Text

DSAR, for Zion Station
	ML20195D122
Person / Time
Site:	Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	08/31/1998
From:	; COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20195D113	List: A98053, Forwards Change Instructions for Update to Zion UFSAR, Rewritten to Reflect Permanent Defueled Condition of Plant. & DSAR,; ML20195D122;
References
	NUDOCS 9811170299
	Download: ML20195D122 (800)
	v • d • e

-

Zion Station DEFUELED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (DSAR)

Comed

_~ . . . _ . ._ __- . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES O ,

PAGE DATE PAGE DATE Controlled Copy Cover AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-7 AUGUST 1998 Sheet Figure 1-8 AUGUST 1998 List of Effective Pages Tab Figure 1-9 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-1 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-10 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-2 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-11 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-3 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-12 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-4 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-13 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-5 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-14 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-6 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-15 AUGUST 1998 Master Table of Contents Tab Figure 1-16 AUGUST 1998 ;

1-i AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-17 AUGUST 1998 l 2-1 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 2 Tab 2-li AUGUST 1998 2-1 AUGUST 1998 3-i AUGUST 1998 2-il AUGUST 1998 3-il AUGUST 1998 2-iii AUGUST 1998 3-lii AUGUST 1998 2-iv AUGUST 1998 3-lv AUGUST 1998 2-v AUGUST 1998 i 3-v AUGUST 1998 2-1 AUGUST 1998 l O

' 4-i 4-il AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 2-2 2-3 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998

' 5-i AUGUST 1998 2-4 AUGUST 1998 6-1 ' AUGUST 1998 2-5 AUGUST 1998 7-i AUGUST 1998 2-6 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 1 Tab 2-7 . AUGUST 1998 s.

1-1 AUGUST 1998 2-8 AUGUST 1998 1-il AUGUST 1998 2-9 AUGUST 1998 1-iii AUGUST 1998 2-10 AUGUST 1998 1-1 AUGUST 1998 2-11 AUGUST 1998 1-2 AUGUST 1998 2-12 AUGUST 1998 1-3 AUGUST 1998 2-13 AUGUST 1998 1-4 AUGUST 1998 2-14 AUGUST 1998 15 AUGUST 1998 2-15 AUGUST 1998 1-6 AUGUST 1998 2-16 AUGUST 1998 1-7 AUGUST 1998 2-17 AUGUST 1998 1-8 AUGUST 1998 2-18 AUGUST 1998 1-9 AUGUST 1998 2-19 AUGUST 1998 Table 1-1(1) AUGUST 1998 2-20 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-1 AUGUST 1998 2-21 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-2 AUGUST 1998 2-22 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-3 AUGUST 1998 2-23 AUGUST 1998 Figure 1-4 AUGUST 1998 2-24 AUGUST 1998 ,

Figure 1-5 AUGUST 1998 2-25 AUGUST 1998 O Figure 1-6 AUGUST 1998 2-26 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-1 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES l PAGE DATE PAGE DATE p

2-27 . AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-11 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-1(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-12 AUGUST 1998 l Table 2-2(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-13 AUGUST 1998

! Table 2-3(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-14 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-4(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-15 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-4(2) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-16 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-5(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-17 AUGUST 1998 l Table 2-5(2) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-18 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-6(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-19 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-7(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-20 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-7(2) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-21 AUGUST 1998 l Table 2-7(3) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-22 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-8(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-23 . AUGUST 1998

, Table 2-8(2) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-24 AUGUST 1998 )

Table 2-9(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-25 AUGUST 1998 i Table 2-9(2) AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-26 AUGUST 1998 :

i Table 2-10(1) AUGUST 1998 Appendix 2A Cover Sheet AUGUST 1998 Table 2-11(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-1 AUGUST 1998 '

Table 2-12(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-2 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-13(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-3 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-14(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-4 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-15(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-5 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-16(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-6 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-17(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-7 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-18(1) AUGUST 1998 2A-8 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-19(1) _ AUGUST 1998 Appendix 2B Cover Sheet AUGUST 1998 l Table 2-20(1) AUGUST 1998 2B-1 AUGUST 1998

. Table 2-20(2) AUGUST 1998 2B-2 AUGUST 1998 l- Table 2-21(1) AUGUST 1998 28-3 AUGUST 1998 Table 2-22(1) AUGUST 1998 Appendix 2C Cover Sheet AUGUST 1998 Table 2-22(2) AUGUST 1998 2C-i AUGUST 1998 Table 2-23(1) AUGUST 1998 2C-1 AUGUST 1998 l

Table 2-23(2) AUGUST 1998 2C-2 AUGUST 1998 l Figure 2-1 AUGUST 1998 2C-3 AUGUST 1998 l Figure 2-2 AUGUST 1998 2C-4 AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-3 AUGUST 1998 2C-5 AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-4 AUGUST 1998 2C-6 AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-5 AUGUST 1998 2C-7 AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-6 AUGUST 1998 2C-8 AUGUST 1998 Figure 2-7 AUGUST 1998 2C-9 AUGUST 15)98 Figure 2-8 AUGUST 1998 2C-10 AUGUST 1998 p

V.

Figure 2-9

. Figure 2-10 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 2C-11 2C-12 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 l

L LOEP-2 August 1998

e ZION STATION DSAR l

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES 1 O

V

PAGE DATE PAGE DATE j 2C-13 AUGUST 1998 ' 2C-56 AUGUST 1998 2C-14 AUGUST 1998 2C-57 AUGUST 1998 2C-15 ' AUGUST 1998 2C-58 AUGUST 1998 2C-16. - AUGUST 1998 - 2C-59 AUGUST 1998 2C-17 AUGUST 1998 2C-60 AUGUST 1998 2C-18 AUGUST 1998 2C-61 AUGUST 1998.

2C-19 AUGUST 1998 2C-62 AUGUST 1998 2C-20 AUGUST 4998 2C-63 AUGUST 1998 !

2C-21 AUGUS" 1909 2C-64 AUGUST 1998 2C-22 AUGUf: < '%8 2C-65 AUGUST 1998 2C-23 AUGUST 1998 . 2C-66 AUGUST 1998 2C-24 AUGUST 1998 2C-67 AUGUST 1998 2C-25 AUGUST 1998 2C-68 AUGUST 1998 !

2C-26 AUGUST 1998 2C-69 AUGUST 1998 =

2C-27 AUGUST 1998 2C-70 AUGUST 1998 i 2C AUGUST 1998 2C-71 AUGUST 1998 2C-29 AUGUST 1998 2C-72 ~ AUGUST 1998 l 2C-30 AUGUST 1998 2C-73 AUGUST 1998 1 O 2C-31 2C-32 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 2C-74 2C-75 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 l

2C-33 AUGUST 1998 2C-76 AUGUST 1998

. 2C-34 AUGUST 1998 2C-77 AUGUST 1998 2C-35 AUGUST 1998 2C-78 AUGUST 1998 2C-36 . AUGUST 1998 2C-79 AUGUST 1998 2C-37 AUGUST 1998 2C-80 AUGUST 1998 -

2C-38 AUGUST 1998 2C-81 AUGUST 1998 2C-39 AUGUST 1998 2C-82 AUGUST 1998 l 2C-40 AUGUST 1998 2C-83 AUGUST 1998 l 2C-41 AUGUST 1998 2C-84 AUGUST 1998 l 2C-42 AUGUST 1998 2C-85 AUGUST 1998 2C-43 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 3 Tab 2C-44 AUGUST 1998 3-1 AUGUST 1998 2C-45 AUGUST 1998 3-il AUGUST 1998 2C-46 AUGUST 1998 3-iii AUGUST 1998

_2C-47 AUGUST 1998 3-iv AUGUST 1998 2C-48 AUGUST 1998 3-v AUGUST 1998 2C-49 AUGUST 1998 3-vi AUGUST 1998 2C-50 AUGUST 1998 3-vii AUGUST 1998 2C-51 AUGUST 1998 3-viii AUGUST 1998 2C AUGUST 1998 3-1 AUGUST 1998 2C-53 AUGUST 1998 3-2 AUGUST 1998 2C-54 AUGUST 1998 3-3 AUGUST 1998

-O 2C-55 AUGUST 1998 3-4 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-3 August 1998

n. - . . . - . - . . - . . ~ - . - . - - - _ . - . - . - . . . _ - . . - . . - . - . . - . - . - . -

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 3-5 AUGUST 1998 3-48 AUGUST 1998 3-6 AUGUST 1998 3-49 AUGUST 1998 -

3-7 AUGUST 1998 3-50 AUGUST 1998 3-8 AUGUST 1998 3-51 AUGUST 1998 3-9 AUGUST 1998- 3-52 AUGUST 1998 3-10 AUGUST 1998 3-53 AUGUST 1998 3-11 AUGUST 1998 3-54 AUGUST 1998 3-12 . AUGUST 1998 3-55 AUGUST 1998 3-13 AUGUST 1998 3-56 AUGUST 1998 3-14 AUGUST 1998 3-57 AUGUST 1998 3-15 AUGUST 1998 3-58 AUGUST 1998 3-16 AUGUST 1998 3-59 AUGUST 1998 3-17 AUGUST 1998 3-60 AUGUST 1998 3-18 AUGUST 1998 3-61 AUGUST 1998 3-19 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-1(1) AUGUST 1998 3-20 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-2(1) AUGUST 1998 -

3-21 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-3(1) . AUGUST 1998 3-22 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-4(1) AUGUST 1998 3-23 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-4(2) AUGUST 1998 3-24 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-4(3) AUGUST 1998 3-25 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-4(4) AUGUST 1998 3-26 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-4(5) AUGUST 1998 3-27 ~ AUGUST 1998 Table 3-5(1) AUGUST 1998 3 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-6(1) AUGUST 1998 3-29 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-7(1) AUGUST 1998 3-30 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-8(1) AUGUST 1998 3-31 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-9(1) AUGUST 1998 3-32 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-9(2) AUGUST 1998 3-33 AUGUST "998 Table 3-9(3) AUGUST 1998 3-34 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-10(1) AUGUST 1998 3 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-11(1) AUGUST 1998 3-36 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-12(1) AUGUST 1998 3-37. AUGUST 1998 Table 3-13(1) AUGUST 1998 3-38 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-14(1) AUGUST 1998 3-39 AUGUST 1998 Table 3-15(1) AUGUST 1998 3-40 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-1 AUGUST 1998 3-41 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-2 AUGUST 1998 3-42 ~ AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-3 AUGUST 1998 3-43 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-4 AUGUST 1998 3-44 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-5 AUGUST 1998 3-45 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-6 AUGUST 1998 46 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-7 AUGUST 1998

( 3-47 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-8 AUGUST 1998 LOEP-4 August 1998

j r ZION STATION DSAR ll L

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES V '

PAGE DATE PAGE DATE I

l L Figure 3-9 ' AUGUST 1998 4-iii AUGUST 1998' Figure 3-10 AUGUST 1998 4-iv AUGUST 1998 l Figure 3-11 AUGUST 1998 4-1 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-12 AUGUST 1998 4-2 AUGUST 1998

Figure 3-13 AUGUST 1998 4-3 AUGUST 1998

. Figure 3-14 AUGUST 1998 4-4 AUGUST 1998 l ^ FiNre 3-15 ' AUGUST 1998 4-5 AUGUST 1998 j Figure 3-16 AUGUST 1998 4-6 AUGUST 1998 )

' Figure 3-17 AUGUST 1998 4-7 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-18 AUGUST 1998 4-8 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-19 AUGUST 1998 4-9 AUGUST 1998 i Ficare 3-20 . AUGUST 1998 4-10 AUGUST 1998 -

Figure 3-21 AUGUST 1998 4-11 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-22 AUGUST 1998 4-12 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-23 AUGUST 1998 4-13 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-24 AUGUST 1998 4-14 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-25 AUGUST 1998 4-15 AUGUST 1998 ,

q Figure 3-26 AUGUST 1998 4-16 AUGUST 1998 !

i' V Figure 3-27 AUGUST 1998 4 17 AUGUST 1998 ;

Figure 3-28 AUGUST 1998 Table 4-1(1) AUGUST 1998 i l Figure 3-29 AUGUST 1998 Table 4-2(1) AUGUST 1998 1

! Figure 3-30 AUGUST 1998 Table 4-3(1) AUGUST 1998 ;

- Figure 3-31 AUGUST 1998 Figure 4-1 ' AUGUST 1998 !

Figure 3-32 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 5 Tab i Figure 3-33 AUGUST 1998 5-1 AUGUST 1998 l

' Figure 3-34 AUGUST 1998 5-il AUGUST 1998 j Figure 3-35 AUGUST 1998 5-iii AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-36 AUGUST 1998 5 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-37 AUGUST 1998 5-2 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-38 AUGUST 1998 5-3 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-39 AUGUST 1998 5-4 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-40 AUGUST 1998 5-5 AUGUST 1998 ;

Figure 3-41 AUGUST 1998 5-6 AUGUST 1998 i Figure 3-42 AUGUST 1998 5-7 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-43 AUGUST 1998 5-8 AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-44 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-1(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-45 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-2(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-46 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-3(1) AUGUST 1998 Figure 3-47 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-4(1) AUGUST 1998

_ Figure 3-48 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-5(1) AUGUST 1998 i' Chapter 4 Tab Table 5-6(1) AUGUST 1998 l"

4-1 AUGUST 1998 Table 5-7(1) AUGUST 1998

- il AUGUST 1998 Figure 5-1 AUGUST 1998 i

l LOEP-5 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES O

PAGE .DATE PAGE DAIE Figure 5-2 ' AUGUST 1998 Figure 5-3 AUGUST 1998 Figure 5-4 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 6 Tab 6-1 AUGUST 1998 6-1 AUGUST 1998 -

6-2 AUGUST 1998 6-3 AUGUST 1998 6-4 AUGUST 1998 6-5 AUGUST 1998 Chapter 7 Tab 7-1 AUGUST 1998 7-1 AUGUST 1998 7-2 ' AUGUST 1998 O .

O LOEP-6 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS l A V SECTION TITLE PAGE l 1. INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1-1 l OF PLANT

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1-1 1.2 GENERAL PLANT DESCRIPTION 1-2 1.2.1 General Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.1.1 Overall Requirements 1-3 1.2.1.2 Radiation Controls 1-4

.1.2.1.3 Fuel and Waste Storage Systems 1-5 1.2.1.4 Effluents 1-5 1.2.2 Structures 1-6 1.2.3 Waste Disposal System 1-6 1.2.4 Fuel Handling System 1-7 1.2.5 Electrical System 1-7 1.2.6 Site and Environment 1-7 1.2.7 Facility Safety Conclusions 1-8 1.3 IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS AND CONTRACTORS 1-8 1.4 DRAWINGS AND OTHER DETAILED INFORMATION 1-9 L'

1.5 REFERENCES

, SECTION 1.0 1-9 i

i l

i 1-i August 1998 I

- -. - - - - - - - , - . - . ~ - - .. - - .~. . - . - - - ... - - - -

l ZION STA'llON DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2-1

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2-1 L 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2-1 2.1.1 Site Lccation and Description 2-1 2.1.2 Exclusion Area Authority and Control 2-1 2.1.3 Population Distribution 2-2 2.2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION, AND 2-2 I f MILITARY FACILITIES

! 2.2.1 Locations and Routes (References 1 and 2) 2-2 2.2.2 Descriptions (References 3,4, and 5) 2-2 2.2.2.1' Nonmilitary Facilities 2-2 2.2.2.2 Military Facilities 2-3 2.2.2.3 Waterways 2-3 2.2.2.4 Airports 2-3 2.2.3 Evaluation of Potential Accidents 2-3 2.3 METEOROLOGY 2-4 2.3.1 Regional Climatology 2-4 l Q( /

l

- 2.3.1.1 General Climate 2-4' l 2.3.2 Local Meteorology 2-4 l 2.3.2.1 Normal and Extreme Values of 2-4 Meteorological Parameters 2.3.2.1.1 Climate 2-4 I 2.3.2.1.2 Wind Direction 2-5 2.3.2.1.3 Wind Direction Persistence 2-5 2.3.2.1.4 Atmospheric Stability 2-6

, 2.3.2.1.5 Severe Weather 2-8 L 2.3.3 Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program 2-8 2.3.4 Short-Term Diffusion Estimates 2-9 2.3.5 Long-Term Diffusion Estimates 2-9 i-l O

i I

! 2-1 August 1998 l

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING 2-9 2.4.1 Hydrologic Description 2-9 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities 2-9 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere 2-10 2.4.2 Floods 2-11 2.4.2.1 Rainfa;l 2-12 2.4.2.2 Flood Design Considerations 2-12 2.4.3 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers 2-12 2.4.4 Potential Dam Failures, Seismically Induced 2-12 2.4.5 Probable Maximum Surge and Seiche Flooding 2-12 2.4.5.1 Surge and Seiche Water Levels 2-12 2.4.5.2 Currents, Tides, Waves and Littoral Drift 2-14 (References 21 and 22) 2.4.5.2.1 Wind Effects on Surface Currents 2-14 2.4.5.2.2 Wave Action Due to High Winds 2-14 2.4.5.3 Protective Structures 2-15 2.4.6 Ice Effects 2-17 2.4.7 Dispersion, Dilution, and Travel Times of 2-17 Accidental Releases of Liquid Effluents in Surface Waters 2.4.7. 'i General 2-17 (s 2.4.7.2 Temperature Alterations 2-18 2.4.8 Groundwater -

2-18 2.5 GEOLOGY, EEISMOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL 2-19 ENGINEERING 2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic Information 2-19 2.5.1.1 Geological Program 2-19 2.5.1.2 Seismology Program 2-20 2.5.1.3 Regional Geology 2-20 2.5.1.4 Site Geology 2-21 2.5.2 Vibratory Ground Motion 2-22 2.5.2.1 Seismicity 2-23 e 2.5.2.2 Design Basis Earthquake 2-23 2.5.3 Surface Faulting 2-23 2.6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2-23 PROGRAM 2.7 RF.FERENCES, Section 2.0 2-24 2-n August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE 3.1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC GENEr AL DESIGN CRITERIA 3-1 3.2 CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS AND 3-7 SYSTEMS 3.2.1 Seismic Classifications 3-7 3.2.2 Seismic Class l Structures 3-8 3.2.3 Seismic Class I Systems and Components 3-8 3.2.4 Structures, Systems, and Components important to the 3-9 t

Defueled Condition (ITDC) 3.2.4.1 General 3-9 3.2.4.2 Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations on 3-12 use of the SSC Reclassification Criteria 3.2.4.3 Boundaries and Interfaces for ITDC SSCs 3-12 3.3 WIND LOADING DESIGN 3-12 3.4 WATER LEVEL (FLOOD) DESIGN 3-12

( 3.5 MISSILE PROTECTION 3-13 3.5.1 Missiles Generated by Natural Phenomena 3-13 3.5.1.1 Criteria 3-13 3.5.1.2 Design 3-13 3.5.1.3 Aircraft Hazards 3-13 3.5.1.4 Structures, Systems, and Components to be 3-13 Protected from Externally Generated Missiles 3.5.1.5 Barrier Design Procedures 3-14 3.6 SEISMIC QUAllFICATION OF SEISMIC CLASS I EQUIPMENT 3-14 3.6.1 Seismic Qualification Criteria 3-14 3.7 SEISMIC DESIGN 3-15 3.7.1 Seismic Input 3-15 3.7.1.1 Design Response Spectra 3-15 3.7.1.2 Design Time History 3-15 3.7.1.3 Critica' Damping Values 3-15 3.7.2 Seismic System Analysis 3-16 3.7.2.1 Seismic Analysis Methods 3-16 3.7.2.2 Vertical Response Loads 3-17 3.7.2.3 Interaction of Noncategory I Structures with 3-17 Category l Structures O-3-1 August 1998 L. ..

I ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE 3.7.2.4 Development of Ficor Response Spectra 3-18 3.7.2.5 Comparison of Response 3-18 3.7.3 Seismic Subsystem Analysis 3-19 3.7.3.1 Determination of Number of Earthquake Cycles 3-19 3.7.3.2 Analytical Procedures for Piping 3-19 3.7.3.3 Buried Seismic Category l Piping Systems 3-19 and Tunnels 3.7.3.4 Interaction of Other Piping with Category l Piping 3-20 ,

3.7.4 Seismic Instrumentation 3-20 j 1

3.8 DESIGN OF CATEGORY I STRUCTURES 3-21 3.8.1 Concrete Containment 3-21 3.8.1.1 Description of the Containment 3-21 3.8.1.2 Loads and Load Combinations 3-21 l 3.8.1.2.1 Dead Loads 3-21 3.8.1.2.2 Live Loads 3-21 3.8.1.2.3 Hydraulic Uplift Forces 3-21 3.8.1.2.4 Seismic Forces 3-21 3.8.1.2.5 Wind Loading and External Missiles 3-22 l 3.8.1.3 Design and Analysis Procedures 3-22 3.8.1.3.1 General 3-22 3.8.1.3.2 Computer Analysis Programs 3-22 l 3.8.1.3.2.1 General 3-22 3.8.1.3.3 Containment Behavior 3-23 1 3.8.1.4 Structural Acceptance Criteria 3-23 3.8.1.4.1 Structural Design Basis 3-23 ;

, 3.8.1.4.1.1 General 3-23 3.8.1.4.1.2 Stress Tables 3-23 3.8.1.4.1.3 Foundation Design Criteria 3-24 l

3.8.1.5 Materials, Quality Control, and Special 3-24 Construction Techniques

-3.8.1.5.1 Concrete 3-24 3.8.1.5.2 Reinforcing Steel 3-25 3.8.1.5.3 Quality Control 3-25 3.8.2 Other Seismic Category 1 Structures 3-25 3.8.2.1 Description of Structures 3-25 3.8.2.2 Loads and Load Combinations 3-25 3.8.2.3 Design and Ana!vsis Procedures 3-25 3.8.2.4 Foundations 3-25 3.8.2.5 Materials 3-25 O

3-ii August 1998

i ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE __

PAGE 3.9 FUEL STORAGE AND HANDLING 3-26 3.9.1 New Fuel Storage 3-26 3.9.1.1 Design Basis 3-26 3.9.1.2 New Fuel Storage Facility Description 3-26 3.9.1.3 Design Features important to the Defueled Condition 3-26 3.9.2 Spent Fuel Storage 3-26 3.9.2.1 Design Basis 3-26 3.9.2.1.1 Prevention of Fuel Storage Criticality 3-26 3.9.2.1.2 Fuel Storage Decay Heat 3-27 3.9.2.1.3 Spent Fuel Storage Radiation Shielding 3-27 3.9.2.1.4 Protection Against Radioactivity Release 3-28 from Spent Fuel Storage 3.9.2.1.5 Monitoring Fuel Storage 3-28 3.9.2.2 Spent Fuel Facility Description 3-28 3.9.2.3 Design Features important to the Defueled Condition 3-31 ;

3.9.3 Fuel Handling Systems 3-31 ]

3.9.3.1 Design Basis 3-31 3 3.9.3.2 System Description 3-32 3.9.3.2.1 Failed Fuel Cans 3-32 3.9.3.2.2 Spent Fuel Pool Bridge 3-32 3.9.3.2.3 Fuel Building Crane 3-33 J 3.9.3.2.4 Fuel Building Crane Interlocks 3-33 3.9.3.2.4.1 Interlock / Limit Switch Function 3-33 3.9.3.2.4.2 Hoist Limit Switches-Operation 3-34 3.9.3.3 _

Design Features Important to the Defueled Condition 3-35 3.9.4 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Clesnup System 3-35 3.9.4.1 Design Basis 3-35 3.9.4.1.1 Fuel and Waste Storage Decay Heat 3-35 3.9.4.1.2 Codes and Classifications 3-35 '

3.9.4.2 System Description 3-36 3.9.4.3 Components 3-36 3.9.4.3.1 Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exchangers 3-36 3.9.4.3.2 Spent Fuel Pool Pumps 3-37 3.9.4.3.3 Spent Fuel Pool Filters 3-37 3.9.4.3.4 Spent Fuel Pool Strainers 3-37 3.9.4.3.5 Spent Fuel Pool Demineralizers 3-37 3.9.4.3.6 Spent Fuel Pool Skimmer 3-37 3.9.4.3.7 Spent Fuel Pooling Cool System Valves 3-37 '

3.9.4.3.8 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Piping 3-37 3.9,4.3.9 Spent Fuel Pool Sump Recessed Area 3-37 3-iii August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

O

-V SECTION TITLE PAGE 1

3.9.4.4 Spent Fuel Pool Make-Up Capability 3-38 3.9.4.5 Design Features important to the Defueled Condition 3-38 l 3.9.5 Spent Fuel Cask Drop Analysis 3-39 l 3.9.5.1 Objective of Analysis 3-39 3.9.5.2 Statement of Physical Problem 3-40

'3.9.5.3 Calculational Methods and Other Assumptions 3-41 3.9.5.4 Results 3-42 3.10 PLANT SUPPORT SYSTEMS 3-43 3.10.1 Component Cooling System 3-43 3.10.1.1 Design Basis . 3-43 3.10.1.2 System Description 3-43 3.10.1.3 Components 3-44 3.10.1.3.1 Component Cooling Heat Exchangers 3-45

-3.10.1.3.2 Component Cooling Pumps 3-45 l 3.10.1.3.3 Component Cooling Surge Tanks 3-45 l 3.10.1.3.4 Component Cooling System Valves 3-45 3.10.1.3.5 Component Cooling System Piping 3-46 3.10.1.4 Design Feature important to the Defueled Condition 3-46 3.10.2 Service Water System 3-46 3.10.2.1 Design Basis 3-46 3.10.2.2 System Description 3-47 3.10.2.3 Design Features important to the Defueled Condition 3-48 3.10.3 Ventilation Systems _

3-49 3.10.3.1 Control Room Heating, Ventilating, and 3-49 Air Conditioning System 3.10.3.1.1 Design Basis 3-49 3.10.3.1.2 System Description 3-49 <

3.10.3.1.3 Normal Operation 3-49 3.10.3.1.4 Design Features Important to the 3-50 Defueled Condition 3.10.3.2 Auxiliary Building Ventilation 3-50 3.10.3.2.1 Design Basis 3-50 3.10.3.2.2 Normal Operation 3-50 3.10.3.2.3 Design Features important to the 3-51 Defueled Condition 3.10.3.3 Containment Purge 3-51 3.10.3.3.1 Design Basis 3-51 3.10.3.3.2 Normal Operation 3-51 O

3-iv August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE !

3.10.3.3.3 Design Features Important to the 3-52 Defueled Condition 3.10.3.4 Auxiliary Ventilation Systems 3-52 3.10.4 Fire Protection System 3-52 3.10.5 Operating Corarol Stations 3-53 3.10.5.1 General Layout 3-53 3.10.5.2 Design Basis 3-53 3.10.5.2.1 Control Room Design 3-53 3.10.5.2.2 Annunciator and Audible Alarm System 3-53 3.10.5.2.3 Radwaste System Control Panels 3-53 3.10.5.2.4 Miscellaneous Local Control Panels 3-54 3.10.5.2.5 Design Features important to the 3-54 Defueled Condition 3.10.6 Lighting Systems 3-54 3.10.7 Communications System 3-54 3.11 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 3-55 3.11.1 Design Basis 3-55 3.11.2 System Description 3-55 3.11.2.1 Offsite Power System 3-55 3.11.2.2 Onsite Power System 3-55 3.11.2.2.1 AC Power Systems 3-55 3.11.2.2.1.1 4160-V ?3ystem 3-55 3.11.2.2.1.2 480-V System 3-56 3.11.2.2.1.3 120-Vac Instrument and 3-56 Control Power System 3.11.2.2.1.4 Cable Derating 3-56 3.11.2.2.1.5 Cable Tray Loading 3-57 3.11.2.2.1.6 Reliability of Power Supplies 3-58 3.11.2.2.2 DC Power Systems 3-59 3.11.2.2.2.1 125-Vdc Power System 3-59 3.11.2.3 Design Features important to the Defueled Condition 3-60 3.11.3 Fire Protection for Cable Systems 3-60 3.12 REFERENCES SECTION 3.0 3-61 O

3-v August 1998

_- ... - = - . - - - . - ,-

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

4. RADIATION PROTECTION 4-1 4.1 ENSURING THAT OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION 4-1 ,

EXPOSURES ARE AS LOW AS IS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE 4.2 RADIATION SOURCES 4-1 4.3 RADIATION PROTECTION DESIGN FEATURES 4-2 4.3.1 Shielding 4-2 4.3.1.1 Shielding Description 4-2 4.3.1.1.1 Auxiliary Building 4-2 4.3.1.1.2 Fuel Handling Building 4-3 4.4 HEALTH PHYSICS PROGRAM 4-3 4.4.1 Equipment, Instrumentation, and Facilities 4-3 4.4.1.1 Personnel Monitoring 4-3 4.4.1.2 Protective Clothing 4-4 4.4.1.3 Physical Barriers for Access to High 4-4 Radiation Areas 4.4.1.4 Monitoring and Change Room Facilities 4-4 Ox 4.4.1.5 Records 4-4 4.4.2 Procedures 4-5 4.5 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 4-5 4.5.1 General 4-5 4.5.2 Liquid Waste Management System 4-6 4.5.2.1 Design Bases 4-6 4.5.2.2 System Description 4-6 4.5.2.3 Design Features important to the Defueled 4-7 Condition 4.5.2.4 Wastewater Treatment Facility 4-7 4.5.2.5 Oil Separator System 4-8 4.5.2.6 Design Features important to the Defueled 4-8 Condition 4.5.3 Solid Waste Management System 4-8 4.5.3.1 Design Bases 4-8 4.5.3.2 System Description 49 4.5.3.2.1 Processing of Spent Demineralizer Resins 4-9 4.5.3.2.1.1 Design Features important to the 4-9 Defueled Condition 4.5.3.2.2 Processing of Miscellaneous Tank and 4-9 Sump Solids 4.5.3.2.3 Processing of Contaminated Oil 4-9

( 4.5.3.2.4 Processing of Dry Active Waste 4-10 N 4.5.3.2.5 Waste Storage 4-10 4-1 August 1998

l ZION STATION DSAR l TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE !

4.6 RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS 4-10 4.6.1 Design Bases 4-10 4.6.2 Process anel Effluent Radiological Monitoring and 4-11 Sampling Systems i 4.6.2.1 System Description 4-11 ;

4.6.2.1.1 SPING Radiation Monitoring System 4-12 j 4.6.2.1.1.1 Containment SPING Air Monitor 4-12 1 4.6.2.1.1.2 Auxiliary Building vent Stack SPING 4-13 j Air Monitor i 4.6.2.1.2 Liquid Radiation Monitoring System 4-13 l 4.6.2.1.2.1 Component Cooling Loop Liquid Monitor 4-13 1 i

4.6.2.1.2.2 Waste Disposal System Liquid Effluent 4-14 Monitor <

4.6.2.1.2.3 Fire Sump Discharge Liquid Monitor 4-14 )

i 4.6.2.2 Calibration and Testing 4-14 l 4.6.2.3 Effluent Monitoring and Sampling 4-15 ,

4.6.2.4 Design Features important to the Defueled 4-15 l Condition 4.6.3 Area Radiation Monitoring instrumentation 4-16 .

4.6.3.1 System Description 4-16 !

(

4.6.3.2 Design Features important to the Defueled 4-16 Condition 1 l

4.7 Sealed Sources 4-16 j i

l l

l-l O

l 4-li August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

5. SAFETY ANALYSIS ' 5-1 5.0 GENERAL- 5-1 5.1 SPENT FUEL POOL EVENTS 5-1 5.1.1- Loss of Spent Fuel Pool Cooling 5-2

'5.1.1.1 Event Description 5-2 5.1.1.2 Method of Analysis 5-2 5.1.1.3 Results 5-3 5.1.2 Loss of Spent Fuel Poolinventory 5-4 5.1.2.1 Event Description 5-4 5.1.2.2 Method of Analysis 5-5 5.1.2.3 Results 5-5 5.2 FUEL HANDLING ACCIDENT IN THE FUEL BUILDING 5-6 5.2.1 Accidant Description 5-6 5.2.2 Method of Analysis 5-6 5.2.3 Results 5-6 f 5.3 RADIOACTIVE WASTE HANDLING ACCIDENT 5-6 5.3.1 Accident Description 5-6 5.3.2 ' Method of Analysis 5-7 5.3.3 - Results 5-7

5.4 REFERENCES

SECTION 5.0 5-8 O

5-i August 1998

,._ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ . _ _ ~ _ _ . _ _ _ . . - . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _

ZION STATION DSAR l

l TABLE OF CONTENTS i

O SECTION TITLE PAGE

6. CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS 6-1 6.1 RESPONSIBILITY AND ORGANIZATION 6-1 6.1.1 On-Site Organization 6-1 6.1.1.1 Duties and Responsibilities of the 6-1

Operating Staff Personnel

6.1.1.1.1 Decommissioning Operations Manager 6-1 i 6.1.1.1.2 Shift Supervisor, Decommissioning 6-2 6.1.1.2 Duties and Responsibilities of the Support Staff 6-2 l l 6.1.1.2.1 RP/ Chemistry Manager, Decommissioning 6-2 i

! 6.1.1.2.2 Maintenance Manager, Decommissioning 6-2 l 6.1.1.2.3 Regulatory Assurance Manager 6-2 l 6.1.1.2.4 Engineering Manager Decommissioning 6-2

-6.1.1.2.5 Services Manager, Decommissioning 6-2 J 6.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 6-2 6.3 TRAINING 6-3 l Q 6.4 PROCEDURES 6-3 6.5 PROGRAMS 6-3 6.5.1 . Emergency Plan 6-3 6.5.2 Security Plan 6-4 6.5.3 Fire Protection Program 6-4 6.5.4 Fitness for Duty 6-4 6.5.5 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 6-4 l 6.5.6 Process Control Program 6-5 6.5.7 Maintenance Rule Program 6-5 6.6 REVIEW AND INVESTIGATIVE FUNCTION 6-5 l

l i

l l

i 6-i August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE EAGE

7. QUALITY AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 7-1 7.1 ENGINEERED / QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ITDC SSCs 7-1 O

O 7-i August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS

'l SECTION TITLE ' PAGE

1. INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1-1 OF PLANT

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1-1 -

1.2 GENERAL PLANT DESCRIPTION 1-2 l 1.2.1 General Design Criteria 1-2 l 1.2.1.1 Overall Requirements 1-3 i 1.2.1.2 Radiation Controls 1-4

)

1.2.1.3 Fuel and Waste Storage Systems 1-5

- 1.2.1.4 Effluents 1-5 1.2.2 Structures 1-6 J 1.2.3 - Waste Disposal System 1-6 1.2.4 Fuel Handling System 1-7 1.2.5 Electrical System 1-7 1.2.6 Site and Environment 1-7 1.2.7 Facility Safety Conclusions 1-8 1.3 . IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS AND CONTRACTORS 1-8

1.4 DRAWINGS AND OTHER DETAILED INFORMATION 1-9

1.5 REFERENCES

, SECTION 1.0

1-9' l

l I

l l

i Y

o 1-i August 1998 l

[ .-

m. . . _ . . - -.- .

_ . _ . . _ . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ - _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . . . . _ _ . ~ . _ . _ _ _ --

l ZION STATION DSAR -

1-l l LIST OF TABLES l

TABLE TITLE 1-1 Cross-Reference for Controlled Drawings i-l-

l l

L m

I ,

I -- )

i i

1 l

i 1-ii August 1998 l

ZION STATION DSAR FIGURE TITLE 1-1 PROPERTY PLAT 1-2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PLAT 1-3 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - MAIN FLOOR EL. 642'0" (UNIT 1)

I 1-4 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - MEZZ. FLOOR EL. 617'0" 1-5 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - GROUND FLOOR EL. 592'0" (UNIT 1) 1-6 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - BASEMENT FLOOR EL. 560'0" 1-7 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - MISC. FLOORS 1-8 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - FUEL HANDLING BUILDING 1-9 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SECTIONS A-A AND B-B (UNIT 1) 1-10 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SECTIONS C-C AND D-D (UNIT 1) 1-11 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SECTIONS E-E AND F-F 1-12 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - MAIN FLOOR EL. 642'-0" (UNIT 2) l 1-13 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - MEZZ. FLOOR EL. 617'-0* (UNIT 2) 1-14 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - GROUND FLOOR EL.592'-0" (UNIT 2) 1-15 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - BASEMENT FLOOR EL 560'-0 (UNIT 2) 1-16 GT NERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - CRIB HOUSE 1-17 LC 0ATION OF ZION STATION O

0 1-iii August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR (q/

1. INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PLANT

1.1 INTRODUCTION

in February 1998, Comed certified the permanent cessation of operation of Zion Station Units 1 and 2 to the NRC (Reference 3). In March 1998, Comed certified to the NRC that all fuel assemblies have been permanently removed from both Zion Station reactor vessels and placed in the spent fuel pool (Reference 4). Comed plans to maintain Zion Station in the SAFSTOR condition (a period of safe storage of the stabilized and defueled facility) until final decommissioning and dismantlement.

This Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR)is derived from the July,1996 update of the Zion Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). The DSAR has been developed as a licensing basis document that reflects the permanently defueled condition of Zion Station and supercedes the UFSAR. As such, the DSAR is intended to serve the same function during SAFSTOR and decommissioning that the UFSAR served during operation of the facility. An evaluation of the systems, structures and components (SSCs) described in the UFSAR was performed to determine the function, if any, these systems would m.d.rm in a defueled condition. Each major SSC was evaluated to determine if it was ' m:ed to support the safe .

storage of irradiated fuel in the spent fuel pool, or needed to support decommissioning activities.

The criteria used to evaluate the major SSCs and the conclusion of the evaluations are provided in Section 3 of the DSAR.

A brief history of major plant operations and licensing related actions for Zion Station is as follows:

O 1. Construction Permit issued, December 1968, ,

2. Final Safety Analysis Report submitted, December 1970,

3. Operating license issued, April 1973 for Unit 1 and November 1973 for Unit 2,

4. Commercial Operations achieved, December 1973 for Unit 1 and September 1974 for Unit 2,

5. Certification of permanent cessation of plant operation submitted, February 1998,

6. Certdcation of permanent removal of all fuel from the reactor vessels, March 1998.

Upon docketing of the certification for permanent cessation of operation and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessels, the 10 CFR Part 50 license no longer authorizes operation of the reactors or emplacement or retention of fuel in the reactor vessels. In addition, the operating licenses scheduled to expire in April 2013 for Unit 1 and November 2013 for Unit 2 continue to remain in effect until the Nuclear Regulatory Commission notifies Comed that the licenses have been terminated.

O V

I 1-1 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR i

Certain sections of the DSAR may contain figures that are copies of controlled Zion Station O drawings and diagrams. These figures are included to supplement the text and aid in the understanding of the represented system and its operation. As a result of updating the Zion Station DSAR on a biennial basis in accordance with 10CFR50.71(e), latei revisions of the controlled drawings or diagrams may exist.

1.2 GENERAL PLANT DESCRIPTION Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Sargent and Lundy Engineers, and the Commonwealth Edison Company jointly participated in the design and construction of each unit. The plant was operated by the Commonwealth Edison Company. Each unit employed a pressurized water reactor nuclear steam supply system fumished by Westinghouse Electric Corporation designed for a power output of 3250 MWt. The equivalent warranted gross and approximate net electrical outputs of the plant were 1085 MWe and 1050 MWe, respectively.

In the permanently defueled condition, certain structures, systems and components (SSCs) are required to safely store new and spent nuclear fuel, prevent the uncontrolled release of radioactive effluents, and provide shielding to maintain occupational radiological exposures As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). In addition, certain structures and equipment function to prevent or mitigate accidents and their consequences.

1.2.1 General Desian Criteria The general design criteria followed in the design of Zion Station were developed as performance criteria which define or describe safety objectives and procedures. Along with these performance criteria, Zion Station was designed to comply with Commonwealth Edison's understanding of the intent of the Atomic Energy Commission's (AEC) proposed General Design Criteria, as published for comment by the AEC in July 1967 (see Reference 1). The

- Zion construction permit, which fixed many of the safety-related design criteria, was issued in December 1968. The Zion FSAR, which presented the detailed design of the plant, was submitted in December 1970. Subsequent to this submittal, the AEC's final General Design Criteria (see Reference 2) were published as Appendix A to 10CFR50 in July 1971.

The separate performance criteria that are applicable to the defueled condition are specifically addressed in the DSAR where pertinent. As applicable, the performance criteria are quoted and followed by a brief summary of the design or procedures. The design or r:ocedures are then more fully described in other sections of the chapter.

Compliance with Commonwealth Edison's understanding of the intent of the AEC's propoced General Design Criteria, as published in July 1967, is presented in Chapter 3.

O 1-2 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR q 1.2.1.1 Overall Reauirements l L) 1. Quality and Performance Standards l

l Those features of the facility which are essential to the prevention of accidents which could affect the public health and safety or to the mitigation of their consequences are designed, fabricated, and erected to:

a. Quality standards that reflect the importance of the safety function to be performed. Recognized codes and standards are used when appropriate to the application,

b. Performance standards that will enable the facility to withstand, without loss of the capability to protect the public, the additional forces imposed by the most sovere earthquakes, flooding conditions, winds, ice, or other natural phenomena characteristic of the Zion site.

Features of the facility essential to accident prevention and mitigation are the controls and cooling systems necessary to maintain the integrity of the fuel cladding, the power supplies and supporting services to these systems, and the components employed to safely convey and store radioactive wastes and spent reactor fuel.

Quality standards of material selection, design, fabrication, and inspection goveming the i above features conform to the applicable provisions of recognized codes and good nuclear construction practice. Visual structural weld inspections in accordance with guidelines prepared by the Nuclear Construction Issues Group, NClG-01 Rev. 2 s (5/7/85), titled " Visual Weld Acceptance Criteria for Structural Welding at Nuclear Power Plants," were implemented and used effective July 1,1986. Vessels comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code under the specific classification dictated by their use, or other appropriate Codes. The principles of this Code, or equivalent guidelines, are employed where the Code is not strictly applicable but where the safety function calls for an equivalent assurance of quality. In the same manner, piping conforms to the requirements of USA Standard Code for Pressure Piping (ASA B31.1-1955) and Nuclear Code Cases N-7 and N-10.

In the normal course of valve vendor quality control, periodic dimensional checks on a sampling or spot check basis were made. When errors in thickness were found, the output from the foundries have been checked and repairs have been made, as necessary. In addition to the above, those valves 2-1/2 inches and up were generally subjected to volumetric inspection by ultrasonic or radiographic means (or by both) and hydrostatically tested.

In the case of valves furnished under the NSSS contract, Westinghouse conducted periodic vendor inspections to verify that the vendor was indeed complying with the approved program and procedures. Commonwealth Edison has audited Westinghouse to confirm this action sequence.

bv 1-3 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR g For valves purchased by Commonwealth Edison, audits and inspections of various y vendors have been conducted by Commonwealth Edison to verify that the vendors have complied with the approved programs and procedures.

All of the above actions were performed in accordance with the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program.

No reliance has been placed on the ASME survey and inspection system for equipment.

The majority of the Seismic Class I equipment was purchased before the ASME system was instituted.

Structural, equipment, and piping materials, in the Auxiliary Building have been selected for their compatibility with the expected normal and accident environments.

2. Fire Protection Fire protection facilities are provided in accordance with the recognized guidelines of the National Fire Protection Association, Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, and Underwriters Laboratory.

The Fire Protection Report outlines the basic design and operational features of the plant Fire Protection System.

3. Record Requirements I\ Commonwealth Edison or its authorized representatives and Westinghouse Electric Corporation have retained complete documentation of the design, fabncation, and construction of all essential plant components.

These records are available to verify the high quality and performance standards applicable to all essential plant components.

1.2.1.2 Radiation Controls Monitoring potentially radioactive areas is accomptshed in the Control Room from which most actions required to maintain the safe operational status of the plant are centered.

In addition to instrumentation and controls which are required to maintain plant variables within prescribed operating ranges, means are provided to monitor fuel and waste storage and hendling areas and all potentially contaminated facility effluent discharge paths.

Monitoring and alarm instrumentation is provided for fuel and waste storage and handling areas to detect inadequate cooling and to detect excessive radiation levels. Radiation monitors are

. provided to maintain surveillance over the release of radioactive gases and liquids.

A controlled ventilation system removes gaseous radioactivity from the atmosphere of the fuel and waste storage and handling areas of the Auxiliary Building and discharges it to the atmosphere via the plant vent. Radiation monitors are in continuous service in these areas to actuate high-activity alarms in the Control Room, as described in Section 3.

1-4 August 1998 4

1 ZION STATION DSAR D 1.2.1.3 Fuel and Waste Storace Systems k

All fuel storage and waste handling facilities are contained and the facility design is such that accidental releases of radioactivity directly to the atmosphere will not exceed the limits of 10CFR100. ;

1 All operations with the spent fuel are conducted underwater (see section 3). This provides visual control of the operation at all times and also maintains low radiation levels. The borated water ,

assures suberiticality at all times and also provides adequate cooling for the spent fuel. The I spent fuel storage poolis supplied with a cooling system for the removal of the decay heat of !

the spent fuel. Racks are provided to accommodate the storage of 3012 fuel assemblies. The ;

storage pool is filled with borated water. The spent fuel is stored in a vertical array with I sufficient center-to-center distance between assemblies to assure a K effective of less than l 0.95, even if unborated water is used to fill the pit, for fuel having a maximum loading of 57.4 grams U-235 per axial centimeter of fuel assembly length. The water level maintained in the l

pool will provide sufficient shielding to permit normal occupancy of the area by operating l personnel. The spent fuel pool is also provided with systems to maintain water cleanliness and to indicate pool water level. Gamma radiation in the Auxiliary Building is monitored and a high level is annunciated in the Control Room. I 1

l Water removed from the pool must be pumped out as there are no gravity drains. Spillage or l leakage of any liquids from waste handling facilities go to floor drains which flow to sumps. l 1

1 Postulated accidents involving the release of radioactivity from the fuel and waste storage and ;

n handling facilities are shown in Chapter 5 to result in exposures well within the limits of Q 10CFR100.

1 The spent fuel storage pool is a reinforced concrete structure with a corrosion resistant liner. I This structure is designed to withstand the anticipated earthquake loadings so that the liner will prevent leakage even in the event the reinforced concrete develops cracks. The transfer tube which connects the refueling canal and the spent fuel pool and forms part of the Reactor Containment is provided with a valve and a blind flange which effectively closes off the transfer l tube.

1.2.1.4 Effluents Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities are designed so that discharge of effluents i and-offsite shipments shall be in accordance with applicable governmental regulations. I Process and discharge streams are appropriately monitored and safety features are incorporated to preclude releases more than the limits of 10CFR20.

The plant restricted area, as it is applied to the definitions in 10CFR20, is defined in Appendix F of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). This area includes sections of shoreline. The area is owned and controlled by Commonwealth Edison Company; the control being required in 10CFR20.

m 1-5 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR Commonwealth Edison Company has no riparian ownership extending out into the lake.

G Verification of annual exposures to persons in those portions of the lake which constitute the restricted area will be accomplished by station release records and the environmental monitoring program. The restricted area does include shoreline frontage. This shoreline will be controlled. The shoreline is monitored at both the northern and southern boundaries by on-site stations as shown on Figure 1-1.

Environmental conditions do not place any restrictions on the normal release of operational radioactive effluents to the atmosphere. Radioactive fluids entering the WD System are collected in analysis tanks until the course of subsequent treatment is determined.

All solid wastes are placed in suitable containers and stored onsite until shipment offsite for disposal.

Liquid wastes are processed to remove most of the radioactive material. The spent resins from the demineralizers and the filter cartridges are packaged and stored onsite until shipment offsite for disposal. The processed water, from which most of the radioactive material has been removed, is recycled for reuse within the plant or is discharged through a monitored line into the circulating water discharge.

1.2.2 Structures The major structures include a separate and independent Containment for each reactor, a

,w common Auxiliary Building with holdup tank vault, a common Fuel Handling Building, a common Turbine Building, a common Cribhouse, and a common Administration and Service Building.

Generallayouts of the Reactor Containment, Auxiliary Building and interior components arrangements are shown in figures 1-1 through 1-16.

1.2.3 Waste Disposal System The shared WD System provides all equipment necessary to collect, process, and prepare for disposal all radioactive liquid, gaseous, and solid wastes produced as a result of reactor operation and decommissioning activities.

After collection, liquid wastes are demineralized. The treated water from the demineralizers may be recycled for use in the plant or may be discharged via the circulating water discharge at concentrations well within the limits of 10CFR20. The spent demineralizer resins are drummed, dewatered and shipped from the site for ultimate disposal in an authorized location.

Gaseous waste discharge to the environment is controlled to keep the offsite dose well within the limits of 10CFR20.

I l b i

1-6 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR 1.2.4 Fuel Handlina System O The fuel handling equipment is designed to handle spent fuel under water from the time it leaves its fuel rack until it is placed in a cask for shipment from the site. Underwater transfer of spent fuel provides an optically transparent radiation shield, as well as a reliable source of coolant for removal of decay heat. This system also provides capability for receiving, handling and storage of new fuel. Both the new fuel storage facility and the spent fuel storage facility are shared by the two units.

1.2.5 Electrical System The station auxiliary power system consists of auxiliary transformers,4160-V and 480-V switchgear,480-V motor control centers,120-Vac instrument buses and 125-Vdc battery buses.

Figure 1-1 indicates the six 345-kV lines that service the 345-kV transmission terminal. The two Libertyville lines share a double circuit tower line and the two Wisconsin lines share a second double circuit tower line on a common right-of-way for 6.1 miles. The two Northbrook lines on a double circuit tower line approach the terminal from the south. This Northbrook right-of-way

- does not connect or intersect with the Libertyville or the Wisconsin right-of-way.

1.2.6 Site and Environment The characteristics of the site and its environs have been investigated to establish bases for determining criteria for storm, flood, and earthquake protection and to evaluate the validity of calculational techniques for the control of routine and accidental releases of radioactive liquids and gases to the environment. Field programs to investigate geology and seismology are completed. A Preoperational Meteorological Program to provide onsite observations of wind speed and direction was begun January 1970. A radiological study of the site environs was initiated March 1970 with the objective of establishing background radiation levels.

The site is in Northeast Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan about 40 miles north of Chicago, Illinois, and about 42 miles south of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, as shown in Figure 1-17.

The site is covered mainly by sandy ~ soil with patches of peat and muck in the marshy western

, portions of the site. Test borings, to investigate subsurface conditions reveal that the site is blanketed by granular lake deposits underlain by glacial drift consisting of till, outwash and lake deposits. The site is well ventilated and not subject to severe persistent inversion. While tomadoes occur in the region, none have been reported to affect the lake shore site directly.

High winds (on the order of 70-mph) can be expected once in 50 years from storms.

. A horizontal ground acceleration, at the site, of 0.17 times gravity (0.17g) combined with a vertical acceleration of 0.11 times gravity (0.11g) has been used for the earthquake design criteria based on site investigations.

i O

1-7 August 1998 l

ZION STATION DSAR 1.2.7 Facility Safety Conclusions l O

r The safety of the public and plant operating personnel and reliability of plant equipment and l

I systems have been the primary considerations in the plant design. The approach taken in j fulfilling the safety consideration were three-fold. First, careful attention has been given to the design so as to prevent the release of radioactivity to the environment under conditions which could be hazardous to the health and safety of the public. Second, the plant has been designed so as to provide adequate protection for plant personnel wherever a potential radiation hazard exists. Third, Engineered Safety Features were designed with redundancy and diversity, and to stringent quality standards. The first two approaches above remain applicable to the permanently defueled condition of the facility, while the third is no longer applicable to the permanently defueled condition.

Based on the overall design of the plant including its safety features and the analyses of the possible incidents it is concluded that Zion Station does not represent an undue hazard to the health and safety of the public.

1.3 IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS, AND CONTRACTORS As owner, Commonwealth Edison Company engaged, or approved the engagement of, the contractors identified below in the construction of Units 1 & 2 which were put in commercial service in December of 1973 and September of 1974, respectively. However, irrespective of the explanation of contractual arrangements offered below, Commonwealth Edison Company was the

sole applicant for the construction permit and operating license. Commonwealth Edison Company, as owner and applicant, was responsible for the design, construction and operation of the plant.

The plant was designed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Sargent and Lundy for Commonwealth Edison Company. Westinghouse Electric provided the nuclear steam supply equipment and system including the fuel assemblies. Commonwealth Edison Company engaged the architect-engineering services of Sargent and Lundy, Chicago, Illinois, to provioe the design of the balance of the plant and to prepare specifications for the purchase and ;

construction thereof. Commonwealth Edison reviewed the designs, construction and purchase I specifications prepared by Sargent and Lundy and Westinghouse Electric Corporation to assure that the general plant arrangements, equipment and operating provisions were satisfactory.

Analysis of all environmental data was performed by NUS Corporation. Specific investigations regarding seismic, geologic and hydrologic features were prepared by Dames and Moore.

O 1-8 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR i

e 1.4 . QRAWINGS AND OTHER DETAILED INFORMATION r

Table 1-1 lists DSAR figures that are controlled drawings.

1.5 REFERENCES

. Section 1.0

1. Atomic Energy Commission, Proposed General Design Criteria, Federal Register, July 11,1967.

2. Atomic Energy Commission, General Design Criteria, Federal Register, July 1971.

t

3. Letter from O. D. Kingsley, Comed to U.S. NRC, dated February 13,1998, Certification i of Permanent Cessation of Plant Operation j

4. Letter from O. D. Kingsley, Comed to U.S. NRC, dated March 9,1998, Certification of Permanent Removal of all Fuel from the Reactor Vessels -l l l l

l l

l I

l l

l O

1-9 August 1998

. . . - . . - _ . - ~ . . . . _ . - . . . . . _ - . - . - . _ _ - - - . - . - . . . . - . . . . .

1 ZION STATION DSAR j TABLE 1-1 CROSS-REFERENCE FOR CONTROLLED DRAWINGS i

DSAR FIGURE NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 1-1 M-1 1-2 M-2 1-3 M-3 1-4 M-4 i 1-5 M-5 1-6 M-6 1-7 M-7 1-8 M-8 i

! 1-9 M-9 l L

1-10 M-10 1-11 M-11 1 1-12 M-12 )

1-13 M-13 !

i 1-14 M-14 1 1-15 M-15 1-16 M-16 2-16 B-32 3-23 B-277 i 3-24 B-50 i 3-25 B-404

3-26 B-421 l' 3-27 B-390 3-28 B-172 l

l l

i.

l-

O 1

August 1998

"% spuS4 l 3 ) $ h l I-n l 4

b.

py )

f '

[" ]

-e.

ll 3":=2 l q._,s.= .. s l

- ,~l o . . .

.=_ = ,y

\\ / j 1 N

m,,_

. . ~ .

N -

/jk/ e

,o f 27 %

_J' /

/ /'!

, 6 51 - I

,g

, . - . : i ., =

=

... / k-h

~ '~ y, , ,

,l 1 s~ t % ,

w ..N. /

.r ,

.1;

. /; /SM i

, .. t i

- . ,, 4 a D I =6 l %

- -28* $f- / g

. N i.!

, n 9%,, s x

II I : xi s .

r.

'f. .

T9* v &' - 2 www

- - E --

. . u:

1 i - _ _ ,

l l M %

) 1LLINOl$

L EEACH ...,m..,

STATE PO

. M 33* 5' - ,

.a

IU esesa

M"J:#-

a 3 4 s a y + .:-,

i

/ -

7 a-l

~.

i

) ~

-- - -] < ~ .

APE ?TURE l f e"J ;r:... C ( RD

! ~

j'f T_. ~ Also, millsblo on f /7%.4.g m Aps 1 ire Card

- . . . . i s.n- a .s. u..sn.

/ 1 Ty(/

E ,

r r. N .z M '%-

~D . _FC x

d \

=

r N %.(-an. -

2 -

1 l' - ' IEW, ) @ l

c~ . ~ .

E [

( w e y ; M

..d;r *~~.:. y. ,2 %% -

r. , , *x. s. - ,w.._

~, - ,.

Av ,

f% *

,,,~ f l. * ,,

5_'

m. m%m,,,

,'~~.

u

-w. ee N~

N

., , . . % ~ .,

N~

33 _.

9 N%.-

Ah W <

,i l

w rg %, , s- E-

.,n, 4 m i ' f% , ~ ~-

m, - y,._

~ ~ -

q ,~ 4

n. - -

~~ '., m_ _._ i . . . .... .. . . . . ,.

,,=n= =_ .h. _.s 981117029T i CD /

p-ZION STATION DSAR I M-1 Rev. D 3/6/89 l

- Figure 1-1 1

PROPERTY PLAT AUGUST 1998 m

. - - - - . _ - . _ . _ - - - _ - - -__--.._-____.______-_.J

. ~ **=* \

r $

\

1

^;-

,m E WA \ g

., ~n n

, a

(

/ u h\

b '.:.% '

l /

~~ -

a, G . , '

F f l ,

ll ..k A- \

f i' N N

p re r "

.. . \

' \

[ * ;

i A

,. d., '

O ,

t cr

> i l ' * m*.

l !

l lf s-fY :

I k ,jl -

a i i ?

5

/ a ! l C a

' N

'yt hl

.i. ^'

Nl1Iis $

fsN' e

ll 1, i

~

I kl v

~

I2

.a.,:... '

l,i 3

\

)

}

e

- t'h<sr , s f .

f/g, g;; W' ', '***'*

\

I l

1 l

j j -

t lh,

'n 8(l i

l j I

%\ $. );

I lf N

~M*.:?,:. i I'u

. <l __ i s - *i s

t

.c

}

\

f9- '.

?

y ..

~* **

~ h.e:'s lI ; 3:::-

e 's l- i

,>I lL l "ll

~

4,-lf N

\ t I t I\ 3 O

, l ; l x O

q

' >\

\ i i m!

l- .

q i \'

N x .

% l N

+ ~.. '

- \ l \

i s j I \l

> 1 \l . ... 4 .

\

\%y s

O.,. . \ mg,g

\

, \

- \ \

1 ) a I

-r- ,. j

_ . _ = _ ,

a t 4 r

.N _ ~

% ~ %~~,

- ..) -

' ' U e uo - j n .2 's

]

//

s l .

r>.5,(g ' i m u, . .

i ps s. .

/ MEF&*6 D cM

( ~ ,. .

~ . ,

ll, /

/^. [~ [f ,j ^7e*2u*i$E

* %,A .h.*:,: ) 's %

'N

.g-eg, Qa.z

' x N

~

S l Qw, mi-

! = }

~~"'

ji ll f f ? R [ f? m D l' &y 3 g %

J./ r p 7 a 2 7-,< G['A e .,

6 .

e

%Y~ . I OF ; l t r ';b i 1:.'m., .

Y ~'f, %

/

- r -N t

ka'#f p. y

'NG

~

/ f '

s

-t~ '%z ,

// ~,* ., ,

e, %,-n-

.g

, y, W %;6.. . . ~ d@; - -

>~-.- ,

- j %,,

,r

.w : <

a. t .

.t.

1

'l ]f*.med.i g 4&, ., ' ' . '

).1$

.;i[_l't !} r. - - , : . s u . . ,.. ,

'ig~*q.i ' ie . ' ' M .t ., il -;- .uu

~,'

>n-we

- . . m Mj,

. ..> m~ r p -1: / :

6/ ^ .@ .

Sc.,&,

~.' '*%z..

l l' '%

'. ./

s j_ l. -

U X IGW

~~0 X '$.% y.- f ' .

j% M.; ..j {I ,.5, i - l: w J.'.'l ~'.%s ameaa, sann ausno f:'jg, .keN' 'fl 3y 'Rt'h' .;.$s %,,yg

'"""" ~ ~ '" ~ ~~'

1

} ~. !'j . l

~..

$l }l

~ -

'3N . A !. .

'x I ~ N{- {,::f,J ,-

%G? "

. . ... . u.u : . . . - :r N. V.____.

D - %

i s.. ' . . ,

~

y 981117029T -O 1

'^ / ~ -

l ZION STATION OSAR M-2 Rev. D 7/16/84

' ~ ._ ,_

'f Figure 1-2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PLAT W ? ' AUGUST 1998 I

s-

- _- l t_n i I

I f ,l sn ym

.. y

>Q

./_ s A.

~

-N+ f( .. l

~.

anm erm

, 7 g -...m.

r* f t ***,we a se y

@ w.=

g f pM, t.

i w ~~,-

~ er '

e:.

l x

s..

j

l

% P- gr. 3 v.- j c i i

,i m:_ ._._-

^ Q$r -

b !% !

1 g l ;

V I N;T. .'_7 \'~~h._ _f'sy2_._

y, _

_m....,

se a ir y 8 ,= =~- ~% l Am l ,$ g

~

s k

\

r$% aan n ff$nc .,7xhkh, h

Y Ig"_y

y l il- i' o

A*L ; D_u ,

m._

um s m_ a_ .a ji l M . h.

w

- N" fr( [ h5 d dh7t5 j.1

. - rv

%,t o.

ps rl 3 ,.

- ==

/s

= w.=g%n -~

1 1 I

&g = ,= @m s

.- 1 1

O

~

i / \g iu4 ! #, I jj / i ,,ft /

t . *

4. ,,,,,y f "'2" Ju2"" "~l_

yy $ 229*- Y- *---*e>-

l ,a.. r 9, lt; lj ,- , , .

a.

d { 4d;; ,

m..-- l .~ n / o q -

b,. \i s i;I R

- vg ./ H , 4'

~

'g 4*

I

N3'f W

j '

s.d Y l l d C_ :,;

I

& g-th v - - -

--~-

%2 s,,N"Y-~~ % ..

.r ,

k'~==7 [ bl w> '

b,

=%- i-$2- ~;.: I i, y ..f ,

L- --

,3-- fj ;'" 4.&

'l 13 f_ .

h et.Aflee0 301612 $1ADE i ,

- : , I . i

' I* *'

w

.e ... .. ... , .... .. .. .

, ,u . i . . . , . . - i .

l I ! I en-s*

- ~ ~ .

~

p -____

2-,.

,3r-f

$37-F s_- gj ;

n-q l

- n . . ,

@ @ + c

g. .....

-3 e7 7.y.-

, -,w- ==*= ,r Es _ _l ,

~ ~ ' '~

w_ { } -Q -

- ----.+

',(

u s

. y -- .

c ._

.a =-s w 1

-,g,ggTuRC.

u e2=7 a_q&

f~MP a #gL

=

\ ff CARD

d:

= . -

e% . o,

[,ett te CCfd

,Y p s N13 _L tg%

qe _ : s % -

e iml;%vsgML _.aq&, =a msnj h -b garP nam Sy_ m-w"w wmase wmte)!!!e!!NNp.g-w. sa u g.xw sMN,_; e _ _ _i r --g n -aq

~. ai _

qs -. r-

.g m -=_ u i 4 N

._g

_L. %,

l\

a.a ha. I -:- i [

E s

==

, m t k i e m x d -

r

r=_ - ,x4; -

.. == t.i, ---

j ,.

Le_"._#

w-gmA Ap g:a

_%__- t

_a--

_m 14;, W=_

t,e 2

r: m e_o Lt r

_m.= ._ _

-_m.

y.yey-c-- s s--

e m ;f---.m - x_. '

m>

pp.- -

=

r I =-

-"'_t-um4&=~ #_-@d > ,, ,

M .

=w pg- el- \

.p w

- 4 =..N:zn '/\ - 1t 3,,,

_R - -

F#

g F- hr' a ,4 4. .P5.. . ; i c.

I ----at

_4=

IL

= p:-=AD 14 ea ad)

U mWw e, WI. g

-=m-e<s,)

\g.

Ww. , . . .

3 .

m.

_ my, . - . . . . . ~

g O

_TTP ! .

981117029T

._ _ _f.. !! { @ ZION STATION DSAR l M.3 Rev. P 12/19/97 y ! ! }

4 -

l n .'-- n< Figure 1-3

, , l GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN g ,g-p g p ,,j r g MAIN FLOOR EL. 642'-0"(UNIT 1)

AUGUST 1998

--s*

u ,. .a 8 $ 4 $

t- rt l f~.

. o*e 5 i

m A.f

'a;i,

"?f" @p- / ~

r.

/ V . ,W,(;;t!

$ 4+ .::::: #g ,g N I j...' .; .

I .,, m_ .u

....,- .I , , -, .m , --

3-l;;*.

g h,b ;.' $ ( , tr"*'

- :::=-' = 5'#~di Q'?:'s. '

g x.y ,

qq

&. .WE a

.. > .q.,- ~m.

.a. p+-< -, -Y S,? ?

I

~ .&'y*N: k J%, Miur.t" 5--a r---

?") *

%.% Q %.J

% .. . il n

en

. 0 4 6

.e N.4 - . *.

gl

', E I

.. _._,t i

._ K, '/ L _l y L i g

' ,,~ ,, . . . 1. _ _ . . _"=ir-'=# . U .:=.1 e

-e- n, ,

'. _6

. _ _ .;N - ' "

. .g -Y

._ __; i.lp ,_ . i-[ ,__m ra N T---

-g g .

. . ...__ 4 5

c

,trn: .

s.,,,

+ g.

i :25: , a w

h. . - r 3u e*

yll :]m. =r~.. m.:

. . ,. .a.

.. &4 -.;.

.,:v.g w-

. ,,,-3

?

i

o. . . >

, ., u 3 1

. g.-.'..;......4 r.; .A. . . , .! g ,q g<

=a .

g. . .M L,. ;; ..w ,,,-,= ,.

. _ _ . . m' ^ ;. -- , _n"u A, , ,- .e

.Dn _

-a i LL4 .) -,m..~,.. 1 "l.-'.T .,

".'r G.s~

q

.,r r-# - -

c , . - - - - - CE D..w.. **". 2 - 9..

/,.ag ,,v ~

l a.y 4 .

, c-s.y w

4 I

< e.. :. .

.g L [.- yt W d rys b C d LTm'F_.i.

\,/ *_i ,_._

i i

f=~,T1pID,1,, e

@L _9 ,, _.g .. :_ -..= ., m

-r - t =u-----

p +c 1 g_. . es -* ., r e o . e_w m; a

.a , - _<.

\

s". ,;

,, , n.

. .. . s

.ng -

.n

- - i.

-; --.s .

i!mp

-p

-. q l----: n ,--.y / \

V

, i - :::: .t, -

. Cr . rx1 - -.. rr - - n- -cu -

g twa'

.H

- ..~ -, i

.t.r ;t : r.g 4 p w+.=:y,,- l- . ,: - :

1' 1' . _

3 y *1C:t E r1**_.-_4

.L' - -i -

Er+""

-8

--Q* >_ r - - -e '

8 l

. J t.! .e % . ;

I r y.,i . .. $.i r-

, 1 J '! .t-

_ . , ._ ' ., ! , l .

j -

r,-: ; I . .. - _3,.

e C5,.m-smt 4

4 - M -.

,. L.: %, 1 t -- -. .

i L:::- ,m,n- - '-

_J - ve, ; :.-e i ........ ,

. , i ,

r.L .fe: .- .::M!

y " ' , '. f""""'l-- .mmr:2 ' 'A"'""

~

l [j'

@""t, . . -f .

i .

_ ,,,. g -

.Q...,3.,.1 r'

M , ,--- .u. sees l ; . . ,t, % . g.-

. . _ i . .

( se - -

i. --

( .

' ,n . t l 2 M. -

. .-- - e%

d, .

e-- i l

i n:::::: 7 m.:.::1 rei,4.j.. d3 L .

~E S pi e L' e

g ! '-' _ ....d.m. ._ _ t _ __' _ _ _ _ .I

. {r_ ._

-- d _W- P,:::::a __1

- ~ Q __i l t. @_,_a-i m

i

1

7 rA -

. 'I , f E',I'[

l I

i j

. I

, h .

l! l ,

N 4j [ f' rg' -

4 i ._

4 _ - . .

_s_; . .. n

' g ((.xi .

i

. g 9 c..? : t,.','

j M '!. ,

i j. .

I '

U

( .]

l jl' l i

l ,

M :.

k. ., ,- -

_r...

. u. < ,

...- <. .... ..Me

. rv..t,.miAmer __a.._. assnaum.E

l

. w: e _ .- . .n.._-_-

m. .

m - - -w---- -.---.... .. -=4 l.

(A

- - - - .'*t-4..

(A)

=.

d) $' 4 6 s'. & s s S d*" e fs 2 3 4 $

1

, . ,o l & @ e

---~' ..- hn ..-

.c.. . ,

.=.=. t -' *:1 .= = . O G ,-. -.

l

- , 1 QA,.h, . 47-% a *y/s.

N O m. _,N.

. ~ , , -

= . .:

s G

l l Q * \~% r. Q

.x.+==. mmm *W' .m

.ghe,7% N+, e g&

m :-:nm- l y%(y y_..

- - ~ -'

, 3m t @d-ks, y ,g; m. /y'(A:Q, Q ir .

d i' '

eg e e : i/ 'l 4 +4 % m( , 8 my[gx,. .".Jq bi ....

. = ,.s-i

~

w m. }: w:.~ ,p- f m.w _.

Q. ..

.=r aA :. ds i

,9.eh h . s,y' K,f

,tT% ,,br w.^ 3 Ay % .+ - w -r :n-- .3___ . - .~.

w , f. .- .__rJW D--JE:n s

,7,% -w- 2 F M.n.= % g,*;w P E E r W.s 'Y-

~

$ .L \'. E .s.- _

@. e.. ,^ .. ,\,;

p UEED' A; nw% %

l

.s 7J ..J%= p.me G LEJ!an

..-- al=g tggyn_R , .,,.

% .g>

s

-.z. E.~7hh'#' vm ,f../i/. ,.<,1,a.

W.

, . I.u..- - '--

a s , y .-,-. y n, w ...

j n

J. m.,gaar ,gM. ' ,

,g 3 I .

w, . %g y

, s ' w, f (,/ .f m. .

gWd. ; gw^ m; e ~.

3 h. g y,'

i.-

y m..'grMu i gg=.._y d!w m.--wa@.a. y 4* . bwg %y,o Qp t,.b, p ^

: . w.r=EP J 6r s r w p _s P .Ag .

moEL h. +w- se .aA y.g , -

.a

&a:sygt" g.TP 7, y-=;-= /

,, c. . - , g. " c " g e =g " y; genr1% C.

'I +1 f. N i2 , y) P s .i, '

j g .3 i!r- ,

6 ' y=[ o.-- - =e, -

. . ~ . i- .._. . ..hw a. w w_ = n =

s

--N < W n ure Cr. d

_7. .

s n.m.r

_= m.. ,

.C .~M.,g. _y ..p.,.=.._

,p g.g'.

.a . ., g- . a gj

.- o g .

c .,

.'I 55 ' - [.qI( 7f? 't =rA *~i ,7[ } y n.

N f" [ g' hYm $ .b.

w -

-=,.=:.=_-.

9ip =e

+

t.r.w-. f.nd %.. w,.! n.q-. . u. g.s,1;r-:=s-.- -ih, r.u

+

n.9 aw a. % n' W =n a o -~-

qw us m

_i . t,.s:=~ c_ ,=r g ,.. m7 ns ._m.m.,

-e. .

._= 2r i- h,;a.m- , x ,-.-. n.

i,:

, 5_u.3"*"

a kg et 7!N= * .**-- f - " %,

y.t .. : .r. -

7.--- .Jr. p -h,o I m., t, P; .. L. g ' w.. f .* ..J F =*w~g4 . m.:..j.. .- -

,. .=.

q m %-r._.!

g ;.._.,. l _ . , n" *"p,yf.a l h-N--l.;~l *]'

id].

b: _" l.LGpC '

.:4 E.-;.::- : l e .

g .. g,r _.. in Tm. I i

-- - + -u_"2 w==r-1y- vJer& .m.,.-.-

. y _ il .

L J y,; -

m. ' g

.:,z,, ;. - sVL ._ r -: 2-r%mn:...a w@ amig- ' ' g: =" g "' g "'g "".g "" g l

sg.:.n, L. j > = ::. _. .. -- -

x..-

... .. .. 4 .

n,, g g*(

) _/;,,- - ?

"J d .= > wL. ..'. j\'.b'N$."i l

. i,

. M. !. ,,

il .k, #% ," '

, , .M O4 M .g.r 4 r f- j, -

~ j,, Mr I

'j5P*~4. L. r,s {a L lil-

...~

--. r .

3 . 'edL _ . . . _

e_ .c.,..aT~p ;s+- =.v -

-g.p.

VT ..h r.rN(;)%Ed mNii~5 NUCHM 5Mm mmD

"~'""~~'""~'

ijy)l)

' [ ...

9"! n

'd::f:.- 71- - 9 ,. Q.m.Q Q @ f.g:9/

, _ . y- y _ .

w, ,

n ',j g5th_, !i b: .-- .

-' , + _ 6-D Gi

. . i j .-a. Z Ei 3 3

w i

l l

W 981117 0297 M2,[ -

$"-b_-$. ZION STATION DSAR lt t lI l

5fi ! ' i #'~

M-4 Rev. P 8/19/94

+4 - i 3

." . I;s. l .c + 1

'... a--@ Figure 14

. _m .. e a.- _ ...n .< .n .

_..g.

3

- ~ ~~;-~ . " .. n M.'4 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN 9 n h n x .- MEZZ. FLOOR EL. 617'.0"

- AUGUST 1998

.m

- J

<When , ):,:A9 8 8 8 p___._____- _I s S-W l g \ q x c

.) -

l l

,.p-- .. ], _ .

\

-..~p [

l l . O , \

. l 1,y,*,-l- .'.a-hfM e :f.

I

,f 9 W. \.

a l

b' ' \ ""'it"4**

l l ,YI 'v' ,

l i

.. g , .

t

/

.A .

l (

l . . ' ' . -

l i

i l

4 e

'*gat .J -

V

,9 ,

s i.

t 'r' 'l 2D-2 -

. ,, u h~

o' <

\ '

gl g l

p, "fI', o.,,/[',ol i '

t 5 l

gl E7 r -# s .sa a sa .e 9 &

I.

5 - *-

'g_u '

y, .2 . .-,.h gl 1

. p. 'n8 g ,, Inns Soft I ea # ,, a.se

y. t *

+

is zg ie.w. .

fw m. _;T,7 yx w a .1 3 ! P . q L. . 1 * ' .. h .E*~ W,

--r-m ;,. g, *? -

I '.... ' ' ' ' ' '

,- f ., ' , . a k-W g . . ,,; ~%

'""E" ,;

,-j . .t

? .mbne.i N(,d, , m

+ - .,y.; <

m

k- ,: .=, ..: --

=

_wnd.A. W_ e ;;,g w. f:.. e'N,J:10 i

n~.. ~

F i", s._. .

v

.j jdLY --~

I.. ..

s2* ] amW .

'~'

A ;: f.J -

2e P t 2, l .'.

'F[4g.nE6fra - - - --

-64 . g 4 l i

l /p j y_.-

7, E~:i ,' m.r_ n- }&i%_ -M, f, _ .._f _~ o -@ b,; .j. w' Isi. !. Yn I vt. ,, I,pv. A

-N,.. :I p .: . ! ,I l L. W i 1.bl . & I I w,il.i *4 , i.! d. hd d dd Q : '@

I IL+h-li$s;d 6yi A i,

~

I 4

n lE E w -..

T', .-

p.F)...mtr,-I

,,.,, . .,a p ,,

,t;".

L.7 x

i . .

.a

.,2.

m-Ge:.t,1 a- ..

%.48i -

~.u .,.., .....

=;p< .

.__. N k ' i ,,,,.,w E.,*

. , d , >: ,. , ,, - ' -.'I 4l A Mr : v i,I".l_

7.

pl,, %o y-4.A d - Ig

= %, . .

:.:.S i .

m i i '

f k * -~ f 3'y :* " '

i lt@: / '

Wm... '

..___.-] a.L' Q . "w"*

pq [_

i:

\l-,%

5 ? H -~ -l 1 y,y 7~ s&,. 4_ ,_ .yg@g A ='

m g ;Q_ yy 3,

l I y ,

s w le 0- i I

i i=~

. . . _ , . , =

h -

y '

D -

iny

. a_.L e .,a i ,

l n i Le 5 D.'"*.' ' ,y* [ ' *b.

' # _ N '"*",' ""* l S$"

.'2. k " \

Dh

~~~' 5 .

P9E % 1 r-i-2sg ; '

(

ty f..,!W '

. q} g"'"FEEE r y, h

_v?pi =63t j,i e ,w w -@~ffJQ i ,

w

(.J . .. F.:';.** - S :B' h . a ~d #

1

/1 ,l',:i ,1 6

j' l '

=" -

.= =.g = I N

.-- ,"; 1',"m m M -

/

l I

l "l; Eb _

, DM._j L' . F Il h.n j :l ,

i a' .i

%1 W W. L..T,~~'

?, _- ,

1 .

-@1 W:W"%

' d !

"'t' ,h ., .

i1

'J j

i >

$..... h ..

sa a. 1 e- ._ sg. s . . - _n. n

}. ..T .,,,.

g

)

2 . 4 8 e19 4lh sv8 "'.v.6 k

5 c_______ _

~,.- .-

w-- 9-

~% ',o : -i g.- _

w . . . . . . . . , ,

x. _._l,

! w ,=-

m , . _

, +. 4 4 ,J,;;Q \

=4 ' '

. 4:4.,'7 , = ..-.Nite f r e ,!

e . . . _ ,

.- - i a yl .

j g

Af7*- --

x

,; & 1 m.-..- ..

dN.m

'rEE W gr % ._ _ m::.:.% .N- . - g' 2.N %W=mmt.@walr -' . b_ 33 & W_&bM 4,9 % &.k_c.~' __1, p e p.-

4 s g " ' W .t s W q 9.ir's$kjdb-Qyaq#,7'L_Jt .

m .

T?e 4 $ II 2 3 l % 7 k N *g *4 lTuERTURE N O e a M' f CARD 2[iwr dF#gd @pF5h.---D2.ryMM won v 9 <

-v- -

n we

, Curd es kI -m n " T g m@. ,M :EE,d e

'i**

_____ aI, 't:ck.uli

e. -

dei

@j@@M. 4-- g;, st ip":$@.n 4.s A e .._

m a s a s..uss ece.p p ..= m ver v .sgyg -

,= w:.- _

g- ;_, ,_q . o ;

4 =xp1

y._ M. =: g . 1 w ;

_ i

.e . .- . -v a

rm, - - s z,p M 9.x M % g4 __u . rir.

n 13.

M.. .ih

. ~P -

u c y.sg-gt - ,

b htMpG n* -.j-*i% pj ,,r-34 Eeh . w g m t

- , n 6

ggmpg DSO:

=. = M k .,,, - s.-

. mg ,=m:DiF=w.-s g - f&][

ges

. nr.r- g m -- - ;

Ii-= E m-=1 L_ Eer

, ;; - - m -:pf aw+>ngt w; .r /1 a

- I : ~;;; ..ib,

$L f -Q--

$$ bT Qd'whm

%w: g y ===-

i

..... -= ,1. ,y di ,.%

I

. %. e; r

r-. v.v"

_._ .I m.Psta.am

>m-m c_ i n_

. r. pre- ~= .. ~ .

e u,. .:,

. w. ; , - ..

c

._....._.m+.

,r .

y=7 N=t----33

= w= , 5ad u#

811170297 -05' z

, ,_ t,.g

! l ZION STATION DSAR

'e -j

~m_8_ :;. .* +

f +

j l '"":M , h':T" **~.- _ _

M-5 Rev. V 1/30/97

'3

4' JL ' 9

. L, - ,

,4 Figure 1-5

h hm & ,m rYj n '

M

. 1 e GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN GROUND FLOOR EL. 592'.0"(UNIT 1)

AUGUST 1998 l

/

m ov i

i a > +

-n I q.- ** 1g i v Ep , ,,

g ,

._ _._ . ._ .._ # t$ -

i 6

O

- v s

dr9i%

D

~# j'?

Q 6 (. '~ -ii,i.?.3aa.: h';

- v . . :-

g

... g_-) . _ - . - - . . -_ C g, %, "

.m e

~H-

~

~b:. r'

.h A.

g.. _ _ . ._.

)<--'=~

a

.)~

F

.n _ y(s. -

T\ ,

4 } }. y i . .s g__ .-- - . . - - _ .

' %;h '> , ,

g,' 3 .,

"' %.. I [--'*

8; i M -

9.. .; . . _ . - - . . . _ _ . . . - - . - . . - .

_ ' h,jr '

r._-..,

8q W. @, S.,

gs 3__ _

g 4 . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ .

. "

g~ .

/ ..__

p, I

y _.. . . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _..

. _ . . . ..". q .T y~3".-~ .

.k%'

" ,,,o$

r (fa g_ _ - . .

p43w j .?e ,

7: h 'i~~

wf .

} h .

W -'

4 ja.h al -

3 .y.

i . . . . , i --

t tr =ms =:-=. M 101,. !J lh

-s_3.g 47 ==

y =_- =w=-.g.31

- 2 ;- .-. . == -,. _

p -ga y -

,ap g g= m

u. &=.= &.bmy iE o-

- .- _&. . .'f_~

, e. . . c.j. . ..

-f='

y ,

"fsvpgr[\ h / g;;

%l5,J$/Ph

~

E, ~

9-- _ . 'n -e a 9sru 7

, s

.s

/ j(ii N.

y.3** -

..e .r "'-f=P....

3w$ (E g;;:

/

@y --

i ~45%

/.[/ M_

(

.1._-41 65~R l r a 'A. .- ? T.***.*""*"*j

, , ' , -.M, L ~~. *' -' ',lli'%t - -

d 1*O

.. .. i 6 4sfl ,* eea

tE y$'..' N ; lT.- f , . 'E"* gges==_

, e.

g _

7, ,

.-.q ,' 4l g,_.- .- .

i .- . .

1

,' I l

}

ge) - 1I

. w z...a J, l,,N % /

@ r.e ]'.a.

- ~ - - ' -

l.' . . . i.. ... !_ ..... ...

. w ,_

[ .

v k @ @ h e 8 @ h h d

... . 4 . .

.v.**~.

a,.e g/p# -

e .

_., t1 _ . . _ _

w_ _y -

p-o <

JQ x

y,. , aca- - ., ,,

~

k

1. y

.#=r t L ,.

m y.-

i.va : .

~R.&

1 rd?

oe2i. W'* w 9 a xr.u r,

!.= W=. ,

-)_

=

3. y

\ 9 1 ,x .

w e,3 - _;

u m 3_ _m.: ..--

m , .. . . .

..t ,.

b =, .

' No .

e

~ W~' mme - Ji-r am.- s 5-

' -=a em ,

w ~

.b:pja( . , apaaTua; c- s w+p@,

.a n = ogso a v 4..> era,su w .. - m_ ,=-\ ..

wApertureaas w.gM,+-@m

._ _m t";"

rsr uo p~"kwrd[lj~? E e

d . .- . . .

Cat 1 me._n

,c ,-

l

-_i i

ad a. =e..=_

G % w..u M .w m rd h- = n B 4r '

e

,!! , a--

.sw = ,-

a

~~

=.-- .

Gr- 7

, -- - :=:

w o;=. m;-l 7n ._

-pws

-- 1 ,

e w.sn-ggs e n &eg R. -?"' E u==.3 -

E,yW n Fi s ug- .. .jg_ .

7 w12

,m u.. m m m ,no i ./ .

=

1 a t..o 1, g.7 w'*_ ,ig t..e to ,

- - i, !

w w w-4a r,; g;- f -

. x _. u. %- _- s e .,,=4 =. -_ ~._..<

i i

o ,

dg

~~ ~

4b{ == i !

rg,.-

L! ;..

i ....

.... i .... ... . .u _

9811170297 -oc

. , ', r . .

"--I ZION STATION DSAR

) . ' "' @ ' 4 'd D G R @ M-6 Rev. M 10/14/96 Figure 1-6 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR EL. 560'-0" AUGUST 1998

._m

/

a s s.

4- n t . .. . I

"+

l # '

r- - - - s * * . 7 -

6 .,,,

@ an, . ./ !

i g e '

l '

i x_ g p /

5 _ . 'N li' %

. 1,. %. -

l ll > g

/

e v6N.

, .- p 4 l s .\

~^'

h , ; ,./ g_, - ,</ )

i s .f y N' ,% h4 ' . 1

- ~

l O;*

p -. .. ,-

I , . '- .., \ g '

_-;i .--; p

~ ~ . . .

_.,s ,

...sx xj . .""N r.:::.;

p i - r s.: ,

c -.

g~~ Q w ,

igis" '**

ji-'.

i i e .

~3._._3 '

' 3 3 ,.iq ph' '. r.u ,r I 0

s l, ~~f Nk

.. llT+/Tu -+ - -

--r - EURIE . 4 _ . ,__g

, ~ . - ."

3 s.,

4 i y;t g .

B 3 . _

)

t. -a= e e.

.n.=.

~

.2 -:: y pp l MF ._ _ %"':. - !

c -

.ex ...u_.....

U_ .'.. .

)

% J.ita v*ase

.m * =v eg tec,r.s e,,;,, sg.p. , g ':

'C ' ! <.M . 4 i

<-.)

{ oco -am of /

-- $ 6 3 $ $ 1

/

'/ I,_ _

h ,b( l l...f ( l J

- - sw _

L- % 1 ....- .v. ,,,,

-- - sve g .

' i

.o w -.,.

, ' s -r,y

- _ , __,'))T s.

,. , s J-'- ~

s

- y f, '" . _,

.:, r. . - _.-., c-.-

J "?/ m) . ,N:"; -

qlT=Z-

- T. ,

f Mbh f l

@ . - . - - _ _ _ . _ . _ _ ' "k<

t.-

'h 3

. [. *. \., )

+

_=

. _ __r-t

@.,_. mI ,

.i e

/ - , -=.w . .N l 4

h },. ,

l W -- t

=*

- /'/ &?- .

-o[=l >ru . .:.w]

6 f 5%W.~ lr4I m- - -

a im{ hI2=.s.rl, 'W._f:h- N.,

e- l _

__ c' m3!j,, p pI%.N T r pl.. ,97 m*ny *iqq'TF k, sg a

a

, t r ';

b ./ b/t /

n ;

.e - -

m

- - i.l <

4 -r -n -

Q@@QG cl4@:~!! @mIcn- P' j

l'p 5 5 .c- c--81 Wwusum@u@ L %:~,. AL -

\ Sn .

%@ d:.m;.- @ =g =.c=: -

p - --ng;ip n-.

ggg. .

i 7 p.4I ~. ,K s J

v:::*1 IT-

, _q a 1, ;l EE. c m

,]s7-~:: i

% / .

I i

s ,

a ;yi" nn-=y l ,

s k. m L - ,. .

_.\ m ,_. 1

@ f b::b :ra .$AMx;;me_. i

~

I

.vc l. w P.EOJIi?.'.i..Ef3.'.*r.:iC'

i.*:-- r. r ;- ., a y.v=.5, ; =~:z.=:: . -- , ._,, ,

ea3ma e

, n. ,

s %auou.=v r.-

+ e e . g 4 - @- .

4.,

.m ,oe. . x

< + 4 ,

,s - _

k e d/ Ilw n _

e _ e_ e e j yj y..

y.3 p .

i

.. f, . .

n m g_._ 4_gy p U

.ap n. : w

, m, 7 d.

,, = .; ,c9: ;

.._. 3 .

o:

g -

i Ut G. ,

// ,

Vi .y \' , ,

g *Q- -?. .a g$ . , "mtg 1

ggYR ~ i iT n.*

' . m' u..ft.' .w f*" --

u 4- a r-: C a 5... g.c F.

w i. p/_..r. l p---.,

.- n e,k _m..;pf

.'. x, .

4lf+' .

%.\.

\-V #

. e.

/ ' C D

/} O#

~~

._.= ,- _-

1 p .

=ep

-4 h q qq. Al1p 7g _d-S; a

9.mq;AWp -

EpWW O ~pqp EEm..m.q,@_...he e ..

p Q ._ f a e R O S w.5A m. i APERTUF E

h. a m CARD

~

Fs ee.

v

,__c

_. i c

, L-~ ..

.

a ae f

.Q.~ - uJ w - - ]9f.

ra r

- -n

'q.._

9000 9COCM M;--er*"y

' ca w [,v p-f,t p- Q.,k Also Avallabic m s- [,g

..) g +.3

,,,,y .-.

j*tt ji.=wx.

i a ~u Lt&m=_. 4 a c-w '.t ! _g c4

^Pesture Car

= _ _ . , _ _

"fs

...s .... ... ,

'" y . _ u.._ _ m _. . . . ... , ....-

s s e 8 8 3 A @ 6 4 G s8

. s_ ... ==

n., x

1. -

D4 l

l r

t*

n_ . - -

- - t

. m... ..,,, . .,,e 6

._. 4; -..,

t 9811170299 -O ZION STATION DSAR M-7 Rev. H 3/18/87 Figure 1-7

$ ' ~~l GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN MISC. FLOORS AUGUST 1998 co'- ,,.

l 4 $ 4 $

G-n -

1

.......,J l

~

- ?.

V .. -

[tn m i ~, ,

+

I

_ .*L.

, 3 4 =c

mu.afm-6. e w}--M i

- .) . . -

1

. . . . - . -fp..=_5.,cf

@ . .- n T- %

ff

. .,=,,,3\. 4 .! .s 1 I . ,

m \ ./ _*e <

I Il.

< N@ / .\ [E >: . . .- r.;:;

-> m. ..A. . . :" -

+ . 'Y3.5 me eema. 3

== N-r wg":t M- :w 1

J7: b_"- _ _ _ a M*J24.s j:

r g p. . ="" /

f; 5 k~~ -

6; . -

I@y i / . -- i -

=--V--

v /. "O" we . a3 .- !

""'ll"?.'s

. k

@ S =

eL c. e C o' f

> (M-9 w a

@m

J_,, _ ._.

i y.

ge)

.'7 .I' *$. 'u .

m r::=-. f. ed

, sa g -, Q

\ V I #a pr'" ! p (

< e o. =aur,s 'y i

-. p \Ng,

&b

'-5). -

r cw , '

B W '

7 l =='- v.

.. @2 J 6tL h

@ +._;ps," - , . . - . re l L :* ;*.1.*:": -: , /. / 7- i I ;;",a*J ***% '" \ \ .d h s& i l

i 9' \. yli *

. i I

+

g y

,;* 'g

. . , , I f__ ',4_

l f *** **,W' MJ

. 6s . .

PL Jt5=br

- _.i, ,=

..m I l j

' _ _ weg;*_ 4 .

a. - a F q N g ';;;,;g=;= -a _A

, I w

, to f(~d !! -

hJ.!

4 h

a 4 8 7 9

! VN 5 _ _ . , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - -

. , . H u_s _ _ __

o- e . 9 ... 9a ...e....

e -

-e

+

x A. .-.

W%. J._. 5

6' _ __,'. ___ /

.-~

f

. _L c-l v i

_. / . /

r__,.

g

-_ i j

r. wL - :t%=::=,; --

)

f;,

CT i 1 -

~

I1.a, j

-*j c

- , m i APpt3TURE.

i .

v ." Tk . CARD 4.-m sikg-r Also 4 rallable on

_d ," p Aiv ; um Card a Q h

. .e s b .a e Y w . 0 ..e $ e l , . , . *4*-m=_=

g_, @ . . . - .

$$,1I'/*.~'""',;

A- -

. = ,-'. a T

~*

~

Y~s_ --

NUCLEAR $ME ff REL.ATED .

- .. - - i j n . -

,-~,,,,[

~

~.' h y_, . .- -, .u y-."*G , '

' ? )

ts -_.p__ r..~ :..

- - -y M2, -

6:w

~ . tl': 1r 8' /

P e l psm a --w w-( ut ono .e.es .on

9. "J

,1 nty~"

"N'*"*

-y iJ.L .

- -v- 9811170297 -OT bi ..- ZION STATION DSAR

M-8 Rev. J 11/19/93

- . _ - - Figure 18

. = . . . -.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~'=-- GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN .

l

. 7 ~'~_ e FUEL HANDLING BUILDING l

AUGUST 1998 l

""""*===== .

}

E a 3 4 ,

! Wa D b -. N .. N.. d .. h .

i i o ;

j i I I

t w*t. %

ei, w se e i l' I % .I i

I i },.

T

.. . O . . .

@@ m.

-a-

.q , Efr i

$7t= \ [ ; '

)

.e.,

.w._

l p. s . _ :. .

- i-F Fe

.....I 7~ *::n.F "I

- . ctg ['

o .

l f.* *.* .,

=q Nb., on' ==.-a=7 -

-~

- /f -we n - . . _

e P

. r 9

, k - - - b e I j- "~pu/ :

i .

II l ;

1 p"'

' ' ' ' -

j i M **

.eas

.- L=., na.

, w' m -- 3 ..e i s ' '

4

,,1,, n;+

_ c r,.~m

. . nS"t _ _

y p.

. a:.....L

4. q .% ..a Qf. f$ "f 9.e ~o.

_ . ~ _

.. 1 l t. ..---S t.-

k .l c d.ao q p i

E _. ... ,w j $ -:_,=:.=- = &. _G,. Cf u'.=. f in?ha

. i y

IT h

-*:::'.:1-llT7 E'*~4' ' 'f "a"::'T IVC :*".,

. . - - l 5 .)h 'sl y ..

,t,j t . -

- _i.

n .~n -----t .

'A~+'-*J'

.[ -

t' .3 ~. _.%

Tf[

(-(A _ {__ Ig~ " ~'.

t ,

=== -mA .7

'r="~34.:: ^ '

c.

4(es e) g 4 (ie.e1 actm ..c ?. g. .s .

Q ( n )""' * *f'E*8* -

"9..*.***.."

- ~. . ....- ..

~. . . . ! ..

l . .=.i. . :r l i l

.. . ;- m- ;

c ..

m ,

g

..,e,,., # 6 22:4 7.-

s_a .d-i" F h

,1 W

-c ':.7

~ ' " " : %f)d--- Yi

, y!.

! ,, I p 4::tsw t

E.-N ra ]r J.3 a

.ct

~

==

It _'--

=g*y.;m . _ r ;'a$,( P} '

yG.

je g+ .

l .s.sinag(

, m; m .p,

/,f.M** *g

,w m n

,.- u<

g_ W Wj + QI 0:.:==;hm-+.r !

~

P

.W . .a- k.-4,a.j4 mOy :: 1:tL , k. . . .

J j[_=_%';!l f"

- -e) w,mm-w.aw.kQ-Q_--4y&

........,7

,t _ . -j.-idh p

4 4h ern a

s

_ t2a.qwcr;. %

. .t-i

.% ,i 3,J 6~I w T;

'W ! I M6W^

%wy g ,' r=e.ep

{ ,

f

~ , _

. w .m - ---]W, , I-.r._ _J'p*"*dl Mp_, \

, g 0. l

,_,[ a-- . . .G

. . rT" n___

g gg,4 ]

F g i s i I o ,

Y

_.x wx_

,. e -

., . ~ - -

l..

L..m y.c k, r.= m e..: 7 [w.

. . < - . - ~

.y ' 1 ;1gI env w .. m.' -

c- -- --2 ,

a - .y

y Pi --

%h I!Fl E iC

/ . t .

-s ..s . .

~,

- / m n . .. ..

l

1) .

L.,. . l.b. . L1 - . . ,

9 a.* ' ve 4 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .-

p- , . . .

) .9.se- e, - @- .. o

, .~ .. . e.9e - .

w .i i

,__s.m./

1,

+- a; y . .g;h

2. m i

. s cr. n ,

,w

? O b Ay {- *)

., 4 4.

c

-i/mf'/'.--I - * , <

igi

- )^ ../.i -

w gu r w ./

a;,,,,,j

_m. g.- i

. a W

--au"" r

%\L% L l 3 h*4* b $id ,[F l gg..-- %>

g ; I ,g w :-ni i a a i

_-L#h ,_ e 1 L !sml i.F =,--: _om M_.

-~

q<: &7 _, .

~ u- g:s.4~ 7 r* 1 e.i e,,

!1 +g..--T.,- ol ! ml %n; ')p En. . *6..=._. _2 i_*-

s t *i

.3 , . .

N,- A tJ.2" i$g,A, CARD j

, f I"

-T

( '

,~**"'*"

LISO Avglie'D10 Ort 4 u .e...,

Card cg. eg:re p , ::::=._-n .

_1 *

.~ _a v _.,_ ,

i 6 --

t.

l T' *

!,.1 i

.n m.

H .

. - = = . -

g r* ._, 3U- - . j ----e' r

k4 l-"" ~"--"Tht .t: . "-

.u rn. . . + dE] 6,

,g' ,

.d,i 2L

~~~

=cT. . ='

b

.dd Ir .h *)

X g ,

hir-%

Y N;ia. ,

}%C- , ', .m),

L W-+.hl .

E,P_ _/ -.-:w r e, l

@g _ ,~. , . .

.',l

.,. . a-

9 -[ j

}** Q o .

'd,q) .

L / ?" **

r- r"-*., 4 ll:

! p,h4.h ,W !: a / ;- , f-m, M_ ] afy p t=: .q-~ q

~

.. A tey_.

p-rn /Q[oaLL>yc '".- h.

.b .-

<a=

-m y;

L, _.,

el L,, . ,., u, ,h u- 7 ;-g __.._L r ~ ~~ 4 l$, /W__ g% 9 81117 0297

=._ -03 sg-- -

l ZION STATION DSAR

'"*" '~~~ . M-9 Rev. F 10/2/96 L'M i * '

Figure 1-9

'- GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN SECTIONS A-A AND B-B (UNIT 1)

AUGUST 1998 l

, , = - =

M m__.________._._

m pa 3 1 4 9 oi-n l

(.a- 9 e: ei.

~

9 g

e 9 e c I e

ee ,

._s..

e e e-

^~

... ... ...< 1. . . .... ... ,. - . . . . ,.. .... .... . . - .._

g.: .y.v--

i g i

! i, i

l , i ,

I

< 9E n

I 1 i _ . . _ -- _ - .

l l

i

-] - -

',' l . . . _ _ _# f q:_

.-s -

l _, Oi I

.. e ,

l l****"" E' '- [.- &Mf',G.{._ _,

'R'

l 'u 4I/

w Y

[. .

. . ....u '

, , ,,,, j -= gnia i 4,,_,

t ._,.p'i .- a 2.l.::. p .l

, . . \ e -" -

6=n. , .--w, :an'EinERI

~~ ~ " ' ~~'"

% *h

@3 i

-i 4 --.m

. .. Y, =W lM._h S4h. 3 ..._y E. /M' .

h , l .)i, I . ... . . b

~

t'E" fY a* h , h 4 *7 --

i

,i 5 0[ CLr I/ 1 ( m Tl e saevic: av6oeae

. ....a =- w ._/rr t.

w. /

-n t':l.-..

..J .a. <

?,.a i

,i - - - - -

,4,______,_

5 . ... e_ 3.-. _

e

s s.

_9.. arm e SECTIOy

(=.b. s ..*a l l'

~

rO .. .. a ..<

i, ie

...e ,.

$G Y....

(d Y s . .. - T'52) in 1

l'-- ' l__ ! !

i

[-- - l ' .- 4 .--hlA...,

c ...wr- ; , ;g l

=

l

%~L n

_ _:_ }

} i /

, p ,=.m

[ %I."# f I

,' I g.

~ . . -

nm.r-I rw .', f/qf/ -l lt ji c- d' 3, p@d

. . j i * "" l '0 -E$>-

f i . ., g

.s_-

f

....3 7 s

[

-+ -. .d l Q l me l

W, m.,...

?q' e ,$.""e g . --.ec.

ai.m... l y i . q

.- t*~

i{ ! ,.

e s: i e.. - ..

3 g il -, y,g'-* ! ,, .. .

vj gf--

p.y >

, g i

, $ c-q s,,;-egm J

w=

-i j@

r ;;y "*** a

,83-3

{

4 ,

.I g ll ;.

}1 Y' 44 i

5

. tin ,'M

/ =~irli.e

=mt7tg

--l H 4 l

I

-*c n i

l a J H ~I s a ksg*C, ,w ; ,]. -

ll j

,,,,,1 i

o ">

r- Lta-t4-c

] Y .i.o

~!

Ar5" i a.

.[ .

s i

o I

J l.

l i

l l L

V 1 .

.& .b /w.,,.,

$aYw

[v -

r.,

MCTO h

g b 4 $

e/ M 3

mm (q.* s)~

e e e, , ... :..,

9 ..

9-.e . . j .. . ,

! l l l l t=-

...,.. . . . .: / 0*.2.*:P

_ _ . _ _ .. ;_ 1 : _r -- + -- ---- _ . . _

m, __

y =. -

1-+ , O; +. - p4 _2Spg.~t_a n .

w , ._ .1^ m , - w% i==

u.c=iy - . = ~ , - . se.+ a b u i+ w ~1~ .

s y 5.

~ -

W(4 /:=~

=_. :; ;

-- A. l .- W.L .

L=I w /:1. sp e

pg% 7 3,, AF ERMRE l<

histMRWEddil =d .a(IrJELas

... v

/=r PARD

.. w_.=., -

_ , , , , , , '*' i m /, m ,. . 7

/ n' dig}Mi~.- i.a-*)

uDjD Og T=.-~ '~"% s l R . + :ra Cn" i

A.

i

'l c : i + -

! g'*.~, .

', I h I.4h 1Nk

A E e,.' .A., _ hr::.:: V.::s_d//V _ ' M , ... _.

w I is.

23 .

cre

. .. e . aa ...

f --- -

F f l I r. .-

e ,m ,

"~ ,y j i

, , y =-

= . =- , i

.i .~ - i i EnrA l t".,-.

m!.rx. '"Ta- , ,

l , 0

-"}

J

. . wu,

. . mm .__ ,

rm i

i i

c e_.__-

T.3 gg.Li % - - -

L- 1.,

B? Met '

5n#e Le i FI 'tD i VGk-~ f"= -

t.:. :. ., w-..

M_.. w g

.. . +.. 1~ .=

. = a.

m._s _- s

_ . . . t.

___ ... 1" ,h I : [

e 1xi u_== - --- 4

./:.

j

.,l r2 ,

4

=-' {

u '~"

e b g g M r!- Q ~P 9811170297 -(O QMM .

^

~ f

,,~t"" -- :: a

- ' ' ~ -

ZION STATION DSAR r' ~7 8:"' 1 l"'#~' 2 :lu::= . t.,,. M-10 Rev. F 1/30/97

A* I E.Edilll""

tr. NUCLEAR SAFin RELAffD 4.""..'> Figure 1-10

" ' ^" ***'"' " " ' " *"

GENERAL. ARRANGEMENT PLAN f i ._ _ ' '

SECTIONE C-C AND D-D (UNIT 1)

AUGUST 1998 y._m.,

E

e% /*

1 1

2 3 g 4

n-n I e .

i

.. j e-e6**W -s' ..

I~ . I I, l 4

! . . . .. , = ,

I

~~ ~

.a.

...l I l l

- 1 1

\

w I d WWl 6%

T l

r i

.' i_

n i 1 . _ , , , , _ d

,n i. +

i

. I: '}..:::: - s

.d e- -

s p l N; qg

=='m

-6***'*-,*

l,,

{,L_. _._.y,.-g 9 ,

b :'.a j

I

- 'l 4

y; m ., .-i ..

e

(, g g,,

.. a gm.

.g r*-d . _ . _

, ' C _dd TI '2. .

. *.".* L'.;,L i y _. '*

.c r i li 7t- - :.-.=. * ;

y .. .

_ L.

a

% [T ?E I

r*M.. i *'s i t,.=,. :- $, . [=*

=.a e.,yje.. - qe f j .;( ..

ui !

-a_h" ,.

~

I

.m

a. _l L. ,. . . .,,4---

,e.t.,,,,..,.,.,.a i ,-< lib...-e i L 4 ..Ll.2*J., '}

1.,; _.

!I. r it{

I.

_,..4 4 .

c R :

4 3p q,

.t.:. t .ip =

i n o aL

- q4--%,. j.

jn ...c

.. i

. -.4

.. ,_, - - . . p.... y ,a .....r

.,,; 9x1 ! .;

Im v . 3 _.ILo I l 1 h !

\

===.::N:D

.. _ c. ..

e a, ,o m O ,, e a.'s l

- u: i.,, !j i

, it, _ . _

h ,

.L= - - .

=n 3... m rg1 'm.,y; ri n p [ g [1 l--

jli"=1 li.=. i! I ll,L' r ,

p,,.._ .

._~_ ..y... _T_h. $ ~m l lI 2: l I 3 ,I Pil '

' *E

,I y .. . .

i t

e.;j ,

$=.=i cr.:h-r.:-=mli.%

m r

ii 1 in' AnL i

.i:

a l --

m _. l! h ,. M%_.gdug M

i Jn. - ,

.. u , _

""=='

.. .. . .. , ,l . . a . . k 0 . :;;a M <i.t " '

T- g.

F1,, n l -

q -

7 ' c.6 ' ! _

ir.J i_.

rr..m u s-

/ - n er.: = . .e.. .

u

. s on.w o s me ovo At RfonED ST Af sm00uCTIO.I s5dLTA88fl.

CO.c,aani.cau, i '...*N^ ' ';.pb^

't~ ~

ls..2'*v"ph,A'.

' ~'"~ -~' "

LTD.

- '8. 3_ 7_ _88_ _%3dIIa.

! a a a S

' WM

uw

+ +

O _ ,

w ., - -n_ . - . ..

s m I

I i I j a-r s I

I.

l

_~

l .rg IM M iJ ;\

e i ,

I

~~~

-l _, i

= t c - -,

, g. ,._

. :.h.-

N ,

.s. .. :- -

nt

- -- , a .

.1 ,_

e i i

. l:i., j . . _ ,

.i

_y i . w --- u' t.

l:.. --

,Y.,/ .m..=..

. .; \ c. .

i s . . . ,. a. . . . L. .o :: :

~'

h

~~/

N_ ~$N : ? - .~ ,

~

t ! :@ [ l* .le.:E5 11. :, '1,P I

. :!' {

h,a@~, . - , ,

i. m , < ..e. n...i i .

I ..& ;

a '

. a. i e~ : ..- v I r ~+ t ---...--

t :.. ... _:. i ,...a::1 j .~,I .i iia, : ,a i, -.. - ".

--m ' m.

1...... - _

p. ,, g rp6

. e ,

rt1h M -ln I . . . .

..]l .. m i ,

p] t t

q j ],.7; p prrt!RE 1 __ ,

y ,g./. .t,. . .. -

T' i.a- .

.e ,,-i '"--a=-----

, ,i, ,i i ., . . . . -

. .f.~+' tay s o n ten.

_a i...

g

_w . -9 -

1

' Aperture Card

.:::. := .

i

, tE

T.Oes 5 -D *

, ,g, 2g g 6- , ,_. . . . ..

..._.n.,-

I

. - ,f;:r. ...

r.

I }. .

.3., _

i ,_...,

I -

,.,,...m, ,,

~ _7 _f-~ . . ,. . . d L_.i l _ UIl0Illf(h.fCN"' _

l

. - - . , g y. .

-) c.. . ,

mm- .3 2

( -. . .q , - n,- - -

, w. J .- , =. , . .

-m ._,

ft,1*r.1 **.T'.' l'.

- ., i y

[

e ~. , . j

> .p - i .

ui. ..i. = .wr.3 7 w -n r_=r- 1

-ga m J w_ diRTR E I,

811170299 -Ll

- E;q t p w +. T Ei ,'*I "h -

d.'.E##-- ZION STATION DSAR

$ ! , M: $ j 3 ~.

2. d i. 2__ g _i m 'l - --

<Ma* M.11 Rev. F 3/31/88

=:- mo. ~.~~l ' E h

(?-#]:-

1

-.XJ pm.=

p.

. . . :=.F .Tr".i2.,

ls. r,imx,,u

. ;- o k-w.u=-

w %- ::: 'U [< q.-

I t-- . Figure 1-11 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN SECTIONS E-E AND F-F s T AUGUST 1998 l

-l

es %

2 ) E .$

El- n l ___ _. ._

n;.sev ^i w

i a ,, ,, I v s...,*-

% , r.

' ** 'j p N. n ,a ._

l,

, [ m

- /

. - =,

~ *. ";.75 **.

p/ s

,. 7. /

. . s.' y'. /

, Q Ea . off, '.- l I,

- ~

/4 l

~

r

[* i ,

..-y.. , ...,7, -4

-s---. - -. _ . , _. ,_

Ql

< r i

ros E3uienstpar aos asacme com tA w.assi1 e s.:e s .wr t . w a -4 *I u s ome ea-a

- HEw.tm666 a?.os

-4 *.. ,*.'aa 8

^

/ %ys - - - - -

E,L, .

/

e N s- p_.' .. - <\\

,* %,,. . . * . - .m. .g /y

,y- / ,

"~ swar:~ - z.

- - -/- ' - n 1 /. /

.~

"s- u.'

. . .. . .~

.,a 1:wii.*. , j' : .: . *, c.. -i ; ! ',

so

se >

l n' - . zy, l

1

-r:r. 3.

3 --

1.,;, _ _ ' _ - i r.H' : _m.1__.,.._.. -

m*

g*fa u: #d .'"*j._4e-f d

' #Of'""

n .- r = - e *,- F *

tra tunu.=f W Asim em q c**

c 5 a :"

$cNe [rar$ .. [I n

,- -- 4 set sec an-i-3 a L--. , , , , ,

sct o'.c. u-3

,..q,.,,.,..

y-Ym'-e * * =-gg;*c, yv -Aj

--x.*.,,.

e, mn m. > .. " .

n m . .tf ! L.: e * *

-a w 7(e; = -g ' , , yy,-- 44p }I

. . r.- s tiog eeeeeeesse j

4 ( ;, ,

<. . ... t ron u n aoou l; 4s+ ug b=:

. a' M=

.; r..n.. wesc w.,e:wu s ,- -:,. .

. g ,jj ,

, t .

.m tc9ra v Q = t.s 4

wwct=t'a stt

- cac au-e-w c .o aa s-s,-use d.: / . . lj .4 4 em 2 :

r p

,.,a 6{ , <s'* _ c*...;i-, h. s.* p. . , l' e . -- g p*dl,u. ;-

giil L; - - -

- .*r h m.e?

l ~_~~~ . g '..n.1, : _ _y V :_, . .. ,,co ,,,,,,uu

? m. . Q

) .l " hJtf

,.~ .

= * * ~

,.--y.

6 - T' *..M. 2/. . , .

_'

i;d*E" nc

'.Y .a 2E: r, - - 1_ - - r-' N ' '"i

1 C . n. ;-n _... w-- % W ,s;. $_

Wre.-.Y N,,M_ -

, m __1

. , , , - . --c_I~: ."I.-w o ..

.~- c 7 .' .j' . :- ,

~& .b--m e G i, . ,

~-u. .n'. .. --

. 1

,~T.-'*.'~~ ,-

. + - _= 3 . _ . . - . g h, -.-.

...---.1.

.....,.2 -

+

'.."-------+.4**.'. **

[

_fm---

.:,._,4a s.3-n: :

l

. ~J i v ? ;7;e_.,-.s ..n . .u "-_ .* _".- }~"

~

+ n_

~~G. i

, -* M (--'-p..-~*** g

....s

-w::~-. ..

y ,

q. .. ..g.

,; . ._ _g . .

'I -

.r;C W .. '.,

l ->*-I L s i g

+=

V

-, ** .*/

g

- . 1 2, p --

o t *"? .+

q3i'-

m 6 J

,' lg-a

_r q

L_

- .,_.g

,o '".27!.'C2 "*

i - ?'

l - . _ ,

+

- -- _* - - '~

- " ~

..m

~

a 4 _

. _~_- .' .~mm

.g 3r i , , {_; t -*"Wf. '. _- .c - - r - -,- -}_. . -

[ 7F - -: - e.e ,

6

)d es .e ~_ e

- 4**g... h d.q .,

. __ . 1 t**'"'" 1,

** 3 I

4

3. l l : <

l . u k. . . . . . . . . . -

a s

f r ,,,lj h, #

.-+- + . -

i l

- f' 4r.-'

- L4 ... .j a.__-. l D 1

-,____.y i

__: _,.u i

- s _ _ _ _n _

n---

M . 1 2 3 4 S

1 @

% i \

4 \

t l

E \

i

\ 1 l

1 t

-- n m

8 \

\

s, ...

/. ) i APERTHRE CARO Also Avann 40 on 6

%-sure - .:ardc i

d v.;

.= , - -o b F7 I n.. .,. ~;,, \i A, ,

3 . n. J.

. 4. I i j* \ IV T *

-t i . 4

?! - i=... j .I

- m+

~M- ! /'

_j L..

&.y. %, i .

?j

- - c- .. . = mgy ..

,. _. 3 .

. . .. .. , , f

, ~ .

-;_y -

r- :eI r, '

g -

, '.*ll"7 *

- _ , _a. _: --

us. ,

'._n ,

. T'= .

.: w u.- ~ :

I . p,-., -7.___.._, ', ; . ., w a ' .

3" E. s

.n ,-

i p .. ; L ,,, , {, l 1 ~- .t % %=q* e 3 T/0# 0000000440 p=: xpj .!_ _ - :: - s- %

.. . . z.

v g-. ;.

Na&=t-- s ,

-- 't ,

r=- - ,

op.

.m.

, _ _._l_ 7 Y k * -h -ddC'fC,i. C

} r. -

j! $ ,9811170299 -l Z -

k . ZION STATION DSAR l*

. --.1.

M-12 Rev. N 10/7/97 j . . ,, , ' - .. . . ,

. , . s. . .-_ _ .

~~

Figure 1-12 l

,, _ . . . $' GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN i i b 6 4 i MAIN FLOOR EL. 642'-0" (UNIT 2)

, AUGUST 1998 0

g- ---%

me i

l 8 9 4 9 ci-n l i

h*

F

,5 es ?

l l .. i W s

_4 i

i T

4 eI i' N- j ,_

h.

g - c ..

4

\ - i

,' .Ei J @;

K

. .i. ,. ,,

pm. ,

< .l \

I r i s 7

,. EE=aP ,,,Y. 9

\

@ n

/ l \

,/-

't c./

/" - \"' \r .

l

,/ v,' \

. g /-

S.

s.. ,,

f

.. ~

.m @ '-.

u _a_ _! i

]V . -

t gl T 'h. .: 9 c- f

__ .t j .

2. t i- t

m. i

_ p .

_i -e x l :::':::: ,

g '

m h.

.-s-,---

, : .=. ~.,3

. \. i " C *

p. _ . - - . . ,,

.--.,----, ;._-,- y

~

- Uyny i4.1 7Q. *.y=>per_ ne::: %; :

~

x *Ml j,o- e,=-

~~

Ja

.l Jm .

q. ._.-...A----.~_-I.I- . . . . .

l ,p l ". E.7 d."J" '

5$$'

. . . 5Y +-- Ib i i gusd. ,)Y.., r v,i~j .' p)

~

t .7 t - r s

.^

- -- ppf. wr-.---,W.'1N i

~

f.nN y...

,Q .__ ,

[e' tq, a' i .

t =..n+ %

.. >.~. .

>g

>,..,I H di ,g . , g - .-. .., .- r T RGJ g F*

-- a g L

..;.,g r[Fy;., - ,

u.

-t "I t",)

g3ey- am. ' __'"" : r'"'.

] ]. r l ._

. ,' r a-

'T F! I f

1

f I.f .4j is f if l i n i t i

f i l 1! ' - 1 15.. 5. ..

l i i l El 1,1 l-l '.; i i.

4 ,J. . . 'b- ,

o._a.. ,i m___ fu. ., _ t . _ _.,s .

fit .,*1. * .**

,'9(.

]'..y _. j ..-}j. . ** es" y;,4 . 4 ' g't W..4. g

, ba f

a s e s i

we %

. ~

e 4

,s

+ --

9

~8 ,,z m um e ..

s

., c

. s "s ,

'~

t g PERTURE

= -.

CARD

& -O i poAval!6190"

Aperture Card f -- x 1

> 14 . ~~"A fe,.! ,j S --< ~

D 'P,w ; ~ 4 s J "g W. , . I h9 Sin

}

^

O

_n ; - ... t

- Am. ! in. i

~. , y~, ., ,U~7,q--

-r :

ig;,,. , ,. . _

__, _.m,. _ . , _ . .T iq 1; ,

K,,, s. g '

/I .

W ,3o -

3 t;- - -

== Q p. --

,m.

,u., _ .-

- _- a r.ar.

(/ '4=.:.:.,::-

ee.i . .w g I .

(m#

t.

_ i _- p - -

-4 ,g g.

7.

Qr_= unw. :,% /te -J/i lt / e,

i. a ?*

Y. , l,! I jj s(l Q*y: ;.f ir* r 5 .i Y_

p __ , _t, , 'a =. mas _.

h s ,./ s, \. i ,L ._.

f

-- M.l. . .-. . ..1Y, "ll."llT" l ,

u

___i, ..

g .

{~~

E] '

oe innes orm e

% ;; i;F W L. ' ^ '3 efh g c m- A '; . f A -- t.

,nr p ), ..,,,,,, ,;r, - - , -

nrr -.> -e .

pb" M E u .an .

~

b ,.

=

Y~ i

( .gji.j ,I.l T_9 Si. Y .-bwt.__S _ _a eo- -- ._ u s_g

) t C - ~ + .w .l ' i e

.c p.,I.

'4,-

s l

a

= 9 81117 0297 -(3 .

s -

A;JYgd

.e+ -

- ve) ZION STATION DSAR i n - ~

y, - - -w--- t e* - = * -

M-13 Rev. F 1/30/97 (e) ' ?h @ ~t fM~ (.*, 'i) i Figure 1-13 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN MEZZ. FLOOR EL. 617'-0" (UNIT 2)

AUGUST 1998

A Je .

t 3 3

,=_ l N-n 1 4

_.jb. -

r# q L.-, .= ,". I .k.. O. __

aa

,. T.s - -- . #

- s* I p.

i i

%. n%J J

~

m l f

u r l ;

)

G <-,

.d+G) @

qj 1 p ' ,

4 6. !

- C I . Y[.. "*% 1

<=w. V, k> i h9 i,4p l

l

\

i #k . s- r v 3,. .' . - - _. %

.! }!

s . .

l ag. gan.edue es piig gp4gpagg g,,

== : em te l .me . s L' _ .aur.un ~. -

hI

/

4.. -/---- *i j.

s.u, u Fl . 4u l tp.- a3 / O \

r. // . .

en.s.u.e,e.it i'

same II ll

.a ar s.o ar ' 1 h e.s . .J $<

sy e , .l ar.a. - n.

l - g --

Y5__ ,e ,=-.-..-.: l[ ; ~*----

l; 9 7

l Lc,

..u 3}. m9 ----- s 1

l l b

q-_._.___.- ,,.,,,,.,._o,.

_ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ - ,#.q ,

~

' h -

i !l TM i

d 4!E"hl a

== l z o ch ,

l 7 *.' " - ; =di l 4 t

. - _. .. .=-- ::.,!.s,v, "

e -..e

.d_.,m .,N=.q.i,e ;22,

- -pa _. __.p% ,;g , ^.C ; ..

l hD<

f,,,,,,--- , .--4,--,- g.g ,,

r:...J.m* w s.".1:.' 3 '_ m :/ &

~wl

/

.i _, -

pl6,g -

,O'..,,,,,._,:-

~ . - .,y - - - /

.' =n-

/ "'L3 I

' .* n: . , w.=. 9* - & - *- <,

c L__ ; '.:. . ..<

l .1 l

l rwe. .=e.T --Q./ ~rou e

I ,w.. n:;'

%.4 .aa = b . g , :- :s."~t. p

~ __ ._ . .

--_>_-._--s

i

' 'y

.,<..m.. ~i ; . P '-

i i y p.MJ-4/ !!

i Ux- =.w -4 ".g,. ' 0 -. I*. ? '"b %

.:' 4- AW g.

. >; ; ]c--- - - - -,,e.-- .

.- y ==r.:. ; j > gp

~.d--.41 l.- em it. a3 .ff

:: . d'p---. 'g '

q lNi g% "

i

[!d'h O.H s- 4.'.Wg f5.\

mA "t" *

. lC u m . 7, 3 , ,;, , p[ g . --- ~ I e !

I v r.re. s.

l vt_'jf,! ___, Q- ~ _p p..1;, ~~ T i: .,

- e- -

l d u

[i t -.a_.

,'., t ."a,M..

1 _-- . . ,,,,,,. _ 1 . _ . L 4-. t .

.l -

-, . . . - - - c a ry.i.~ c

, i V'

ag .I .

l. . : -- . - - -s- . ..', ]

e e.I. ~_ L.~ __r4 ~ 2

h. : **f."

.i r . - ll . ._li. i ..

3'.j1

!T N W , l'l t

!' ]l;I g

3,,....,

L G> . . Yi ;

u

.Ia

...I u,t ., te

,5,

_u g y.

.. .A - . . , . .. ..w a

.r ..- u .. .i

-an

- .-. p ..y g

.y , _

I . . .. -

l a s v%,

,._.._., 7 (f)==() NUCLEAR SAFETY RE

/ e

-lg ".---!, ..

... , _ . ...LA.TE .. _D

, i ec~,n.s - t l I, %. Li .n

, i .rs. A.,

I i e 8 I h .?

r, I i e i >

,i ,;

4L i

i

- _ _ I, . ._.

y

. .y ,

2, ,

g i . _ . , . ,

_i p

3, q

.g ' y .i _-

g .

11 tl w fgh-= ,

==

1 11PERTURE CARD 1 '- : ; c5 ;

y;

\, .

s.f,c.v 4 s j i

._- ';_ L'a_ ._ . L __. __. _.. _ . . - . _ . - - . - HD i 140 Ava!!ablo on

.' l Mnorture Card

~rsag(i .'

% ==l, n

t a _, ..y - . p, .

w $~&

y,-_--.

e .

, r, i i1

,: x $?mJQ .

d m'"% a -

j-., w .i.

'i m,-%g.; il *t y

i r =a . -

u.b.m .

. -===

x.

.i. . ;.,s,;.u:.=" . :_ (n ,

y' a

w..

.i

%gF_3,-_

,M T P 2 1 C O M ;

~~-~ - ~

P" 3,_

g ws .. m .

pg.,.

m . _e,. . -- .! .

> 9._.

- - - l-f.)

wt 230: ? !

's ;~

= --l. :

-, 4 t r' i

- , !.-. ., - . m,.se L.'

x..,. .n.,.*,

Ii m) ., ._.. <r. _ .>

r +. raw.

r .

. -. . - . - - 1,--+-4

-d ., \c! e, 5,h

" < x :.,

f ..

Y n .] .

._._.._.h *'l'

. ::=.= -. ) y, . _ . ; .

o%, a,

4. :..

! m+. m.w Mg ==s0 p2 '

o u

i

: ea- .

- ' <. _-l Ln.1 A _ .

. , -. .r-.-. ---we .

.h it.* Oitt

.J h .L._f._ ;_._ ._ } a. h 9811170297 -(3 I

.*

l . *.

, -.2*.

a. .

~

)

! ! ZION STATION DSAR W.7:='W- - ", ', ..... . . . - 1. , . . . -

'N M.14 Rev. L 1/30/97 h . 2. . _

Figure 1-14

}, e y, , c ; 7

, l GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN GROUND FLOOR EL. 592'-0"(UNIT 2)

AUGUST 1998

<---~~ ,

% e**

I i 4 4 5 SI-M l e ..~ @ .

QQ

, p - - e

,,,gy nee"

l h 5 i.

i O !

N l

).e.

24 I

, :- l r N

4N ,

- == ! , i =_ ... . y y

..._....___a.._..

i!

somsa,=w.

_ g p cowr , ,oe eeu ,7 .c .

s

. , ., x 3

i [

.l - /

8 i

i. ' -

i N 1 9

6 O

't-- L # - )

b ,6*

g a e . e ...., S.

+ f

_._.__% ._._.d._ ' -_

=aav g g.y, -.-. . _ . _ . - . - . . ',i . Eq 2

a'*.'1,M .'t. *. -

',M-5& a MM M,% '

.l l 7 , ; [ h,i '

e

. _'"* '*"*=. ,~ -

,c@s i 5* = ' ' *9 " " = , =' ,= - - - e===-

I l

l g [3-- % ,rj l ,r4

.na;==4 H-o j.

l g ,.

"'"*'*h e

n c' o)'- :::. ku:u .m ,? vs.

_a# f"*'*""ky.h 7.Ms,c_. g_ _ . ... . w%r I

. a _..

'Y b. M ** W.asb @

=J = "

.i TSfel gi,. MGl -- i. ;8 [c~e'"*' t

..'d '; ,;;?- & .. ,

e I. p. , # R, 3 / . % /

- v' L ,a a -"'

, j r - - -

af

,; - llk/',

\ / -

Q >,_ - atwl h'

3 f;u -'l,b' igr "y" ' 8'-y +...-

I/\ Wr wl.. G 4i ,

+ e I

ILJ - . , . .. p -'

, iib A _h. b..

w:s,v 3%-.

'4, ,J w?.!.E,.

f

. - 4-5. bu <

a ;,;m ,. , x..w.a , y

(\ ! +- i py-3

.- y- w :itf%Dr . -af ,

I -1 . ,o- - -

f. _

f X._ . at*-* 0 T.,Q 1. to .I D$

va'=.-3 M. i 1 J.

s i 1 j1 t.G*t..o --

a

\-f,;+,eL '.~..

.-' ~..., d,4, i

y . j' ' %'n,r i r r#: -o , . ;

{ ,1 gh

~

w.= -

pi rpc u! l'+ -m- ..; - -

l --- . - --++-

,,,,,,.j ,

_l *** .*-

.e.

).

t l

N.,

'c ~*~I'*l A l O~ -Jf4'/,, l , T , q,.y;a s censa+ies i l g.;,,,7, l l l u

t . .. p e- r ~. : ,,

.J}. rin, t i . 72 a - .

r.-- ".-i-..4 & i *_ ,. -

_ ., _,.s-

.4#

g

l

- . _ 7 _. . ._ . , . _ . 4. ,(.'r.. ' ;'y,> '.3

-w k tg l l l l l l I

., . .. .. .., . i .. ,,

b"'

l e , , . .

t l

l .- v

w

_.___._._._.7 Y i e _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ,

I s- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ q s.

k i

~ . .

s .

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ 93 g ; . ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.__ p i h PERTURE

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ e s ; CARD

. j_ , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ /g GO AVhduble 07)

~~ " O8fd

.QWs~f,_._ __._._._._._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _4,

~pM%. .. ! t

.. 3L

_.c

_li l' !

._s , u

._______._.__Q

.4 _4 ..

a w2h.

__.==-

.-= . m ,#, , , e_. - .

a . ,_ - - + e. _,. ;1

r,:;,r_

. _utuq.

G LM _

y ._._._.${

w -

. w_.m t

.f.Vef 344*

l y l

_ _ " _ y. . __.z. _ _ _ _.

4 ld =m ,;:l:':t i ,

._ (. m .:

u+ 2,n y._1._.+. 4 J,.... ,,B @

yq- ,l . , - - . , . _ _ . ,

, . -4 -

i 9811170299 - 5

.p._ l !, g cq. _ t, .__4 _! .

p _ _q-. .

' *; ZION STATION DSAR

.'I..___l , eg __.7.___

l

, l l r._c_.y. ,.

l l l# M-15 Rev. G 1/30/97 r

u- -w ..-w t _p.<w. .s,.p_y Figure 1-15 6 g gg g g g g

~~

'+ * .

GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR EL. 560' 0" (UNIT 2) l AUGUST 1998 l

l

f i

$lam Pg

@ - - @ . , k .,, 9 -, @ .

t D'M.*#'** .

g fN_,*dN, .s a

\

ur w --

l i '. i e i ; *i

~

~N ,,

' \l N

.,fu i ./

f l ,; l r*g <- ( s\ ge,. ~

, .at p

/ g (

O -- a i - ,, - + - . _,-

. _ .~ T'T^.,% 7 h.ik, 3 .

v .-, .k.nr-rR.,..

Fi % s T C-', N' ,

$' *n m . . . _ ,

,{ . .

e

..," Ma , j s. - . i;

. m

- q : ,:

2 . u .ggg". m v.ir "

. . q. - -- 22 y _!-$ pg;3,,

, 3 f =".4

, ; zg

<=

W;f

s .n _, ,, e R.n.WO n

h. O. ,w 'S ~g ,Q. n

- O f~, i. O Q,Y.5 g

,L*DL m mmllL k h-

"E.d 7 i. 'l UI ' . rm,r i. Ur. !.m rm mll!. O O NL Ql p ., 'yS*2. % -

l; 3.;

c ,l '

,Rsl:&_4___. '~~r u &5N--Fri vr= k"ef w$ *-

w_=._,>...,.m.-..-...g..~......... -

.;47 ~

v, jl O L..- g L s 0 l ,

, H. <

n.A . (4 Na.

l '

"-. , . , _ . - .r .- ., ..rQ) r .rI.r. .r '

's

., ,e i '

i il N r( l i

.' ]

/[/ '

1 '

l' 1t @\ .c. ,r,.,_,.rdi m iw Nsqw

-* l y ,w) -

a.s . a.. ,!

n m

+w. po ._

y o

w~ , ,

g*q vr-- -

/n g w,- J' m.-

W' _ ,;,,.::',,) 'J s %9 , r%=

l:. +- ..

Q6 . -

s s o

?: .h_ '.,V w' : .w . --ee

, ' f( C \ \ k i l

I l

, s \ r i

l l h - _I h__ a#

[

_._r.s____.' . }j ,

e i sr , i

' , 4 .., =

_..., c _ . . ,

. . , I PLAN i

\

F<

l l

l

! 3 . , ,

l

a

e. a e n 4. , , e .,

s 4ars'

w= ,

,w=

i w~ ~~ 4 s- _

, , %' 's

,.m, p- , __.

. 'z%_<

q_ , . .c_..

j ?5'I ((

\

/(

T ja,o i : -}L F

f+qip r:: N 3 i e .,. i I

,- Tp a, *w~ r~ ,' wn M" <

o _. .. _

a,m, ;

= .. - ( '; vgzy -

er

(

-4' --

u , ', ,,, ,

APERTURI.

% ,'- CARD k %!fss I Also Avaliable c ,

secron x x' Aperture Card 3!.

r

?

~s 1

O 9811170299 -

ZION STATION DSAR M-16 Rev. C 1/30/97 Figure 1-16 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN

CRIB HOUSE AUGUST 1998 a n.

J

ks 46 4* 48 46 50 51 S2 93 S4 55 $6 S? Se

f. :7 S

, e . cm egenation....s,-

a k

e<

,.,,..;-_., , o e , .> . nm . . '= . , - . .

t .. t. o c N N. p -...v

- , %of,/ a-"--

e, . . - ._ ., g __ ._

l 5-* ;. . _- - _ : A1 -

. . . }s.- ,

. . .. - g . . .

.t. --- c. .-

.. .- ...._... = =. . . --

_-- _-..- _.t...,., -. ..... ,. >

. ,1 -

cy m

e - h.

.r . -

..., e :.

- _o

. -.- i

-- - _ .a ._,

. .i

~-

c==f. q__ _::~~~ 5h-

~ ~

Sis _r.f _.-' " ~- ~-: at- - - .. i

.o _ gr. .- . . . -

___.-- _., :c

_ - _.- ,___ --- = -

.- -.-. =. ~_.-+ .- . .

5.rb-.;,g=. ' _.m,,.

_. c =H= ~. .

& ~ - . - - r g ;

3- s ~1 ' o~ L_=* =,;N - - -K.,;;;>, _, ,. - *~- ~~=',' -

_ . e .,i a.-. ,

. . = _ ~ - =_;-%

- -. , - - ,-- ::u W """9 ;. . g -. h. - , -- .

.g A---e-*....,.J . *>. .- . , ,

d.. ,

; f- -.

. z.nny, P.'. .

- - c, . ; ,

. ~ m - ;- .-

n

=*_

.*,2w.,.-- -

._,.g._a

.g P* as,.,a,.

w,,,..,,

4 r

,-r

,,", s-~_-...-

--* ,.,,.,-- * .,,..,.3,y.,

u 3.g5 .--_-.. -

__., . -- .A

.- s -.,. .:,..... . _. .

i

_.,r-- _

.7,*.* -. mM'",,*_

.i--m-- at -

- _ f .. - ., --

.u- wC * - . '

.:w.- .f - pv

t- .

~ -- ~

% .:. =h LC .,, +r

r* :~ =T%~ - *-

7,aas ,,,- ' _* , h \ s

..- a, -

__..-5--5 e ::- t =jy_-nue-_ __r. hE" a=, ~ :g = :.:.5*"- v.' .i : .* ~ - ;w..d . '

~._ _ .

T 2.=m=.-

MI

-~.-

~a ";1"P-- **

r.

d -- -U.2. #"-*.6.,ll ar.n . w - . .p=. " ~T

' --5:su .v-

-T.T.h _

.=

gw:t I-c+iN ;.8 ::::- .iY%*

^

.e_. 7 - ~.

'.EU. .p. - ':

. - .: : --: --- 1;::

Ar %*

. %. Q._

.7.~~&::: , $3maap^=::_

.~ = i= T ._ C- R h _2 3

.. _ _, r- y g ]:.:y %. '~ 3

W

.: d

... .:..,. . g, . -_% u

. ~'~ .i .?'~ir' s. -~M r -G_?..s:^fg= . g .-we.L' ;--Q.f.7.'~.-d%. e,'"\.

l l :

~

.-- - i . ,;;f.,

~~

7_ _i;= __, ~.2".' 8*I

~

-y +- - s "_%(.h7 @_%.._ 3, .~~.. g __. .g--.:r:.w 8

,~~

._.8"FFD"3ms'E -

s_

ommes

.y ..;k N i J-

.' . .a .ss h;. .,,,, "1 ?O-"" - ".g"y,'MJ.: gr 1 w._;lY.5. 3B"r _: dtr .N~-* . .v 5[js .e.f . d

.~ '"'

m:

y,,- _m s ,,=~ _z- .,.. -

_m --

.k. '2-- *, , ": gip' -s.r:if-'. .%. .,%.r's~'

~= 5~j~4., ,.3_:; _, $.~.',. , . .-*'.'. : := ,..-'u..). 8_;ld.+;

8"w., s p =g: . . L.. . m -

=. L,_ , ._. me _ ; -s-a

--r .

- ~ --* 1

. ' . a _- .--

- . ar-. c

= ghr- .r _ ,g-r.-s. _.

.:.;;;=pr'g" - "-~.='

r"=.~ c. ,aw . - n. - =7 su*:r.1.

r- .r. - -

p . -

- ..c r w

. ._ - ,=. ..- . . .,..., r =:n m - -

l'~-.-. .::~ ,: ._.

'"' fir =%g

- ,l~" , -d' .;t. .E'.=*- G_ . . m%.. o .j

-i

.3 ~=Y d, ah:::w ..._ ,fr.

D ii.T_e.:,=M,s.(_=5k=s. .

t!r.s=0.,1-QMkhE@d55; s ;;g:;- 4ec.

+M bir. .:.d_

e = w .. ;,. a. M. ,w . :.t .

6 b.

-=

a.- . . _ . _=q, .

,.T===. - - , a ..~4,.t ---t..*u"-*.-. w, --

g.:r.-

t.i_=.

_ _ g -

.g_ .,;;:a,, -

r- .s- r E.e, **"*v - ; j .:E.),.I s.,u

_ -w. - - =., - ..

. .. .. ,i 2.

/'%,Y.- %a ~

F -7'_6 2- -

. A. _. E- ~~Y._=, .-rn.,,r,r .e-r.-- y~:: ;$2!.

w= 4'_ _ S ...;t;; _r _- " D ' .

m-- ., -

#. J e g.,.:;'P. .. _e 2 ._=r _ .,r-h,_gn . . =. -: r-uw.=-

. . - - . a-g _. . a-.= %.

a .- , ,,,, :. .- y t:._, arca.., :

, . . , =i5 -;,- . ., __,,...._..3

.. i w.- . . .s.- .-

--==. _ r ~ -. _._

i

.- ... .. .. ._._ ._ .a.

- -i

. n: '- =' - .

,.4 I .A=.- ._=3

, =4 .

..g ssi.. l= -r==- m=

- ar- .-.+-

~.

~"a4

' ' ~ T ~ <. .

'"r'g * =0 + ia 'c '-, m8.y_ gt,.fip"*.am._

T~*'- - ~-" - d'V - .

= ig==:;_ , -=~=l"I e-4 : d'r y,,,,%'p'- m x , = .*-- 3,, , , _ -_ , ,,,,.;,;, ;;,,, .-r ; ,,,_ . .-,..

u ; . -= _',.',f;.rr.g y, ,.es. 4 N5f , .

e m,- . :.r . f, '.; .- . . .. .- :._. -

R '!;u.f,a?

- -- -y:'a~:.f9.;

g G- ; .e .d ,./-+=.,_C.*.

. *f-iA- _ . . . . . .. ~.%,E... _ ,

.= . ,

. =:.

.. :. .b-

".""'~~au.-.J.a'.'.'Tip,;'_..:.-~T-[*,"hT~.:f~[.Q-:#

.~ , s Wg* _ . . -- , ..; .-= Q 3 .* --N ..

h-f _~M. . :.

. - - _, ~ --

. ,..g=

- i. .

. t.

- -. . - c - : = . .c - ',",e r .. . -

. - . - - f;.~.:;.P : ...

.lll . .- .z:; _,

_=- .- :_ . -- . ,. .a. .

=

ZION STATION DSAR

% -- ,a.=-Eck z - g-n-*

- =: . ,. .

.::-.-- -.K- -

u ,-- .a

. _.E_W

.:.. . j.?w:qg .

Figure 1-17 m_

.._.,. ,, . ..e.. .

i/r <

LOCATION OF ZION STATION AUGUST 1998

(

1

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2-1

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2-1 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2-1 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2-1 2.1.2- Exclusion Area Authority and Control 2-1 2.1.3 Population Distribution 2-2 2.2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL, TRANSDORTATION, AND 2-2 MILITARY FACILITIES 2.2.1 Locations and Routes (References 1 and 2) 2-2 2.2.2 Descriptions (References 3,4, and 5) 2-2 2.2.2.1 Nonmilitary Facilities 2-2 2.2.2.2 Military Facilities 2-3 2.2.2.3 - Waterways 2-3 2.2.2.4 Airports ' 2-3 2.2.3 Evaluation of Potential Accidents 2-3 2.3 METEOROLOGY 2-4 p/

w 2.3.1 2.3.1.1 Regional Climatology General Climate 2-4 2-4 2.3.2 Local Meteorology - 2-4 2.3.2.1 Normal and Extreme Values of 2-4 Meteorological Parameters 2.3.2.1.1 Climate 2-4 2.3.2.1.2 Wind Direction 2-5 2.3.2.1.3 Wind Direction Persistence 2-5 2.3.2.1.4 Atmospheric Stability 2-6 2.3.2.1.5 Severe Weather 2-8 2.3.3 Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program 2-8 2.3.4 Short-Term Diffusion Estimates 2-9 2.3.5 Long-Term Diffusion Estimates 2-9 LO l

2-1 August 1998

t ZION STATION DSAR TABLE OF CONTENTS 0\

SECTION TITLE PAGE l

2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING 2-9 l l 2.4.1 Hydrologic Description 2-9 l 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities 2-9 i

2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere 2-10 l

2.4.2 Floods 2-11 l 2.4.2.1 Rainfall 2-12 2.4.2.2 Flood Design Considerations .2-12 2.4.3 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers 2-12 2.4.4 Potential Dam Failures, Seismically Induced 2-12 2.4.5 Probable Maximum Surge and Seiche Flooding 2-12 2.4.5.1 Surge and Seiche Water Levels 2-12 2.4.5.2 Currents, Tides, Waves and Littoral Drift 2-14 (References 21 and 22) 2.4.5.2.1 Wind Effects on Surface Currents 2-14 2.4.5.2.2 Wave Action Due to High Winds 2-14 2.4.5.3 Protective Structures 2-15 2.4.6 Ice Effects 2-17 2.4.7 Dispersion, Dilution, and Travel Times of 2-17 Accidental Releases of Liquid Effluents in Surface Waters

('

2.4.7.1 2.4.7.2 General Temperature Alterations 2-17 2-18 2.4.8 Groundwater 2-18 2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL 2-19 ENGINEERING 2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic Information 2-19 2.5.1.1 Geological Program 2-19 2.5.1.2 Seismology Program 2-20 2.5.1.3 Regional Geology 2-20 2.5.1.4 Site Geology 2-21 2.5.2 Vibratory Ground Motion 2-22 2.5.2.1 Seismicity 2-23 j 2.5.2.2 Design Basis Earthquake 2-23 2.5.3 Surface Faulting 2-23 2.6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2-23 PROGRAM l

2.7 REFERENCES

, Section 2.0 2-24 I

f 2-il August 1998

.. .. - _ - - _. _- - . - =- - - - - =

1 ZION STATION DSAR i

2-1 Population Within 10 Miles of the Site 2-2 Population Centers of 25,000 inhabitants Within 10 Miles of the Site 2-3 Meteorological Extremes l 2-4 35 Ft. Wind Speed and Direction (January 1,1980 - December 31,1980) 2-5 35 Ft. Wind Speed and Direction (January 1,1972 - December 31,1980) 2-6 Pasquill Stability Classifications vs. Temperature Lapse Rate 2-7 Wind Speed Distribution vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) 1 2-8 Wind Speed vs. Direction-Stability Class (1970) I 2-9 Wind Speed vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) 2-10 Highest Expected Winds for the Zion Site 2-11 Tornado Occurrences 2-12 Meteorological Instrument Locations and Analog Data Recording Systems 2-13 Zion Station Meteorological Ir:r.trument Locations and Analog Recording Systems 2-14 Nearby Lake Michigan Water Supply Systems 2-15 Annual Precipitation at Various Illinois Locations 2-16 Door Locations and Principle Use Exterior Accesses Below Elevation 600' MSL 2-17 Data on Surface Current Speeds for Lake Michigan (July through O 2-18 November 1963)

Frequency of Deep Water Wave Heights D.ue to Storms l 2-19 Well Data -Zion Station (within one mile of Station) l 2-20 Geologic Formations ,

2-21 Elevation of Class I Structures with Respect to Various Foundation Soil Levels 2-22 Regional Earthquake Occurrences 2-23 Modified Mercalli intensity Scale 1931 I

l 2-iii August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE 2-1 TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE 1 ZION STATION '

2-2 MAP OF ZION STATION (LPZ AND EXCLUSION AREA) i 2 SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 2-4 GENERAL LAYOUT OF WAUKEGAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT 2-5 CLIMATE OF ZION REGION 2-6 AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND ROSES - MILWAUKEE, WAUKEGAN, CHICAGO (O' HARE) I 2-7 AVERAGE WIND ROSE FOR THE ZION SITE l 2-8 WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE AT MILWAUKEE 2-9 WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE AT CHICAGO (O' HARE) 2-10 WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE - FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 2-11 STABILITY CLASS DISTRIBUTION - 5 YEAR

SUMMARY

- CHICAGO 2-12 STABILITY CLASS DISTRIBUTION - 5 YEAR

SUMMARY

- MILWAUKEE 2-13 ANNUAL AVERAGE x / Q 2-14 x / Q ISOPLETHS 2-15 LOCATION MAP - ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION AND BULL CREEK DRAINAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES

/m 2-16 INTAKE STRUCTURE - SECTIONS AND DETAILS i 2-17 WATER WELLS IN ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AREA 2-18 BORING LOCATION MAP 2-19 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 1) 2-20 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 2) 2-21 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 3) 2-22 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 4) 2-23 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 5) 2-24 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 6) 2-25 LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 7) 2-26 REGIONAL EARTHQUAKE EVENTS O

2-iv August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE 2A Five-Year Stability Data (WINDIF) for Chicago and Milwaukee 2B iix Month Stability Data for Zion Power Station 2C hJo Airbome Effluent Diffusion and Record of Meteorological Monitoring the Period of May 1,1971 - April 30,1972 O

O 2-v August 1998

l ZION STATION DSAR

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS

2.0 INTRODUCTION

This chapter summarizes information on the geological, seismological, hydrological, and meteorological characteristics of the site and vicinity, in conjunction with population distribution, land use, and site activities and controls. The purpose is to indicate how these site characteristics influenced plant design, operating criteria, and overall adequacy of the site for nuclear power operations. Much of this information is historical in nature. This information i demonstrates, in complement with more detailed discussions provided in other chapters, the i overall adequacy of the site for safely storing, monitoring, and handling of fuel, to safely handle I

radioactive waste, and to monitor all radiological effluent release paths.

2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1.1 Site Location and Descriotion i l

The site is in Northeast lilinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan about 40 miles N of Chicago, Illinois, and about 42 miles S of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, as shown in Figure 2-1. The site is in

' the extreme eastem portion of the city of Zion, (Lake County) lilinois, on the west shore of Lake Michigan approximately 6 miles NNE of the center of the city of Waukegan, Illinois, and 8 miles south of the center of the city of Kenosha, Wisconsin. It is located at longitude 87 degrees 48.1 minutes W and latitude 42 degrees 26.8 mhutes N.

The site comprises approximately 250 acres which is owned by Commonwealth Edison Company. The site is traversed from west to east by Shiloh Boulevard near the northem property boundary. Site maps covering details out to a 10 mile radius and in the Low Population Zone (LP7) and Exclusion areas, are respectively shown in Figures 2-1 and 2-2. Figure 2-3 is an aerial photograph depicting the site boundaries and details of the site.

In addition to those roads which connect directly with the site, there is a network of primary and secondary highways and section line roads in the adjacent area which provide a variety of high capacity routes to and from the site and the immediate vicinity, as indicated on Figure 2-2. For example, in addition to Shiloh Boulevard, which extends approximately 2 miles west of the plant site, there are within 1-mile of the site three other highways or roads (Ill. Rt.173,29th Street, and Wadsworth Road) extending westerly and intersecting each of the principal north-south secondary highways located within four miles of the site, i.e., Sheridan Road, Lewis Avenue, Kenosha and Green Bay Roads (Ill. Rt.131), and also U.S. Rt. 41, a four lane, highspeed, divided highway. In addition, Interstate 94, a limited access, four lane tollway, is situated approximately 6 miles west of Zion.

2.1.2 Exclusion Area Authority and Control l

l The site, consisting of approximately 250 acres owned solely by Commonwealth Edison Company, provides the requisite exclusion area. Reference Section 1.2.1.4 for discussion of the restricted area.

There are no residences on the site or within 2000 feet of the station structures.

2-1 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR .

2.1.3 Population Distribution The 0-10 mile population estimates were made using the 1980 Census Bureau population deb for the incorporated areas and 1980 serial photograph for unincorporated areas. The incorporated area totals were added to the unincorporated area totals to obtain population estimates by zone which appear in Table 2-1.

A list of incorporated villages and cities within 10 miles of Zion was prepared by finding their distance and direction using the following maps: USGS 1:250,000 topographical map, Illinois Highway map, Wisconsin Highway map 1981-1982, New Expanded Chicago Tribune Chicagoland map, Kenosha County Highway map and official township maps for Kenosha and Lake counties. Population totals for these municipalities were obtained from the 1980 US !

Census Bureau lists of Incorporated Municipalities for Illinois and Wisconsin. Those areas with :

25,000 inhabitants or more are listed by distance and population in Tatie 2-2.

]

1 As tabulated in Chapter 5, the to'al radiation doses under postulated hypothetical accidenis to an individual at the boundary of the exclusion area or at the boundary of the " low population zone" are within the limits prescribed by 10CFR100 and within USEPA Protective Action Guidelines.

i The population density and use characteristics of the environs are compatible with the operation of the Zion Station.

l 2.2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION. AND MILITARY FACILITIES 2.2.1 Locations and Routes (References 1 and 2)

The Waukegan-North Chicago area is predominantly an industrial region with 144 manufacturing establishments. The product of the largest of these manufacturing firms is pharmaceuticals and chemicals with the most predominant product of the remainder being in ,

l the metallurgical and fabricated metal products field. None of the industries listed by the

. Waukegan-North Chicago Chamber of Commerce will represent a limitation to the operation of l the Zion Station. I 2.2.2 Descriptions (References 3. 4. and 5) l l

2.2.2.1 Nonmilitary Facilities ;

The Zion-Winthrop Harbor area is a small industrial region. A portion of this industry is located between the western boundary of the site and the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad tracks approximately 0.8 miles due west of the plant location and is light in nature. There is also a warehouse located in this industrial area.

There are no schools or hospitals within one mile of the station.

l The site is bordered on the north and the south by the Illinois Beach State Park.

The centers of the communities of Zion and Winthrop Harbor are located 1.6 and 2.5 miles, respectively, from the plant location.

2-2 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR According to the Lake County Regional Planning Commission, commercial fishing is almost l nonexistent in this portion oi Lake Michigan due to the migration northward of the Lake Trout.

Sport fishing has ir. creased in popularity since the introduction of salmon and trout in the lake. ,

i 2.2.2.2 Militarv Facilities #

The major military installation in the vicinity of the Zion site is the Great Lakes Naval Training Station.

The Great Lakes Naval Training Station has a small arms practice range utilizing a small area of '

' Lake Michigan 10 miles south of the Zion site.

1 There is no active vessel of the Navy on Lake Michigan. The U.S. Coast Guard operates surface vessels and aircraft on the lake. l l

It is concluded that military installations and operations in the vicinity of the Zion site do not pose l any threat to safe facility operation. 1 2.2.2.3 Waterways Commercial barges and ships do not ordinarily operate within five miles of the Zion site, and the majority of commercial traffic on Lake Michigan does not approach within twenty miles of the site. All barge traffic north of the Chicago area is limited to the summer months due to waves or

' ice on the lake. Explosives and toxic gases are carried only aboard oceangoing vessels which O

do not closely approach the site.

2.2.2.4- Airoorts Waukegan Regional Airport is the closest airport to the station and is the only one within 10 miles of the plant. It is located 3.14 miles southwest of the site. The station is located 0.76 miles from the extended centerline of the longest runway (5/23). Figure 2-4 shows the general airport layout.

2.2.3 Evaluation of Potential Accidents A probabilistic risk evaluation has been performed circa 1989 which estimates the potential for an aircraft accident resulting in a post-crash fire within sufficient proximity to Zion Station to present a hazard (References 6 and 7). The evaluation concluded that the probability of occurrence of the event was below 1.0 x 10 # per year, and would remain below this value even to the year 2008. The NRC reviewed and accepted this evaluation via Reference 8. The NRC's conclusion is stated below:

"The overall probabilities of an aircraft crash leading to a fire near the ventilation intakes of the Zion plant meet the acceptance criteria of Section 3.5.1.6 of the Standard Review Plan. Accordingly, the technical specification for aircraft fire ;

detection is not required."

]

i The Zion Station can withstand any fire or explosion which could result from an accident in the normal shipping lanes on Lake Michigan. The release of toxic gases on the lake could affect the environs of the station, but would not cause the Control Room to become uninhabitable.

2-3 August 1998

! j ZION STATION DSAR

} 2.3 METEOROLOGY i

2.3.1 Reaional Climatoloav

{-

2.3.1.1' General Climate i The climate of the region around the site is primarily continental, with characteristic cold winters l l and warm summers. There is no dry season; precipitation occurs with some uniformity ;

! throughout the year. Average annual precipitation is about 33 inches, average annual snowfall

! is about 40 inches, and the mean annual temperature in the area is near 50 F.

Winds over 70 miles per hour are not expected to occur more than once every 50 years.

Tornadoes occur with relative high frequency in Illinois, but are mostly found in the southern half of the state.

}

I Northem Illinois is well-ventilated, with' infrequent periods of calms. Most frequent wind direction i occurrences are southwest and northeast during the warm months of the year, and southwest i

and northwest during the cool months. The lake breeze effect is an important factor in wind direction during the summer months. The longest duration of uninterrupted winds blowing from one direction was 39 hours4.513889e-4 days 0.0108 hours 6.448413e-5 weeks 1.48395e-5 months from the northwest.

i' Some extremes of meteorological variables are listed in Table 2-3. )

3 Data and analyses in Section 2.3 are based on: five years of hourly observations from i Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago (O' Hare); wind summaries from Waukegan, I!!inois l' (Reference 9); summaries of climatological data from Wisconsin and Illinois; and other j reference data of a more specific nature. Data presented from the Milwaukee, Waukegan, and i O' Hare airports was that five-year period which was available on magnetic tape from the

, National Weather Records Center.

2.3.2 Local Meteoroloav i 2.3.2.1 Normal and Extreme Values of Meteoroloaical Parameters i

l 2.3.2.1.1 Climate i

l

~

The climate of the Zion region is illustrated on Figure 2-5 which shows average and extreme temperatures and precipitation for 30 or more years of record at Chicago and Milwaukee.

The climate of the site region is influenced by the general storms which move eastward along the northem tier of the United States and by those which move northeastward from the southwestern part of the country to the Great Lakes. This continental type of climate is modified by Lake Michigan. Wind shifts from westerly to easterly directions produce marked cooling of the day time temperatures in spring and summer, in autumn the relatively warm water of the Lake prevents night time temperatures from falling as low as they do a few miles inland from the shoreline.

Summer time temperatures seldom rise above 90 F along the Lake shore, and sub-zero l temperatures occur only about twelve days during the winter months. Rainfall averages around 33 !

inches per year, with the largest proportions falling during the growing season. Extreme winds for ;

design purposes are described below. 1 2-4 August 1998 i

_ _ _._. _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ~ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l ZION STATION DSAR I

Results are from a special study done by the Weather Bureau for winds at 30 feet elevation.

Extreme-mile winds are: 50 mph with probability of 0.50 and a recurrence interval of once in 2 years; and a 50-year recurrence interval is associated with a 70 mph wind with a probability of 0.02. (The extreme-mile wind speed is defined as the 1-mile passage of wind with the highest speed for a day.)

An annual stability wind rose table for 1980 was generated using the Zion meteorological tower data (Table 2-4). The 35-ft wind speed and wind direction data and the 250-35 ft differential temperature data were used in the comparison. The modal wind speed for this period was the 4-7 mph class (41.80%).' The prevailing wind direction was northwest (9.75%) followed by west (9.24%). Stability classes were weighted towards the neutral-slightly-stable classes (44,42%).

2.3.2.1.2 Wind Direction Average annual wind roses are shown on Figure 2-6 for Milwaukee, Waukegan, and Chicago (O' Hare). The wind regimes at all three locations are quite similar, except that the results from Chicago (O' Hare) show considerable observer bias in favoring the octant points of the compass.

At all three locations, the warm weather lake breeze effect is reflected in a definite spike of I higher wind frequencies from the northeasterly direction Calm conditions at these three sites are reported to range from about 1% to 6% on an annual bases. There are no major dissimilarities between the three wind roses. Data from Milwaukee were selected as being reasonably free from observer bias and representative of the west coastal areas along Lake Michigan, and have been used in the preliminary determination and analysis of Zion site meteorological factors. Figure 2-7 shows the average wind rose for the Zion site based on O limited onsite data. No major differences are noted between the two figures. These wind roses were used in evaluating the meteorological factors for initial licensing.

Table 2-5 presents the stability wind rose data obtained from the Zion Meteorological Tower for the period of January 1,1972, through December 31,1980. These roses are based on the 35 ft wind speed direction and the 250-35 ft differential temperature. The prevailing wind direction for this period is west (9.73%) followed by southwest (9.52%). The modal wind speed class for this period was 4-7 mph (44.98%) followed by the 8-12 mph class (29.73%). Wind speeds less than 4 mph occurred 7.23% of the time. For the period, the stability distribution was weighted toward the neutral-slightly stable classes (59.70%).

The information provided for the Zion Meteorological Tower is used in evaluating the Zion site meteorological factors.

2.3.2.1.3 Wind Direction Persistence Wind direction persistence at Milwaukee and Chicago (O' Hare) for the five year period of record are presented in Figure 2-8 and Figure 2-9, respectively. For each direction, the duration in hours, the number of occurrences, the data of the beginning hour and a summary of the stability class spectrum is given on the plots. Maximum persistence winds follow the wind rose pattems shown previously in Figure 2-6. Most persistent winds at Milwaukee were from the SSW for 32 hours3.703704e-4 days 0.00889 hours 5.291005e-5 weeks 1.2176e-5 months under neutral (Pasquill Class "D") and slightly stable (Pasquill Class "E") conditions; from NW for 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months all under neutral stability; and from NNE for 29 hours3.356481e-4 days 0.00806 hours 4.794974e-5 weeks 1.10345e-5 months under neutral and slightly stable conditions.

2-5 August 1998 y- y ,- * - - - , c -

)

ZION STATION DSAR l l.

l l

The most persistent winds at Chicago were from the NW for 39 hours4.513889e-4 days 0.0108 hours 6.448413e-5 weeks 1.48395e-5 months (twice) under slightly stable conditions, from the NNE for 38 hours4.398148e-4 days 0.0106 hours 6.283069e-5 weeks 1.4459e-5 months under neutral conditions, from the SW for 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months under stable and neutral conditions, and from the S for 32 hours3.703704e-4 days 0.00889 hours 5.291005e-5 weeks 1.2176e-5 months under neutral conditions. In general, flow from Lake Michigan over land occurs under neutral conditions.

Based on the five years of data from O' Hare and Milwaukee, a wind direction persistence frequency distribution has been constructed (see Figure 2-10). For one-sector persistences, 4

O' Hare would exceed an 80-hour duration with a probability of 10 , while Milwaukee would exceed a 38-hour duration at the same probability level.

Table 2-6 identifies the Pasquill stability classifications versus the temperature lapse rate.

Tables 2-7 through 2-9 present the hourly joint frequency distributions of wind speed and direction by stability classifications.

2.3.2.1.4 Atmospheric Stability l

Assessments of atmospheric stability at General Mitchell Field, Milwaukee, and O' Hare Field, Chicago, were made based on five years of data. These data were analyzed by techniques l described by Turner (Reference 10) based on work done by Pasquill (Reierence 11) and formulated into a computer code (WINDIF)* by NUS Corporation.

L Hourly surface observations were analyzed for seasonal stability, dispersion (x/Q) calculations and persistence including:

1. Hourly stability index distribution in percent of total observations and in percent of each hourly observations; l

2. Day-night stability index distribution in percent of total observations;

3. Average wind speed for each stability index in knots;

4. Wind rose for each stability index in percent of each index total;

5. Average wind speed for each stability index and each of 16 wind directions;

' 6. x/Q as a function of release height, wind direction, and downwind distance weighted by stability class and wind rose frequencies; and

7. Seasonal wind persistence calculations which include frequency of wind persistence by wind direction in percent of total number of observations for one sector, centerline plus and minus one sector, and centerline plus and minus two sectors. Stability variation for each hour of pre-selected magnitude of wind direction persistence.

I Tabulation of data is shown in Appendix 2A. Zion tabulation based on limited data is shown in Appendix 28.

2-6 August 1998

.- -.~ -. . - . . . . - . . - - - . . - - - . . _ . . - - . - - . - . . - . ,

ZION STATION DSAR Results of the stability class distribution along the wind rose for both Chicago (O' Hare) and Milwaukee are shown in Figures 2-11 and 2-12, respectively, for average annual and seasonal wind roses. On each direction ray the distance between the symbols for each stability class measured from the calm circle is the frequency of occurrence of each stability class in percent of total observations for five years of data.

. Routine releases of radioactive gases will be made intermittently from the vent discharge pipe near the top of the Containment structure. Atmospheric dispersion of these gases may be described by various analytical exoressions such as the Gaussian formulation described by Gifford,

- (Reference 12) as modified for the building wake effect. The basic expression for diffusion is as follows: '

x/ Q = (tr a, c, + cA)

- where:

= 8 x concentration (units /m )

Q =

release rate (units /sec)

=- mean wind speed (m/sec) o, and e, = respectively the lateral and vertical dispersion (Reference 13) ;

coefficients (m) c = building wake factor (dimensionless)

A = area of Containment (m)2 For distances out to the exclusion boundary, the predominant dispersion mechanism is that due to aerodynamic turbulence in the wake of the Containment structure as contrasted with releases from a tall stack with no local interferences.

An overlay plot of the annual average x/Q resulto for ground level release of waste gases corrected for initial dilution by the building wake model (Reference 13) is shown superimposed on the aerial photograph of the site in Figure 2-13. Based on Milwaukee data, the annual average diffusion factor (x/Q) is about 2 x 10 *sec/m 8at approximately 2000 feet to the North of Unit 2. Figure 2-14 presents the x/Q isopleths results for a ground level release based on available Zion site data.

!O 2-7 August 1998 l

l ZION STATION DSAR l

l 2.3.2.1.5 Severo Weather l

l Northem lilinois experiences about 36 thunderstorms per year, with the largest number i occurring from May through August. Most of these thunderstorms are oflight or moderate intensity; but occasionally, severe thunderstorms, accompanied by high winds, hail, and heavy l rainfall, can cause extensive damage to crops.

l Based on work by Thom (Reference 14), highest expected winds were determined for the Zion site and are listed in Table 2-10.

f l The value of the highest gust of wind with a mean recurrence interval of 100 years is l approximately 104 miles per hour, and for a 50-year interval, approximately 91 mph. The above estimates of highest gusts are based on work performed by Huss (Reference 15). i l Since 1871, only three tropical storms have moved far enough inland to have passed near the Zion site. The tropical storms, which passed within about fifty miles of the site, occurred on October 6,1949; June 28,1960; and June 26,1968. All were in a state of well-advanced dissipation and did not cause any significant damage to northeastem Illinois.

In the period from 1959 to 1969, thirty-four tomadoes have been recorded in Weather Bureau records as having occurred inside a square 80 miles on a side with the Zion site in the center.

These are listed in Table 2-11, with the occurrence recorded as to state, date, direction of movement, path length, and width. Most of the tomado activity in Illinois takes place in the southem half of the state, and relatively few cross the shoreline from land to water.

According to methods outlined in a paper by Thom, (Reference 16) estimates of the probability of tornado occurrence at a point within a one-degree square are possible. Using the median values of path width and length of Iowa tomado tracks, and the approximate area of the site, the l

probability of a tomado occurrence at the site has been calculated to be 1.29 x 10d On the basis of the ten years of observations used in Thom's paper, the 95% confidence limits have been determined to be

4.07 x 104 (* 2.20). A probability of 1.69 x 10" is thus determined at the 95% confidence level. This indicates a recurrence interval of approximately one tornado every 5900 years within the site boundaries.

An attemate method, using the value for a path area of 2.8209 square miles suggested by Thom, yields a probability of 9.0 x 10d for the 95% confidence limits. These result in a range of recurrence interval from 800 to 1600 years.

2.3.3 Onsite Meteoroloaical Measurements Proaram i The meteorological measurements program at the Zion site consists of monitoring wind L direction, wind speed, temperature, and precipitation. Two methods of determining atmospheric stability are used: delta T (vertical temperature difference) is the principal method; sigma theta

! (standard deviation of the horizontal WD) is available for use when delta T is not available.

These data, referenced in ANSI /ANS 2.5 (1984), are used to determine the meteorological i conditions prevailing at the plant site. Site specific information on instrumentation, calibration 4 procedures, as well as the meteorological measurements program during a disaster can be found in the Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) annex.

[o l

l 2-8 August 1998

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . - _ _ . . _ _

ZION STATION DSAR The' meteorological tower is equipped with instrumentation that conforms with the system accuracy recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.23 and ANSI /ANS 2.5 (1984). The ,

equipment is placed on booms oriented into the generally prevailing wind at the site. Equipment signals are brought to an instrument shack with controlled environmental conditions. The shack at the base of the tower houses the recording equipment, signal conditioners, etc., used to process and retransmit the data to the end-point users.

In addition to the onsite meteorological tower, three 10-meter towers are located 2,5, and .15 miles to the west of the station. At each supplemental tower, wind speed, wind direction, and ambient temperature equipment are installed to measure the inland extent of lake breezes off Lake Michigan.

Recorded meteorological data are used to generate wind roses and to provide estimates of '

airborne concentrations of gaseous effluents and projected offsite radiation dose. Instrument calibrations and data consistency evaluations are performed routinely to ensure maximum data integrity. Data recovery objective is to attain better than 90% from each measuring and i recording system. Data storage and records retention are also maintained in compliance with ANSI /ANS 2.5 (1984).

2.3.4 Short-Term Diffusion Estimates Short-term diffusion estimate data is contained in Appendix 2C.

p .2.3.5 Lona-Term Diffusion Estimates

^

V Long-term diffusion estimate data is contained in Appendix 2C.

2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING 2.4.1 Hydroloaic Description 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities 1

The plant's cooling water is drawn from Lake Michigan. All radioactive liquid waste generated at l the plant is collected, treated, and either recycled or discharged. Those liquid wastes that are discharged are monitored to assure compliance with 10CFR20. Radioactivity levels will not exceed permissible concentrations at the cooling water outlet. The Lake County Public Water District operates a water intake about one mile north of the site and about 3,000 feet out in the Lake. This water intake is the closest source of potable water. Continuous release from the plant of cooling water will result in radionuclide concentrations below those permitted under 10CFR20.

Operation of the plant will not result in releases greater than 10CFR20 limits at the point of discharge and consequently normal operation shoul:1 not result in significant radioactivity concentrations in drinking water. Interactions witn contributions from other nuclear power stations are not considered significant since there are none located or currently announced within 66 miles of the Zion station.

2-9 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR The next nearest potable water intake which utilizes surface water from Lake Michigan is 6 miles south of the site at Waukegan. The Waukegan waterworks uses two intake aqueducts.

! The crib of one is in 27 feet of water approximately 1250 feet southeast of the Waukegan i Harbor entrance light. The crib of the second is in 35 feet of water approximately 3250 feet southeast of the first crib. The water is filtered and treated prior to distribution.

Potable water supplies from Lake Michigan are also located at Kenosha, Wisconsin, and North l Chicago, Illinois, ten miles north and south, respectively, of the site. Others are located farther up and down the Lake shore. The municipal water system characteristics are summarized in Table 2-14 and are based on References 1,4, and 17.

The topography of the site (see Figure 2-2) and its immediate environs is relatively flat with elevations varying from the Lake shoreline to approximately 20 feet above the i set of the lake.

Approximately two miles west of Lake Michigan is a topographical divide causing surface water drainage west of the divide to flow away from the lake while the east drainage flows toward the lake.

l l The site itself has very little slope and is relatively marshy in its western and central portions.

l- However, the eastern portion of the site (next to the lake) on which the plant is located is not i marshy and has good surface drainage toward the lake. Just behind the beach there is a low line of bluffs approximately 5 to 10 feet high.

2.4.1.2 Hydrosobere Lake Michigan is one of the largest of the Great Lakes. It is 307 miles long from north to south and has an average width of 70 miles. It has a maximum depth of 923 feet, an average depth of 325 feet and covers an area of 22,400 square miles. The total volume of water in Lake Michigan is approximately 1,400 cubic miles. However, since an exchange of water occurs between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron through the Mackinac Straits, the water ultimately available for dilution is approximately 2,500 cubic miles.

The normal water level in Lake Michigan is approximately 582 feet above mean sea level

. (MSL). The maximum recorded water level is 584 feet above MSL, which occurred in June 1886, and the minimum recorded to date occurred in 1964 at 577.4 feet above MSL according to the United States Geologic Survey (USGS).

In tha general vicinity of the site, the 30-foot depth contour of the take is 1.2 miles, and the 60-foot depth contour is 2.0 miles from the shore.

l l The subsurface water table of the area is sloped to the east towards the lake. The shallow i aquifers are the sand and gravel overburden and the underlying dolomite formations. The deep l aquifers are in sandstone and dolomite formations with a strata of shale above them. The " free 12

water" in the shallow aquifers over the six county northeast Illinois region is 4.72 x 10 gallons j and in the deep aquifers is 3.53 x 10" gallons. However, the artesian pressure of the deep i aquifers has dropped some 700 feet since 1864.

i i

!O iU 2-10 August 1998 i

ZION STATION DSAR Since 1957, the cities of Zion and Winthrop Harbor, and the Illinois Beach State Park plus a number of retail establishments in unincorporated communities have obtained their water from the Lake County Public Water District. The supply is treated by coagulation, sedimentation and ;

sand filtration, and is chlorinated prior to distribution. !

2.4.2 Floods I The surface streams near the site are: l Kellogg Ravine - 1.25 miles north of the site; flows west-east.

i Dear River - 3 miles south of the site; flows west-east.

l Bull Creek - 0.2 mile south of the site; flows west-east The first two are very short drainage streams extending 2 and 1 miles from Lake Michigan, respectively. Both contain negligible flows except during periods of high runoffs. Flooding by l

any of these streams would not involve the site.

t

! The runoff, due to a probable maximum storm over the water shed of Bull Creek west of the plant l site, was analyzed to examine the potential for flooding the power plant Class I structures. The l significant and maximum (1%) wave effects of a coincident 45 miles per hour (mph) wind from the critical direction were superimposed on the maximum water level corresponding to the probable maximum flood conditions. This was done to determine the upper limit of the Bull Creek flood l potential. Shown in Figure 2-15 are the locations of Zion Nuclear Power Station, Bull Creek i drainage area, and the significant drainage structures, railway, and roadways. )

,O Analyses and computations show the maximum water surface elevation in the vicinity of the i

i power station, under probable maximum precipitation conditions over Bull Creek, is 590.1 feet l above MSL. Superimposing the wave effects of a sustained 45 mph wind on the maximum water level, the calculated wave runup elevations corresponding to a significant wave and a maximum (1%) wave are 591.2 feet and 591.7 feet, respectively. The grade floor level of the power plant Class I structures is elevation 592.0 feet above MSL. l Results of the aforesaid analyses and computations and observations made in a field inspection of the Bull Creek water shed and plant site lead to the conclusion the occurrence of a maximum probable flood in Bull Creek and a coincident 45 mph wind from the critical direction would not result in flooding of the power plant Class I structures.

The marshy area of the site is classified by the Lake County Regional Planning Commission as a flood plain. However, this does not include the area of the plant location. The flooding is due to poor drainage and the presence of peat and muck which inhibits percolation of surface water into the sandy soil. Measures such as grading have been taken to drain the site adequately, i . The high water level of Lake Michigan is 584 feet above MSL which is 8 feet below grade floor level of the plant (592 feet inbove MSL). Therefore, the occurrence of maximum wave conditions at the site is 6.7 feet, which, even at high water, would not result in flooding of the l plant area. Section 2.4.5 discusses lake flooding in more detail.

1

!O 2-11 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR l 2.4.2.1 Rainfall Lakes Michigan and Huron are considered as a unity from the standpoint of drainage and water level since these two lakes are connected. The drainage basin for these two lakes comprises 115,700 square miles and has an average annual rainfall of about 31 inches. Table 2-15 lists the average and maximum precipitations recorded at various locations on the Illinois shore of southem Lake Michigan.

2.4.2.2 Flood Desian Considerations No special design features are required to accommodate the hydrological characteristics of the site. The station grade floor level is 2.1 feet above the theoretical maximum water level at the shoreline due to a 6.7 foot wave occurring simultaneously with the maximum high water level.

In addition, the station floor grade level is 3.8 feet above the maximum expected seiche (5 feet) occurring simultaneously with maximum recorded high lake level. No consideration was given -

to the simultaneous occurrence of maximum high water level, maximum deep water waves and maximum seiche water levels because of the differing meteorological conditions required for the wave and seiche generation.

2.4.3 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers Text for this section is not applicable to the Zion Station.

2.4.4 Potential Dam Failures. Seismically Induced Text for this section is not applicable to the Zion Station. .

2.4.5 Probable Maximum Surae and Seiche Floodina 2.4.5.1 Surae and Seiche Water Levels A seiche may be caused by intense squali lines that move across the Southem Basin of Lake Michigan in a direction generally toward the southeastem quadrant. The accompanying pressure gradient and wind stress acting on the lake surface can produce an organized mid-lake disturbance which resembles a solitary wave. Upon arrival at the lake shore, this wave can create large changes of water level through the operation of shoaling effects. The highest surge (seiche) on the Chicago shore occurs at Montrose Harbor as the resu't of squall lines which have moved toward the southeast at about 55 knots. The surge travels with the squali line as it crosses the lake and thus, for the usual west to east motion, occurs on the eastem shore with the squali line, but must be reflected to reach the western shore. This means the '

west-shore seiche usually will occur at a time of meteorological quiet and thereby can catch people unaware unless they are a!srted to the danger. Amplification of this discussion can be found in References 18 through 20. On June 26,1954, the maximum recorded seiche occurred with a rise of eight feet at Montrose Harbor. The rise in level calculated to exist at Montrose Harbor and Zion under the conditions of June 26,1954, is 6 feet and 2 feet, respectively. With the number of variables in such a calculation, the predicted value of 6 feet versus the observed value of 8 feet is considered a good correlation. The pertinent fact is the seiche at Zion will be f- less than any of Montrose Harbor by a factor of approximately one-half. This observation is supported by the " contours of amplitude" curves shown in Reference 19, published in the Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 93, Number 5, May 1965. These curves show the maximum seiche levels at Montrose Harbor and Zion are in a ratio of 8 to 5 under the worst conditions.

2-12 August 1998

t ZION STATION DSAR Therefore, the maximum seiche level that will occur at Zion is considered to be five feet.

o Using the Platzman Theory (Reference 18), the storm surge that could occur at the site was

found to be 8.8 feet due to the passage of a squali line with a pressure jump of 0.21 inches Hg

and a wind speed of 65 knots. Adding this surge to the maximum monthly lake elevation of 1 583.24 feet above MSL results in a maximum water level of 592.05 feet above MSL. The surge I

height of 8.8 feet was based on an estimated deep water surge height of 2.92 feet with a i- shoaling factor of 3.0. The surge, in combination with waves in the height range of 1 to 2 feet, j would result in overtopping of the crib house wall v/hich extends to elevation 592.0 feet above MSL and would create water levels of 1 to 2 feet above plant grade (592.0 feet above MSL) for

up to 20 minutes. This transient water level will not cause flooding which might impair the operation of any equipment important to the defueled condition of the plant.

l An analysis of wave runup on the crib house wall showed waves breaking 100 feet offshore will runup to elevation 594.2 feet above MSL, overtopping the wall at elevation 592 feet above MSL 3

by some 2 feet. The analysis was based on the assumption of an equivalent slope from the point of breaking to the top of the wall, as suggested in " Shore Protection Planning and Design,"

Third Edition,1966, p.190. The depth at this point is 11 feet and the breaking wave height 8.6 feet. The runup above design highwater is 11.8 feet. Wave setup is estimated at 0.17 feet.

j The amount of water overtopping the wall will be less than 1 cubic foot per second per foot of

width and will not impair the operation of equipment important to the defueled condition of the

plant.

s !

3 Table 2-16 identifies the location, elevation, and type of use of all exterior above ground accesses below El 600' above MSL. There is no safety-related equipment located in the Turbine Building or in the Fuel Handling Building. All equipment previously considered safety-related is located in the Auxiliary Building, Crib House or in Containment. Water entering the Fuel Building cannot get into the Auxiliary Building, since there is no communication between these buildings below El 617'. The potential for flooding the diesel generator room, via a flow path through the Turbine Building, is minimal because the doors into the rooms are kept closed and latched.

The entrance at L-30 opens into the Vermiculite and Cement-Mixing Room, which is separated from the main portion of the Auxiliary Building by two sets of double doors. Any water entering by this path would be contained within the dry-active-waste storage and drumming station areas. It is conceivable a small portion could find its way down the stairwell at H-25 and eventually collect on El 542'. This small amount of water could be handled by the sump pumps (total capacity of 400 GPM) at this elevation.

In the event the Auxiliary Building door (L-10), which is a normally locked door, was left open, significant quantities of water could enter the Auxiliary Building under postulated maximum seiche conditions. The general areas house the motor control centers (MCCs), which are protected by 4 ft. tall flood walls. The amount of water required to cause initial flooding above i the 4 ft. level, so as to affect the MCCs is approximately 240,000 gallons. Based upon the above flooding margin and the design provision discussed below, we have concluded the transient water level will not cause flooding which could impair the operation of any equipment important to the defueled condition of the plant.

O V-2-13 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR O in 18e evemi t" e18er ^exi'i <v seiie'e9 eee< <x-so) w ief enem. em'v ve<v ii ae "titv ef water could possibly enter due to the raised elevation of the sill (595' 10.5"). Any water entering this opening would be contained in the drumming station and dry-active-waste storage areas since there is a set of double doors separating this entrance from the main portion of the Auxiliary Building. The exterior louvered openings providing fresh air for the diesel generator rooms are at El. 592'-3'. There are concrete barrier walls immediately behind the air intake louvers that provide all of the barrier requirements for the diesel generator rooms, including flooding protection. There is a small, normally closed and latched door designed into each of these walls that provides access for inspection. The bottom elevation of this door is approximately El. 593'-9". Because of the raised sill and the closed and latched door, the leakage of water through this opening from a postulated transient storm surge will be minimal.

The other openings in the concrete plenum wall are above El. 606'. Grade floor level in the Crib House is 594 feet 0 inches and the service water (SW) pump motors are mounted 5 feet 6 inches above El 594'. While it is conceivable a small amount of water could slosh up through openings in the floor of the SW pump bay, the elevation of the pump motors precludes any effects from flooding.

2.4.5.2 Currents. Tides. Waves and Littoral Drift (References 21 and 22) 2.4.5.2.1 Wind Effects on Surface Currents Surface currents in Lake Michigan are generated primarily by wind stress on the water surface.

The lake's wind-driven currents have speeds averaging 1% to 2% of the wind speeds. Thus, an average wind speed of 15 mph over the lake would generate an average surface current of about 0.15 to 0.3 mph. Such currents may persist for several days after the wind has subsided.

On large water surfaces, the wind-driven current is theoretically 45 degrees to the wind vector, due to the rotation of the earth. On the west side of Lake Michigan, the current is largely parallel to the shore and nearly 22 degrees to the right of the prevailing wind. Current velocities were measured three miles off the coast of Waukegan during July 1963 through June 1964 by the Great Lakes Illinois River Basin Study of the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (see Reference 23). Measurements taken at a depth of 10 meters showed the flow to be from the south 60% of the time with greater than 40% of the current directions within 70 degrees centered on south.

Data on current speeds for the period July through November 1963 are representative of the entire period and are shown in Table 2-17.

Median current speed for the observed period is 9.2 cm/sec (0.3 ft/sec).

2.4.5.2.2 Wave Action Due to Hiah Winds The second phenomena is wave action due to local squalls and persistent high winds. Deep water wave heights in the general vicinity of the site due to storms, based on Corps of Engineers observations at Chicago and Milwaukee, can be expected to occur with a frequency as shown in Table 2-18.

O 2-14 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR ;

Based on the deep-water wave heights in Table 2-18, the maximum elevation of wave runup and wind tide is estimated to be 6.7 feet above the normal water level (at an occurrence frequency of once in 500 years.) It is to be noted this 6.7-foot height is the maximum elevation at the shoreline.

Of the two phenomena, the seiche presents the greater hazard to the site. Although of greater height, the deep-water wave will be quickly dissipated as it overruns the shore and is therefore of little consequence to structures located at some distance from the shoreline. However, the ,

seiche-generated wave will comprise a much greater quantity of water, and the rise in level will endure for longer periods of time.

Waves are responsible for most of the littoral drift on Lake Michigan. The predominant drift appears to be to the north.

I During much of the winter season, portions of the lake are covered with ice, and fetch areas are l limited considerably. In additien, for a somewhat greater portion of the winter season, the coast i area of the lake is covered with ice. Even though waves are generated in offshore areas, they l I

never reach the shore, being interrupted by the ice around the rim of the lake. No account of this effect of the ice was taken in the compilation of the above data.

)

l 2.4.5.3 Protective Structures l 1

There is no equipment important to the defueled condition of the plant in the Fuel Handling !

Building, the Auxiliary Building, or the Turbine Building that can be adversely impacted by O. flooding. Even with this, several means are available t prevent excessive water intrusion into the Auxiliary Building from probable maximum surges. These include:

1. The two large doors in the Auxiliary Building are required by operating procedures to be normally closed.

2. The door into the Vermiculite and Cement Mixing Room opens outward and is provided with " dust-tight" seals at the sill and jamb which will restrict gross leakage of water.

3. None of the exterior doors in the Auxiliary Building are used for routine personnel access which will reduce the possibility of leaving the doors inadvertently open.

4. Motor Control Centers (MCCs) located at the Auxiliary Building elevation 542' are protected by 4 ft. tall flood walls built around them.

Waves cannot break directly on the Crio House since it is protected by sheet pile wall up to El 592' above MSL at maximum high water El 583.24' above MSL. The maximum water depth at the wall will be 7 feet. The offshore bottom slope at the wall is approximately 1:45. All other Class I structures are protected by the Turbine Building.

vO 2-15 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR I Assuming a wave period of 8 seconds, the maximum height of waves breaking on the wall is estimated at 6.7 feet. The corresponding deep-water wave height is 6.0 feet. This estimate is based on the assumption that waves breaking at a distance equal to seven breaker-heights offshore will strike the wall.-

The runup at the wall is estimated at 2.8 times the deep-water wave height, or 17 feet. The wall will be overtopped.

The quantity of water overtopping the wall is estimated at less than one cubic foot per second.

Using Minikin's method, the peak pressure on the wall (static plus dynamic) is found to be

' 3310 psf and the thrust is 7.3 kips per foot applied at El 583.8' above MSL.

The concrete wall at the Crib House can withstand this loading without overstress.

The mir .num water level of the lake is 575 feet. The depth of the trough (also height) of the surge wave is 2.92 feet in deep water. Considering the shoaling effect, the depth of the trough at Qe shoreline is 8.8 feet. The offshore location of the intakes will result in a trough depth somewhere between these values.

Assuming a linear increase (a conservative assumption) in trough depth from deep water at one mile from the shoreline to the shoreline, it is expected a surge wave depth of 5.8 feet would occur at the intake located one-half mile from the shoreline. This results in a minimum lake q level at the intakes of approximately 569 feet and a minimum water level in the crib house g forebay of 560 feet. This momentary low level will not adversely affect plant operation.

There is no conceivable combination of conditions whid, would result in an insufficient available suction head for the SW pumps. The minimum submergence required for continued safe operation of the SW pumps is 6 feet 0 inches. The SW pump intake bells are located at El 552'

, and the normal minimum water level in the forebay (at low lake level) is El 566'.

The lake intake bell is located at El 560.7' and, based on a low lake level of 575 feet coupled with a surge trough of 6 feet, the forebay will lower from El 566' to El 560'.

Under such circumstances the submergence on the SW pumps will be two feet more than recommended by the SW pump manufacturer. This level is well above that which could cause difficulty.

An earthquake-generated seiche in Lake Michigan has been considered by assuming the occurrence of the Design Basis Earthquake, a shallow focus Intensity Vil event, near Lake Michigan. The magnitude of seiche effects at the site was estimated by methods proposed by lida (Reference 25) and Wilson (Reference 26), and by research of historical data. The calculational methods indicate the seiche caut,ed by the earthquake would be on the order of one foot or less. The research of historical data (Reference 27) indicates an Intensity Vil earthquake would produce a barely perceptible surge at the site. On this basis, it is considered there would be no adverse effects on structures from this phenomenon, and wind-generated surge would be controlling at the site.

O 2-16 August 1998 i' - -. .

ZION STATION DSAR 2.4.6 Ice Effects The water intakes and discharges for Zion Station have been designed so as not to be obstructed by wind-driven ice. Design provisions include the following:

1. The top of the intake structure is approximately 13 to 6 feet under water (dependent upon monthly high and low water levels). Also, the intake is located 2600 feet from shore. At this distance from shore, and with the depth indicated, we do not expect windrows to cause a problem.

2. The top of the intake has 12 sides and, therefore, has a circular effect on any object floating at that level. In the unlikely event that a windrow extends down to the top of the intake, it would be deflected. The " circular" top acts to prevent total obstruction.

3. The intake is surrounded by a circular thawing box, which, under winter conditions, is used to recirculate a portion of the warmed effluent to the intake while the remainder of the water leaving the thawing box has a warming effect in the immediate vicinity of the intake. This water distribution will prevent the formation of frazil ice and will tend to melt floating ice in the immediate area. It should also melt down any windrow to some degree before it is deflected away.

4. In winter it is expected about one-half of the warm discharge water will leave the thawing ring as described in item 3 above. The remainder of the effluent water will leave the conventional discharge, located 760 feet from shore at a depth of from 4 to 12 feet, O dependent upon lake water level. The combination of the staggered discharge openings, the arrangement of the openings (most of which are oriented perpendicular to the shoreline), and the fact the water is leaving (not entering) the discharge openings will preclude the possibility of obstructing the discharge.

2.4.7 Dispersion. Dilution. and Travel Times of Accidental Releases of Liauid Effluents in S.prfaco Waters 2.4.7.1 General Water from Lake Michigan is extensively used for municipal and domestic water supplies. All liquid waste discharged will be less than permitted under 10CFR20 in the cooling water outfall.

Thus, any radioactive releases from the site into the lake will be diluted below levels permitted under 10CFR20 for unrestricted areas before it reaches the nearest water supply intake. As previously stated, the nearest potable water intake Is located about one mile north of the site and 3000 feet out in the Lake.

The cooling water is discharged through two discharge structures (1 per unit) located 308 feet apart, and 760 feet from shore. The design of the structures is shown on Figure 2-16. Outlets are located at 45 from the shoreline and in a direction to divert the water away from the inlet.

The inlet is located between the two discharge structures. These discharge openings are located slightly above the bottom of the lake and discharge water at a velocity of approximately 8.5 feet per second. The diffusion studies made for Zion are presented in Section 2.3.3 of the Zion Environmental Rcport.

2-17 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR Radioactive contamination of the plant cooling water can occur in two modes. The first is by an

-intermittent controlled release of small amounts of activated corrosion products and fission products into the cooling water stream. The second type of radioactivity release is assumed to be an instantaneous discharge which could only result from a series of operating errors and equipment failures, the combi,1ation of which is not considered credible.

As described in Chapter 4, and supported by operating reactor plant data, the radioactive liquid waste treatment facility is capable of maintaining radionuclide concentrations in the effluent below those permitted under 10CFR20 for instantaneous and intermittent controlled releases. ;

2.4.7.2 Temoerature Alterations The effect of temperature alterations to Lake Michigan as a result of the circulating water ,

discharge has been determined to be non-impacting to the lake ecology. Reference 28 discusses the exact effect upon the lake.

2.4.8 Groundwater The ground..ater table in the area is close to the ground surface, and has a flat gradient to the east and south.

Ordinarily there will be no municipal uses of potable groundwater in the Benton or Waukegan townships. Two older wells in Zion, with depths of 1025 feet and 220 feet, and one well in Winthrop Harbor, with a depth of 130 feet, are maintained on a standby basis to meet

( emergencies (Reference 17).

Zion's two deep wells are 1100 and 1025 feet deep, respectively; they derive water under artesian conditions from Trempealeau Dolomites. The radius of the core of their influence is estimated to be approximately 4,000 feet. These wells are located approximately 1W miles west of the plant site. Winthrop Harbor's two shallow wells are 130 and 138 feet deep; they derive water from Niagaran Dolomites. The core radius of their influence is estimated to be approximately 500 feet. The wells are located approximately 12,000 feet away. The radius of the core of influence of other domestic wells drawing water from the upper 30 feet thick sand stratum is well within 500 feet. Table 2-19 and Figure 2-17 furnish the details of recorded wells within one mile of the site.

~ Considering the locations of the wells and the topographical divide which causes surface water to drain to the east, contamination of ground water supplies is unlikely. No pathways for radioactive materials such as wells, old unsealed bore holes, etc., were detected in a survey of the power plant area. Commonwealth Edison Company will monitor any plans for municipal water development in the area of influence.

Intermittent liquid effluents from the site will not affect ground water supplies in the adjacent area in excess of 10CFR20 due to local drainage patterns, release rates, and specific features of the sources of water supplies.

O 2-18 August 1998

l ZION STATION DSAR 2.5 GEOLOGY. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 2.5.1 Basic Geoloaic and Seismic Information The site is located on the shore of Lake Michigan in the extreme eastern portion of the city of Zion, Illinois, and occupies portions of Sections 22,23,26 and 27 in Township 46 North, Range 23 East.

Marshy depressions and sand ridges comprise the principal surface features. The uppermost soils at the site consist predominantly of granular lake depositions. These sediments are underlain by glacial drift which consists of till, outwash, and lake deposits. Beneath the glacial soils, Paleozoic sedimentary rocks extend for several thousand feet to the depth of the crystalline Precambrian basement rock.

There are no cut and fill slopes at the Zion site.

There is no evidence of faulting closer than the Des Plaines disturbance, located approximately 25 miles southwest of the site. Other inactive faults exist at a distance of about 45 miles to the northwest and 75 miles to the southwest.

The geology of the area indicates that the strata underlying the site is capable of supporting loads at least as high as that required for the station structures. Consequently, no problems or restrictions beyond noimal design practice were anticipated.

The region within 100 miles of the site is considered an area of minor seismic activity and has O experienced a few earthquake events of moderate magnitude during the last 150 to 200 years.

Structures built on adequate foundation materials at the site are designed for horizontal ground accelerations as defined in Section 2.5.2.2. Detailed studies performed to evaluate the probable ground accelerations and to prepare dynamic response criteria appropriate for the site are reported in Appendix B to the PSAR.

The principal sources of data are given in References 29 through 50.

2.5.1.1 Geoloaical Proaram A detailed geologicalinvestigation of the site has been performed. The scope of the geological program concists of:

1. A review of pertinent published literature and unpublished data, and discussions with local geologist, in order to describe the geology of the region and the site.

2. A test boring and laboratory testing program to identify predominant soil and rock types and to evaluate pertinent physical and chemical properties of the soils and rock.

3. Field observations to determine the depth and gradient of the groundwater table at the site.

4. An analysis to evaluate the ability of the geologic substrata to suoport the anticipated building loads.

2-19 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR I

The results ofitem 1 and 3, the test borings, and a portion of the laboratory testing listed under item 2 are presented in this report and Appendix B to the Zion NAR.

The possibility of liquefaction of soil layers supporting Class I structures was evaluated in accordance with methods proposed by Seed and Idriss (Reference 51) which utilize standard penetration resistance as an index of soil relative density. Considering standard penetration resistance in excess of 30 blows per foot, water table at a depth of 5 feet, maximum ground surface acceleration during the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) equal to 0.17g, and depth of susceptible soils equal to approximately 30 feet, it can be concluded that there is a significant margin of safety against liquefaction of soils below cr adjacent to Class I structures.

The possibility of settlement due to the densification of soil strata supporting Class I structures during a DBE was also considered. Because of the high relative densities of the sand, as indicated by standard penetration resistance in excess of 30 blows per foot, as reported in the PSAR, essentially no settlement due to densification is anticipated.

2.5.1.2 Seismoloav Proaram A seismologicalinvestigation of the site has been performed. The seismological program consists of:

1. An evaluation of the seismic histoy of the site.

2. A study of geologic faulting as related to earthquake activity.

3. The field and laboratory measurement of the dynamic response characteristics of soil and rock strata underlying the site.

4. The postulation of an Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) and a DBE.

Data which pertains to the seismic history of the region are presented in this section. The results of the remainder of the seismological program are reported in Appendix B to the Zion PSAR.

2.5.1.3 Reaional Geoloav General Bedrock in the region consists of Paleozoic sedimentary rocks which rest on the Precambrian basement rock. The thickness of the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in northeastern Illinois is approximately 4,000 feet. The bedrock dips gently toward the east at a rate of about 10 feet per mile.

The bedrock surface in the northeastern Illinois region is covered by a thick mantle of glacial drift, formed when most of Wisconsin, Illinois, and the adjacent areas were subjected to repeated glaciation during the Pleistocene epoch. The advancing glaciers scoured major stream valleys and formed the large depressions now occupied by the Great Lakes. The glacial drift deposited by the glaciers consisted of till, outwash, and lacustrine deposits Recent deposits in the region consist of unconsolidated sand, silt and peat.

2-20 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR l

l 2.5.1.4 Site Geoloav Site Conditions 1he site is located on a narrow strip of lake deposits which borders the Lake Michigan shoreline.

Crossing the site is a series of low parallel, beach ridges teparated by marshy depressions.

The beach ridges are composed primarily of sand. In the depressions, organic materials have acm!mulated. I 1

The subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling seven exploration test borings I at the locations shown on Figure 2-18. The test borings revealed that the site is blanketed by granular lake deposits which range in thickness from 24 to 33 feet. The granular lake deposits consist of fine, and fine to medium sand which contains variable amounts of coarse sand and gravel, and occasional pockets of peat and organic material. The granular take deposits are ;

underlain by Pleistocene glacial till, glacial outwash, and glacial lacustrine deposits. The glacial deposits consist essentially of silty clays, clayey silts, and silt, contain variable amounts of sand and gravel, contain pockets of granular outwash, and extend to depth ranging from l approximately 102 to 116 feet below the existing ground surface. The glacial tillr. and glacial l lacustrine deposits are firm to hard and are relatively impermeable. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions at the site is presented in Figure 2-19 through 2-25.

The Pleistocene soils rest unconformably on Niagara Dolomite of Silurian age. The Niagara Dolomite, penetrated by our test borings, is pitted, contains small solution cavities (vugs) and pyrite crystals, and is generally moderately fractured. The degree of fracturing varies and is ,

indicated on the log of borings. Coraline fossils are abundant, and attest to the reef origin of a large part of the Niagara Formation in this area. Although no large solut:on cavities were encountered in the drilling program, they have been found elsewhere in the upper zones of this formation. These large solution cavities have usually been filled with clays and sand. The Niagara Dolomite was the only bedrock formation encountered within the depths of our drilling program at the site.

The Niagara Dolomite, at the site, is approximately 250 feet thick and dips gently to the east towards the Michigan Basin. The lower bedrock formations consist predominantly of sandstone and dolomite with subordinate layers of shals and'siltstone, are several thousand feet in thickness, and are underlain by crystalline Precambrian basement rock. The thickness and age relationship of the various bedrock units and surficial deposits of the region are presented in Table 2-20.

Table 2-21 provides the elevations of all Class I structures relative to the elevations of different foundation soil levels at the site.

Groundwater Groundwater is near the surface over much of the site area. Ground water levels at the boring locations are shown on the log of borings. The beach ridges project slightly above the water table, and most of the intervening depressions are marshy and are at or slightly below the water table. A very slight groundwater gradient trends to the east and south. A stagnant condition now generally prevails between the beach ridges.

r O

2-21 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR Shoreline Modifications An environmental characteristic of the site is minor shoreline modification. The rate of change in the position of the shoreline is due to take level fluctuations, currents, wave actions, storm conditions and the nature of the shoreline sediments.

The shoreline of Lake Michigan along the east side of the Zion site has moved approximately 100 feet during the 83 years from 1872 to 1955. The movement of the shoreline is a result of a combination of approximately 50 feet of aggradation along the north half of the site and less than 100 feet of degradation in the form of shoreline erosion, in the south half of the site. The tendency during this period has been to " smooth-out" the irregularities of the shoreline to an equilibrium position. This equilibrium condition exists at the present time as evidenced by the minimal shoreline movement during the last 20 years.

The general movement of wind-driven current sand is from north to south. When Commonwealth Edison Company built a breakwater at its Waukegan Generating Station during the period 1928 to 1938, sand accretion built up the shoreline out into the lake as much as 1000 feet from its original position. The Zion shore, however, is not affected by artificial barriers and therefore will move little. Sand erosion has been easily stopped by the construction of groins or jetties, and by the use of rip-rap.

2.5.2 Vibratory Ground Motion q 2.5.2.1 Seismicity Northeastern Illinois is considered an area of minor seismic activity. King's distribution of epicenters contours the area as having approximately three epicenters per 10,000 square kilometers, a figure near the lower levels of his classification. The Seismic Zone Map of the United States prepared by the U.S. Department of Defense, dated 1966, also indicates that the area is a zone of minor seismic probability. The site itself is free of known seismic disturbance.

Since the beginning of the 19th century, two earthquakes with epicentral intensities of Vil, Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931, are known within a distance of 60 miles of the site.

The first of these earthquakes, near Fort

Dearborn,

Illinois, occurred in 1808 at an epicentral distance of approximately 35 miles from the site. The second occurred in 1909 north of the Illinois-Wisconsin border near Beloit, Wisconsin, at an epicentral distance approximately 60 miles from the site. Including the earthquakes described above, three earthquakes are known within a distance of 50 miles with epicentral intensities ranging from lli to Vil, and nine earthquakes have been recorded within 100 miles with epicentral intensities ranging from 11 to Vll. In addition to these, a few very great, but distant earthquakes may have been felt at the site, but with very low intensity.

A tabulation of earthquakes having epicenters in Illinois and Wisconsin, together with certain out-of-state earthquakes felt in Illinois, is presented in Table 2-22. The regional earthquake events are shown on Figure 2-26, Earthquake intensities are described in terms of the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931, which is explained in Table 2-23.

r i

2-22 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR 2.5.2.2 Desian Basis Earthau.qkg Earthquake design is based on ordinary allowable stresses as set forth in applicable codes. See Chapter 3 for further information.

2.5.3 Surface Faultina The site is located near the center of the Central Lowland Physiographic Province. The dominant structural feature of the area is the Kankakee Arch which separates the Michigan Basin to the northeast from the Illinois Basin to the south. The La Salle Anticline to the southwest of the site forms the northem side of the Illinois Basin and is believed to be Pre-Pennsylvanian in age.

i A series of minor folds whose axes pitch eastward have been traced through all of the bedrock formations present. This system of folds which begins near the site and extends to the Sandwich fault area appears to be Silurian or younger in age.

Several faults are known in the region. The Sandwich Fault zone extends eastward into Will County from the town of Sandwich in De Kalb County. Faulting in the area is quite complex, but movement has been generally down on the north side of these structures. Twenty miles north of the Sandwich Fault and parallel to it, another fault has been inferred on the basis of dislocations of the lower Paleozoic sediments and the Precambrian basement. Near Des Plaines, approximately 25 miles southwest of the site, a highly complex faulted zone exists which appears to bear no relationship to the regional structure. The zone is roughly circular and covers an area of 25 square miles. Within the faulted zone, the bedrock generally has been upthrown. Some faulting also exists in southem Wisconsin and the closest known fault in southem Wisconsin is approximately 45 miles from the site and has a northeast orientation.

There is no evidence of recent activity along any of the faults that are known in the area.

2.6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) being conducted in the vicinity of the station has as its objectives:

1. Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactivity in the environment and relate these data to radioactive emissions;

2. Identify changes in the use of nearby offsite areas to assure adequate surveillance and evaluation of doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure;

3. Provide environmental surveillance in case of an unplanned release; and

4. Provide year round monitoring of principal pathways of exposure.

O 2-23 August 1998 -

ZION STATION DSAR

~

The REMP provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in

. those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from the facility operation. This monitoring program implementsSection IV.b.2 of Appendix I to 10CFR50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

The site specific annex of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) describes the current REMP and presents the required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses tabulated in terms of the a priori minimum detectable concentration (MDC). The a priori MDC is a before-the-fact limit representing the capability of a measurement system and is not an after the fact limit for a particular meam ement.

2.7 REFERENCES

. Section 2.0

1. 'Waukegan-North Chicago Economic Survey," Waukegan-North Chicago Chamber of Commerce, November 1965.

2. "Open Space in Lake County," Lake County Regional Planning Council, November 1966.

3. " Planning the Environment," Lake County Regional Planning Council, N. Drummond, Director.

O 4. " Zion, Illinois - Community Inventory," Industrial Development Division, Commonwealth Edison Company,

5. 'Winthrop Harbor, Illinois - Community inventory," Industrial Development Division, Commonwealth Edison Company.

6. Fluor Daniel Study for Commonwealth Edison Company's Zion Nuclear Power Station,

" Aircraft Crash Fire Detection System Analysis Probabilistic Risk Evaluation," January 1989.

7, Fluor Daniel Study Commonwealth Edison Company's Zion Nuclear Power Station,

" Aircraft Crash Fire Detection Risk Evaluation, Part II, Responses to Questions,"

December 1989.

8. Amendment No.119 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-39 and Amendment No.108 to Facility Operating License No DPR-48 for the Zion Nuclear Power Station, Unit Nos.1 and 2, transmitted by C. Patel (NRC) to T. Kovach (CECO), May 9,1990.

O 2-24 August 1998

. _ . . .._~- - - . . . -_ ,.

ZION STATION DSAR A

V 9. Personal Communication, John Murray, Murray and Trettel, Inc., Northfield, Illinois.

10. Turner, D.B., J1 APCA 11 (10) 483-489, October 1961.

11. Pasquill, F., " Estimation of the Dispersion of Windbome Material," Meteorofoav Maaazine 90 (1963) 33-49 (Februcry 1961).

12. Gifford, F.A., Jr. Nuclear Safety 2 (2) 56, December 1960.

13. Hilsmeier, W.F., and Gifford, Jr., F.A. " Graphs for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion,"

ORO 545, July 1962.

14. Thom, H.C.S., "New Distribution of Extreme Winds in the United States,"

A.S.C.E. Proceedinas. February 1967.

15. Huss, P.O., Relation Between Gusts and Averaae Winds for Housina Load Determination. DGAI, Report 140, U.S. Weather Bureau, June 1946.

16. Thom, H.C.S., " Tornado Probabilities," Monthly Weather Review. pp. 730-736, October-December 1963.

17. "Public Ground Water Supplies in Illinois," lilinois Stata Water Survey, Bulletin No. 40, Supplements 1 and 2.

18. Platzman, George W., The Prediction of Suroes in the Southem Basin of Lake Michiaan Part 1. The Dynamical Basis for Prediction. Monthly Weather Review. Vol. 93, No. 5, May 1965

19. Irish, Shirley W., The Prediction of Suroes in the Southem Basin of Lake Michioan Part II. A Case Study of the Surae of Auaust 3.1960, Monthly Weather Review Vol. 93, No.

5 May 1965.

20. Huges, Lawerence A., The Prediction of Suroes in the Southern Basin of Lake Michiaan Part ill the Operational Basis for Prediction. Monthly Weather Review Vol. 93, No. 5 May 1965.

21. John C. Ayers, et al,"The Currents and Water Masses of Lake Michigan," Great Lakes Research Institute, Publication No. 3, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1958).

22. John C. Ayers,"The Currents of Lake Michigan and Huron," Great Lakes Research Institute, Special Report No. 5, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1959).

23. Verber, James L., Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Region V., U.S.

Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Chicago, Illinois, Personal Communication, April 5,1967.

24. " Wave and Lake Level Statistics for Lake Michigan," Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers Technical Memo 36, March,1953.

2-25 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR

25. .

lida, K., Magnitude and Energy of Earthquakes Accompanied by Tsunami and Tsunami O- Energy, Joumal Earth Sciences, December 1958, pp.101-112.

26. Wilson, B.W. and Torum A., The Tsunami of the Alaskan Earthquake,1974, Technical Memorandum No. 25, Costal Engineering Research Center, May 1968.

27. McGarr, A. and Vorhis, R., Seismic Sieches from the March 1964 Alaska Earthquake, Geological Survey Professional Paper 544-E,1968.

28. Letter to E.G. Case from C. Reed, dated December 18,1977; transmitting report, "The

' Environmental impact Assessment of Occasional Temperature Excursions Above 20 F Intake-Discharge Temperature Differential an'd a 55 F Discharge Temperature During ice Melt at Zion Station."

29. Crustal Movements in Northeastem Illinois, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis by McGinnis, L.D., Dated 1965.

30. Structure Counter Map of the Pre-Pennsylvanian Surface in Illinois, Unpublished M.D.

Thesis by Smith, M.H., Dated 1941.

31. Aerial Photographs Taken by Chicago Aerial Survey, Dated 1-28-64 and 4-10-60.

i

32. Des Plaines Disturbance, Northeastem Illinois, Geological Society of America Bulletin,

. Vol. 73, p. 959-968, Dated August 1962.

33. The Silurian Strata of Northeastem Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey, Reprint Series 1962 M, William, N.B., Dated 1964. .

34. Cambrian and Ordovician Strata of Northeastem Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigation 218, Bushback, T.C., Dated 1964.

35. Preliminary Report on Ground-Water Resources of the Chicago Region, Illinois Cooperative Ground Water Report,1, Suter, et al, Dated 1959.

36. Crustal Tectonics and Precambrian Basement in Northeastam Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 219, McGinnis, L.D., Dated 1966.

37. Illinois Shore of Lake Michigso Beach Erosion Control Study, House Document No. 28, 83rd Congress of the United States, Dated 1953.

38. Interim Report for Erosion Control, Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways, State of Illinois, Dated 1958.

39. Earthquake History of the United States, Part 1, U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey, No. 41-1, Epply, R.A., Dated 1963.

40. The Charleston Earthquake of August 31,1886, U.S. Geological Survey,9th Annual Report, Dutton, E.E., Dated 1887-88.

41. Earthquakes in Michigan, Michigan Geological Survey, Publication 5, Geological Series

~ No. 3, Hobbs, E.H., Dated 1910.

2-26 August 1998

,. .- - - - - - . ... - - - -..- - .~...- - - . . . . . - . . - - . _ . - - -

! \

l l ZION STATION DSAR l

A V 42. Observations On The Earthquakes In the Upper Mississippi Valley, May 26,1909, -

Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, pp.132-143, Udden, J.A.,

Dated 1910.

43. "Quartemary Tectonics in Middle North America," by P. B. King in Quartemary of The U.S. edited by the H.E. Wright, Jr. and D.G. Fry.

l

44. On the Earthquake of January 2,1912, in the Upper Mississippi Valley, Transactions of The lilinois State Academy of Science, ppi 111-115, Udden, A.D., Dated 1912.

45. The Missouri Earthquake of April 9,1917, Monthly Weather Review, pp. 187-188, Finch, R.H., Dated April 1917.

46. United States Earthquakes, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Various Authors, Dated 1928-1964.

l 47. . A Contribution To the Seismic History of Missouri, Bulletin Of The Seismological Society of America, Volume 31, pp.187-224, Heinrich, R. R., Dated July,1941.

48. Observations On The Earthquake Of May 26,1909, The Popular Science Monthly, pp.154-162, Udden, J.A., Dated August,1910.

49. Seismic Zone Map, Seismic Design For Buildings, U.S. Department Of Defense, ,

TM 5-809-10, Navdocks, AFM 88-3, Chapter 13, p. 355, Dated 1966. l I

50. CONSULTANTS CONTACTED Dr. T.C. Buschback, Illinois State Geological Survey ;

Mr. George Hughes, Illinois State Geological Survey 1

Dr. James E. Hackett, Illinois State Geological Survey l

Mr. Warren Parr, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers. Chicago, Illinois Mr. A.V. Carozzi, University of Illinois Dr. Arthur L Howland, Northwestem University j

51. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, l. M., " Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soit Liquefication Potential", Joumal of Solid Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SM9, September 1971.

l l

O l

2-27 August 1998 l

i

ZION STATION DSAR O

b TABLE 2-1 POPULATION WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE Radial Distances - Miles Local Censuses (From Center of Containment) 1980 0 to 1 289 0 to 2 15,506 0 to 3 28,182 0 to 4 32,644 0 to 5 39,243 0 to 10 234,180

.Oto1 289

.1 to 2 15,217 2 to 3 12,676 3 to 4 4462 4 to 5 6599 5 to 10 194,937 August 1998

i l ZION STATION DSAR I 1

l

(- TABLE 2-2 i

POPULATION CENTERS OF 25,000 INHABITANTS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE l

l 1

Community Distance to the Center and Population Direction From the Site (1980 Census)

! .Waukegan, IL 7 miles S 67,G53 l l

- Kenosha, WI 9 miles N 77,685 l

l North Chicago, IL 7 miles S 38,774 l

l l

O ,

?

1

O August 1998 1

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-3 METEOROLOGICAL EXTREMES VARIABLE CHICAGO MILWAUKEE Highest Temperature 105*F (July 1934) 105*F (July 1934)

Lowest Temperature -26*F (January 1982) -25*F (January 1875)

Greatest Monthly 14.17 in. (September 1961) 10.03 in. (June 1917)

Precipitation Greatest 24-Hour 6.24 in. (July 1957) 5.76 in. (June 1917)

Precipitation Greatest Monthly Snowfall 42.5 in. (January 1918) 52.6 in. (January 1918)

Greatest 24-Hour Snowfall 23.0 in. (January 1967) 20.3 in. (February 1924)

Highest Wind Speed NE 87 mph (February 1894) SW 73 mph (March 1954)

I l

1' O

August 1998

t ) 4 ' , ' .;,> ! , 1<!, t. 2,:,,! $. ,; Ii : , , ; 1; T .!, <

. s s.

. . s s o 2

. s

- a s

3 e s s s s . . .- _

s s . . 8 _

s s.- s . .

s .- 6 _

s

. . . 6 _

s .- . _

s s e L

. e .- -

- .- . 1

. s s .

. s s

s s, s.

- n s

.- . 6

.. a

,e s

. e .

. n

( s. s, ,

a s s s

.- .- y 0 i. . .

.- s 8 s s s s .

u s s.

6 ,s , , -

L i.

s.

i s

- s

' . .- s s s L . s s s , s

. s s E .s s

s s

si . s s ,

J e s s e s-q a e 2

e s s s

- s .-

s s.s.....

s 4 t

u . s. . sss,.ss,s.s.ss s

,ss.s.s.

a sssss .

ssoss<s e s s. s, s,s.

s . . ss. s . .

ss .s... ..

s , .

sss,s.

e s . . a . .-

s ss . . .-

o .s .

...ssss ssa.sss e se s ssss... ....... ...

u. .. ....... ...

O . . es.s. s.s. . . s as s.. . s.a,ss s , s... . .- o.oo... - - -

s . s.- . sos - - -

s . . . -

. . . s...... .......

- ... .s,.... s ..... .. .....

0 .. . .ss.aes.' ss s,,.

e,s sss sn ,.es...

sss .. so.....

B 9 .. ..

6 . . ,s

.. s...

s . . s a . .-

s,...

a..e .

.s s....

o....

ss.....

V (L . s ..s... a e e ,....s,s.

ss... s ss . - s .

sss. . ..- . . . . -. ....- .

2 .

S ... . .a. s...... . .. .

. . s.s....

O 10 I' ..

.. ., so s.ossu s,.ss oess s.,

ss ss sss..,

u . . , s. s. n s s.s...

ss .. e. .... s.ss. ...

......r. .. . -

A - ..

N L J i. . ......- -

s..s...

s...s.. .s.s... .

O ) e s s,se. .s.. s. s- s. .. o...... . .. .-

l 1

Fn

- u s.s

... ss

..a s.- aass,,,e sss

,s sss os. -

.asas..

s... - -

V Ze .

saees.ss as e

s.s.s. e . a s. s. .sss .. .. s. s. . . . . .. .....

I 3r) .

s .. s. s.e

. . s s.

ssss

....s..-

S 7 u s.. -

s eIe . . n-. -a .-s.-.s-..

s.s....

s. .. .......

N 8o V!

.s ..

. .. s. s..sss

.s,u ss s.

.. . . . e s s, sss .s..- -

,sssn..

s.s.

s......

O l

1 )a a ~..... .

...n..

...ss.

..e

..s..<,

. . ns, ass.

s.ssss<

ss s. s. s. s

.. o...... .......

Z J .

2

..ss ..- .......- .... .. ..... - .

O a , s . s. s. ..

....e.s. . e. s s.... ...

es.,se. ,,e. .es sses . . ..

.. ....ss ssssss. sss ss. - _

P s. .

u so

.sess.sss,s. .s...s.. . -s s ..s.- s. .. ....... .......

s e ... ...

...s.,,,s.

n . . s p . . . . ..- ...... ... .......

s. _

a e

d a.

>. i

. . s. s. s, ., .s s..a

<s.ss..s.

s

. s. s. s.. . s. .s

..-s. . s. .s s.

s......

s . s. s.. . . .-

s ..

s

... s. s. s s.- s. a s. s.ss. s -e-. s. . . . u . s. s.

s..s. .s. ass .

. s o . o...... .......

...s. ..... -.

s p .

u s.<ss.s.

...a.s es..s. .

a s s. . . s....

s .

ss.. . . s. .. s.. .......

M s.- . . . s. ..

n ..

..e....- -

U' .

. ..... . s. ..o. ss -

s...a.s.

s s s.

s,s ss a...

s... -

..su s. ,s...

so s... s.

S ,sse...

.s. .... s........

E .

s.......

.s s. ss,.s n , . s.

s.- se.s s . . a s. ..

s......

ssss...

s ss..s.s. .s,s....- . .....

s. .. s.

. . . s..

s. .s,.s

. . , . a s.

ssns.

...e...

.ss

,....s...

. . ... s. . s

... s s..

.s

. . . ., . s..s

. ,. .s ... ... .s <s.,.

ee . .. s. . s.

, , . .s

, . aa

\(

~

-. -.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .~ __._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

l l

4 k

i (

- a. . . . . *

= : j

e J

1 e ,. . . . . .

. . . \

w 4

. . . . a a . .

l. = ,

g ,

m j

. . 0)

. . e l 4 . . . . .

\

. . .a .

t e

3 i 5 . . e '

*

S G '

2 d, '

g a \

- . . . . <C c -.

. . . . 1 C -

0) . . .

2 1

e . e. . . .

m . . . . l

.5 .

w t .

....... ....... ....... 3 .** *=-

EE,L.C s .

. . .....a .

- e ...... ..... :

v. e s* ....... . ..a=..~.

l

,~

C, t.......

e

. =...=.~...

a--...

- e. e. . .* *. a=

0 -. ......

..... ... . . a.-a- .

& W <

on , ....... ..... **.

<C -~ r 1 ....... .....

.e ...... ... .....e..

. . ~. .* = . e.

m N

w. " ..

e a

. . < ~. e . .,

O O es . ....... .......

N - ,..

- . .. . 1. 11 ....... ..... ... ...... . . ..e...

2: ... .. ..... ... ...... . a O

% g *

5. ..... .~...e..

.. .. .. 3.. .....

s p

4 Tm m,, c

=.

8... ....

.c .

S. t. . . . t. . .

. . I.

H W s> - . ....... . .....

.f...... ..=== ....

. I.

W J c ..s*

====** . .... .... ..... 1. . . . . .. ..* .....

=

- ....-a-..

a3 . , ....... ....... ....... . .-....,

Z <t .9

6* *. . ....... ....... ......!

O H .E Ug.. e .......

.e.e....

N - ..=.... ....... . -..*...

O-- t ..= we ......,

I .,-....

V .. -. ** ....... .. ....... ....... .

c d. w *..*... *...... ....... ....... *

.4..=...

m k.. a .. ...... ....

=r

-=. , . .......

hJ ......-

M :. .v.

U ., .u . ..... ..... ...... ......

c -

..=.=. .......

.....o..

...... . . . . . ....=...

..... . . . . . . ==. ...-

i Y

....... ...... ....... . . ........ . - i

... I g ......-

n . ....... ....... ....... ....... .

-e.

er

." ...

V r. r. t' . # a* ? . . . . e r. e cme

.. S.tYT 1. Er.F.3 e. m f r. 28- 3Y F. f . sM ms. . -8e r. 3 .

8 08 . Up 4 b.J3 .$.4pge

.*6 8 .e #*T

. -~ . -~ _ . . - - . -..-.-- -. - . - - - - - _ - - - . . . . . - - . .

I D)

Q_j s

c.

e. e

, . . ~

4 . . . = co 4 4 4 4 , 0) o,-)

r . . .

. . .- 3 a.

w

. . m 3

4 O a.

a) -*-

c.) . . .

v * .. . . . .

. ~

,- .. 1 ea . . . .

M . . . . . e 4 4 J 4- 4 E, a., .......

- -e w

.g .

...e...

..e..~...

.- . ....... .. .. - -e....-

l

.w

. a . ......

..t..... ......

..e.... .

e...... .

. . r. e.... ...

N ..... .. ... ...

g s .-. ....... ...... ...... e

<C m

m

~ v-

+o , --a, N

3 -

.e .s,....

O . ....... ....... ....... ..... * .-. e....<=..

2: -

-e D'=-5" O cy ,. ....e.. ....... ....... .....-.

p e c Ne.

...... ...e...

s. e. e. . . . S.

. .....e.

% ) <C ....... .. .. . .. ....... . .......

H W %-

. ... . .. .f.. .

. t. . .. ....

W _; c m

=-

w at (>.9 - .. w .

O n. ..s.. . ...... ..... ...

a.

N .

a

. w .......

1 .......

Q f V . -u ,....... ....... . .,.....

C m .t-.

a ..

w.

u

.s......

y -w ....... ....... ....... ....... ., .,.....-

s s. . ...... ....... ....... .......

==

....e.. ....... ....... ....... . o. ,. .- ,

W ~~ -

l

, . ...... ...... ....... ....... ....a,-

..r.... ...... ....... ....... , . . . . .

e c . ....... ....... ....... ....... .-,....

m . .......

....e.

f2

.. :==a . .a.

e. e. .

s s. .t r .e. .a m.

a . ,. s wls..r .m .a .s .. <.m e. .

.e

-.nse se. r. a w.

4 kga - 6-. -F G.. W. .. bed. ...e...

e i

5 i

,~

)

I

.- .. . .. .. . . - . -. ~ - .- _. - . .- - - . - . . . - - --

I

\

l Y t

l I . - ,

.a . , .

i t

e

. m

. . . O,-

t . - . ,

. m 3

. m

. 3 i

o . . .. .

a.

m . .

7 v .

c,n

. a. - .

m .

i u

m ..

.I L . - .

3 :: ,

s u

.., ....... ....... ....... .... . .. ....... ..... 3

w. . ...... ....... . ....

..... . . . ... Y.....

, I . .. ...... . ......

t n Es N .- ,

l

, E

< m .. .

......I.

3....... ....

i i m N . . .. .......

3 ......

4= g- .--

O o -.a .-

Z N - . ....... .... ...... .. ..... ......

......l.

. .....s. a. .

1 .....

O

%- e .

- @,c) .

.= I- , ....... ........ .....

...... i.-.... ...

F( Nm .

l F- W ~L : ....,,-

...r...

..... 3 .......

- ..... ..... 1 D .; c 3 h

E 1I Z .. .....,. , ,... ..

4 .O .

t l

O .. , .. . ............ - ....

i F- ... ..

N *t .. ....... ...... .,.,... ....... .......

.I..,...

--O =.

t t. . ... . . .... . ......

i 13 c

I...

.E o.

. .t.

. . F. . .. ... .. . . . .

m -* * *******

t,., t. ., ....... .t

.......I. .

...... .t. ..... ....

! (* ....,..

m ...

l .....

1 13 c

t 5 ...--,.

C w -...... ...,.... ....... .., .--.

m . ....... . .....

m .... . .,...., . ..... ....-.. ...... .,.... .

y j

..g...

... ..u 1 .... .. . .. . ... I... ... I.....

g . . . ... . . .. .. . .. ... .

i i

1 s_-

(

_ . - _ . . - . _ _ . . . - - . _ _ . . . - . _ . - . - . - . _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ . . _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ . - ~ . . . _ _ _ _ . .

ZION STATION DSAR -)

O TABLE 2-6 l

l l

PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSIFICATIONS i VS .

TEMPERATURE LAPSE RATE ;

i

, l INDEX , RANGE Pc/100M) DESCRIPTION 1 1(A) AT < -10.3 Extremely Unstable 2(B) -10.3 s AT < -9.3 Unstable

'3(C) -9.3 s AT < -8.3 Slightly Unstable 4(D) -8.3 s AT < -2.6 Neutral ,

5(E) -2.6 s AT < 8.9 Slightly Stable 6(F) 8.9 s AT < 20.4 Stable

( 7(G) 20.4 s AT Extremely Stable l

l l

L iO i

l August 1998 i

l.

l i

ZION STATION DSAR

~

TABLE 2-7 (1 of 3)

Wind Speed Distribution vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) ec.-.. e... ca.. u .,. .. . n . . i ,s e i u .n . . i.., a . ..

,, .m. .n i. ,i n.. i .. ci .i.. ... m. .. . u oi, aan u. nacr ..

c .i . ....

.. ... . .., o..... <

... . .r ..,

t i. . ..., ..

i.s ..

.... .. .l.l.

. .i.!

.. .., .. . .is

..e i, . . ...

.., i s.

.. .i ,s . .e

..e

...e.

.i ,i.

.3

...... e i en

. . me. .m.i n.. . c.i eLi.s.. 6.m .is u ,iu . aan, m n u.nii 4 4

c.t ..... ..... . . .c..

..e

, i .>i

. .i>

.i.s s.i i.. ... .

.i

.ii

... . s.i

.e ...

.. s. ;. ... .i .si

...i .i ... ....

1,.i.ii...l.

....i

.......e.... ...e....e

... ..l .... ....

,<-- .e.e.

. es ... ....

..e ... ....

. . m . e.m .i n 6i micii., u . t m .u si iuo man n. n.a.n c .e.. .... .e.. .., .r . .e..

i, ... ... .... ...

... . . e.

..e

... ia

... ..i.i

... .e.e ...e ie.s.l.i . .,e ..e,. . . . . .

i. ...

..l.i

.... . , ...e.

..e ....e .....

...cci .

.. m e. .iu.i ,n

c. .....

... . n.m

., u. . tec .a u.i ..on man

.c..

. .... . .r.. u naa ..

... . .e.

.i> ..

. ,. .i.i

.. .ii .

. i.ias . .e.

.i.

.18

. 31

....i .l il.,..n i.c.i .i... ...i .s ...,

.=>

. ..s r

r August 1998

l l

l ZION STATION DSAR lO I

TABLE 2-7 (2 of 3)

! Wind Speed Distribution vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970)

C're.. to. Cn.. Itte blallwg las el tietti vino saf o 19te niettiles ese vine %>tle alstelevignw e!=s11 Be re. tar P sett staattllt (talt IIN PtSctall a n t s e 9 e t ai n e.go e ee e.es 6.ee e.ee e.ee 0.ee I la p .e. e.se .e4 .ep 00 .es .of I In . .ee .gr .pt e.se .le .of .ar S in a .t3 .ap .e. 13 .73 .40 .44 9 in e 08 een 0 64 .99 9 Spil .it .)4 0.00

.eb est .et ett ett .04 44 litple .Se .es .es 18tals

.et 9.se 0 00 0.00

.Je s.e9 ett 4.01 0.t4 0.00 0.00 145mte .38 4.pe 4.se $.04

.97 43 0.00 Si il .04 0 98 4.e0 6.Se 0.00 6 00 0.00

! eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese Gl9tttibu me elms 4Pitt Silleteet te's et4Sv4 Stur. LAPSE pett Sisestif f CLAll 19# Pittthil a d C e i F 4 l Cotu g.00 0 0e 0.e0 e.se 0.0g 0 04 0.eg f

8 18 7 .56 4.te 4 00 .07 .et ett ety l

3 19 4 44 ell .07 .99 34 ela .38

! S 98 4 .7% .63 .48 .79 .35 ott .34 I le 9 98 .PP .e4 .ee .e4 64 .et 9 tall

.ar .63 e.de .e b .33 .St .et 14984= .75 .ee .0 00 4.ee 0.te 0 00 0.00 j 149el* .it 4.e4 0.e0 6 00 0.00 Sete 0.00

[

190### .43 S pe 0 40 0 04 0.e4 0 08 0.00 88 f t 0.eg e.Ge 6 00 e.Ge 0.00 0 00 0.00 ese.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooseeeeeeeeeeeeees.

Slettile t Nuo klNe SPfle SIlleigWiled tae tvl SpgP. LaPlt Walt Glasitlit Stall 104 PttttNil I

. 4 W C D t F G t ht n 0.00 0.v0 0 00 Sete 0.00 0 00 0 00 I te P .it .et 0.00 .04 .e4 .04 .99

) le e 47 .03 0.00 .07 .53 .44 ett s le 4 * *4 .96 ell ett .e4 .99 .00 t le 4 .53 .94 .44 ell elt 9.00 0.00 9 lall 178414

.]}

.Js

.et 0.00

.43 0.e4

.04 0.00

.et 9#

.St 0.00 .

.6{

.Gr Iglele .e9 0.se d.ee .of 0.00 0.00 0.60

.04 0.00 0.00 0.00

( i.tlet I #3t .St 0.0. 6.te.

... e...e 44 0.. I.00

.00 0.0.

..e.e.e...ee.ee..e...e.......e...........

914ttilD4 N elHe gotte SBStelhWilha viabes Iano thest hatt $16818 879 CLate the Ptettatt a t e a r e j C 6LW 0.88 0 98 0.e4 0 00 $.40 6 00 0.00 t le e . 09 0 0. .44 .07 99 .St .04 3 In 6 .lP .J7 0.94 .33 .04 .44 .99 l 1 to e .fa .v. .op .le .33 .et g.00 g i 30 e 64 .6* .31 .it .33 .04 03

7) t

49 9,tel.l .es. ...de, ei n. . 93 , . ..

l 1 .l leini, egat.

e,.

.. ,i .l

. .e .

.e4 ..,,

.t

.se

,e. .e..0. . ,

94

.e4

.e

, .I f t .or .., ..e 0.50 0..e 0.e I

l I

1 ,

s.

s l

August 1998

1 i ZION STATION DSAR O TABLE 2-7 (3 of 3)

Wind Speed Distribution vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) l I

e l'ait bettu Olbthis,ullese #4ptthf Catu i te i 1 19 4 i le e $ 3000 148014 45t889 19f033 SI 23

3.** %.tf 31 5% 40f.u446 18.99 Op.te 86 49 ' 4 47

3.et left l

f .............e.e.......................e e

senatslems i WiesO sPt8 9 tilltidesti.we ves.t ve eset o Is ev.aeep. Latt.pgl melt glaste lif CL All llet Pf 0Cleell

't # C D e F S l C 8t =0 0.De e..# dete e.ge 0.1e e.00 0.00

$ le s 7.td .it .61 .64 8.31 4g 33 3494 6.*4 e%8 **# l.44 f.It ett 8.f8

! 5fe4 6.72 65 3.68 3.81 1.11 8.S9

' t to a 9.4a .ev 1.43 3.0,6 3.e 3.11 69 36

Sell it.l* .v4 8.e8 T.91 8.86 51 33 Sten 84 f.%F .8% .5% 1.F9 33 .el .e9 1 l$1484 6.%s .64 .4e .lg . 83 .49 .li i

19satt f.tl .Il .d* .jl .et .62 84 l

el #3 1.51 .43 .23 .u3 .et 9.40 0.00 i

. . ......e.s...ese....e...eeeeeeeee.e.e n SU. ewe Svik ALL ItseP. ($sS(

/\ 4ie.J %Pt49 viseSU$ WielClite. Ilse M498 PleC(sell$$& bit lIlt$

I s) C ee.as I se p east 14 est e.94 4.te e.et

.tt feat

.it e.

4.mo

.M 4 %C e.de

.Ft 14 e.og old t ht S SSe Su slW 0 65 d se e.00 Seet 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 80 0 00 0 98 ett 67 4# .11 62 W

eer wees led

.2f le assu as 48 33 l

3 en

41 .m. .=4 .44 4F 49 4w .ta .60 9 34 B.04 98 91 lett .00 .69 1 te. e e 49 4.>4 .31 . A.: .fa .vg 3.e4 0. 8 63 1.tf 4 64 f.49 1 55 1 08 1 44 1 48 i gn . .se .ds .ve .=- .de 4% l st t.9)t .4v 1 18 93 f.39 1 47 0 03 .99 .98 9 tell .el 1.Pt .vt ..a .sg enf .=, f.e4 8 74 3.lg 1 5e f.og g.ft g.eg 4g 1 43 189414 .31 .se .f .4= .4a .#v .f3 .** .a4 8 83 .Il 8.42 .69 .48 ett ett l'tal* 43 .%4 .t* . 99 ell .00 .** *** 8.te eef .e4 .%d 40 .tv 16 9) i legate 74 .38 .lJ *

4.. e . .'* .4f 60 . 34 .e4 ett

<. , t i .ie .74 ... .e r.e3.,e0f

. 9.4e e . .i ,.t .., .te.

.t ..051, . 56 5. .4 .ett

.e. ..I 4 i

l

)

i August 1998 i

l

ZION STATION DSAR l l

t l I

O.

's i I

TABLE 2-8 (1 of 2) 1 Wind Speed vs. Direction-Stability Class (1970)

\

l ce ,f . E .. ,. si.ii<. . .. r if es t . . . . i990 f.- 4 4 ...it .

,,,,.i..e,,,...

s v,,,. ......l...l . c,e.i ,,0 . ..

g . is se > st % 4ge le v$s v wqe NW NNW h sea.t 1 t I fp e .77 .Il .># .*, .t *.e ./4 ..' .l* .30 49 .it 94 .86 .it ett l 3 t el 6 99 .J1 .47 .e4 .I. 96 .es . se .gf .9 33 33 44 40 47 .00 l 9 fu 4 .it .*f .sf .** .** ..= . e4 .9a .38 .se .es 99 .f3 ell 64 .ft 44 f 99 e 44 *

..I .b4 67 .so .si .he I. 6 .it .33 39 33 8f 91 53 I

9 tatt 88 .af ... .es .33 47 .., g,te .fg .gl .e4 .gg ,gg 08 ,33 .33 189r46 98 44 .sf . t .' .38 .se ett .at 46 4f 60 49 .Se ofS .33 44 3%fil. 67 .44 .t. ./4 .48 ell .as .e 4 ef3 .at .Se 49 .30 .29 .99 .38 I

letall .It 7e .81 .pe .ef e.:e .Il .Pe .33 .st .e4 .55 .31 .08 ete .48 si to .t* .e4 .s 4 J. .e n. se e.de e.se .we .38 .e4 .ee .Se 04 e.se .et ett-see. ...eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese it"P. La>bd Nalf Sla41Lif f Cl ell 5 e wifs %"tsen efd%d5 UlpttllWN tlN PfpC(NIS N et 98 fed a tSE St Sbt S $4s le wtu u und he NwW N 1 la v 0.94 .et 0.03 .94 e.e9 0.ee e.00 e.se .64 ett 0.99 .02 0.00 0.00 .92 0.00 3 to 4 .es .98 s.64 47 a.te 8.se 0.44 .07 .84 .et .67 .44 08 ell .93 .9f 4 In a .e. e e4 .e4 9.ge .eA .af 99 99 49 .48 04 0f 04 .44 .44 .44 i

I le a .ef 3 e.ge e.e9 .e4 34 33 .13 .67 8f 00 09 44 42 .94 .94 i

9 tall .et 37 43 .gf .ef 0.g4 .e9 .gy .01 .gf g.e4 99 .gf .13 ott .44 l 17tpl4 9.00 .of 62 een t.se 62 94 .tr .99 el) 62 16 .94 04 0.99 0.99 le191* .et 5f e.66 9.66 v.d4 6.98 .et .ef .30 .96 99 44 e.04 0.00 0.00 0f i .94 S&lPl* Sett 17 e.es .32 a.e4 e.e4 e.Se 4.e4 .94 0.94 44 0.99 0.00 9.90 8.00 l

69 ft .d7 e ed 4.64 6.e( a.pe 6.00 e.6e e.es* .tf 0.60 0.04 0.99 9.te 4.00 Sett ett i

eeeeeeesse.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee l

It*P. La#$C matt SlaglLitt Co.a$$ C gehes **ttu views UlstClied 114 Pt#Cthlf use es g .,g g g gg se ggg g gge to gge w www' nw uwe a l le p 9.60 9.49 e.06 .39 .et 63 .et 4.ee .94 .99 9f .99 94 8.06 0.99 .44 3 14 6 e 62 .t# .e4 p.et .it v.te .tr .js 0.04 .33 6{ 94 9f* 07 0.09 0.00 9 19 a .gf .pt e ee .37 .e4 94 3s .gl .e4 44 .ls .cf 94 .cf .18 .gf f to a .td 64 .e4 .44 .e. .e4 .le .14 .49 ell 42 16 e.04 94 44 .Il

.e4 78 .et .tf .e9 e.60 9.69 .13 .61 .99 .11 .ef .et 0.66 .st .e4 98890s sel.l 0.40 88 4.e4 0.de e.e9 a. le 68 e st .99 ell 9.04 84 94 0.90 0.00 .48

.e9 .e9 0.00 04 0.00 .et 0.06 s.00 .gf legete .e7 .18 64 4.80 e. g e.et .ef 998419 4.00 .st .e4 0.no s.00 e.se e.e4 e.e4 0.00 .62 0.66 .42 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.99 A f f .t .e4 87 4.es 0.99 e.e4 0.e4 e.e6 0.te 0.00 0.04 ott 0.04 0.00. 0.90 0.00 99 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeece itsp. L APSE Stf( SI498 Lilt CLall $

el40 SPfly vidSUS elettlltu tim PlectNil med =t f ut ( e st S4 the S $$s le als W www WW hww m 1 te v 0.90 .ef .at .ed .pt .54 .ef 9.e8 est esf .e4 99 08 6f 44 .6f

) 14 4 .16 99 .*7 est 64 ell .e4 .e9 .It .29 e3l .99 4.90 .99 .0f .13 i

S 14 4' ,88 .le .td .e4 44 .#8 edt 11 .63 36 36 .11 .83 .it .It .it t te e .e4 .it .e3 .e7 .se .36 .It .gl .te 38 .te 43 .ll .e4 .it ,le

.e4 .it 42 .el .18 .et .Al .33 .00 .33 64 ett 88 .48 .44 .l6 9 tall lpgngs 0.00 .e9 61 .e. .e4 .*4 .es .es .8) 29 07 .tt e et 0.90 0.se ett

.94 .11 p.te 0.48 09 .34 34 sale p.Pe .t* .et .h8 6.* e ..d .e4 ..f 61 .et s.e* a ee e.ge e.tv ..e. ,t 0.80 e.e4 0.98 0.00 .et l.e .

te,t.t

.* I

.<3 a.4.n

.. , t.e, 6. .... e.se

.s.=9 ..eee .e.e6.4 . 90 ..I . 62. ..e.t . 90 . 00 6 .09 l

8 O

t t

, s August 1998 i

(

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-8 (2 of 2)

Wind Speed vs. Direction-Stability Class (1970) c e . to. ca.. ii. .iin.. .., pI steet. .is.,t f. i,0.

te.*e.. Laast osalg glassattge Ctatt i ellhi %PtElf VteW13l4ttf jesd gged Peetgett$

fM i ($( S4 5 14 $ ble $d WSW W Weed teu seef es etW ff 1187 84 .h4 esv .to .et 48 .e4 .In .48 .16 .8I .I3 8f e8I .9I +8F 3 te a .e* .Il 9.99 .to .e4 .ll .ps .13 .lg .it .8% .le .34 .33 .it

.tl yet .e4 .g3 6p .ag .)g 4e .sg .it .38 .gf .33 S In 4 .ee .33 .3 .lg

.54 34 .e4 .f4 .63 7 18 e .te 11 34 48 .e4 .e9 .it .3m .33 .30 e69 94 09 ed , 28 38 .et .St .08 .99 9 tell e.00 .43 .tl ell .it .lt

.ef .l3 g.e4 4.ee .e4 .e4 ligele 8.04 0.e4 e

.I l .l .it .et .e4 .se e.ee .e4 .es

.94 lifele .et 32 4.e6 69 3.e4 9.we est 0.e4 44 4.60 99 0.08 e.44 0.08 d.44 e.60 e.49 e.98 83.t 81ee.00 0.e4 4.e6 0.e0 0 04 0 04 0 09 ett 9 00 0 00 9 99 lele23 .et e.te e4 .et0600 00 g.se 4 40 4 00 4 00 et 33 e.e4 e.e4 e.se t.no 8.ee e.se .

aseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesesseseeeeeeee fg e . taett doit Sta.eliiff Ctett F e uttale SPtite vientes elettflum tiet PthCLNfl t seed les seeW to arf Hf teet t EM St Sit S 6te $d WSe

.48 .48 98 .48 .cf 04 99 0# .08 .ti .92 8 I4 7 4.90 0.t J 0.e4 .et 4.00

.cf .cf .cf .13 .e4 ..e4 3144 04 0.88 .e4 .St 0.99 94 92 g.gf .99 .tt 50 .99 04 9 le 6 .ef .e4 .e4 .e4 .e4 , .e4 64 .it ett .it 34 38 44 99 04 0.04 .44 43 .et .e4 .e0 .50 .33 .e4 .e4 36 I le e 33 0.04 0.00 44 84 .42

.e4 0 4A 8.e4 ett e.e4 83 .08 .99 .88 est 4.08 .33 .9 0.0{p

% fejl 9.99 40* 8.60 0.e4 .e4 0.00 0.00 6.** .e4 .e4 4.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 lil9st 199914 4.94 B.04 .04 4.e4 e.60 9.te 0.00 ,s.00 0.00 .et .et .cf e.et 8.04 0.04 4.94 199e43 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 9.99 4.00 0.00 0..88 0.00 0 00 0.04 9.00 e.00 0.04 0.e0 .e4 el al 4.99 4.08 8.00 8.80 0.84 8.00 0.90 00 0.99 0.00 0.94 9.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.e4 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees ,

% feed'. seelt Salt Staditiff Ctatt t alese sette statert stegcItess else Plattsef g .

WSW W used , sees teeW SI sest set test t (St St SM S Ste Sd

.99 08 .D4 .e4 .49 0.09 eof 04 .St .97 .99 .99 .64 i 49 4 99 0.00 0F a.09 34 .fi .et .99

3 la * .et .cf .e4 .34 .ev .04 .ev t.pt .Il 99

.]3

.el 99 66

.it 38 44 .ll 0.04 1 to a .q6 .et .e4 .e4 .se e.ee 4.to .it

.04 0 00 .92 V la e e.s.e4.e.4 e..s.e 4 00 ett

.e s t. ., .. 4 e64

-., 4 00 0.e.0 ...Il 1,inlei .. I

... .e. .....e . .

...64 Setee..!. . . . .... !..!.!.

ia

.... t.. .....

... 4. .

e.00 e.e.e

... ..., t..ee..

e..e.

o....

...e.

. .4

...I

.:!.4 .. ..l.f. ..t.4 4 li f.ei38e ....

.e. e..e e.e. ... ... .... ..e ..#. ...... ......e. l...

..se . 0. ....

. . e.e. ... ....

e.t. ... ....

.e. ...

. ... .. ..4 i.9.n ...e

.e. .

August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR

,<-~\

V' TABLE 2-9 (1 of 2)

Wind Speed vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) 1

c. . r i. ( ... , l . . I , . l .. , . .e . L ( s. t l si.e,e.... i98.

aie.cil.. .:

nisso Spite pistdl eutlut vt%but Iles. lap $( palt staeltlly Ctats tlN PthCENfl a e C D CetM O.op e r s h.09 9 99 8 89 0.40 ', 0 00 0 00 1 Id # .se test e.6e e.es .e4 0 00 .99 9 l'8 e 99 87 and .14 .Bl .04 98 1 Op 4 .96 .64 .08 .22 99 .88 .94 9 in e .se .ef .at ett .70 .87 Sett 9 till .tl ett 0.06 Ill006

.54 .44 .44 98 34 Sett 0.99 telt Sett 0 96 0.08 948118 .=8 .67 599024 .#d

.ti 8.00 92 0.9% 0.89 G.es 8.00 .07 4.40 9.99 0.00 Of it 99 07 .e4 .07 0.80 9.08 0.00 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee elde t tibi NE WING SPitt 9851dleu11Du ut.= hut stre. LaPit malt Statitity Ctall f 8N Pl#CthIt 4 m C 9 e r G Cat u g.30 p.30 e.Se e.eg g.gg g.g4 e.30 l le F .Il .e4 0.80 ett 67 0 00 0.00 3194 31 .47 .92 .99 .99 0.00 9I 4 14 * .47 0.se .02 46 .13 .04 .4#

988 4 .53 .pt .ed .47 .13 e.e4 0.;0

8819 68 .98 .it .16 .13 0.00 0.04 179*86 44 .df .08 .cf 0.00 0.00 0.66 Blt996 42 .e# .t7 .St .ef 4.00 0.94 lllite ele .47 .44 tote 0.00 0.00 0.00 68 73 .P0 .02 elf 0 09 0.00 0 06 0.40 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

'\ -

. pl*(Liten (dC vlHO 4 Pits ellidioutlen to ASus it*P. LAPSE natt $16eltify CtaSS $$N PENCENil 6 . C e e a Cain 3.36 0 60 9 40 0 00 e.se 0 00 0 00 t to P .99 0 94 0 00 .32 .69 0 00 .42 395a .89 s.#8 .62 .sf .95 .02 .04 S 99 * .28 82 0 99 .47 .92 37 .62 8 le 4 53 0.04 .e4 .13 .34 0.00 0.00 9 tell e44 .07 .Sf .27 .38 0.04 .

0.99 179016 .if .42 0.00 .62 .56 0 00 0.00 198nte .d. e.90 .03 .sp 9.se 3 00 0.00 001444 .Il G.es est 3.04 e.se 3.3e 0.00 St 21 64 dets t.69 0.00 0.DD 8.00 0.00 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Diet CIID=4 t 4140 SPtf D a98534198f1** e

't95HS IIPP. L APSt esit Staettlf f Ctant flu PteCCNtl C d 9 f a CetN 4 00 s.Se 0 00 0 00 0.00 Sett 8.09 I se p .tt .04 .se ee7 67 .62 .tv 3 la a 33 .8 9.*d .e4 . t. 6 .tr .14 S In 4 44 s.ee ett .e4 .it .e9 99 8 89 4 42 9 44 .e. .ti 99 .42 0.00 9 la .tr .0# .98 .98 .9% .ti 4.00 BPl le.t l . # f. . *4 S.ep .44 .81 0.80 0.00 141986 .it d.te 4.as .ps .af 0.00 62 99frit 17 4.#8 c.33 I et ..it

.0 e. e e.e4 e.ee.

9..

0.ra 9 re .. 0 0.ee

0. 0 D

(G August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR b

TABLE 2-9 (2 of 2)

Wind Speed vs. Temperature Lapse Rate-Stability Class (1970) c . (.. te.. 20 ... . iis ri trette e. .sia i9te niet et tb= C SC ylwg aptes pittel$ntles stubut t* wp. LLP6f batt Stahltill ttall itN Pf 8CtNIO e e C U e W G totu g.03 0.ee 6 99 0 08 0.04 0 00 0.00 t la 7 .gf 4 04 est 48 05 .02 48 3 ta e .se e.es .ll .e4 .e4 0.00 .et 9 Og a ..e .et .e4 .99 .99 .04 .e4 f 80 P .1% .94 .Se .99 .f4 est 8.89 9 tell .34 .et ett .63 99 0.00 0.00 873814 31 0.00 0.04 .04 .e4 .48 0.04 11188g .tv 9.40 0.e4 0.00 4.pe 8.00 .e4 19tett 99 0.04 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 48 f t 0.04 S.Se 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.e4 e.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese elate 98 tit GIntelgetitu endtw4 elettfle S siser.tLAPSC matt Staettiff CLASS 1881 Ptetthlt a e t 5 e r e Calg 4.99 9 00 0 00 0 00 0.89 4 98 0 00 8 19 t 0.00 0 00 98 .44 .07 0 00 .84 3 to 4 .96 0.6e 0.09 ell 04 .94 04 9 le a 44 .st .e4 .30 .le .04 0 00 t 99 m .63 .04 .e4 ele .09 .08 0.00 9 tell 49 0.e4 0 00 47 .tl ett 9 60 ttela lttage . .tv .44 0 00 g.eg

.e4 .et 0.99 0.99 u 31 g.30 .gf 3.et 3.00 3.e3 890et3 0.00 9.60 e.00 0.00 0.e4 4.04 0.00 s et it 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 eeeeees.eeeeeeeees.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees N

elettflem 908 WIMS Spite Dilld19ullou etendt stMP. LaPet Salt Steeltlft SLASS tle Pt#Ctelli a e e e r F A a

(ble . 0 00 4.64 0 00 . 4 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 t te t .te 0 40 .et .07 .e4 .04 .04 3 le 4 .30 0.40 .68 .04 .11 .08 99 9 to 4 4m .69 .40 .37 .53 .02 0.00 t le e 84 ell .96 .1% .16 .04 .04 9 tell 40 .pe 9.04 .Il 63 .St 0.04 539884 69 .ee est ett 44 0.00 0.00 94 tela .6e .et .e9 .44 .e4 0 04

8.04 19tett .38 0 00 0.04 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 48 33 0.00 0 00 0 04 s es 0.00 0 00 0.04

...........o...............ee....eeeee..

Slettfitt S .

vise 9Ptte alltelevtlesa statut Itair LAPSE Salt StatiLiff CLASS ION Ptetthfl e a a C e t F G C 4La 9.90 6.80 doet Sett 4.00 0 00 0.00 1 te P .23 0 04 0 00 0 96 . .it ett .St 3 In a

.38 eff .53 .99 .#4 0 94 0.89 9 to = .ta .0w ell .31 4# .11 .tt t to e l.&e .lt .Il ' .bl .86 .Il .lI 9 tell s.tt est elf .93 * .44 69. .si ligele .9 .et .48 .44 9.0e e.99 04 14 tale .9) et t .37 .es g,gg g.go g.eg latell .#4 9.e4 9.e# 0.cp 0.00 et ti .4 ..s e .e.

8..me ..e4 ..I seet.

0.. ...

C

(

August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-10 HIGHEST EXPECTED WINDS FOR THE ZION SITE Maximum Speed Recurrence Interval (mph) Probability (years) 48 0.50 2 60 0.10 10 69- 0.04 25 70 0.02 50 80 0.01 100 l 1

i I

O l

l l

l i

I August 1998 i

ZION STATION DSAR k

TABLE 2-11 TORNADO OCCURRENCES" ILLINOIS DIRECTION OF PATH WlDTH A

DA.TE MOVEMENT LENGTH (miles) (Yards) 9/21/59 NE 2 40

.9/26/59 NNE 10

9/26/59 NE 10 10/8/59 NE 2 90 4/19/63 N

4/11/65 NNE 10.5 400 4/11/65 E 5.75 200 4/11/65 E 0.3 100 4/11/65 NE 0.1 250 5/26/65 ENE 15.5 70 6/23/65 0.1 10 4/19/66 NE 0.5 30-50 4/19/66 E 0.5 100 6/9/66 E *

O 4/21/67 E 28 600-1200 C) 4/21/67 4/21/67 E

NE 9

50-150 4/21/67 E *

4/21/67 N 8 20 4/21/67 NE 16 100-200 4/21/67 .N 0.25 10 7/26/69 E 5 35 WISCONSIN 6/12/59 2 1000 9/26/59 NE 4

9/26/59 E 15 50 10/8/59 NE O

7/22/59 25

10/4/62 NE *

7/9/63 SW 8 30 8/22/64 NE 2 400 4/11/65 NE 1 50 3/21/66 ENE 15 200 5/23/66 NE 5 50 5/26/68 N 1 100 6/29/69 ENE 10 100 k

Not Available These occurrences are within a square 80 miles on a side with the Zion site at the center.

August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-12 ZION STATION METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS AND ANALOG DATA RECORDING SYSTEMS Measurement Type Threshold Range Recorder Type A rq ( bov rade)

Wind Speed / Teledyne 1%/i5 0.28 mps/ 0 to 44.7 mps/ 35 ft Esterline Angus L1102S Wind Direction Geotech 0.31 mps 0 to 540*

1564/1565 Wind Speed / Teledyne 11 % / i5 0.28 mps/ 0 to 44.7 mps/ 250 ft Esterline Angus L1102S Wind Direction Geotech 0.31 mps 0 to 540*

1564/1565 Ambient Air RDF 23789-4 0.3 C N/A -40 to 48.9 C 35 ft Esterline Angus Temperature MRL-244-0-RD-RC-64-MP Differential RDF-23789-4 i0.14 C* N/A -5.6 to 16.7 C 250-35 ft Esterline Angus Temperature ' MRL-244-0-RD-RC-64-MP Precipitation MRI Model 0.25mm N/A 0.0 to 25.4 mm Shelter Roof Esterline Angus 302 Tipping MRL-244-0-RD-RC-64-MP Bucket

10.14 C over the height differential on the tower is within the ANS 2.5 specified accuracy standard of 10.15 C/50m August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-13 ZION STATION (2, 5, & 15 Mile Supplemental Tower *)

METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS AND ANALOG DATA RECORDING SYSTEMS E

Measurement Type Threshold Range ecodedype A g {Abov rade)

Wind Speed / Teledyne - i1 % /15 0.33 mps/ 0 to 44.7 mps/ 33 ft Esterline Angus L1102S Wind Direction Geotech 0.42 mps 0 to 540 Series 50.1/

50.2c Wind Speed / EG & G Model i0.3 C N/A -31.7 to 37.8 C 33 ft Esterline Angus MS401BB Wind Direction 110S-M

Equipment is identical at each of the three locations.

August 1998

.-. .. . . - - . . . . _ . - - - . - . . ~ . - . _ . . . - . - - . - - - . - . - . - -

ZION STATION DSAR

/3 TABLE 2-14

'd NEARBY LAKE MICHIGAN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Average Withdrawal, Intake Distance Million Gallons Storage Capacity,

. Community From Site. Miles Per Day (MGD) Million Gallons (MG)

. Lake County, Illinois, 1.1 2.5 4 l Public Water District Waukegan, Illinois 6 7.4 8.6 North Chicago, I!!inois 10 6.5 5.0 Kenosha, Wisconsin 10' 11 10.2 Great Lakes NTS, 13 5.8 4.5 lilinois Lake Forest, Illinois 16.5 1.6 2.9 1

O l

I i

i (3-U August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR TABLE 2-15 i

- ANNUAL PRECIPITATION AT VARIOUS ILLINOIS LOCATIONS Mean Annual Maximum Annual Maximum 24-Hr.

Precipitation Precipitation Rainfall ,

Location y th._e_s Inches Inches '

Antioch 3, 13 42.71 5.10 l Waukegan 31.89 41.97 3.58 )

Chicago-WBAP 32.99 45.92 6.24 Chicago-WB, City 33.17 46.41 6.19 Marengo 32.89 40.77 9.08 Wheaton College 35.01 45.58 5.60 Aurora College 34.52 47.03 4.87 Park Forest 35.60 43.43 -

Chicago University 32.29 45.71 --

1 O

s August 1998 2.

. . _ . .. . -_. ..~. _ _ ____.. ._ _ _ _. _ _ - _ _ . _

ZION STATION DSAR

, e TABLE 2-16 DOOR LOCATIONS AND PRINCIPLE USE EXTERIOR ACCESSES BELOW ELEVATION 600' MSL LOCATION ELEVATION TYPE OF USE (PRINCIPLE)

Aux. Bldg. (10-L) 592'0" Equipment access Aux Bldg. (30-L) 592'0" Material access to vermiculite

! and cement mixing room Aux. Bldg. (30-K) 595'10-1/2" Removal of solid waste from drumming station and dry active waste storage

' Fuel Hand Bldg. (17-W) 592'0" New and spent fuel access l

f Diesel Generator Bldg. 592'3"

Ventilation and combustion air l (34-J, 33-J, 31-J, 9-J, to diesels i 7-J, 6-J) '

(D V Turb. Bldg. (38-G) 592'0" Equipment access l

i- Turb. Bldg. (37-G) 592'0" Personnel access Turb. Bldg. (38-C) 592'0" Personnel access l-

' Turb. Bldg. (22-A) 592'0" Equipment and personnel access Turb. Bldg. (2-C) 592'0" Personnel access Turb. Bldg. (3-G) 592'0" Personnel access Turb. Bldg. (2-G) 592'0" Equipment access Crib House (113-AA) 594'0" Personnel access l . Crib House (101-AA) 594'0" Personnel access

Elevation corresponds to bottom of air intake leuvers.

, Plenum access door elevation at approximately 593'-9" I

August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR I

% TABLE 2-17 l

DATA ON SURFACE CURRENT SPEEDS FOR LAKE MICHIGAN (July through November 1963)

Current Speed Frequency (cm/sec) (ft/sec) (% of Time)

<6 < 0.2 21.9 6-15 0.2 - 0.5 - 46.5 15 - 30 0.5 - 1.0 24.9 30-45 1.0 - 1.5 5.8 l

> 45 > 1.5 0.9 !

l t

O l

I l

O August 1998 l - . . . _ . - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ .. _ _ - _ _

I L .

i !

i ZION STATION DSAR i

' >q l

TABLE 2-18 1 FREQUENCY OF DEEP WATER WAVE HEIGHTS DUE TO STORMS Wave Heiaht in Feet * (Reference 24) i

! l l' ice Free ;

i Freauency Full Year {

l Period i Once each month 6.5 5 Once each 6 months 9.9 7.5 l Once each year 11.4 8.5 Once each 2 years 12.6 9.4 Once each 5 years 14.3 10.8 L Once each 10 years 15.7 11.8 Once each 25 years 17.4 13.6 Once each 500 years 22.0 20.3

Crest to trough height.

,o l

l l

I l

l f

August 1998 i

- -- .,. ~ _

i O O ;O ZION STATION DSAR i

1 TABLE 2-19 WELL DATA - ZION STATION (WITHIN ONE MILE OF STATION)

)

Location (T46N) Surf Elev Mineral Pump Rate Static Level Construction Well No. Rise (MSL) Depth Analysis (GPM) (Below Grade) Report t

W-1 320'S, 880W 1500' Partial Cent. Sec. 22 '

W-4 200*S, 200'E t 108' Partial Cent. Sec. 22 !

W-5 175'E,1630'S i 225' Partial Cent. Sec. 22 t W-6 . 400'E,1660'S ,

50' Partial Cent. Sec. 22 W-7 300'E,1550'S 220' Partial Cent. Sec. 22 _

W-8 300'E,1380'S .

225' Partial '

.g Cent. Sec. 22 W-9 750'E, 500'N I Yes

SW Cor. Sec. 22

W-13 1150'E,1800'S !

160' -

, NW Cor. Sec. 22 615' l W-18 1500'N,1500'E 17 Yes !

123' -

SW Cor. Sec.14 20 24*

t W-19 1700'N,1000'E 19 125' -

SW Cor. Sec.14 30 25* Yes !

W-20 1800'N,1200'E 13 180' - !

SW Cor. Sec.14 3 180* Yes i W-21 50'S, 800'E 14 120' - i NW Cor. Sec. 23 20 50* Yes I i

W-22 50'S,1150'E 9 144' - i NW Cor. Sec. 23 2 142* Yes i W-24 570'N, 510'N 1370' Partial '

August 1998 ;

i

_____.___m__________________________________._______________-_____m___ _ _______ _ ___ ____ _,_____..._ _ ____

. _ _ . _ _ . - . . . _ . _ ~ . - . _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ . - . - _ _ _ . . . _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ .

ZION STATION DSAR l

TABLE 2-20 (1 of 2)

O GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS Approx.

Thickness Geolooic Ace Geolooic Name in Feet Description Remarks Quaternary Recent 0 to 35 Unconsc'idated Largely Lake L . Deposits sand, sitt and Michigan shore peat deposits. Present at site L Pleistocene - 80 to 150 Unconsolidated Largely from l material Wisconsin

ranging from Glaciation. All clay to boulders but loess present deposited as at site till, outwash, loess and lake sediments Silurian Niagara O to 465 Dolomite, vuggy, Bedrock at site Formation locally contains solution O' cavities, fossiliferous Ordovician Maquoketa 0 to 250 Shale, grades Generally not Formation locally to water bearing l dolomite or limestone Galena- 220 to 350 Dolomite or Aquifer Platteville limestone, shaly Formation Glenwood- 100 to 650 Sandstone, fine Aquifer St. Peter to coarse Formation grained Prairie du 0 to 340 Dolomite snd May not be Chien sandstone present under Formation the site I

i O.J l

. August 1998 1'

l l

t ZION STATION DSAR l

TABLE 2-20 (2 of 2)

GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS 1

Approx.

Thickness Geoloaic Ace Geoloaic Name in Feet Description Remarks 1

Cambrian Trempealeau 0 to 225 Dolomite and '

l Formation sandstone l

Franconia 45 to 175 Dolomite and Formation sandstone Ironton- 105 to 270 Sandstone Most important l Galesville bedrock aquifer Formation 1 l Eau Clair 235 to 450 Shale and i Formation Siltstone l l

Mt. Simon 2000 Sandstone with Aquifer O

d Formation siltstone and shale )

l Precambrian Undifferentiated Unknown Granites and Principal l associated basement rock intrusives t

1 l

l t

5; August 1998

O O O

> ZION STATION DSAR 1 TABLE 2-21 ELEVATION OF CLASS I STRUCTURES WITH RESPECT TO ,

VARIOUS FOUNDATION SOIL LEVELS -

i Glacial Lacustrine & ,

Class i Foundation Granular Lake Glacial Till Glacial Outwash Niagara l Structure Elevation DeDosits (Sand) (Clav) (Sand. Sitt & Clav) Dolomite [

Fuel Handling 555' -515' 486' 571' & 587' 585' Auxiliary 554' 526' 481

, 537' 585' Building i Diesel 556' 523'- 483' 562.5' 585*

Generator (N) ;

Diesel 525' 476' 562.5' 585' 554' Generator (S) ;

521.5* & 548' 585' 554' 522' 483' Unt R 555' 529' 480' 521.5' & 548' 585' Unt Crib House 530' 585' 554' 515' 486'- l i

[

August 1998 j i

ZION STATION DSAR

, i i i i

TABLE 2-22 (1 of 2) 1 i

REGIONAL EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCES Epicenter Location Area Q31t Intensitv* Locality N. Lat. W.Long Sa. Miles 1804. Vil Ft.

Dearborn 4.20 87.8 30,

000 Aug.20 l

1811 XII New Madrid, 36.6 89.6 2,000,000 L Dec.16 Felt throughout Missouri l lilinois 1812. Xil New Madrid, 36.6 89.6 2,000,000 Jan.23 Felt throughout Missouri Illinois 1812 Vil New Madrid, 36.6 89.6 2,000,000 Feb.7 Felt throughout Missouri 1 I

lilinois l 1883 VI North of 42.3 85.6 8000 lq Feb.4 Michigan -

V ladiana Border 1886 X Charleston, 32.9 80.0 2,000,000 !

Aug.31 Felt in Chicago S.C.

l f l 1895 Vill Charleston, 37.0 89.4 1,000,000 Oct. 31 Felt throughout Missoun l lilinois and l Wisconsin 1905 V Menominee, 45.0 87.7

. March 13 Michigan 1909 Vil N.E. Illinois 42.5 89.0 500,000 l May 26 IV at Kenosha l

1912 VI N.E. lilinois 41.5 88.5 40,000 Jan.2 1917 VI E. Missouri 38.1 90.6 200,000 i t

l

As defined in Table 2-23

!O i

. August 1998 i-

. .m. . ._. . . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _

ZION STATION DSAR .

l TABLE 2-22 (2 of 2) 1- REGIONAL EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCES 1

Epicenter .

l Location Area Rain Intensitv* Locality N. Lat. W. Long Sa. Miles

( .- 1923 V Cass County, l Nov. 9 lilinois f- . .

1931 VI Madison, Oct.18 Wisconsin 1933 IV Stoughton to Dec.6 Putland, j Wisconsin I

1934 VI Rock Island, 41.5 91.5

' Nov.12 - Illinois 1935 - VI , Timiskaming, 46.8 79.1 1,000,000 Nov.1 Felt in Canada Wisconsin j 1939 V Southern Nov. 23 111 at Janesville,- Illinois Wisconsin 1943 11 Thunder Mt.,

Feb.9 Marinette Co.,

Wisconsin 1947 V S.E. Wisconsin L May 6 1947 VI So. Central 42.0 85.0 50,000 Aug.9 Michigan i

1956- IV Oostburg, July 18 Wisconsin ;

1 1956 IV Milwaukee-Oct.13 Racine, Wisconsin 1968 Vil Southern 38 88.5 Nov. 9 (Ill at site) lilinois i '

As defined in Table 2-23 August 1998

ZION STATION DSAR O TABLE 2-23 (1 of 2) :

MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE 1931

-(Abridged)

1. Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable circumstances.

II. Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. Delicately suspended objects may swing.

Ill. Felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings, but many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.

Vibration like passing of truck. Duration estimated.

IV. During the day felt indoors by many, outdoors by few. At night some awakened.

Dishes, windows, doors disturbed, walls make creaking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking buildings. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.

V. Felt by nearly everyone, many awakened. Some dishes, windows, etc., broken; a few instances of cracked plaster; unstable objects overturned. Disturbance of trees, poles, and other tall objects sometimes noticed. Pendulum clocks may stop.

VI. Felt by all, many frightened and run outdoors. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster or damaged chimneys. Damage slight.

Vll. Everybody runs outdoors. Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures, considerable in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. Noticed by persons driving motor cars.

O August 1998

6 ZION STATION DSAR 1

l t TABLE 2-23 (2 of 2)

MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE 1931 (Abridged)

Vlli. Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse; great in poorly built structures. Panel walls thrown out l of frame structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls.

( Heavy furniture overturned. Sand and mud ejected in small amounts. Changes in l well water. Disturbs persons driving motor cars.

l IX. Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb; great in substantial buildings,'with partial collapse. Buildings l shifted off foundations. Ground cracked conspicuously. Underground pipes broken.

O' X. Some well-built wooden structures, destroyed; most masonry and frame structures l destroyed with foundations; ground badly cracked. Rails bent. Landslides j considerable from river banks and steep slopes. Shifted sand and mud. Water l splashed (slopped) over banks.

I t

XI. Few, if any, (masonry) structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Broad fissures in ground. Underground pipe lines completely out of service. Earth slumps and land slips in soft ground. Rails bent greatly.

XII. Damage total. Waves seen on ground surfaces. Lines of slight and level distorted.

Objects thrown upward into the air.

!O 1

[ August 1998 i

t

. - . . ~ . _ . - _ . - . . - . - . . . . - . . _ _ . . _ ~ . - . . - - - . _ _ - - _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

! l l

1 i

"l )

e b ' m:NlI N ' k$$V A ll NNW - "

NNE j : 9 KENOS /

"'- Q ( /

) NW 4 2M/(

fhj5- -

NE b $ ?fh*?Y 0

~

I A@cRrb /

W N W.- - N MAME O

<

bhY O , , _ _ aggama._ _ _ ENE w

s /wm - sw.4., s

lM amemmwg ": -p[y J.'dD .tM , -

N -

.g.,

l W I$ EU;?

M M)ffTWIM -i y E 10 Muzs M nm.-

Lbr EL=s A LE i

I EACM STA E

) ==""""1 - ^ F a. w; 4W,3 i XL j i i see M( 14 ~A GAN

('t n+ ts x Wp1 ( ,

/

["A NORTH AVALbAmt ICAGO C

\\

s[

"[ "" i 8 swh /

ssE -

we%s..e i

\ N SCALE O 5 10 Miles O 5 10 Kilometers ZION STATION DSAR l l Figure 2-1 TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE ZION STATION AUGUST 1998

l I

i 1

l 1 , =. c. q -

, y" 7, i w tom

~~

g i

.-, 2'.,u m 1. 1k..v ::: . .... p. . jl.d'< n . n

. ;C l . ,! ' .u t- ... .

l V .iii 4QA

~

. .. ... _. _ _ .. l.. .B_. x u.,i ,

m

&Q . -2CT".'.D. W..6g%.n,,.:.-M...O.:_.-4..:,%..,

7: an~_r. .-

L ,- ~. /.

, s.. :

.c w r ..g ,

.J , d

= 5.

i i

_T ? =

"_ J.'

. Q '

ic -l

+j: :: -

$, . 7. ;,. a , g , . % ..i .......e.,,--.-.

.s

. a

. n .a c

m .i./ b. t ..- .-j._. ,.

. _s .. _ . . .

.:... , i t ::.- e q!; _ r. -V ~ _ -? ..: _ ./ f. b .f b}l$s-SE d'i$ $ I 4IlMfh. ' 19' ~ ' 4 .~id 7.

t .- d 1.J ITTg %. \

p1 : r s= = m m .'

P.N ,,... . .- .. _-..L--

- t. .

._.- /. . au.m aa

r, - n :: p)yfu.. fyf:g+ib.. 1 I; e. ~ p --

~

..-l .. m y

.,~i . . _ - .- ;

x J g.- r q .>

_ y ,amaaw.zeu. e .it . .

i syi ., . a.r .i.

r.ou.e.m.- fj.i,t

,y . .. ~, 3.,.,

i .

.m. . _ - . - _ _ .q g

. , . bg.., . o. ~~

Q I:' ij@4-4 -

.[ t I'

! **% .[ N. [$- W

, ~ 5-- 5 [ ." ! .II - ,

W gy Mp .

... [jlg Q[~$[;~ -?f...(.

ea \'i 74 h" I -; -I 1.,,arpi ,:rr In M \smsuTM.

g,y _5r

+l 1. ;4I c. -r/ .pt-i gg .%

$ N,Y ) Y Y,. . ,I & ]J?.E.N-.-: $ ,:~~ ,

~

A .[

I. g.i. t_~.~ _.; _-U "/c :;/ ,I :;;~

". .1-

) . -.

1

. M. .

i' e _ .

. H_. _ ._. .

k i -[!

c ~

6 Y Y ,,d "

? : _' /.y., . Ec i a %,; ?, % _-w%E _..-f a> f>1d d.~ _

--(~; _ .p.

. fNnI' - % ,+ M--F:.l-x ,.r i

a ==='

f,2di t,: _-

- . s. - ,- .- ,-

li, . - s --_

.. ' '4 t g .. . .: .. y l

.V. , l

'. k l 1,'h'1

. " . ,.1- W. I f '.1 : 7 .I _'- N .4 i:& . v- -

-u .(

. Vf s _ . -

m.,egal.y.

.Os ! ; v:

,.a. -

",, t- l _s

. .. :. m

9. - _ _ . _ .

h ?.$ $ ,N --

'h$h$ ~ ~lh f';

=m a , . . e.- , u. ,9o q , ; . .s a

.4 .::. s h r 7 n c q_ m R

-.v.ed i; . c:s . __ . zu f ,, -

I t e : isu.s ZION STATION DSAR

{ } Figure 2-2 MAP OF ZION STATION (LPZ AND EXCLUSION AREA)

AUGUST 1998

A-. dAu -A.A_A._d.La.mm&. "Ah-_a

,A+w-_n--.w_.6ahaL.e m me_.42.--m.s mmm am,m w w mm -n- -.w -am.---u.w---A=_--'-----------a-----m_ - - - - - - - - -

II

mnye ,,n, ~ _ _ _ en; y ym$iAB ji >i%s TE M55mj21r^g4 y a hNI% f.f % CL $

l l V(fih[hNk@fbb,'au$$ddi$a:,I'd dm Mi !?nG W54 w mam r "

s + y) %

k[m "En$iN$d3%ky $ fddE7 $Ub

C

g. $9 ^^ z 9 u

H o

Lg < A5mmsM3*k: a3ga o.

- . I MW Mw knR$(idM!

Ml d H E k

^~jd

'i- IhdNNhN $

.p$h@Me M\ 4 2

"- k w huwad u) E ul

. ,4 . ~ m

.. m m- .

f. , e

' p V

. I$d:

);??. $$ # 'A y

l

);&g$f)

Q y1 %s ]%:a F y y* W

. P.V.:\ -

u. ,- m w,, g7. 3 9

, - . w... 'S Y.*

%M bk .

N 1 h A f di

,%y{.w@nf'"4:

GS7h; g '

f .b'r'9y'q s

- 4

+

hm. wg.3- ;ss :6 -

!,. / ^38$$; g

I . l ::t,4

, a ggg l g?fp A l s

_ i '

.gm l: y

'j M -

-L , .q M 4. :yg h? ' ^ a :-

a .k g

q"*qq3 , :.

k . Bli -

.M eu a d,a x.

u. ss - .& A :Nq".: ' a~q:g; gig $M . . . p f.,i(+ - 'bi

.bi::SM:iA'S he- m. v se . .i y,.

h:.;wk f .)ihi: 1 -

[Ef.$.f;. !.:) * .'

$1 n

~ $ s a.sIM9*

. o Ahts !E : '

y 'e;.

6 M! 5 w w Qijir %

L

$m$bh1gg%g$?kN sVQ "wIM e ; k.?

f .

b_png%&g Shi$$g+ ggy r' k '

m$ggehjana a#

Es & M gepn fa - ^- ^'

hh M :andays^as2 c@k n n yeM kkk@$ mw

$kIbk' ', ,

&e#sp;ei@dadEfsshnjyS%n

$E r

%j ti diW JS%IMC$f 30Y Nh%W .

{+

Q @ a V 1N % % ...: , WlW' isXhh$s $5W >~

.nmWws ~~.

> ll'k l

y.

.? x ~ ;

Mi:$$$7x Nf>h $7+^^

d i

. h* Oi!D$3Ed2%MIi: he$i%db..* % "1 L -

{5 Ji%fMdQFN*E MMMNl T _

ik h , a?

l ,.

w %n e et d m a a m% n$ .

. ;n 6w ac g

.1 NikjfM[wiwmeINb$7.$T

IbN 4-I hbMhhNMh$C NhhN5hhl

%l2%@ 5%*3b '* nWP%% -

Tap #Hwas ",' & #!'Yeh ?P w.

iWhME@R*M*;s M-4 j g C Jhyn ' s ;

'J' W m. ?% .

1 F > s s ichfN p .f tg_, ,.

(#hs .. (

E- s sseams:c A:ss ~ mi:saw

.ma .. sq N4 -

I

~~

N' T ^_\. *[O i

~ ;%

JFlypg

< i k, r+ g

[D t

\f q '= [,3 tF J '

lh Ch 1- b8 f, i j d .:' ~

~ \s .. g x i e Di m .x i ir$ tR

~

u_tili N -w -

j some f.est .

) - -

16 L < l / ..;#

1

'~'

\ ,y , .

\ h

" ~.

' f J I

., g

.o.

I / ~

N F /.'-

Q,, ~

N 8 ZION STATION DSAR l l ,[

I Figure 2-4 2

GENERAL LAYOUT OF WAUKEGAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT AUrUST 1998

120 i i 4 8 8 8 8 gbN go o@

F%

=

+./ :

5 - e -

4\*go -

fe .

E .

E lm

/o -

0 -

-20 .

t i i t t t t I I 40 :

J F M A M J J A S O N D

{ l MONTH 5 i e i i s i i i i i i i E '"

4 =

d Y

[3 n - A, ~. MAXIMUM h2 9:

'N / ,e...f', IN 24 HOURS ,

A g

g s y 1 -

1 I I I I I I I t t I I '

J F M A M J J A S O N D MONTH ZION STATION DSAR

{ } NOTE: Figure 2-5 BASED ON WAUKEGAN DATA CLIMATE OF ZION REGION AUGUST 1998

a LAKE MICHIGAN a- n-53 I_a E 52 w8 I -d w Em 8e !

as g=* $~ i

$E 5 l s #

g x W

1 o l i

" # l h

" ~ ~

/ \g ]@!

V

~

[

\# 2 ;

Y j

i ,

I

! l ZION STATION DSAR i

Figure 2-6 AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND ROSES MILWAUKEE, WAUKEGAN, CHICAGO (O' HARE)

AUGUST 1998 t

1 l

l 1

I t

N NN -

NE ,

i 5FT. LEVEL l 1

NW NE

! I j

l WNW ,ENE l

~

l l

i I W CALM 3.74 % -

E i

I l j WSW ESE i

t SW SE SS SE S

,. l l

4

)

4 i ZION STATION DSAR q } Figure 2 7

, AVERAGE WIND ROSE FOR THE ZION SITE !

AUGUST 1998 i

a IWE effw I l NOURs 30 5

9

% W 88 s

le 8

s EM W90N la, cAi.m zoo i,o uom-ee) 34 ne ,,,

MmmM W - MMMM as,ic,its l I Y ' 4.* ej

~

w E'

04 a

e s k

4 8'

Sw 8' =

1

$$E S ZION STATION DSAR Figure 2-8 hoeber is Tetel Neves Of tesh liebility WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE A. ...G P og ill Seebilier Clos.

AT MILWAUKEE AUGUST 1998

1

'. w

~

l mw est j Noues il l l 8 8 1 I

=

W 4 Se I NE A of & ts t 's 83 l

't ' o ,

+, +

l n

=

+

~

! rs l

i 3 +

b le O' %

+',o+-

i CW s & +- ENE

*4 M y

- +

j caus ,,25

! is ne e M b m M (' '"**"** ) MNh -- t za is. ac. sa. sP:

l4 j

g se,sc isc l

c'

'e

! W .

g*

ESE 3 l i, a E 4

is 3 l

4 d 8 h-l 4' * .

e s

I -

p:

u i nouns j

s ZION STATION DSAR s

il j

j l

N.mbee is Teost Howe of Eseh Seebilley s Figure 2 9 A. . . . . c - Peng ill Seebility Close WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE f AT CHICAGO (O' HARE)

AUGUST 1998

l l

(5-YEAR D ATA RECORDS) se se e n io 5 2 i s.3 a.: em s.es

,, te w w so re to i e i i i e i i i i i e i i a

{ }

e g les -

~

/**

~,, fi.. r _

i -

uni..dee -

l

1. -

l I -

s f _

- / - ;

/ .

, , i l i i e i i i e i e i i

,a ,

n to se 7e to N 8 M 2e to 5 2 i e5 a.t e.es e.st

% PROBABILITY OF DIRECTION PERSISTENCE 2 t ZION STATION DSAR

{ } Figure 2-10 WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION AUGUST 1998

b 6

i s

stassts 7 class ensinsense in encEnf F terst aus. sisGat?? Cues etsfatense to etnEInf F 19fut 855. sisettlit tues erstesente la etgrms F tcM cus.

emeritsum ein asesset tasm wem sm smet ca.act. sere ' su amar cnicam nh e eset eta e,sione ent;mab nt.r spuut rta esens cuecucib att e esse run naam ae

.. c. es.ser: ea.sto ..a r s. .. a

. .e .c es.wra opsto

. . . r r s. a

. .e t. a s.um em.as .t r. s.

m a a esee ser som seg asm .g a / w - ..

N _ _ _ :

. . . = . . . . . .

= . . . . . e = r. . .

. ew . -_ - / _

/

~

se - a m W me ; E l

/ ,

= _ se su a su s s .

sisWRITT CUISS etsfRISHIm In rUFInf F forst tus. sisettlTT CUlss DisTRIRffitBe In PUEDet F TDfit 135. I sur.Jarum su assesw sm meest messer cwacnab nn, e eser run aske/so custnoib su e asig rta e/s>-ene

== . i

- .a e. C. e s.um ea.ste .r a. s. -.= n a ...

_ c es.um om.sto .e r. s. j e -

e ,

t t

.c - se t

\ #

= . . //. .. . . . < = . Y. x - . . <

_ x _ _ _ .. ZION STATION DSAR

,, f , ,,

/

, Figure 2-11 s= su sai ser STABILITY CLASS DISTRIBUTION,

_ 5 YEAR

SUMMARY

- CHICAGO AUGUST 1998

ST8EfLif t CL4!rl Di$fArtutlet le PETENT F TSf84, tek 3* 'T'ftW' puuker%setts $#4 Stresulf 5'88f:,17f CL8F.5 D:1f*IE,'tO'STR IJse. Ab4LO M F ftt'4 (B% SYustLiff ness g!5taruga 3. pgstt=f W 10tg a me.tKt.neve sin sisagent aftasajptte att 12/10 - 58 4 3 attwustte #1% 12N =ll43 PflastsEE. Wik 32/Se - 3:43

.-. aeC g est us t ag O mifD EF u=.= aeC c ast rts as

. . . S ce's

. . . . . a

. e . C. co.m . . . C. . . . Olt.ytri . .t ..

e a m me. wg wee me .se m - av et m w ese tu see te me. tw 7

~. '

. . . t " .

///

7

% . . . t " . .k . .

~. - j . . . I eti (W 4His / EW USD D ')

13

/

. /

m x . w s =

S

,5. ,, s.

/ ,.

i S S ;

Stast(If1 ness Dista mition fu restter F totut enL stsWILiff Clip 55 0?,Tntaffitre tu Ptftfut F TUT 8L tiph EEC.Jukett $m specutt 5m suetst SMeuqT i WiltstsEte uit 12/53 3:43 altestytte u!% 32/30 - 31/63 l

L

-- . . c. .

j

. . ,o E , . . . C . .e., . . , . .

= .

~ ~ =

/ -

t

~ \ //

t

/* ~f% /.

t

. . . i =

\, !

i . .

- tw =/ -

> / w *

ZION STATION DSAR Figure 212 '

s STABILITY CLASS DISTRIBUTION.

S YEAR

SUMMARY

- MILWAUKEE AUGUST 1998

. ;~ 5

l3 i ;f ' i'I, g , . '

h i

l{

] {Q;pg]

4 g[g} f

)

ZION STATION DSAR Figure 2-13 ANNUAL AVERAGE y / O A U G tJ S T 19'48

,7 w ma -- ;

4, .

u,

'W5

_ ;,1 ?'

. C$fdN?"

Y ..

l 1

l ZION STATION DSAR

Figure 2-13 ANNUAL AVERAGE x / Q !

AUGUST 1998 1

i

a - - ,.- - - -

1

p. .-. , v '"' *==.",Q,~; *

.' g~.,a,s 5 ' L.Qmi- -

M('L,

. ,. -. M' ' .n P.

EA SA T IIA II

4, g a- 1 4' > .~ I.. ...e,, b.e'=3 ,e [-d. .-

(. -

.. e , t. .h , '. '"h

. ya..$c.-_ . . .'

d 9 . # W.

m y _; 4 . _ - _._

q _ _ _~:,w' s w ,,,,e.

. . .a

, i k '.As* 14. .a . .

- 4 ';

{q l

' ' ~ '-

I Qet s 4

,e se a-a e s i'T * ! 7 s ,

?* f . (3' . f; 4 T":' .* * -

c, e 1

g__, ,

. p.:,s c-

m. ,

e i., . . .* i l>

b...-

.f.iGr_.as. y .,!

_ _ _ i _ <._e . _ ,, ..u

- . 4 i

.w s...

- . -- 'W- f,rsm. P QN" ---* * - -, .* : e . .e !

i

- ' . -p 1 . , -.. . - .... -

.. s s -(i;9;-. "

g*l*

e.

3 q A,'

u '-

h "r i. - 6 "i i s ") ,g' o i e t -

i

.u .. ..agf : ._ _ _ _ _ a .; y., ,".r..?.:" . . .

_' b_

. . . ,'*. T

, ; ,,pr 3+ v . .. ,1 7 . s. .

a. , _o h .,f',g M . 'i ,i4 g

,y :

. , , na

' .=, e h ! 'h T w, n " ,)

j =

. p n.<,

_ _ .: - _+ i. .) _ _ - t": }N l, g,

) ..;

L -..

. s,

.!cr.: m 's ..r,,...~

' . a.

F .e- .h, '

- .c

, 5 a 10-,

, t .. .

^

1 c Jg.. Y ' ,,

4, .

8 F '*!

x t r-- "-t-

, 3. .'.e..x.

i.2

. :.-- f -

r tt it ' Iq, T, e ,

,,, t

.. .* e n.,y

) r_m.

e- -

6 -

.t

-i ,

~- '

T M s10~8 i..

'I..fe i,.-['" - *

.. . . / s I j 1 .-. d ~, '"S' t

g au

. sai &* '( '

L s I 'l, M

[ f' .;

~ .h*' l'

/'

$.Dx10**

/

l s;. ,.,,v.y ,

,. . t l'-

i ja , 's tl

., a 10"" I .

" y. . *.v d

, g. , 4 8* e pre--? i n

,,._,,- ei.

.x ; .

i 2

e b ,* ...-,

, , . ,s - , n .3 =. .i i

,\

i d,. ".

e v 4,I .

a p I . 't . :.. A[,.*p,. iY- O M .j, l

. - _ ._ !' .3.,,,3_,4 "

2.

. 's..eE. ,,-.- -

.i .

p.

a .g.' T

. 1

. :..*i1,....

'im . r- i 3*

. .j' ; ,,

e .' g,< :'Y .r E' s; "'"!.

4 ,.r 4

.-ci ;: . d p::::g ;,, -

....s,- r -

.~ -

Ql. g . :. , ~ . . . .,

- f- -

-1 ..

, . Q .' _ --

~ j,: i .~, W.' y ,_ /

i .e

. & .%p,t.. u -

' ,,,j,_. ;.'s

,, ,,; .) , . .

- ,, n. "7, .q; . -

. ;9

,.. n........a..

_., . ,,.x .. :. . -

. .. r i:

-H .--

g t

. .. i e . , j. ,

i .. ;,c - N). e i

! i -

,, ' .j

. . (6 *--

', ,b

.y

.e..

g-.3

gf Tw,,, a.. :

hIiI s

( i W

""ow

..' . ::t . /l t p. ' : ., e r l.,!i -

4 lg C f. E a, C +, n i 4.iG % 4" I I :g ' . i,* u = 10-7

a. r N cE '3a

.. ';.,.t i. . , . .- , . .

-4 -

re' W ;y*v./:. I t'

34.'p g Jk _.17 p 'eY, . % .yhI ages & T

[

t, ; tf

.s i;Qg ".g *. .4 -

. r'. -' .y

-4s.;<f g (-f . g !

- ~s a . y ..

p}> = . 4 GROUND LEVEIRELEASE

. wiwoa:TAsiury mEcrRu" ZION STATION DSAR x /0 ISOPLETHS (35 FT. LEVEL) Figure 214 I

UNITS: sec/m3 SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE iso m S AUGUST 1998

4

.V .' y . c. ' o 0; E l

/j

\

j i-l' f l l

..? ,.

[ ,,l/ g.

N y,,c/j

'- l ll fg f ;

I N /

'_'\ .7 7T-- '--'7

.x#n l

[

g

~ ^-

.7 Q . ,, , . .- ,) ) {-%, . lo

.s w-I vyN-. .........1

.ZIDH s r '

1 2ou S ATION d ._

9 s. < i 1 f I f'

' {/lI , A _. _

f p' o _) *!'t-

~

Y. 30 h ., # _t

'I d

SEc!

g) Y' ~i ; - ,j %, )

/

jQ ~l aset"* ,r, c ,

f

6 h+ '. ' -

e, - -

o p .ul l , %. MP 8 '

' -- l ; '~O Y 1r-2 %en \' '

2 g Y. ._Oi g\ ,. *

'I l

l 4' I l 9'.- N Oe 7 3

g'"

22'samu se'Ise< f *. G

~ ^ '

"g \q

~

$ ' ~ . o {

f1 :;

1 l .

= en i ,, s-3cc I

dh,,ff:,?

J' !

%' h', ; %-dec*

%'.)A. \ '

l.

/.'.

s 'l, (l0g k}

l\\

)

(j 3 1 s- l .

__f \ -

f. {f,,'h Y

.. (- . k'q

, ~

va ./

~7 '

c. -

N t ./ -

s s

~ . _ - / .'

ZION STATION DSAR ,

s t.}/

s s

/ , -

seats o% 2ooo' _ ___ _ ) h -

8'oLoareces arem o r .I Figure 2-15 l

LOCATION MAP -ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION AND BULL CREEK l DRAINAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES AUGUST 1998

-= ,n . = = . - - m

,gyga a A\, M. . _ _ _ _

i h- :tw;.3x s

~

/ [ i - -.- - >

3, 1 .. ,.o_~..,

=,

il: g o s. =_.. -.

m

}

M

(

- / -. ' -

=

}' '.' ~ * . ' " *

y o .' ,/ y

- r ---n,

--_ t m

\% (--

, ,i s n N__ -- - - - - -.

i

-. .- . .s, e

_l ; r; ' --

t , fy" elvi. - -

7 e.; . , ; .l.., %s- x) -

.L ,/ . . . . ;

5..)..

-, n. .-..

._.- .=.___..- .

'stt. i ,v,' s ., -l. .. c Y~.9., ,x. - s s :;

\ s

.' . .K. _.'- .' . - -.

n~*~.,,.i

, r. , - - .

s . , . , . ..

y L "~4

~ ._ ~

.\ 's,.y ') ?. .c I .'t'I' S*C , %7E -

\

.f< g.

e.,, N s ^

.s,,

gwr, s.n;:

s

=-

3, <<.

,,,,.%-y

- a<

n, Jr -,. ,

,e . - .

{f t

,a N.L /"

". , ,. f ,

y ;. . . /'.'k, ,,s a n as e ',

'n,p., . s.

w. . .2

,.w e -

w,= t', ,

me 1 v ram ,

d,i M' mn-

.!".TC'."* ' h cc:.v ., t,-". .-

. u .4 / - u)

.A lj

, l%V-E ,. I .

s* - * % .i d.' . ..

t >

.. ~ .. . . .

8 p ,1-e in - M g.,.i,, u.;- ~ J., ,Jr ; .t r ,A. 5 *

- -- , egp -

u t

. ;, e' * - gh

.._...N.

v

. y ..,t s ee

.sm

'a-. -

I,t - 4.-[* .4* . [.b'* i, ,T f*I T

' a. I i . 4- m I!--- e.. --

7t _,._: ,, -. - -

.s = ycd. - - N. f

n' "._ -

+

e A ~_ .

..< L.!.e

.1g. - , s L_.J.

(...

. -. . . .:. - 4,,- .. ,

-t_ e o. i .

f.. =.v -=

i

+c . 4 ,

. structu* e i

. . . , - . L.

y,.

. rama- - - g i,

,-n.:; .

. .:-N

.. w- - -

_ _ = , .

i i % .mes ,-in-T*4L.,==

e

- A -. . .

. .J . ,. .., a ., .

2.- g .. j.

, y .1..

7, . __ m_ . _ . , - -

[ ,/ ,- . Amp.;'g" = -e m r.w. ,, -

' . ' - , .1

_. o 2

\ ,

.e . ..

u,_ . .

. '.. -w,.- ,

r;: = _ j

' ~

/ ; .' ZION STATION DSAR

- - - . vv L ,y, ** '

M' ~ B-32 Rev. G 7/13f/2 4+ns. . ' n ;"

3,c y .., Figure 216

-. INTAKE STRUCTURE SECTIONS & DETAILS i

1 AUGUST 1998 l

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . _ . . . _ _ . _. .. . . . . ~ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

a. ....

1 o .- p* - .

- ... !.e-wp c a o ..

.-r r-6 .

E -

I.

. h. . . '. .

I . -

_.9* . O'. ' N h.y. ..

f

, gf ,,g).c.n.t:/ ,7 .'

pr. .,., y -_1c ; .

4 pa, . . i.g.:

. ., ,g*,

v . . :. a. . ...: .G.1

? . 6..

v.... .-

~ .

- W-6e wie ,

n- .. . .

,,.:,,,._, q .

. . . .3. ..s . . . ,

.. 1

]t.

j~y": ..

,J1 .

./

,d-

. . + ,.

(.y. Q.

. a

% - 9-v ; ,' .,

4 o

r' ' -

. C,,,..-l,.

',~ -"' M m.

-W '. y

N r~V - -

w-z) ..

w-

,,T' ,! T. um. . . I .

LA 4 ;

,. -l m.f.]. .* / . .i.l * ' ' , %.' 4. I

". N@ F ?

3 .

'.,4. l[, 'U.i- u 35$*

, ..b.L - .f'. ' . .

h.

[f Ve n 1' f -

~'

d - 2 /,

t

)

U

.I. M $n. -

[

f N %.- smi.g C =b [' _ ' y ', a- ..

/

4(- '

/

" h dw.. .. - /

- g( y "cQy

, ., i ZION

'. l .i g isr r.. -, ,- . -

l STATION l, '

Ci .

.t i ,c. - . s i \ p, - .

i j, ( ..:

/

' c====85*J

-5>..- 4 i n ... L

,l b .u k-s .- '

y(f.l Z 3j h..!.l' 7- S3 [i. ,'

i j'"'

,1 t 1

r. r .

m, .,

gh

. rl .r ., c -

/ !

m l c Ar.. , i N l -

4 ..,5 as_- .- -

,t e i i n iv ip

. .I yR.%)

I k..,p Q . .

. . f' .- /.

db :

1' n

37 p. l- , .,j -

j

.]{

m . I ,

9 l.

l ). '

..h~ )I <

O 1 4

, .,, ,(.

,,e- .

d.

t~

. T=

.c ~

t ,

/

e. ,' ., .. m. . h. ,. .

W 4e H

i iip -

o N

l ;) M.;

i

h. i - !j ' N lt 5/ .

,F.a_}..N.

.ii .; y28 ,.

\

. s 2,.

N e..+. ..

J . q. l--

. m.

n I ;- .

.I z

.. . s. .. .. . - n.

.. 6'i ci N

&.I ). -. .i , h_. -

_l !. )'l .

I; .-

i . ' ' '

E

.d l

ig g },l-SS I .. X k 4. .%,.A. .~ .4.:?.$'[~E o

i 1

1IN., .

' m -t ;, . , c -

.3s !. , _ _ - . - )-

l}

i 3 te ;. .

1 4 .

L. u

- n .-.

,q.L,>. %w~ .

. 1 x

.p1.bl . :~. .: .

,.y> n~' ." . 62 ;. n%. .. ,,...J.;

. a

,,,,. g - . \.- ,;

p - -s . .e- .s..= ;g4

I, v : .i e,e .

,.i'

.r . .s , *.

L r

n, j .

3 .,

-f .

.3 :3 -

< a ' '

__~

f.*: . .. .. .

g ,- --

Y, .. ... . ) ! :"..::.::.:..

r. ~.

i ?'ges >

,. ,.4- ._

...,.: ,n .

..,,. . y .

,. i f., . _, . . y . a -.- ..# . :::

. 1

.i . . . , -

~

..- . ~ . . g-

. 7. .:.

i, . ' '

ZION STATION DSAR

i. b _D " :

-a-gi 1i -

a

. t -

l ) . ,,.....s. *

..t Figure 2-17

. . " : ' * *, , ; j

. f.

3

... WATER WELLS IN ZION NUCLEAR

A) - - , , , - - - -

nth-. - z . .lly POWER PLANT AREA AUGUST 1998

-'w----- - - - - - - * - - '- '

l 1

l

.l l l

, l' i

/ .' l l1 FA-::" ,' / /

' s !

/ <*/ ,

a , ,'7, '

,. l

, t =' 'M.T. .

/

[ ~ , ' ', # N . ,%.r.k,' I

-.-m...- -

c, , l

., , .i I w5

_ _ _ _fi__f. - .

A

," l wll y I l :

l

/

lY*% d' }l !

y%

) - md nl f l

e 4 .l 1 i l i ?

e3 7/

i s

J- %_s_

L I 1,-

. , M i 2 \, ' ';$,,, N l ,

MICHIG A N I

I,/ i /

1 \ ,~ ti /,

! ,' i1 l I I !

i \ l i /I /

I /

l

/ -I _~ == I

$4 /$h '

i Qsy , $-Q l

g

~ . -

9,7, s -

/+,d

' 4 $ INDICATES THE NUMBER AND 3 LOCATION OF BORING

~ . .

/ /'

ZION STATION DSAR hw Figure 218 l - 3-BORING LOCATION MAP AUGUST 1998

2 BORING I l SHEARING STRENGTH IN l.BS/$0,fT swact tLeurrion ses.s2 fm' i 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 /000 0 390 kN' O SrW90LS DrSCM19790NS e6ac. ctart, siti vo.soi6

'+ f

li s - . - enown amt to atotum sano vita sous saavg6 88@ -2Le b l01

.. 7 eatse LgvtL ass #87 5 4

, 46 5 gp wa l ,,3 g, -omo sont comest sano ano most mmt l

enev pac to stosum same vita soest saavat gg ai.sva re s gp f

si e 360 as a SP

3s-ilt f enav settv ct,-v wita sano,eaavsk.amo

- *MDo- _. so 3 CL-ML 4

i l ) ) ) occasemat satt Lausts l l I l eaa? 88LTv Cha? w Tm s%T L$m$(s SSO~ s4.SUl22snoo 00 % ;, CL J

ML enn aste con vita sano am enavn Lt

. 34C ,s.,,, og e i ,- cg

nass iw ut

~ CA00 00 4 I I 33c n o . n .e ....,=m.. ;

i ,

6 .,

6 ou h9iEiEl' c0% '(C' ML

]

g $20 , , , , , .

gg saa nasv sus vita saw am aavek enn cut a cenass sano em aman '

% se e .'.' .SP

. .; GP j g s

8/C ;

is4 e ff.1 3.*

- .in sas, ras esso jo9o -n.ss-ing sa s " "" " " "' " ***

{. ) SM*

500 as e occas.oma samas er cun, so q g is.own ce e een eme same, so

.

ML so s eea,s o v ame sano 430 ..

.a: ; SM t' ,..

3 I s.as sei sea yg enn sano, so witu eaa.c6 ano soais an 1

- . . . enn miauna ootomers .mven.eesssenaeus.

' ceavams occasionat mrte canvas 430 l nos j ***"'"' "vu'n""E io in = esancita a ans to au's 47C j '!!2n. == $85 """ vues up to m = mamevenies voiess 4 au uvat>=s aren n .s.s.n. . vues ur to e ura earvsa saoamma

! 480 e

=

escoenattLv reacTunto 4

e ,- ..n

.e.siuve.s.m.n.su.s.a.

no .se.. ..c.o... . s.een m.e.,es.t.or.s ia,wu.. .. . . n evt ,

. n-e e.n..tl a.sment. neerun o..e..,e.c.

. . -,.s.io,,au. i,

-~=o ; ,g;;*,gs -= = = ====

dsc =; . a in. = p)( - -L e .uc. meru lIBa31 887o I

9 a.estatti Sta.eans.ptstvaates. titt,Muota T.4 1 SLAs Cou ? teuru-"esiticaf t unsraac7 1.f etsti W e WO u""n, 'e'.w"'

= ann"in na w ec'."'-

n . -

. ":F.OU.u.it. a 040 Penste u(Istf W G 30 M

s.MpaLLt.ci, =acru = 88'raearhana'

..soo . ...oW, iP to l#1'm m 3

j . . m .ssur=, mac== 'll,='3. art'a= = =<

c o.a n, . ...

, . .un.a.nr. u.

P.ic.2esitfr,a In,s.taLLtp m.av.a.,upTu e, W 1

o a n .n. . == = s n .

....,n,.

ne .

t,

. ,uu., ,c., ZION STATION DSAR

= ...un.i..u.,,..u.....

. oc l I Figure 2-19 i .GMt.(LA ?UB t Lf.Ct. O, Cept entCfl SENStst Unattuntt Lt9S faen T' f

8"

LOG OF BORINGS' (BORING 1I 1

j DAMES & MOORE 'm*Ha'"a 'w'***

'wenac*"e't t a *"

m neu's s ' r' ' e r.

AUGUST 1998

_ . _ _ . .. .. --_. - . - . . ~ . . ~ . - . - - . . . . . - . - - . . - - . - - ..

l 1

I

! l 1 i 1

, l l BORING 2

} $ NEARING STRENGTH IN LDS./SQFT sum w r ste nr a ns.n a is.

6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 g

3 srunots arsenorms l aseenagt Davintal Is g ~ 9810em Flut 70 ap(Dewas Seas 0 ystas Acut 044vtL 5#0 - ei e M'4E Ev'<I'aM t

8

SP 1 rse j enaoems To enat 570 es a that Fat $48r0 i sse i i SP l i $sc sae g

Mai $1LTY CLAT WITN $4LT LIES ($

.rs.us e t ......L,.....L l l 550 -.- u.aoo ,,,. . ,,. :3e '- ML

, liiji CL g a246 - ML '"'""**"'"'**"'

enar sitty Coat weva samo aan enave6 t 54C m ene j g asa -

i g *--

N f,4 % *ifI l

an.-as ne CL ML l

l l

A no e I E j

% KE 4e e l

d **

I l ,

, . . . . . , .. ...L,.. ... ,

4 5/0-tamo is, a yg I l ,q enge, Ctav v. L =us or so me ter I

50c o .~ , , , ,

'E CL i F8 '

ML '

t

dsc is s,.-er 3e ,,

$ 9 a

gg ###

"" ,... mat hea$ ate DOLOGIITI .pffTtt.70tstLetta044, 48C 1 $'# N EBIITAIIIS OCCa$sonaL PTAtTE CWYSTALS

< vues we to ur a osaistian pos'. aor's M :. $

/

IIC8t A ATELV FRACTURED l [ wwSS WP TD 34* m DeanstTtn t 007'e stS'l i &^* :

Wlmens CessPLEMD af 543.0*

1 i g/C se S/37#67 Cateses Ust010 a 9tPtas OF 20.0' Put20eef fEa sisRTALLED AT St.D*

Ons 3/3F#57 ZION STATION DSAR

{ l Figure 2-20 DAMES & MOORE LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 2)

AUGUST 1998

i D BORING 3 l l suenct ELEminw see sa SHEARING STRENGTH IN 1.85./SO.FT h j 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 /000 0,.I,srunots u erscwrxws gg once4 FNet 10 stoewss Samo prin Soest amavtt j is s ---

g-- =arta Level aise"

,e a , u u or oms nie manasat 580 ., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ano e u wtL ur nam or oeune martaiaL 57C SP ua UE eaar sitiv cLav esvu sont sano ano saavat ggo Pl esto Linus or saLY anoo-eso%-mom -

sis Q~t eaM Pat $aNDY slLt WITM Somt estavtL It2% t3d teQ($

ML 850 ,,,

san sLvy cta vita sano me saavck

3ooo-ca%-ist i u-anoo ns '

Q WheessG Lauers or sano amo sELY sw ees ML 82 ?%-f 25

CDDo 33 g k 8N SS S *.*

esav osme to connet sasso amo saavgk Wrtu samt silt amo cosetas g .., enseene cessoas ano soukotas O es o *.* SP R gg ,. gp ensome rena smestas ano sou6aans g I,

u s a. . ..

% ; ... ==

i gg g g3 I

g seat ssLTV claw witw occasapeak enno ano

eaavtL asio s4LT staus g/p sano asso saavg6 enaceae out l "Th l I I

ste%-Oo- ~53 6

500 CL l Z3Mi g Lavam or past sano, sitt

' 13.3 % -12 7 ICD /ft 490 l , ufs

.y

.. enar esasana sotomitt .mtfro,ross:Lertneus.

l m..q contains occasionat Penitt carstats 480 eat @ *2 : tsooERATELT FeaCTUn ,to q , ww = va m om eiesa = .. .v.

I

! ,i.4 rnacrvato T,78),gs,w to a a enamnen

-- ya. moor.a m , ,"aacTwt.r=

J ,=" m' 'a"=a 470 mot reactuato l

exm ,"1j moorestatt enactuato vues

vo wa osametre ima voinui eo.n e = cometneo e ..-

(gp ca m a.soumue = a m. v. w u p-PtEloistit a mStaLLE af to.o Oe a ss# S7 ZION STATION DSAR g Figure 2-21

{

LOG OF BORINGS,(BORING 3)

AUGUST 1998 .

i

_ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _m _ _ ______

l SHEARING STRENGTH IN LBS./SO.fT E BORING 4

, 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 /000 05 *"""*"***

600 02 l l l m o%~

4 3 srunots arscursons

} ,

... = =. so ,s...

i sso - su . eno.= rar to meiuns uno i ,,

, 1

, l sa - - . . .S. .P. . .een unL a,s,u seas Fat to istoaves sano wivM sont teavtk l I I gg g SdC j :To-so.swo,4 J :e !

l 1

s.swie se e SP l 57C 1 i se e 4

do S estat siLTv Claw wivu sosse sasso asso saavtk SSC i cL ut

' ' eRev slLev Claw wivu silt Lgeset

,4 gg.gg, gg g .

g.gg saar Lev Chav etim same asso eaartL

, a4 s BBC I nrs as CL .gamo,us,, vo us u..en.

l s7 e ML saw wa*L 1 !

I 45 0 i stes isz se e

L 540 . , =

eiiat 5Lvv Chat sivu seest seno ano emautt j

so a i

i R 53C na i l CL en o.e umas or so

! g e se e ML Lavra or cesetas i o . s.ii3 l no uness.umo, aae saavat omane sut j g 520 ts n

- .mo . . .L . -o u.= 5 .,

E l '

ka j ir? e f

h 5/C

! I

'20a4 emar ret samos e:LT warm sont van CLas es-s i l l i4.eweemorse i enaoise Lemus or ces sano amo soms emavaL 9

l ,, gg I 500 7.es mo are l

l j j dpC ,

enas sur CLav enn twa uness or so i coat 5,- enas e= in mosse uno I; enav s o v chav l is.es-n es a CL 5 4dC .i enav so j q ..

mu s*- mat == ve ca se am a.cL me i FRatsstuv I

r

' - .. : e.La.sE a .. v.osit.a--o.,oseiLi..

moma o on.vs.

i ,,

y: :..! : ,,,m,,,comva=s occasionai. evans Cavnau

i m W:b.

: :S!:!: moornar:Lv enaevvero J ,

' occasiom vues v. So 3,c m o ameren 46C

. I

_" u -.aro ,

un.s n iu.o i l _

es.==3,s .c,o arco av in.o-4 l

, l

. s c 4 casme veto to a erPru or SLP' e

ggg g e,ougs,sj evauseaveso 1

1 1

4 ZION STATION DSAR 4

l I Figure 2 22 I LOG OF BORINGS, (BORING 4)

oAuss a moonc

' AUGUST 1998 l

. . .~ - . _ _ - . .- - _. .. -.. _ -. . - . . . - . _ - . - . - - . . - - . - - . . - - _ . .-.

f 2

=

BORING 5 SHEARING STRENGTH IN LBS,/$0.fT bE l }

6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 /000 0 l5 d srusots

ML20195D122

Text

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.5 REFERENCES

2.0 INTRODUCTION

5.4 REFERENCES

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.5 REFERENCES

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.5 REFERENCES

, -- - :=:

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.7 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

Dearborn,

2.7 REFERENCES

Dearborn 4.20 87.8 30,

a ==='

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search