ML20195B870

Forwards Statement of Progress on Accreditation of Natl Academy for Nuclear Training

ML20195B870
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch, Limerick, 05000000
Issue date:	04/29/1986
From:	Pafe Z, Pate Z INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20155G578	List: ML20155G575 ML20195B870 ML20195B909 ML20195B932
References
NUDOCS 8605290570
Download: ML20195B870 (10)

Text

-

5

,1 institute of Nuclear Pou;er Operations

~

Cuite 1500 110o Circle 75 Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Telephone 4o4 953-3600 April 29, 1986 Mr. Harold R. Danton Director. Office of Nuclear Riactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washi gtpn, D. C.

20555 Dear During the six years since the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations was formed, the electric utility industry has made substantial progress in improving tr,ining programs for nuclear plant personnel. As a reflection of those improvements and in an effort to further strengthen training, the industry formed the National Acadexy for Nuclear Training in September 1985.

The Academy, which is now in full operation, and the industry's training progress are described in the enclosed brochure.

The nuclear utility industry has a goal of having 10 training programs at each of 61 plants ready for accreditation by ti.e end of 1986. This goal has been well-pub)icized, and many resources have been dedicated to the accreditation effort. With eight months left in 1986, the industry believes it is appropriate to report on utility progress in meeting this goal.

Enclosed for your information is a statement of accreditation progress.

This statement identifies utilities with all programs accredited, as well as plants that have achieved accreditation of some programs.

It also identifies plants that might experience difficulty in meeting the goal of having all 10 programs ready for accreditation by the end of 1986.

Should you have questions concerning this report, any aspect of accreditation, or the National Academy for Nuclear Training, please do not hesitate to contact me at (404) 980-3200, Bill Conway, group vice president, Industry and Government Relations at (404) 980-3207, or Ken Strahm, group vice president, Training and Education at (404) 980-3213.

Sincerely, e6o5290570 $ N h o ack T. Pate PDR ORG PDR President ZTP:jaa

,p,-

Enclosures i

= -

m 4/25/85 STATEMENT OF ACCREDITATION PROGRESS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR NUCLEAR TRAINING Shortly af ter the formation of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations in 1979, plans for an industrywide accreditation program were developed and disseminated.

In 1982, accreditation procedures and criteria were forwarded to all utilities. These procedures included target dates by which all programs were to be ready for accreditation (mi d-1986).

In 1983, this target date (1986) was published in the INPO Institutional Plan, fhe nuclear utility industry subsequently estabitshed a goal of having training programs for 10 key positions ready for accreditation by the end of 1986 at all operating

• nuclear plants. This includes 61 nuclear plants and, therefore, a total of 610 training programs. This statement provides a status report of progress in achieving that goal.

On September 17, 1985, the National Academy for Nuclear Training was formed, integrating the training-related activities of individual utilities, the Training and Education Division of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, and the National Nuclear Accrediting Board.

The Academy is, in part, a recognition of the extensive progress made in training in the industry over the past six years. The Academy has been recognized in speeches and formal correspondence by the White House Staff, the Department of Energy, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Inherent in the concept of a National Academy is an obligation to report progress to its members and its interested publics. This statement is the first such report.

It is being distributed to all members and provisional members of the National Academy for Nuclear Training, the Secretary of Energy, the Science Advisor to the President, the NRC Commissioners, as well as the chairmen of appropriate House and Senate committees.

As of April 1986, IMPO had received acceptable self-evaluation reports -- the measure of the readiness for accreditation -- for 367 of the 610 training programs.

By that same date, the National Nuclear Accrediting Board had awarded accreditation to 163 programs at 35 plants. The following pages provide a sunniary of progress toward accreditation by individual utilities and their nuclear plants.

• all plants that loaded fuel before December 31, 1984 E

MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR NUCLEAR TRAINING (ALL 10 PROGRAMS ACCREDITED)

Plant Utility Pennsylvania Power and Light Co.

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Salem Generating Station Union Electric Company Callaway Nuclear Plant PROVISIONAL MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR NUCLEAR TRAINING WITH SOME PROGRAMS ACCREDITED (Number of programs accredited shown in parentheses)

Plant Utility Alabama Power Company Farley Nuclear Plant (4)

Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Arkansas Nuclear One (6)

Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (5)

^

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (6)

Carolina Fower & Light Co.

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (6)

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (3)

Commonwealth Edison Company LaSalle County Station (3)

Quad Cities Station (3)

Zion Station (3)

Byron Station (3)

Dresden Station (3)

Palisades Nuclear Plant (5)

Consumers Power Company The Detroit Edison Company Enrico Fenni Power Plant (4)

Oconee Nuclear Stettori (4)

Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station (4)

Beaver Valley Power Station (3)

Duquesne Light Company GPU Nuclear Corporation Three Mile Island, Nuclear Station -

Unit 1 (5)

E. I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (6)

Georgia Power Company Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (6)

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (5)

Northern States Power Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant (4)

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (5)

Philadelphia Electric Company i

L-

_ ~ =

l

• Portland General Electric Company TrojanNuclearPlant(3)

Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station (4)

Sacramento Municipal Utility District South Carclina Electric & Gas Co.

V. C. Summer Nuclear Station (6)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (5)

Southern California Edison Company Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (8)

Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (1)

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (1)

North Anna Power Station (3)

Virginta Power Surry Power Station (3)

Yankee Nuclear Power Station (3)

Yankea Atomic Electric Company UTILITIES THAT COULO HAVE DIFFICULTY MEETING INDUSTRY COMMITMEN All plants are working toward accreditation with full intention of It is anticipated that virtually all of the 61 meeting the industry goal.

operating

• plants will have completed the necessary development work and will INP0's measure of have' all ten key programs in operation by the end of 1986.

this is the receipt of an acceptable self-evaluation report for each Recent assessments by the INPO staff indicate that the nuclear plant program.

listed below could have difficulty in meeting this end of 1986 goal.

Plant Programs Utility Dairyland Power Cooperative La Crosse Boiling Instrument and Control Water Reactor Technician Electrical Maintenance Personnel Mechanical Maintenance Personnel While we are confident that each utility will strive to meet the end of 1986 goal and that INPO will provide every assistance, it is appropriate at this point to acknowledge and identify each plant at which extraordinary efforts will be required. Subsequent reports will update the above lists.

• all plants that loaded fuel before December 31, 1984 u

.5 SENEllEllllD - NATIONAL ACADEMY 4

w i

FOR NUCLEAR

~

M TRAINING U.S. Nuclear National Nuclear institute of Nuclear Utility Training Accrediting Board Power Operations s

9 i

)

b-

When a plant's first training program In 1979, there were 10 training simu-

{cg*

gp is accredited: it becomes a branch of the f ators in the industry. Currently,48 are in academy and is eligible toissue cer-operation, and when those planned or Ut'll*l4u Lf tificates to graduates of accredited pro-under construction are completed, 73 grams. Accreditation of all training will bein operation.

e TMlUlHQ programs at all of a utility's operating nuclear plantsis a condition of full Training staffs grew as utikties ac-membership in the National Academy celerated improvements for Nuclear Training.

Ten years ago, a typical nuclear plant But accreditation and full academy training staff consisted of one coordi-uclear utilities havelong been membership comeonlyafter solid nator and a handful of instructors. Today, awareof thespecialroleof train-commitments and hard work. Nuclear an average of 24 instructors and five ingin their plants. This awareness utilities are building, buying, hiring, additional training professionals are has grown into an extensive, industry-organizing and working to ensure their at work at each nuclear plantin the wide effort to improve and sustain the trainingand qualification programs pro-country-four times as many as in 1980.

training performance of all utilities.

duce talented, competent and moti-The National Academyfor Nuclear vated people to operate the nation's Programs are meeting plant manpower Tr iningwas establishedinSeptember nuclear power plants to very high stan-needs 1985 to focus and unify industrywide dards of safety and reliability.

In 1983, more than 4,500 people efforts. All U.S. electric utilities that completed formal, initial training pro-operate or are building nuclear power Training facilities are on the rise around grams for 10 nuclear plant job cate-pl ntsaremembersof theInstituteof theindustry gories.This represents a 43 percent Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)and in the past, trainingfacilities at increase over the number completing cre, therefore, members of the academy.

nuclear plants did not always receive the similar training programs in 1982.

T he academy provides the framework to attention they needed. Today, separate coordinate the various training activities.

facilities and special instructional areas Additional shifts mean ongoing training The academy is supported and admin-have been established orexpanded to for operating personnel istered by INPO,which was formed by enhance training. Utilities have almost Five years ago, most nuclear plants in the nuclear utility industry in late 1979 to 1.6 million square feet of space dedi-the country were staffed with four shifts promote improvements in nuclear plant cated exclusively to training nuclear of operating personnel, which left little safety and reliability. The Institute's plant personnel-more than three times time for ongoing training or requalifica-group vice president, training and educa-the amountin use five years ago.

tion. Today, plants have five or six oper-tion, serves as the academy's executive Speciallydesigned, state-of the-art ating shifts, allowing one shift to be in director.

training centers, located conveniently to trainingat all times.

the plant, are becoming the norm across INPO and the academy are vehicles for the industry. Classrooms and laboratory industry uses the latest in instructional industrywideimprovement training facilities include sophisticated technology INPO manages theindustrywide pro-training aids, such as duplicates of many Each nuclear utilityhas adopted a gram for the accreditation of training plant-specific components and equip-performance-based, systems approach programs for key operations, mainte-ment and scale models of other com-to training. Modem program and curric-nance and technical support personnel ponents and equipm'ent.

ufum development is incorporated into in nuclear plants. Every nuclear utility in a training system development model.

the United States has accepted this Multimillion-dollar contmi room training This approach meets the unique needs tccreditation program and accepted simulators meet a need of the nuclear utility industry. It consists membershipin the academy by making More and more nuclear utilities are of five steps that produce performance-I a commitment to have their plant train-buying computer-based control room based training programs: analysis, design, ing programs accredited. And the U.S.

training simulators, an investment of development, implementation and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) several million dollars for each installa-evaluation.

has encouraged and formally endorsed tion. They duplicate individual nuclear this accreditation process.

plant control rooms and allow operators One of INPO's missions is to assist the to hone their skills in dealing with normal I

industry in upgrading training. This plant operations, abnormal events and assistance leads to accreditation of key simulated accidents. Utilities are finding training programs by the independent that these simulators provide an invalu-National Nuclear Accrediting Board.

able returnin better preparingthe operators for unusual events.

I

~

I l

1 hg

• A formal presentaton on the training uUir:y edustry. This er:sures that the programsis madetotheaccredsing National Nurlear Accrediting Boardis board, and the board makes the deci-tru,ly independent of the uti!ity industr NUCIear

, ion. a,e o,ee,e,ac,eeita,,,n.

,n,, dec,s,ori mak,ng p,ocess.

When training programs come Accrediting soard maiies finai accreestat oa ded530a before tbe board mernbers examine the The NationalNuclearAccreditin8 repottof theacreditationteam andthe hgf Boardit composed of 20 eminent utilityi responses, as well as the utilny American scholars and executives f rom self. evaluation report. They questcon the followingfour groups:

representatives of unutysenior manc3e-

• senior utility executives ment, plant marugement and training A cess,tof theaccreditationpro-s par

• non-nuclearindustrialtrainingexperts management,and heydetcemine which evaluates and verifies

• membersof thepost-secondary whether the training meets accreditation the effectiveness of utility train-education community objectives and criteria.

ing, the independent National Nuclear e individuals nominated by the NRC The accreditation program, by requir-Accrediting Board determines whether a utility's training prograrns meet accredi-Aworkingboard of fiveindividuals ing reaccreditation every four years, tation standardt A utility cannot become meets to consider accreditstion for each ensures that the utility's training system a fullmember of theNational Academy nuclear piant's training prcgrams. Tt is maintains training quality. To achieve fot Nucleur Train.ng untikll of its training wcrking board includes one or rnore in-and retain accrediterion, a utility's trein-programs meet these standards.

drviduals from each of the classificatiore ing system inust indude an effective.

Every nuclear utility is committed to listed above and must have a majority of ongoing process to identify and ircpfe-tchieving accreditation of its initial and representauves from outside the nuclear mentchanges as they are needed.

continuing training programs for the 10 y

p.,

g y

)

key tions necessary for nuclear plant Q

f.t.gg,,g & 44DdfgeeseanleenComposqq f

Q The Institute of Nuclear Power hPmeden,paghese nde esme'g1hehe, g.gggggg.,

Operations developed the accreditation j aund gq;.AgtmeePieheentiwAcadendcANaps i

p procedures, objectives and critena.

g Unbes0@

g [5 k UnhedAirEnes (r

g%AkiseleOmskJr.M

' 9.m di Qgq @g These procedures describe the following iAssoclaseDwectorof NuclearReacter M@6 3 six steps in the accreditation process:

WeePsonidetand$duMansp + @k

• e The utility develops the training pro-4 agJabomeoryaruDianorensectorC 1 grams usinga systematic, i. Opemmone

. i GM

• 9 B -

s.

Gusseechusessk-ama ofindeedesy ~W;r.4 enOnoheNudeerGenomebgsession u performance-based approach.

un mm Gr==astead C 'W M N.v..P. *

• Usinhtheaccreditationobj.ectives and a-criteria, the utility performs a self-m$..feediC 8usaserM?;.

_ f, vic p,,,,g,,, tijMq Q M

1. Cu- ".EdhontemperyM,N eC "PsoyomsA *Ci"'C'"'"IM*"l'L T fossasil.hsendi,fu.M :- d4 ;,r evaluation to identify weaknesses in i

a-

-1' M

11 ' 'MaandsamhPsessdentiorbessesth,;

.ts training programs.

$ Ec e dek W i

• The utility then corrects the.dentified MIdahoNshonalbghneennslabosseory Q i

Pennsv enimaieneurwesesty,g#

o T Q A' u pe nemmiss.cmeses(1),.,..A.

weaknesses.

AM Mesdent.asWeed,fmM d

--.3~

-.<w.

• A self-evaluation report descn.b.ing MeniorhPsesidert.PosicsuppF; W; 2 manneyhen 1/

NenhemsseneshwCompany;a.QE Finsessosmdearenepneerts how the training programs meet the A

,j accreditation criteria is sent to tNPO.

~-

s,.

'8" " '"" N

~Y 9 5essiwMW EnegrM 47, Denddtsches4' MM/M~

? Ashens=PowwatStCnmpersWgy Mceriesidere.mdser 6 ?@

• Anaccreditationteam,madeupof.

training experts from INPO and utili-m.

-o ~

id*-

ties, visits the plant and assesses the 4 WayeeH Jams,thA0) q. ".t y% m asN t.kiiansecuriccommenr M r

w

- an, nw training programs. The team's recom-

%Psesidwe,NudemW$seso4 QGmbesiSede,MM 4U Z l !.

3:, f,7 yeend,Deparenanto mendations, along with the utility's

< g e pes,oitsdi,an company 10 W T.,..

responses, are provided to the utility p

lunheskyalArtsosey dh o

admeds.) anes, tham ', f Qnm 2 ^ y5g.

and to the National Nudear Accred-M

2. Oiief Hwaanfecess EnWneer aw +@.v n

Op RWemR.IIsosi, fha &w,.QQW Asemeen QQ'h),gmerg

_ Q y f4 A

f iting t$oard.

• gg g r _

- W

. + - -

Mg 3 y& wgabCommwilcanore chhei h

a M,

V Dem Couepeof Engbioenr4 - %[QQQ s, % mMp ip q

The % nucicar plant pos.tx,ns moswd m the MMNY[NM:NM$

I Usiheseky of U

%z. 4, n p:q g up,ident,P4st'earOposestens $.g" accreditation program are as folloe g.tvicePies as -

4

,,,g

(,eeeget.nesere@,re wene EAeasianDepartment@sest4 Qih

.f%WC 4

noni.cenwd operator m

~gq reactor opator

- )

s.,,..,,s.,o e s w w + - se m' c hn I

(

a

, y n

_- te-N,D M

m,eanEmeskus,EnWrmwingbh'w,norwiucteerindustnela eintncaimaintenance pmannel

,iem6.ee n.,,=

u, +n y

rn wai-nten.ecepmonnei hemewu mmalam;M$'.4 ~

I*8f84 88 k

N deolog pmte sontahrucian a

i-hn.- and rnanasm k

l i

The following INPO activities support Trainingisa vitalparf of fhe j

g utshty elfacts to nmprove nuclear plant indusiry's overalleffort to Nuclear Power

""iLg as,imnce:iNeO p,ev ee,

'=" rove n'aa' avera"as assistance to nuclear utihties on request.

Indtvidualnurlear utolaans are dedr-e Operations Thisassisoecetekes maerferms.cevee rsene sehs,antelmarl e w, aederb-,

ing virtually all aspects of nuclear plant roovre es to upgrade traming Thr, as training.

leading to a t c redas rion and full rrwm-job and task analysis: Using industry hership status in Ihe Nahonal Ac ademy expertise and experience,1NPO has Con-totNuclear Training Thescutnay ettarts ducted analyses of key nuclear piant constaute an mdustryw,d". wllanttiated.

T be nuclear uthlyindustry, through INPO, has dedicated resources and positions. These analyses identify ta sks seli smpromment pmgram expertise to assist individual utik-performed in each job and set forth the Thr empetus behindthewet/vrtm a ties in upgrading their traimng, ss neces-knowledge and skills needed for these reahaaion that training,s a tev to at brev-sary. The Institute, as part of its role in the jobs. A computer data base contains this

,oghigh 4t.indards of notlearplant salery National Academy for Nuclear Training, information, and utilities use it to help andnluhtay assists utihties in developing, implement-ensure that their curricula cover the Through the arademy, car h nuclear ing and maintaining their training activi-necessary topics.

utilav henehrs trom nationa!. local and ties.

Training and qualification guidelirtes:

internalrecogntt,on of ns Irainmg ac com-INPO is responsible for the day to-day Using input from the industry, as well as phshmerits A quahty f raming program.

administrationof theacademy;however, analysis of jobs and tasks in key nuclear coupled with the recogn t>on the acad-member utilities retain full responsibihty plant positions, INPO has developed 17 emy allords. can be used by ear h ut lav forthetrainingof their personnel.

guidehnes. These guidelines descnbe to enhance the proleuronahvn and the. pecific c omponents needed for the pnde of as station personnel An Academy Council pecedes over-5 view arid advice to INPO on the oper-training and qualification of personnel in The nuclear utrhty industry has made ationof the Nationa! Academyic r nuclear powerplant positions.

strong commitments to ar rieddatcon Nuclear Training.1he coenalis com-Workshops and semina6s:lNPO and the National Academy for Nuclear prised of executives or senior managers sponsors special workshops and seminars Training This industrynide < ominament from member utilities.The Academy for utility training persor nel to assist to euellenee in tra,ning is a national Council meets regularly with the execu-them in deve!oping their own traming atcomphshment.

tive director to review academy activi-systems.

ties, as well as all INPO training programs Nudear plant evaluations:INPO eval-and activities.

uates each nuclear plant in the United 5tates on a regular basis. On every (NPO plant evaluation. both the conduct of trainingand the resultsof training-how personnel perform their jobs-are ex-amined.By focusingon how workers actually apply knowledge and skills in the plant, these evaluations provide (NPO and the executive director of the academy with ind' pendent feedback e

on the quahty of training and the quality of the graduates from accredited training programs.

l l

l l

u 1

4,.. P, n:x. n..:; w.F ' +..~;w:q w:e. g :

M. n..,.M;y %...q.m:d O:M n

.: h h

,hS$$.1f$ w.-[.[ T Y f.

E..

~,.;

? -

.. s. v..:.

3. m.... 5 9 h...h. 4..~k..%y*:},:,x i h;... n

.b. !..r..

.h. k'h~..,iIk' y).h.

-c

\\vy

+ y: w w......n...u.c.1 p;a..;,7;;

=.

a-L L

=-

. e, M,.

e ya w,q.

....n s

3%..,p'.e, +;n.??,M.. e, :@a /.:k] syy4: &,'i* *W@w:i w:n ~Q.t.. i%

L' :c

. R.b

.e, g

• • u t

.,. m

.s.,

yA.

.c..q. p s

BV, :,Q.%....Yp,f:

h

.. ff)k.b....~,p :q?@%..? w.%r' 1l; '

s%-

Qy R

y::.$':-Q;,

a

e.

n.$r.. 'MG,.y fGl.f.b.g:Vm;. &w?% ::. W..;;G m.

c..

L

, W.c. -n.:

., ?;y' if**:.' t.

.m F.

)Y3.%

.n q;~)m,q:m: c.y

.f

. dy.)

.;3. m t. y.y

. q yh.:.r.v:x... m.g.

M *d N[,,h g y $ h.@

. :.n.

h.

..INEM:WM f

N b^$

k h.~d4'4N.hh&W5YEb$

?

$$hNh?k&m h JNThy M.O F m...,Qt'k'l.N.%.-Q.9..y g.: ;

N..

. q,..W.W..

m h.@j.'5%,,kbMNMM[N

" ' "profes' i6ha dN.

7.O b k N.

m W

M.,. mMWs.Q~i 3%.4.w n.f J..

' &~

G"Wv '

m.Mif &.m%e:.g w.

m.w..

h.k Nh MMbM h.

U.h W;%.;4g@p y$. j)p.w sty:4p. t.f-$. k..k.y...$ NMMkh*l y

s

- %m d%F ;

e

, ;.. 0:f % p,

.kn'ow.their.ameing'can Gw.WW%/ Joh 9

m~

m' ' '..

s r

x.

train

,v, h

h IN ff ef$k atisfkt6ty"' hhbk@kNN kk kh,$

N WhShpENdrNrfor$MNMrd$dnitionN N

A N

6hbe k[

I[N agrelih6ilit,i he35'eldchi8,$rhhhfYafhty N NMNNMN).';h hk Il.

utilitiEsjnst M l

?

t M ggg$adw,' 6 e,Vomrns.. ~.d to c llec..a'ri.tstip iridJstrE.; 4 g4

.conipase)heuls$u'cie

~

4+$n%,

9i i

4 4 ypgradejar,id vustain high'q.,ogram.s th.v a.

r.., n:, t.

tt o

twe pr at A.O d

@

n

.~.z.. x.i.w:x:5,s. m...;& i:1,:m. hg.g.g,.

u Nh k, W jainingaMddalifi%tjonof'riuctedr$

.. v.e u

, e,a m.w s e.+

4, & P M W.m..% M,$.i x a ualityin th'e p

F4

^:

f(

t ~

1~ -

t

~

i

?l personnetfA majof pia'rt of these' effortsi i

y g_y up & '

q.

2}!$ MheN'a joina.l$,. c'a'.ddmyf6r. Nuclear /,# "

i'

' ik

. Tram..mg> for.

d. Q stre.ngthen. and unify y'.

b.

. : lnuclyar;tra.inin, k} activities n, atiD, nwide, k.. ?

. E:

s me d.u,. ~f. 4 PY g-c.

p. g.

- y. g.

Th.

..de...mylprovid, 6 a'ftamework so f

g 2

eaca 7( ining. activities *,Tre'sourt6s a

. h[. '

j g$4{

(y

..? y$p 'L. grogram.can worldto J..q z z

7

.N S.

tra

!F i

i 7

Jl'-

thenuclear;uSlityiindustryl}2)t L

g (?

7

'Q 'g j

.hinsti,tute;of% clear Power Operations. '

d, Ii g.

'-,4.

VV: ;

7

..h:

i W. t. <

ng y

h,,g.: 9 h}

k' t,

b

/:

y.

^

e. F :,

, p a :3,,., u. q.

2 w.

-I

,t a.

f L

=

0

.cy j.

g f.

i l

,.., f,lk;!' :.(j '

• ?

.2 p[, ' $ j {(i., j; 4*.,.,

.,d.'

l ~ -.

..'[,;}k

(

Y

,h.,

'i

%.._1% &__. j.. Sl.. A o r.e,, &. & 3. M h y

j

,ii N i?MN.M.Y $ ; I N M,yh Q g i,...p M.$?.o(...'9,.' %.T.d N

i$4icl(

If L'

e

'f e

ill ACADEMY NATIONAL FOR NUCLEAR Gumummmus TRAINING Suite 1500 1100 Circle 75 Parkway Atlanta. Georgia 30339-3064' (404) 980-3213 e

e e

t J

s

_