was informed that an adequt.te resolution of all the open items would result in NRC's full concurrence on the remedial action, as supported by the final TER. The NRC also indicated that none of the outstanding and as yet unresolved open items precluded POE from beginning earthmoving and excavation at their own risk.
With regard to the resolution of the open items, the NRC pointed out that the degree of resolution needed before we could conditionally concur can vary for each open item. The NRC indicated that some of the open items may have to be closed oti completely before conditional concurrence, some may be partially closed out and others may be postponed. DOE was informed that they must assume the responsiblility for making and supporting the deter'nination on the degree to which each open item could or should be closed out prior to the NRC's concurrence on remedial action. Once this determination is made and agreed to by NRC, DOE should work closely with the NRC to resolve or partially resolve the open items. DOE was informed that those open items remaining partially unresolved or postponed will become conditions on the NRC's final concurrence.
The NRC also pointed out that the DOE should not wait until the final Design and RAP to provide the information on the resolution of the open items. As the information necessary to close out or partially close out an item becomes available, it should be sent and discussed with the NRC.
At the close of the discussion on the dTER open items, the DOE and HRC staff's broke into two smaller groups for technical discussions on the radon / infiltration barrier and ACL's.
Sandra L. Wastler, Project Manager Uranium Recovery Section DIS,TRIBUTION:
lAfntral file HMSS rf LLOB rf SWastler, LLOB MFliegel, LLOB PLohaus, LLOB JSurmeier, LLTB MBell, LLRB JGreeves, LLWM MKnapp, LLWM RBangart, LlWM M C LLOB
.....................[
DATE:f/-9388 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - --