ML20195F499
| ML20195F499 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Amundsen K AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00731, 53FR16435-731, NUDOCS 8806270066 | |
| Download: ML20195F499 (1) | |
Text
L
~T.
_.2...
e DOCKET NUMBER
~
b/
YROPOSED RUl.E N S' ? -.- -
I 00tKEiE0
,i U5NRC
,k L
'88 JM 16 P4 :36 i
~
June 6, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk QF_FICE OF $ rat 1 A A /
-I Secretary of the Commission ywKEi g g'E gfrftention: Docketing
{
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch t
1717 H Street, N.W.
i Washington, D.C.
20555 t
f
Dear Sir:
(
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published j
a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
1 The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing rege'rements, including offsite emergency response plans, any pub..ic-notificatior systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
4 As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously i
oppose the proposed amendment to axisting safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's t
interests in mind.
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree 6
t of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
Sincerely, s
I 8806270066 880606 I
..r M U'D Y,,... p u >:. 3 4 I
~ ' ".#
Name and Address:
v j.N. 3
-ns i
t
[
Katherine L. Amundsen C
C
'4 I Island Park
{
-Ip swich MA 01938
.,3 vi *
' ~, ',
s
,e.n tw')
a@
j
'}
p.s.
Please do not forget that Three Mile Isltnd'was e serious e,
1' warning.
Many of the regulations made were from' this experience.
.A _,._
>\\
The ultimate responsibility for these plants i pyours snd this,
_p a
l charge should completely outweight the dollar profit or lo.sses 1
L for Public Service of New Hampgire.
The lives"cif Th'e people of this area may be fact be in.your han'ds.
Dji-/()
[