ML20195E961

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Urges Commission to Reject Proposed Rule Change
ML20195E961
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/1988
From: Gillespie M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00512, 53FR16435-512, NUDOCS 8806240174
Download: ML20195E961 (1)


Text

5/

s7>

(63 FRHes)

-9 5

May 21, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission Attention: Cocketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Dear Sir On May 3, 1998, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low pcwer licensing requirements, including the followings offsite emergency response plans, any public notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seacrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.

The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low power license, even though its ability to be granted a full power license is seriously in doubt.

in the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.

All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree Of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation..

Sincerely, OC Name andu ddressy El dxuhich 5t hubk acet TW 0R Sr i

8806240174 880521 PDR PR PDR 50 53FR16435 05/0

'