ML20195F265
| ML20195F265 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Orenstein H AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00704, 53FR16435-704, NUDOCS 8806270004 | |
| Download: ML20195F265 (1) | |
Text
{?..
Q0
. ; *.cn.-,:c,.,n K, Y
=Cw
--'. DOCKET NUMBER g~
l
. ~...
PROPOSED RUl.E -
,[
&3 FR /M3g) ootxttcr.
thNRC a
h
'88 J.N 16 P3:26 June 6, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk IC GF iistiAn f I
Secretary of the Com, ission Attention: Docketing Ki ENVICI
{
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1
1717 H Street, N.W.
I Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
e The proposed rulo has been developed with only the utility's interests in mi'.d.
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is striously in doubt.
In the interest of public.pafety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk.to the public, including riska from low power operation.
}
g A,s Q & g p l.
, a.... -, n -
. u x,..
z,
Wane and Address:
C '"
'~'<~3<
fp W. &
~
M ma.
nr R
,,,... w
~~ !
a
.9 8806270004 080606 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR
~ ~ - ~ - - -
~ ~ ~ ~
I bS /0