ML20195D881

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on 338th ACRS Meeting on 880602-04 on Proposed Rulemaking Actions Re 10CFR30,40, & 70 Emergency Preparedness for Fuel Cycle & Other Matl Licensees & 10CFR50, Emergency Preparedness...Low Power Operations
ML20195D881
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/07/1988
From: Kerr W
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
ACRS-R-1308, NUDOCS 8806230231
Download: ML20195D881 (1)


Text

'o UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

E

.I ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

    • o,,,, **~,[

k W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20665 June 7, 1988 The Honorable Lando W. Zech, Jr.

Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Chairman Zech:

SUBJECT:

RULEMAKING ON EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PREPAREDNESS During the 338th meeting of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, June 2-4, 1988, we met with the NRC Staff to discuss the proposed rulemaking actions related to:

(1) 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, "Emergency Preparedness for Fuel Cycle and Other Material Licensees," and (2) 10 CFR Part 50, "Emer-gency Planning and Preparedness Requirements fot luclear Power Plant Fuel Loading and Initial Low-Power Operations."

The Comittee previously com-mented on this matter in a report dated July 17, 1985.

Regarding these two activities, we offer the following coments:

1.

We concur with the proposed rulemaking for fuel cycle and other material licensees.

This will codify via rulemaking what is now being addressed through orders.

The rule is limited in application and will require emergency planning for only those facilities which have a potential for i

accidental impact on public health.

The total. number of significant such facilities is about 30, and we understand that all of them already l

have emergency plans that fulfill the requirements of the proposed rule.

We also concur with the proposed rulemaking that would require the 2.

development of limited emergency plans for nuclear power plants during l

fuel loading and initial low-power operation.

During these periods of time, the radioactive material source term is minimal and the proposed degree of emergency preparedness appears comensurate with the risk.

Before a plant would be licensed to operate at higher power levels, a full-scale emergency plan would be required.

Sincerely, W. r, err Chaiman b

NI&

~

s

---r

,