Text

NRC-2020-000157 - Resp 2 - Final. Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed
	ML20178A254
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/26/2020
From:	; NRC/OCIO
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20178A252	List: ML20178A253; ML20178A254;
References
	FOIA, NRC-2020-000157
	Download: ML20178A254 (110)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:~MORANDUM TO: vM: SUUCT: UllfflO ITATU NUCLU,,t MOULATORY COMIIISIIOH NGION* ., ~tMU.I ~ Ull.il, II.UNOII aa-.a, Mt.rd\\ 18, 1997 Jack W. "°'* Dlrtctor Div!lion Cf fll~or Projects :11/1\\' Offlct of Nuclear flluctor fllegulet,on OMii f trw 'ffy~:a.i*IW'vf~~ Ge~, t~.o fllE T,0111 Ass,tf'ANCf

P.tE cooe ouAL1F1CAT10N

&T.4TUS OF THE,OINT IEACH STEAM GENERA 'TOR : ~!l~ WfLOS C4rT 17-014) Dunna an lnapection CIA 10 3011!'6014) perlormtd It Point Beach Ur,it 2 ~,om October 29* 31, Nowmber 12*11. 11*21, O.ctmber 2*5, 11*19, 1998, JerJar~ J -~. 1997, tht. lnapector identified an 111,aotved hem concerning tht ASME COtJt qu,!1fic1t10n of the gas tung1t11n we welding CGT4W) procedure GT*SM/3.3PI, fll1Yl11on one uNd '" produc1n11 !.ht girth weld, for the r1p*ac1.mtnt 1tHm g1ner1tor1 (SG). S11bNQutnt, , SG ,,sucemeni inlptctlon, flleglor, Ill ltlff kttnt,fttd that, Code lnttrP,llltlC. .-92-69 should new been follow~ wNch rtQUlrtd *ctwt tht ht1t Input,,o be recorded on.~ POR, b1 calculated beNd M the pertm1t1r1 UMd I t *nt loc1t1on whtrt the lrT'PICt lpt!Ctme n, \\'1111 "'~-* The ~nt Ir tch rtpltctment SG w,,. f1brlc1t1d to tht 1918 Edition. of SectlO"I ltl, of the ASME ;..ode. However, the girth w1lo1 Wirt performed ltllll~ proctdurH w hich wert ,.~,ed tu fflHt the '81& Edmon. of St: ion IX, c,t th~ ASME Cod.1 The 1995 ASMr Code 11e1ion IX r1qu,rrm1nt1 1pphc1bi, tot~ girth welding proc1du11 "-P1C1l1c1t10n !WPS, .lT*SM/3. '!Pl, flltv11ion o le, inr*udtd* QW-2!1 wt,,ch lmnltm11n:, MC'IOl'l OW-409 '... I 1uppl1m1, Y 1ueni1el verllble for GTAW. OW-401.1 1tat11 *An lncr11*1 II" ht1t,,..PUt, er, n ncr***" in volurr.. <>f ~eld m111e1 depo1hed per unit length of\\, *.Id, over tt It quellfitd.

Ther1fCKt, If en lnc1HN,n heat,nput v,,11 u11d,n tnt !>G girth weld over the* l!sed to

-:;Modu-..:t tht Codt QUllificetion weld, the girth w,ld wo"' ~ not,TIii' ASME Code Section IX rtQUlrtment111 a Co61 qu1ltf11d weld. T~ t1chn1c1I b1111 fc,r th11 r, 0u,,em nt 1ppear1 to be that tht hig -.., ht,t Input could Ol'fl"I * -no * :*mit1ng m,croatr JCtu, 1111 Clffecting mechlni~,, propertlt1, e.g., lnipect toughneul 1ft1r w11'11ng CONTA:YS: Mtl Hol.. 1berg, D"S (130) 129*17U. f*M I II MS... w,vne Kropp, D"S (ll' 1 121*1133, f*mall WJK 970327002b 97031 J CF ADOCK 0500,266 Cf-

J. W. Roe 2 MN"ch 18, 199? for the girth welding operations W:>s GT* SM/3.3P8, Fl111>*.-'!:!or, one, allowed the weld,n, to ~ ~ rlorm* d with hHt inputl of up to 73.3 k}/ln. ~o QTAW ~.... Wirt midi end docum*nt*d ln proc1dur1 quatiflc1tlon rtc(;(d (PQR) ~T-SM/3.3*O2, f!1Yia1on c--.., which wit uaed io,:aualify WPS GT* SM/3.3P8. A aJnglt G"':AW paat with I rtcord1d heat input of 114 kj/ln Wit recorded,.,, PQA G~ *SM/3.3-02, Rtvfalon one. Tht rtmtin ng 29 GTAW PHMI In thlt POA Wtrt mad* with heat lnputt atgnlri~* ntly.... than the 73.3 k,',n alfr.w*d In the SG girth wtldlr,g procedurt. The lntr,tctcw calculated t~tt an average per PIH heat input of e&.4 k)/in had betn uttd In the 30 wtld ~.... rec:ordtd in POR GT* SM/3.3*"2* The llcenMt did not parfOf'm a calr utttlon of hHt inpiJt It tht impact apeclm*n location In ICCOf'daACr with c,J, ltrttrpr11.1tlon IX*92*69. If the l1c1n1H had followed lntt rprttttlon fX*9~ e9, the htat Input at Heh of the lmpaet tpec:,men locations would llkt tv not have mtt OW 409.1 "t qulrt mtn*t,, * 'Ct onf""

weld PHI,th
h1ghe1 heat Input WII UMd ln the qvrliflcatJon wtld. Thul

.. lnlp.t"for C.Ofit ldtrld that aw 409. t r1Qulr1m1nta wtr* Pottntlany not met alnct the Ql ~ 'ic-. :ion..., Id wea f1brlc1ttd with 1J lower heat Input than that anow.j ln the WPS fo, '

fie.a girth welds Thf-refort. thl lntptCtOf' eonaldc..,t d the girth ~:-16, pottntlelly *u.

',,., th*.ASME Codt r1qulrtmtnt1. At the tlmt of the SG replactmtnt ln1ptct,J1, .. i,.~tor wu unaware of the Codt lr-tt tprttetlon IX-92*'9 rtQUlrtmtntt 1n:f bar , ~. :1v1tw of acctptablt r1diogr1ph1 fOf' the girth wtl~, did not havt lmmtdittt Cl)l'Ctt"ll for tht tdtQUI CY of *.hi qlrth welds. Atglo., ' '.aft rtvftwl of the ;\\SME Codt hrvt not ldtnflfltd any furthtr guidance for th11 111u.. In dd1tlon, the UctnMt c01,tt1t1 the regions v.aw of the ASME Codt t1Qu1r1ments and hH cho1tn not top iotm 1.nothfr queliflcatlon v*.-ld. Region Ill r1Qut1t1 thet NRR staff rtvltw the 1tt1chlt'.,,. 'F\\ and WPS and providt I.. t.aff position on whtther tha SG girth wtlds 1hou d be cons1d*n1d quallfltd per ASME Section IX requirt mtnta. A r11ponH Is rtquesttd by May 1, 1997, to 1upport t1rr t ly rt1olut1on of an 111,,auon pending, whtch lncludta thl1 um, lu'Jt 1ppl,1d to othtr welding proc1durr1 used du11n; the Point BHt.h SG rt~tctm1nt. An1ctvn1nt: Al t tattd cc w/t tt: O. lagchl, NRA A McMunray, RIii J McCormlck*Barg:,, RIii

~saae ~ o.cr.~,._ c-. *7 QUAUiY EXECU'rn>N PROCEOl.iRE ,-.n.. ,.,1111,..........., WPS APPRO\\ COVER SHEET '42.5 Fonn P5e 1 of 1

-~o.ie--

QEP 20.%*1 05-SEPT-H PWE WPS UO GT-SM/:\\ 3-2 PB Revi5cJnlOate 1 I 10091'96 APPROVED BY Morriaon Knudsen Corp. JLd -,.,~-~ PQM; UJ::QtL,~ --.~:;;au;;---=.a:;._----- ANI Clltnt Date:

MORIUSOH.-.HUDICNCOfU'OMT1011f WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION 1101 v.e.t,.._ '"""' ~ a,. 441 u Ho. GI:SM 1:+ PB Bu, 1 ~ WlwfNd v...,.,..., f"lbMN. ~ '9 *~) "-'9' "-lfe<P) ,10 N-A 6-12 1SM $ 6 " 1* N.A ,o.,.

, 0 t.wl.

17.2

vlT 10.\\1 27$MM\\.

n, GTAW 16-21 2 2$ Min. SMAW lfl2' N.A ~2* u~ ~* $Ml.II\\ X.-26 ~ 2$ ~ti\\ 6!1) 1*1H~ £WW ~'32 CiMAW li~A:,,',5,S 12*lWTb-2 (1'1. l110naled lll"IOtlenJ £1a1 Ill flolf'IOt~!I 0 YU 0 NIA 0 Ohr W!- :, N t:UI' -t.a* L"ld.nt:U CT)* OWt l", l!'lf r."WW"-"" holdln9 twt* 91 llifflPerat-,~ 1.111 be 2 how"- : ;ii 1S r.wt'.~U for tlUI

""1!0,,11T

CZ flt 4 U t* I I '""\\ la,.= ,rt

I

.,.. 2 a,._, u.r, t **1 o,.., ID flt I WC Ill t

1 IJl,1 C,,,,, 1*1 fl I 11,f,., UU,.... l*I IIISI Ul,,a(

c,,~,, 1-1.n, .., ws,.,. 1i, ID Flt,1 Ncuc AICINl-'o**~~ IIO _.,N:f IN...,. CMWI lhQAld W llt;/Of .... -Old. ~,._......_~._.. MSAltl.251/r/J/o, docuan CNn011 bJ &mlndlno the WPS COwt.. -.~..,_,._end p,-tplnlbclll ~--be~wilhVlelt\\llPeolh ~'-"-

\\ QT-SMl'U-) a-JUt.'"'e"(JU'fU Yua1mcauu11 n-,wro ASME lX 0 ..... "'--C... l'f,...,...._-.,GM.4"'1 T..CC,.._..,.,.. *-ztlt..~ ClrAW1$MAW ~ r-JC~'."':lfl~DE.-='='S,"'!j~N~U~SE.D~~t(.,W~-602':~~,-- M.SIEUCA,1. tQ,11~ Gl"IOe 8 Qua 1 a 2 ,.., I,~......,,... lGo 3 ~-~~

c., m

to a ()'""U t\\l '2!>
tr'J-.. -"'"" t. -v *, sc:.
d'1 f\\;,fl LAatAI

~-- I ~ Hwt ~ in, S.Zt SF'Ai4"""$ A'h'SC:&U ~ Vor.s ~ Pim 1---,----1-(111_)~S,;_:1a: Ptc._;-_N_.Jlt'1:A/l ___ ~---,r----t-----"1'----t-----',:.--) --+-(Uli , )--t_T_r.o \\II S 21 ~02 ,s I 2S ,u 0 ~A GHN A-No f.HQ. Po£Ml'J 11

0CSP

.,., I GT.A.,._ ,:,.. u, SMAW B BI0\\ 6-1.l

s-n l GT.IW

- ** 3\\ I SM-'W '" -~----,,.. S 21 ENOS-02 B ao,,..,. 32_.,31 ~lAN t/1 S 21 ENOS-02 ~" I N.'A NJA N.A NIA eJ CW.NO 0 Y* [!) No D tiA 0CSP ,o

cx::JVt 0CSP 1~22:a u s - 11
zs. *

,c oc,,p S11 0CSP,e,..223,,,.,1 *2S-1 60 2511 F N!A ~A K'A HIA NIA K'A NJA S,.t. A. \\Ill I

I llt CWTl**,H2'1 Tlw-...,_ l..,;~ lta _, T ""' *.,

II,ut *c:..I,._ l ~ ~ v. 0 NIA 0 ~ Non. ,11* TH*C>~[SS OU-~ NEU> 1,,t~ -'l O J AUOED tQN~11 ---~...,.. ~ 0~ &OX>" 3G ~..,,.,.... _ ~ IJp/'IIJJ D DowMa D N,'A ,s-.,....... w..-** wro.C;'i,a,s&Caua~a!'IIII-CA.st\\.~ ICM~ 12~ ATION None ONLY Os-4... 0,,,... °""YI NfA o-a n-,,.... °"'JS NIA H/A ~Cot,odGa no.R&:etc1h) BAOOHG 'flWI.JNG Ngo,\\ Nc,,,e Non* Wlllcf.ng Graot H/A H.'A ,s-20 NIA ft/A a.,g1,1........ a...... SlrlQle

Procedure Qualification Record No. ASM ~~~~---,-.... ~---------------.... ---~----~--- ($,U TU 15 (OW*, !IC> CclnOlc1.0 Dy uc,c, I err T

N11mo. f loW\\ A H.neo'na11. Ta~ ~

t* lnc.A-&-N per OW-412.,o , ~ rru WIOTk n<<:I04Q ""CA Ull'Mo\\Tl 101'4 UI.TMAl l Uff T ~lolOI Wl4C" l\\ol) tlll) --.:."'-=l,\\;.:J __ _.;:\\:.:~=..:;;..

.l_,.___;l

,.l.;.N'=.;ll;_.i;..;..;.._+_;;..;;

w, o sen,,... NiA o,~ 11.sM t:3.SOO

t-----t-------11---------t------+---------

SMAW I 0~1Scf.&. HIA 0111S 11'°' tS 100 GUW I O 5,05,0ck. NiA O ~ II ... 200 GU Ol ~-80-0 TES 1 S (OW* 160> ~td t,y UobCit a o,y T

N llff\\04II f-<1'\\ A. H,

n. T&tJQIQ A..uo::l,at* tr1eJ&-19*!16

\\ 722

Y'1: ~CHIGU"t llt\\lWIO-

,-CF.AT S ! t OW-*62.1 & *'3 11> ACCf PTA8l£ s.o,-ow-"2 2 & *63 lb ACC'f'PT ASL( s:, ow,, £2.1 & *<.l 11> ACC(PTABl E S<t OW~ 2 I *63 lb M:CfPTABLE 10.1:;..,~~ H S'TS (CM* 170) C#,0.c.a or 1.*a I.. H MetTII~ T1uJ&lg ~ l~./9*2'9*9' (Itri

Tl)

..,..c,,..... uu V.'Vl ,v as vvt,cz V

ss

, 2, 17 WMl V 119 I,) ~ WMZ V 16' 10 Wt.Al V 10 M N:A v.,,.,,z V 1£5 10 t9 IU NIA NIA N:A ,VA N'A N,/,l NIA IU NIA ~,. "-iA ~,. H.IA NIA l<iJA Ii: A OTHE.R 11:Sl(S) CcnJ~ee t-y ""* 1, l<.r~an T, i.:::si Aa1x,a1a tnc.1!* 21* ~ \\ ) 'ji,22 l1T Ot-* At.,-. ~ 1,t,

I l(,M:-ir29>. 011P.OC'9S 1 ~N r SJl,,I.

<.012' <.ClA int*tV.MZ <.Olll,<.01'1,<.0121 c;.01

...-. 'Y 11\\o\\' lht Sli'tmentl in I~ llltord.,. corrtC1 and INI I~ wtlels -* p,r AIIU,

l'IOIO IIICI IIS'td tfl v.tOfC:i'lCt., II

.-..n:J of SeC'IO'I IX Ol lrit ASME Cooe. ~ORRI~ J-JUDSEN COHPORATIOt~

DRS ACTIONS TO HEADQUARTERS ACTION ITEM TRACKING SYSTEM (AITSI CONTROL FORM AITS #: 'J1- 01'/: DATE INITIATED: ~t)./t:J7 REQUESTED BY:--~--------- PUBLIC RESPONSIVENESS: YES _ or NO =- DESCRIPTION: A.stnE. acll>£ QURUFcC.AnON ~rZJTUS DI= TH Pr: kRcH,:$7!?;-m (,e'NER.m,g_ ti:t/l,1:JI wezl,s ASSIGNED TO: ,e,e::, DATE DUE: 6 /, /,, CLOSE OUT ACTION: ____________ DATE CLOSED: __

~ ~WI~ If I ~ MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORAllOH n,.ml 21, 19 r John A Grobe Direct lf, D1,i *on of Reactor afd) U r ucl Regulat'>ry Comrru on R o I1I OJ 'u1.rrenville ad Li *,, IL 532-43 D :ar tr Grobe Thi letter I nttcn in response to )Our lcttez of iarch 25. 199

and m part1cu ar to reque t refatwc 10 ac:uons iK ha ahead t en or plans to t e to assure that the le ed cmplo) discrunination dj~ sed m our lettes n01

,ing chi Im effect on other t ' cmplo As ou w,

re of violation, dated Au_ru 5, r fiR <-o 7 durin our o of Color 00' for! t \\ rain Tl 1thnut penalt) pnm u

d ndua of a thoro ation er t1l uon ur pro ch,, also tmplcmerued on pro MM.I~ o fmclu~ team enentor replacement Pt Beach I t Lua pcsf ormed m late J 997) are an l e pan v. t v. e bcl1C\\ nuti ted ent effect that rru ht othem1 ha, ansen from our allc ed,ol tion of ret 1at n the OU? " d1 engm r Becau tK' mt and th an1cular h,e b en mz.cd to JOCFRSO 7 do not b nst tn eer,1c-'1ted th act the admin j JUd n ru ed belie e that the ma of tvidence d, cover, h - shov,.om,na that the jud c* rulin v. As p mt ofinfomlll

n oted that n a oomp~ r

\\'Cd d.,e*s ord~ rcinst run the empJo)ee 11' retureed him 10 o ueate.d him '"airl; and on an equal ba

any other empl~ee On ApJiJ l the compa reached a tentau c senlei. ent a eement Y.1 po ee Th ement 1,'Clldm th lJ appro,111 hich ~ mmcipatc happeru

-ithin the no.1 9805010037 ?00*21 CF ADOC OS000267 CF Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 1 of 81

MORRISON KNUOSE CORPC>taTION tr. John A Grobe Apnl21, 199 Pa e2 In lhi letter c will explain v.-hy ~c beliC'\\c fl<' s action. sin e our \\iolation at Fon St Vnun in mid-1995 up to and includm the present time mitigate any potential chilling effect Thi IC1tcr has been prepared to include the foUo in 1 Immediate correcth e acuons at Fon St \\"rl!.., 2 Continuing corpor tc c<>mmitment to Fon St Vrain le ns learned 3 Policie and procedures in place at both ?! Beach and t Lucie to protect concerneJ emplo *ecs and I\\ oid a chillin_ effect 4 A discussion of how MK recei\\ ed, in esti ated. and di positioned ar. ine1dence of po * "bJe harassment at Pt Beach 5 Other action to nutigatc! a chilling effect from the group welding etigineer martti-includin.pe-cial action t *en to l\\:Oid an, potential chilling effect within fK*. Corporate staff 6 Result and Cf.:fusion of fK's pro-acth t'. effort tc eliminate chilling Imrr;ediau: Correcthe Action et Foo St Yr,ain As soon as iK and P C self disco ered that a c illing effect d1ri exist 111 Fon t \\ r.Jn 1.K too

the tollowin0 actions all of v.iuch v. ere completed pnor 10 the actual cnforcetTh!nt conference a)

L E Pardi rt!mo, ed the superintendent ;mmaril) re ponsible for a hostile or. Ctl\\ironmcnt from the project to underscore the enousne of his actions b flC' s project mana_ement rene ed emphas, on our prc-existin " Open Doo Polit:\\ which encou1a es empl")ee "ith &n) t pe of c-0ncem to bnng th c"'llcems 10 mana_ement' attenuon c) Traimn° of~ te emplo)ees "' conducted,th pecial emphasis on 10CFR50 7 d) B an exit imcn1C\\\\s for ~e!) termmated ernplo)ee man attempt to encourage reponin_ of &n) Wet) concerns and to asoenam if &n) subsequent safet) concern ere omg unreponed for fur of ret.aliauon Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 2 of 81

tr Jotm A Grobe: April 21, 1 P e3 2 P C installed confidential "Emplo) ee Hothne** to funher en :ow e the reporun of saf et con ems MK' s cti-,tie \\\\Cfe completed t Fon t Vram '",th ut 811) u ddr sed or unre J ed saf et i es thu ind1cattn l t l oorrectn e action er eff ec:u e Corporate Cororonan:ot LP Fort St Yee.in Lessons Lcamro lmmcd1 teJ upon d t Fon.,t \\ ram Tt1omas Zar Pr ident and CEO onstrucuon Group cd the et) Alen Bulleu hm ofli and prOJect In bullctt r Z e c:mp open door poliC) and <' u poli of nond, rum ~ cmplo) cc who exp f ct con em A pec1fic ref ercnoe I c f R50 7 To a r that '1K ernplo}ees on future j \\.\\CfC n t intinudation 1n th \\\\Orl 1 c L E Pardi dC\\clopcd f 10 2 9.. Baras ment and lntinudation in the \\ or :pl c ** o"n behind Tab 2 This buUetm reqwr that C\\ Cf) iK proJ t facilities opera ~ under C re ul on sh 11 h.wc a procedure hich pro\\* de for, nurum m, the indoctnnauon and u11.mm of all MK upen, ry <".mplO) ee~, rt e n t of emplo ees to ri pon et) concerns. th indoctnnation and u: nin of all non-penisol) emplo)ee of then n t to expre wor.place et., concern and met od of collectm and d*~ 110nm emplo ee concern re th t i ' did n future proJcct all pen*

3. \\\\hich I from L E P t

ept 1995 Th on h, soom actions to 1,-01d n example of R ate Rcoord docurnc r; of thi letter o I on t occur on ny wn behind 1 b olat,on ' dated em 1 4 m an ement per nncl

s Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 3 of 81

MORfflSON '..NUOSW CORPORATION ir John A Grobe April 2 J, I 998 Page4 3 &ilic1a and Procedures in Plac.c at Both Pt Beach o,nd ht Luge 10 Protc:c:t rooc.emed Emplo.,m and A,oid a ChiJljna Effect1 Bccau~ of fK cxecuthe mana_ement nsiuution to the neeo to a,oid a hosule v.-or

emironmem and a c.hillin~ effect, fK too* considerab c care u both Pt Beach and St Lucie to assure lh~ e problems did not ext t Behind Tab 5 can be ~e.cn fK'1 Equal Employment Opporturuf) poliC) at Pt Beach The dear intent of this policy is to ensure that no person will be di. nrninated a ainst or rubJect to harassment of an, nd A sunilar policy "a 1 sued at t Lucie 1 ab 6 contains the -1.K "Rules of Conduct" at Pt Bea.ch "hir-h 1carly state that "Beha,,or that discriminate a ain t other emplo ee mcludm intimidauon. coercion, or harassment" w1U be subject to di iplinlr) ction~ mcludin termination Tabs 7 and contain SGT' Pt Beach Man gerr:~nt S stem Procedure 1 P 2 0
- ttarassment of Protected PersoMel" and GT' t Lucie ianagcmcnt ontrol Procednre iCP I I
Harassment of Protected PersoMel" respecti, cl)

Both of these procedures st te GT'c policy relathe to protected emplo ee

define "Protected ErnpJo ee" and prm,de e method for reporting harassment and/or 1m1rnidation incJudin a "Protected Per onnel Harassment and Intimidation" repon form The procedure a1 require indoctnnauon and trairun of all emplo)ecs of their nght to l
pres concerns and the uairiJn. of all supervi OJ) emplo rclam 10 the The all ed reta1,atol)' act a ainst the.roup e1dm en mee.r did not occur until rmd*Jam.wy, 199 '\\\\ilen "or at Pt Beach w for the most pan complete B) the ume the inititl DOL tn csti~a~1on concluded in late fa.rch that the.re wa no ment to the oompl int there ~ e,c vinuall) onl a handful of 1K per OMel t Pt Beach Because of thi 1t is hi hi
unli el) that a chillin effect could h, e happened at Pt Beach under an circumstances

-GT 1s a limited habihl) compan. establl ed b} {K and Du *e En *necnng and er.ices pecificalJy to perform steam enera1or replacement proJec:ts iK 1 respor.si le for nil field act, 111 includmg the de\\ elopmem of proJec-t policies and procedures Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 4 of 81

Mr John A Grobe Apri) 21, 199 Pa c.S 4 implementation of IDC$C procedure The proocdur o pro 1dc for the dt~ *11onin_ of all **Protected Per Mel Harassmcn1 d lntunid t1on Repon " Tab 9 and 10 record mdocmnations of Pt B Luae GT personnel to GT' on-Harasyncnt Policy inch include procedur 2 0 and 1CP l I , ('f') emplo) ee on both projects "as indocmnated tc the pro edur At both Pt B~ach and t Lucie GT i~ emcntcd "Emp10)ee Open mm ru at1ons and Co *

uation Request" procedure P l O t Pt Beach. ee T bl I and iCP I 2 Both of these prooedu GT' oor Pol1C) d surin open comm cl on the proJect, 1 e, t prOJed u1A,~

~ procedur , for emplo~ ce to ad h , or ~elfue con pha on la pl t or urtirmd ethodolo for re\\, and ti T 13 pro,1d au e to the u of Open C

ca io

'&luauon Request" rated b) an emplO) cc duri

1 mten, Lucie This parti con med rclau e to the use of a pamc:ular ansu auon GT mana em OJoc:t et mana er, r 'JC\\\\ ed and responded prompt}) to lhi em ms T

14 and 15 c Grs procedures for an cmplO) ee oat une.r\\1~ pr cc h pr tained in Gl" ement PobC) GR-HP-002 wh t ae procedure etnem onuol Procedure 1 P 4 1 Both procedwe-$ pro,'lde pr f per nne1 t termination and pro 'ldc an * ~plo ee th uestion related to conoems for qu 1auon Luci e ch rmplO)

ocel>sec1 thro clear af et Tab 16 cont e ofa comp!

1nterv1f" as u Pt B h Bet een the Pt and -l Lu ProJect wme 1

37 Gl emplo ees or' ed total of pproximat 1 3 million man-h rs Each ofth emplo -ee:.

a. mteT\\1~ed at the tune ohermin tion from the prOJect to

, e there 'ere no unresoh cd fot I e \\ e bcl,r et t 1 ofth aforementioned pohaes end proocdures ere e :trrm., effc 1,e m prot ecllnn emplo. ec and in ciuninatin an., chilhn df ect \\\\ c dtd, ho" e\\ er. ha, e one recorded po le smcm of a prmccted cmplO)ec M ~ mana_ement 'prompt and Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 5 of 81

Mr John.\\ Grooc Apnl 21, !99 Pa_e 6 decish e re~poru to thi act quic., contained 1t and prov1ded rcli to the prott-Cted emplo, ee Be.hind Tab I 7 m all documentation relaxed to this inodent A boontractor health ph *cs rmplo *cc rcponed a craft v.or *er' iolation of a high radiation boundaJ) The a-aft v.or'-.er \\\\U immcdiatel) termi.natea b) il< proJect mana.. ement TI e ne,.1 da,* the H P emplO) cc h-..ard other unidentified craft people mv.e potenuall

threatenin remarb rel ti,c to hi actions in ettin_ a v.orker terminated The remarks '"ere such that the H P technician thou ht the craftsmen ere just, in hi v.ords, "'blo"in off steam..

He dirl not at thi t~ rcpon,in

coneems to MK Se,\\ eral d&) later-a second H P techniaan O\\ erheard some a ain unidentified boilermakers mal:e comment v. hich could po _1 l) be coru dcred a threatenin tov. ard l first H P technician At thi~ point the H P brou.... ! his concern to {K's attention *Jtilizin our Protected Personnel Huassmcnt/lnt1midation Repon.,

fK proJect mana ement too

immediate (same day) actions includmg

) lniuatin an ime~.. ation into the matter b) iK' project managet met '"ith the boilerm er general foreman to cxpre our concern The ene.ral foreman commit:ed to rC\\i~ thi cU\\it ith each foreman c) Th MK project manager met with the boilermaker steward,o e~pre hi c-0ncem d) The fK project mana er me4 "-1th all craft's bene.ra1 fore.men to rC\\ie\\\\ Gr policy regudin protected emplo ces end empha. izc our zero tolerance for an

de\\'iauon to this poliC)

On thi same da) ow project manager a ed memorandum 10 I proje.ct mana.!ement pct\\'l rs, and foremen reemphasiZlflg our poliC) regardrn hara ment, intiJllldauon and coer~n A copy ordu 10 i included behind 1 ab l GT "as unab e to,demif, the craft mo made the rema lio\\\\C\\ er, on the follo\\\\in_ da) project man C-'lletU met with th H P technician, rev1C\\\\ ed mana erneru ac.uv1ues and amed assurance from the t~cian that he'" as not con erned relath e to 1i personal well-bein There "ere no further adverse rem ...s made ) 211) craft per_onne1 5 Other Acuons Tat.en to Mmwe a CbJJUo!i Effect Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 6 of 81

{r John A Gtobc April 21, I Pa e 7 b ~u are '" arc, 1.K requested the firm of tier, Ander. on. and 1alone to do an an-depth. independent iff\\c,

ation of the compan,
actions r ati,e to the group "cldm engineer On~ of the findin ofthi 1mesti ation is that the g,oup "eldin cngm er -a ddicient in the a *stance and suppon he pro,ided to the P, Beach project

~ tier' s intenie" re, ealed that the project people v, ere B\\\\ are of hi deficienci~ agreed v.ith mana ement'a actions, and therefore "ere n01 concerned, i e. there n no subsequent chilhn effect O' ha, also re,iew od what effect the remo, al of the oup "el ding engineer might ha, e h don our corporate qualit st ff Tab 19 contains an or aniz.auon chan onta.ined in ow* Quahty ASiUrance 1anual as of June I 8, t 996 lt i important to note that our entire corporate qualny staff '"as comprised of four people the Quain> Director, the Corporate LC\\eJ m. a Group Weldm En *necr, and Ont' docume 1 control cler

St"Crctan All of these emp!o. ees ",th the ex. ption of the cler secret "ere long-tt.rm qunht) profe sional with a minimum of nine )ears' employment wnh 1K >JI oflhe e emplo) ecs "or in rnc same buildir. "ith and ha, e direct acce to MK mana_ cment t every le\\ el includin the pre
dent, our le al coun

, and our human relations dir, tor mce th rcmo\\ al of the oup ~ e d1n.7 engineer "c ha, e on c, era! o c 1011! told the people in this oup that e re,;:p t their ri t to p openl) m an) ensumg mqume and that thC) need not be conccrnNI about re1al1ation AD corporate office emplo) ee that ere intcrvic-'"ed Junn the tic-rim est1 ataon were informed that,.f ' a committed to the o ~ectivit)' ofthi iO\\esti ation and to th fact that ther w<.1uld be no retah tion nst them a a resuh of theu pan1 ipauon m the 1m estigation I:, et) e:mplo ee who ed to panicip te in the im csti t1on did Results and C.onc]usioos ofMK's Pro-Actoc Effon 10 Ehmmnte Ch1Jbo1: The prompt intense Ml' re ponsc to the prob ems at Fon 1 Vr n and th c.on entr tcd cffon put fonh at Pt Beach and... 1 Luae a ev1d nc~ m thi d1sru on are ind1cau e of M,. ecuU\\e mana cm nt' ns11iu1ion to a ho tile '"~r cn,,ronmcnt and a clullmg effect The wnter, u: particular. hE,in been d1recth m,ohed in fK' respon &nd conec:t1,c ct1ons rclat1,e 10 Fon t Vrain {mclud1 the wnun of ProJect ian *cment Bu1let111 2 9 iii h requires each proJer.t to ha,e a procedwe ddre m har mt"nt nd mum1dat1on m tht' ~or pla~) is acutel_ *~are oftht-need to enable people 10 bnn fonh con em ,thout the li t t fear of du; nmmat1on or retalumon Th u1umatc proof of rK's commitment hov.C\\er, he-. m the fa t that sn the last 24 months v.c aH emplo ed Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 7 of 81

Mr John A Grobe April 21, l99 Pa cl and terminated more than 1,500 craft, technical. and pervi,ory personnel in t\\\\O demandm pr0Jec1 Both of these pro"ect had the rcqu, te procedure m place to a urc that all cmplO)CC con rm \\\\ere captured Onl OM concern rclatl\\c to protected cmplo)cc was ~$Cd and u \\\\as immediate!) and t'.TcctheJ dealt wnh We bell~ e that the informatton provided hescin, and the important infonnat,on d1 :o, cred b) tier, ct al, pro,cs convmcin that fK did not ret 1atc against an

cmpl.> cc nor did "'c create a chillin, effect AC.Op) ofthi~ ietter u "ell a a oop of the tics repon ",II be ent to\\\\ EPCO. Ffond Po"er

& Li n, and Du e En necnn and erv1ccs Please ach, if e an pro"1de &n) addiu n I information A n as the tie, rcpon i complete, th re It ,II be m de a, ailable to our corporate ~a.ff and to our nude projects alon; \\\\1th rep ted affirmauon of cur commitment to pro,ide All open or en,ironment in ercly. lJl' cc W Blado" R Edmister P H,c 'C) D Joh, n 1 Zargc Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 8 of 81

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION £,."-** --* ION ,ow In the faner fomson (nu n orpornt1 n ) ) ) 9 --0 1 I I H)A \\ IT I ouI~ I Prudi, bem ft I du!) S\\.\\om, de ..,.,.., nnd SB)

Jh the J I elUtl\\e \\ 1 c:

President of 1om n Knud en Corp muon. r n meenng nnd on tru JOn roup. Po" r 01, 1 10n. and llt I h( h prepared the mfrmn uon pre ent d in the len r d ted Apnl 22. l .. ubje t.. Apparent \\ 101 u n fr:.mplo) e D1 nmmuuon Requirement.. _ I 9..() J. and no, th,. ntcn thereof. and thnt t.he st t rnent nnd m ttcrs ct forth th rem are tru nnd orre to lh be t o h1 kno" led, mformauon nnd belief HI CO ITY 01 YAlf GA uh nMd m d, m to befi e me. n ottu) Pu he on tlu 21 t d) of pnJ. 199 h :omm1 ion c ptrc __ f.___ ______,... Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 9 of 81

MORRISON l(UUl)SEN CORPORAllO'I afety Alen Bulletin, Tom Zar**~. 6 6 95 2 Project Mana ement Bulletin re ardin_ Hara sment and Intimidation in the Wotl* Place, 8/24(95 3 Reply to a Notice of ViolLtion, l E Pardi to U S *Re, 9/ l 3/95 4 Readin Update Record S Pt Beach EquaJ Employment Opportunit) Pohcy, 9/95 6 Pt Beach Rule~ of Conduct on the Job 7 SGT Pt Beach Management ystems M P 2 0.. Hara. sment of Prntected Per5onne1," 9/11/96 GT St Lucie ianagcment Control Procedures MCP I 1

Harassment of Protected PersoMel, 7/17/97 9

Pt Beach Record of Indoctrination JO St Lucie Record oflndocmnation l l SGT Pt Beach Management S sterru Procedure MSP 1 0.. mplo_),ee Open Communication and Condition E\\'a.luation Results" 12 GT _, I uc1e Mana_ ement Control Procedure "EmplO) cc Open Commurucation and Condition Evaluation Requests," 7/17/97 13 An Example of Response to mplO) ee Cond,uon E,-aJuation Request at t Lucie, 7/1 i/97 14 SGT Pt Beach.Marui_ cment Policy GR-HP-002" GRP Exit Termmat1on Process," 9 '25196 IS MGT t Lucie

iana cment Control Procedure iCP 4 J
GRP Per nnel iln-Proce m and Out Proce.sin " JO 14/97 16 An E.xample of Exit,T erminat1on process at Pt Beach, i:?. J 3 96 l 7 Im e u uon of Report of Possible Harasr.ment of a Pcotec:ted Emplo ee at Pt Bench IOC Relati\\ e 10 Harassment and ln11rnidat10n at Pt Beach 19 MK Quahty As urance 1anual Or aruzauon Chan Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 10 of 81

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORP. Safety Alert Bulletin June 6, 1995 Thtr Morrison Knudsen Eng nHring, Construction and Er111ronment1l Group'* ufety theme for 1985* 1986 Is ~setting :he Tone for Safety*. Togett1er we have mace great stride$ in ach,eving excel'ence 1n 11fety and continue to *se*. the Tone* for p011tiv1 reau1t1. The effective commun cat:on of satery an ormatien 1s vital to setting th11 tone and attaining the aggresa1,e performance goals we have Ht for ourselves. To be ettectrve, th11 exchange of 11f ety lntormat10n must oceur 1t all levels o1 our organ ut on. Management h11 an open door pohcy and encoura;es employHI to freely expr111 any 11fety concerns ano 1t i1 the policy of the company not to o 1cnm1nate agairst any empfoyH for expreulng a sa ety

concern, Effective safety commun cat,on ia not only an Important part oi o~.r ufety program out,s 1!10 protecte.; under venous federa statutes and regu!1tlon1. It is MKEC&E's po'ir.y to comply with employee protection provi1cn1 of 10 CFR S0.7, 29 CFR 24, Section 9610 of CERCLA (Superfuod) lfld other environmental 1t1tut11, where appt c;ab'e, and to,n,ure that our emp'ovees are not discmr, nated against 1or br1ng ng ufety concerns to mane9ement'1 1tt1nt r 1.

As membera of the MK T11m Ne all must have en opan ear to saftty, assure that our employees understand tha means ava, ab* to them to voice their concerns anc respond, ac:cordr gly. Thomu H. Z.lr;c, Ml( EC&E Page #s added during FOIA review *

Page 11 of 81

MORRISON K UOSON PROJECT MA AGE~ ENT BULLETINS 0.2.9 SUBJECT Harassm nt and In m dat on n t Eff cu 8 24 95 Paoe, of 3 A. POLICY of 1o

n to ens re tn t our emplo) ee t

) rl 1 f:.mp u B. REFERE CES TI1 fed r I re ul 11 h pr e.ct hem re uued t \\\\ r un f e \\\\ C. REQUIRE~ E TS em lo) ee \\\\ en t ) perce,, e the) re J m J OCFR50 - * -nplo) ee Prot uon rn rumum requuement to u f~ llu h n to t re utau n m , e pr edure ~ hi h ffilillJDUffl :h ddre m nd Im1midau n proce.dur h u1d ddre a nd tranung o enerat i remen) o nd d1 J A me ensunn that req ired th u r rel ted 1den11, 1n,g pen I I) empl ) ee I ludmg uru n n£hl of empl )tt t report afet of th n n ht n t:e t Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 12 of 81

PROJECT MA AGEMENT BULLETINS I I I f SUBJECi. Harassment and lnt1m1dat1on in the Wor place PRO fl\\ l1 \\' I I 0\\\\ O" ner hem ha apph hie p h ) pr oedure O\\\\ner hem d pph able h n t ha,e procedure l,. 0. ~IDER TIO. Obtain O" ner hem pproval to dopt their procedure D<", elop Jomt pr edure or o l m opro, al to 1mplemen* -rocedure Effective 8 ~** 95 Pa 2 of 3 ------ -1 l uhze 0\\\\ ner hent pr edure-to Ind trmate tram empl0) ees and oll and re oh e emplo) et lmpleffi' mp, edur to mdr 1~ r.ate tram emp' J) cc.r;nd oollc t a1 re oJ*. r mplO) ee concern me unponant pomts to ons1der "hen deH:I pm 1mplementmg proJe t p edure are 1

\\ or, "1lhm th O\\\\ner Client

) tern, hl'ne,er 2 0 tam th~ 0\\\\ ner Chem appro, I fore unplemenung a eparate 1K p h.. ) ) tern pr edure 3 D cument all trammg nd md t.nnau n 4 D ument all on em and the re luuon of ea h n em cusauon of hara sm m nnd 1num1dat1 n m the " r pl ce an he e ucmcl) en 111\\ e pam ul II) 1 the e a auons unpl), J lauon of J 'RC r O HA re ul tJ n All .. h usatl n h uld be reponed to Cle, el nd H O 1anagemcnt unmed,..,d) 6 D p1te dem nstrated good fanh froru. 1

n be held hable for a manager r

pen I r ndu I of har s meat 01 lailure to re pond unmed1 tel) and orre t a Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 13 of 81

PROJECT MANAGEMENT BULLETINS SECTIO II Pro ect Stanu BULLETI NO 2 9 SUBJECT Harassm nt and lnt1m1d t1on m th \\for' place Eff ect1v

8 24 95 P

e 3 of 3 mplamt of m1 ndu t \\\\heth r or t 1Y '" a\\\\ re of u h nu ondu t Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 14 of 81

PROJECT MANAGEMENT BULLETINS BULLETI 1 0.2 9 SUBJECT arassm t and lnt1m dat on t

t e \\ or place

Effect,

8 24 95 Pa e 4 of 3 I.

'Pl.. L PR< n T > 1..8 X In ord r I f; d

,e lJll!>lemen ti n of llu bulJeun. the f ll 1ng 1empl le and typical 1e t re m ludec! on me m "' mg mputer d1 eue l

nu bulktm filename 802-09 ~rp I Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 15 of 81

~ MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION . E£R G. CO TRUCTIO EH\\rute,WMEJilT Al CROUP September 13, l 995 U. S. Tuclea: Reiul tory Commission Mail Stop Pl-37 One Wlu~ Flint Nonb 11555 R.. illc Pil:c Rochille, MK 20 52-273 Attn: Documenl Control Des

Subject:

SU"S: EA-95-079 Monison Kn~~ (MK) has prepared this response to the rRC'i letter of August 14, 1995, ~hicb achise.d MK of Notice of V-10lation (EA-95-079) relate.el to the CTe4tlon of a hostile ~ cmironmc:n b) MK emplOJCCS at Public Scni~ Company of Colorado's Fort St. rain f aaht}. This response as been put fa the format as specified in the U1Struetions of the *ou~ of V101ation. Reason. for 71Qla.tion The decommissiorung of Fon St. Vrain has been and continues to be a challenging project. fan) of the acthities performed at Fo.1 St. Vrain. such u c.oncrc~ cutting, undc.**wate.r divin and demolition, a."ld nggin dlin of acthated materials M~e ne\\er been done on the scale-. cncountcre.d on this projccL At Fon St. Vn.in,

e a co:l\\Clti construction prOJect, all of these "vines ha,c u, be done ith the care, excdlence. and discipline re.quired in i nuclear facilicy. Add1nonal.l), the cff ons at Fon St. Vrain required the c:oordumtton of all *,,ucs of the fo pnnci¢s invol c.d; 1.c.*

The Pu lie SCI'\\1cc Company of Co orado 2.nd the Westinghouse Team (\\VJ) c.omprised of

~ ousc Ele.ctric Co ration* Scientific Ecolo Grcr.ip (SEG). nd forriso udscn nq. In the initial phase of this project and thro h those activities culminaune appro *maw, in larch, 1994, Mcuri

' ud did not recognize that '1ithin an intense ror

c:1 ironmcnt as descnl>od a.bo'\\'C ;av,.;""°""

c must be exercised to avoid the d~clopment of 'O. en ironment iii co Id be pcrc.el\\ed a.s hostile or *chill.in ** As a result a si 'ficant number of per~nncJ -or'* 2.1 the site did hue t.'lc perception that

p.

ucuo '2..S cmp zed O\\c.r safet) and raisin su safet) c:onccrns could result in

auon Page #s added during FOIA review -
Page 16 of 81

Wt..~ SO P'.~DSE CO~TION U. S. TucJear RegulatOl)' Commission Page 2 September 13, 1995 \\\\.'bile, as the Stier, Anderson, Malone Report indicates, there y,as no one singular act or e3use for t.'us siruation there "ere a number of con!:1buting causes including: A Jack of sensitivity on the pan of ccr~ MK superintendents as to hoy, r~y the perception of a hostile or

environment can be created.

Middle and u;,pcr le, cl project management y, ere not aware that the pcrccptioa existed. The project's saiety and ALARA performance, as shown in pages 30 and 31 of Exhibit I, y,ere/are exempla.')' (loss time incident rate less than 10% of industry a\\'erage and personnel contaminations and total dosage significant!) belo industry ave.rage and the project's goals) and ma. have in fact SCf\\ed to mask these perceptions. Because a chilling effect inherently can ~eep concerns from being

expressed manzgemcn* must pro-acthel. l k for evidence of a hostile y,!"\\rk place beyond the data and indices nonnally us.ed to monitor project performance.

Inadequate c.ommunications betv.ecn various employees and entities eiigaged in the project. Lack of teamv.ork particularly bc:ween iiX and SEG emplo)ees. Correcth t Action and Results Immediately upon be.coming a" are that a hostile work environment apparently existed at Fort St. \\'rain, PSC, Westinghouse, SEG, and MK took immechate correcth e action. MK

was aggressive in these actions and fully supported PSC's efforts includin5 the Stier, Anderson, Malone im esti ation. Many of the corrccn~ e actions taken on the pan of PSC d MK are detailed in the presentation made t0 L"ie J\\"RC on June 1, 1995, at the pn:decisi011al enforcement conference, a copy of which is attached as Exlubit I. SpecL'ic correaive actions v.h.ich MY t k on unilaterJ!y or as pan of the PSC/Westinrhousc te.am and the results of these acuons follo\\\\.

Correct1 e Action fo; Im;'ro, ed Su,Penmeodent A\\\\ areness[Trainine Dunng the Fcl>ruary, 1994 time fr4Ille, the \\VT obtained a cop) of the Jant12.fY 18, 1994, release of *nie R rt of the Revie Team for Reassessment of the ;RC's Program for Protecting Allegers Against Retaliation*. The MK operations manager distnbuted c.opies to l:ey personnel and numero s discussions t

place to se.nsitize the fl( staff to the e pe.ctations and interpretations c-0. tamed v.itiun this document v.hich v.as ~horJ; tbe.reaftc: rele.ase.d as NUREG-1499.

Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 17 of 81

O$EN CORPOIUT. U. S. Nuck.ar Re ulatory Commission Pae 3 eptcmbcr l3. 199.5 On Febr 2~. 1994, L. E. Pardi, MK Execun,e Vice President, Po~cr D1,'.lsion, remO\\ ed the MK supennt.endent res s1ble for mwrudann re mar LO an SEG cmplO)CC from the proJect. This supcnntendcnt -u rc-usi ned to another (non-nuclear) p:o;cct.

fr. Pi.rdi met with this superintendent again on August 17, l 5, and discussed.MK*s Nooc-e of Violation with him to undcrsC".ore the seriousness of his actions.

On farch 9 d 10, 1994, all MY management, supcnisory, and craft personnel nended a prcsentauon on proJecl -alues. Ccnu,,J 10 this presentauon as the 1m nance of industnal and radiation snfct; and the abilit; of emplo; ees to ruse concerns. The project's on oing *open d r* he) hie has

v. )S cnco ed cmplo; ccs to discuss Job related concerns '1th pro;ect ~cment '3.5 also emphasized. The outline of thh prescntauon is shown as Exhibit U.

On farch3l, l ~. tr. Pardiparncipatedin ajoint {*. PSC, Westin hose, and EG presentauon re ted to c.o rate philosoph1es,, ues, and cxpectanons. This presentaUO."l ~-as made to all supcnisory cmplo;ces at Fon St. Vrain mdudm uruon cne.ral foremen and 1s included as Exhibn m. Durine the iarch 25, 199 or* stoppa&e truning lesson plans v.ere revised to mc:lude enhanced CO\\en e of 10 CFR S0.1 reqwremcnts. II was mandatory* that ea h cmploJcc

e restan training prior to his/her badge bcin reacti -ated.

Cop'es o~ pplicable pans of thi~ lessmi plan arc included Exhibit IV. On August 15, 1994, "s opera.tions mana er at Fon St \\'rain iss ed "Guidelines for Reduction in Force Actions* s.o ffi Sup-..nntcndcnts.ind union foremen and general f oreme.i, r fically mti.ng out the requirements f l 0 CFR

50. 7. These guidelines are nachc.d as Exhibit V.

Qorre&u-.. e Acuon for Increas:<<1 Manacement A weness n* man cmcnt bocame pro-actJ,. e i.. I for s ns of hostile emironmcnt dunn lhe 1994 \\\\O : sto~e when all umon buSUless cnts ere r:iqucsted to cont.a t thw constituents for f e:edbac on the or

en 'l!onment.

f

continues to meet ith uSU1css agents on re ular basis and V.'11.h the Buildm Trc des Coancil quarLCrl~ for feedJac *.

inning 1:.r"' 14. 19941 Public: Sei'\\1 has ~p ed a confide.nu "Hotline' phone ans enng sernce \\\\ lucll enables emplo} res to, o* ce c.oncems anon; mousl). Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 18 of 81

MORRISON OIU0$EH COql"ORA U. S. Nuclear ReguJ ~~:, Commission Page 4 September 13. t 5 fl( is commined to in-.estigat1n& and resolving these c.onccrns. Additionally. MX has been conducong exit inteJ"\\iew s of all emplo) ees. including c:raft..nd subcontractors, as lheJ arc temtlnated or \\\\OT becomes completed. Copies of sample exit intervie s are included au Exhibit VI. MK's operations man er, the Westinghouse project director, and SEG's project radj tion protection man er meet \\\\CC dy to exchange information pcrunent to the project or* emironment. These same managers and their direct reports, includin the supcrvis~r of rad:ation technicians and final suJ"\\*ey radiation technicfans, also meet.4C:C dy. Additionally, MK's operations manager, the Westin house projoc: diroe10r ind Public Sct\\~cc*s project director meet v.eekl) \\\\'1th periodic oncfmgs by PSC's O\\ersight swf v.ho conduces audits of the v.ork cn,ironrnent. kn 1m rtant aC".hit)' de,clopcd to,he senior site management dlICCt *trom the field* information is th Safet) Sul'\\ cilla.occ Tour in ihich a y manager from the WT tours the project with reprcsentath cs from the craft and radiation protection technicians and~, MK safety supervisor. An enrnplc of one of these suncys, v.hich are conducted monthl *, is attached as ExhibH VII. Corrccth c Actions Relatod Jo Imt?rm ed Communications and Team orl; In,urch, 1994, executives of PSC and the :\\'estinghousc Team reaJ.iz.cod that enhanced comm rur.auons and team or * \\\\CTC needed. Westinghouse provided t e senices of their ianager of Communication Scniccs v. ho acted as a facilitator for a number of communi tio V."Orkshops ttended by SEC i.Dd MK personnel. The objecthcs of these v.orkshops included instillin the importanc:e of f\\\\O *ay communications, appreci tion of accomplishments made th.-o gb t.carnv. or and the imponanet of mutual ttust. A memorandum initiatir. and d~ribin these orkshops is included Exhibit vm. For man) ) ears MY has cond r.ted "'J: 1 Box* saf ecy me.et.in s on all of our projects. TI1cse meeungs, hich ue an exc:clJen1 form of communication, are usually led b) a safet) alist and are a forum for the discussion of saf cty topics. Durin t.: ese mcettngs c.raft personnel arc encouraged to rai!-C an) questions or conoenis about 2nj tas

An example d mentiri one of these rnee?Jngs hich included an At.ARA update 1s UlOV,'D in Exhibit rx.

Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 19 of 81

U. S. 'uclear ulatory Commission p CS Septem

13, 1995 run Ml~ also conducts on oing ricfin s of the requirements of -or cs d

non.;.-on* pcrmiti. These mecnngs arc attended ) ~ ine.cnn, iUJ)C."\\"l rs, craft, AL.ARA coordU1ators and radiation pn.:CICtlon teclmic:wu; pro ide )et another opportunity *or worms to raise concerns. The oorrccthe acuons ha"c chiC\\ed the desired results. In faa, the Stier, And , llld ?\\ one rcpon concluded that the.najo.r elements of the atmosp ere of harassment and innmidanon uc no Ion er factors n the top or'* order ,as issued m late iar,;h, l

4. From this, n 1s apparent thal the S'Jbsumtial COJTeCU c actions undertaken b) PSC, SEC, d !K be to be effocthc cry shcu'tl) after the hostile unosp ere -as identified.

oontmues to refine mechanisms to promote comfortable, open oommuni non of safety issues. The t cus is to mainwn the trust of the -or\\: force b) oonsiderin d aain on identified C".t) conccms T 'O notaulc examples a....

the S\\lppolt of the COIC su_ n fl r (CSFj for 5q;mentation and the removal of {a() insulation from the beltline cxmcret: se ments. The first example relates to :he suppon system for supporo one half of the CSF abcr. e the o er i 'hile the crane monorails and insulation ere rcmcr,cd from the 10p half. nus S) stem bee.rt dequatel) cngincc.rcd to su n the l thou minor dcfcumatlO!l did due to i.'lt load. Some of the II'Ou 'Orkcrs o v.cre required to or~ ndemca th r M estioncd the adequa y of the suppon S) stem. The s pcrintcndcnt calle.d for cniinecriP to C\\ uatc tbe

tion i.nd meet '1th lhc orken faen ith the cxplananon of the adequacy of the

stem, u -as ecd not to p:

until &dditl s n members ere placed beneath che fl r. The second cxarnp e m,ohes the rcmO\\ of * " - 1 insul tion from the bcltlinc concrete se ments. The

rbornc radiatiO!l lC\\ els bad been monitored and d

deternuned not to requm.: rcspuatOl) prote:cuon. The ' ol ad be.en uesuoned m re ard to ssible ano en and due to ilie lac of data to sho othCN1sc and until s I umc that testing sh s that fiber counts e bc1o cc.eptahle 'Ch, respirators.. e bcin till.zed dunn u s Commurucanon c:on

ues to recei, riefm s to seek out conccrm d

s x mee sand J acth c interest in !heir re.solu* on. eoent Jt lllte.-"\\1C "S for craft l r nd s ntraotors ,e been ery cnoou~ These intcn C\\\\ s a c bee.'l performed b. o r C"J1101 Safecy Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 20 of 81

U. S. ' ear Re uhtory Commim.lil P e Septcmbc: 13 I l 995 rts dircctl.)' lO b) S cnt. These ~l er e.mplo) mtmuda ted to exp: eey con ent s "Hotline" on e prq; As endorsed ) PSC dunn tes pp oonccms and the p im"O emem, if oec:cssan* cxecun cs O!

ISS

. Hec::aw;c. of this to promote embraced ) bo* c:omparucs. of the C S ~e ness o ) sense c-f e l!lcrc been e pro;ect t confcrenc, e pro;ca O) ccs e comfo s or conflicts on the e 1th dill ent procoe2urcs, d tUtud pl'C\\ cnt the recu!"'fe.'lOC of 1

1995, To:n ~es, Presi s

in Saf ~ pro;ccu. nn d1 ros or commuru uom: .. concerns nd the emplO} r.c proteoUcrn en o federal stat tcs 1Dcl m 10 0 7. Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 21 of 81

S. ~udear Re-gulatory Commission Page 1 e;,tem r 13, 1995

2.

In <"~l June, 1995. L. E. Pardi drafted and circu ted for comments an

' Project \\WU!.g~-netit B lletin enntlcd ~Hanssm nt and fatimidanon in the Vlor re". Tilis d - mcnt 'U released for implementation on Au ust 24, anc! is indudf".d as E.xhlbu Xl. It clearly cxp.~s.ses MK"s policy of ensunn that our employees ~ not su ~ect to harassment o: in'lmidation m the -oikp ~ pmnun o t 1 such

,itics a.t iRC lic.cnsed facility is a iolation of federal . n.e bulletin requires that each project \\\\ or

t undei l O CFR 50. 7 rcquircmenu shall ha\\ c a p~urc hlch u a minimum requires (1) ind =trinatlon and traini.'1.g of 0: supc:*,-isory cmplo. recs (mcludin union foremen and cne.~ foremm) ID the requiremcms of 10 CFR 50. 7; (b) ind :ttmation of all employees of their ri ts to express 'OI""J>lacc safet) cone.ems; and (c) meth of collecung and dispositionin cmplo)et" concerns.

3.

Ml' reco nizes lhe need for, and is iri the process of de\\ eloping, a formil "<>pend Hey hid1 will be distnouted to and used at all..!K projOCtS. Prior to this {K's *open r" polic)' c "stcd but it wu not a part _ Tir.cn proJcct requircmenu. All of the informauon conwncd in this response ill be forwarded to

RC licensed pTOJOC'.S ~here ~., is 'O

g. F.ach proJect mana~cr \\\\ill req ired to read tnd d ment his understandin ~ this response.

S. p's aecuti e ~ement has been sensitized to H&I imies as a result of our Fon St. ram cxpene.ncc. In or' ith PSC, Westinghouse, a.,d SEG, -e e learned mu at the im nancc of wor lace attitude and mftl'H'fs,ntJ) ys lll bi emplo) ees c..n be Cl\\,Y~,l~led lO Copen d.s..~ssions about -orkp ace concerns 'e are commined to eving this o tmosp "e of o proJects. As noted c, the StlCr, ndcrso, aid 1 one repon concl1 ded that the u01 clemen.s of tmosp ere of harassment and murrud tlon ere i10 Ion er t cto;s hen the stc,p or:

o.. de.~ ere issue.cl in hte
ch, 1994. from Olis, it is a.pparen, that S'J st.anti conecu -e actioru undert

. PSC, SEG, d

ere cffocu e earl) on in u r nnp ementauon 80\\\\C\\cr, 1t u; cle21 to n*

~1 continued unrelentin& efforts to mamtain open communication 2.rc c cnl} mez..,s to UL~tee that e perception of arassment nd mumidanon ill not re.cw. Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 22 of 81

U. S... 'udear Regulatory Commission Pa e St:p-.ember 13, 199S {K belie\\ cs that complianC".e t. as been achiC\\ ed, that communication mcc anisms arc in place and functlomn in a mar.r>cr that ill prevent limih.r violations at other ?\\'RC liCCMCd facilities here MK is pcrforr,dng P...~C licensed chities.

Sinccrdy, i..u,,.

nm~ts oc: L. J. Callan Re *or.al Administrator Ur.it.ed States ucle.u Regul.. tory Commission Re ion rv 61 l Ryan Plaz.a Drh e, Sui LC 4 Arlin&ton, TX 7 11 A. Ole Cra ford Public Scnice C-:>mpan) of Colorado 1225 17th Street Plaza, Suite Den er, CO 80202 Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 23 of 81

QUALITY ASSURA CE INSTRUCTION READING UPDATE RECORD _R_A_P_o_m_n_c_r _n_ng ___________ Em;:- oy umber Post on ----------- st d be ow h v b n 1 .., or revs d docum nts T es documentli ere to re e to to comp te and and eturn a copy to ttie Group Que t 1* Dr ctor u ma; heve should be anent on of t Grou.., Oual tv Director read by Any OOCUMEt T U.1BER EA 95 079 DOCUME l TITLE R ply to a ot,c o' V10l11t1on REVISION

3-Se -95 10CfRSO 7 Com

s ab es g Em,plo'fe Protection ref
n es rec co th a com rat o o1 e pro c p re a d tt 31-Me -95
made to t RC v 1/i g of a s pe v sor p sonn I co
t a* I av r ao e d e
ad g as g t desC'l' b d abo~e as t e'f ts m ob

_J_. ~ _..:::..J __ J._,.-z:s_ l Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 24 of 81

B&~ AVMIABlHOPY ~ MOilRISON KNUDSEN C('IR ORA110N ENGINCEAING, CO~STFlUCTIO"' I, L:NV qOt "'flliT :. CROUP '!SJI:L"T: £q~al Emplo~ mcnt Opportunil) Polit1 This rroj<.ct dQcL'}t1~, anci y,ill QQL diserimin&tc egainst an~ person in the emp:., ment relatlonship. 1, ir. and will be, the. lie) of 1.rjs proi.-,.* fo c-ru.urc a11 apphcant.s are considered for employrnent, anc tha* emi,~o)"les are t:eaterl

employme:n.. v.ithout !'tgard to rece, c.olor, reli ion. ~x.. age, naMnal oririn, cilsabiul), or slarus as a special disabled or v:-:tnam era

,eteran ProJect mlinagc:mcnt and supervisory personnel, and their designated represcntath es, na, e primat') responsibility for enforumcnt cf this polic} We "'ill ensu..-e that no persor. 1.,pable and qualifiui to perform the ~ork required. is diJCriminated again.st. includir. ~ hantSSmcnt of any bnd, in hiring. discharge, pmruotion. J..13)', or oth~r conditions of cm;' *.,,......, bc<..ausc of race, ,olor, religion. sex., *~e. oat:>nal origin, bandkap, or status as a* p:::cial disablet:. or Vietnam era , etcran. ln addition, it is and will continue to ~ the poli~* of this p~e

t0 ~vc "'lnsideration for emplo} mer.t to local rcsideL -5f the area v. here operations arc eonducted as long as com.ietent, qualified persons arr ': ailal le in tha1 arr.a The Equal unplo~ment

";'ty (' '.licer on the projec; lS OAQ* Ste) ens. v.:hosc office is loca1e-d at the mcin oo-sitc trader compl:.A. An) job rd!ted inquiries concerning eq~ emplo~ment oppom.i t) should be brought Iv the EEO Officer's anc ** uon, v.bo may~ reached by tt.'ephone at (414) 7!" -6672, and \\I.ho v.111 ~ aqu)11ble for EEO inquiries at all hol.u'S v.'1en tile job is in progress If the Project EEO Officer is not a, aHable, ) ou ma) con act me &t this address or Ke, in Tobin, o :re-c*or of Hwn8n Resources, Morrison Knudsen Corporat1or., 1500 West 3ra t, Cle,eland. OH 44i 13. ,,orrison Knud.~n Ccrporauo:. eptembcr QQ5 Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 25 of 81

B~T UMIABU IY M:=>RRJSO K U0SE CORPORA 110 P01:,r BEACH UCLEAR PLA T U IT II STEA GE ERATOR REPLACE ~E 'T 6614 NUCLEAR kOAD 0 RI ERS, WI S-4241 RULES OF CC rn ON THE JOB t Nelcome *ou* paroc:pauc;i *.:f cooperation as a emb~r o

e Jo son nudsen construcuo pro ct tea

~e have a con* u1ng respons b t :o ou c.lients to orov1de our cons*ruct1on services tn e sa'est, most effici_1 an~ economic:. manne* poss le Good conduct on e :,o s t us essenl al to t e co:n on good of an eriployees ar,d t e ~any prog;ess of t job Ir, urder thit we may e oy a safe and eft'icien\\ !jOb, u saus!actory contiuct. inciud1~ t;,Ut not Im,eo to 1M (PU-Mt09 v101ations. I be su e-ct to appropna'e d1sciphnary action, incluchnf., te::mnauon Fa lure to comf')ly Company or govcrnmen~l safety rutes or p*ac: =es egUgence resu *ng

UlfJry tJ perso el Oft e da age o! vehr. es, equ,pme t o*

property. Lott, mg, reaming the jobs le, or leavtng e wo

p ace or prem ses hout Pf"per aut \\Ortzation lnsl bo. din te conduct or refl sal o perform wor
assignrr.en*s er fc"ow su r so s d1r ctaon Behavior a d. ~~., ates aga n~t ot r e ees or fOb applicants. ncfuc.J1ng 1 t1midaticn, coeroon or harass ent of any m1ture Unsafe or mproper operation o oo,. equ'pm nt or e, *~s Fallur to abid b}

posted or bbs ed Pro., ct tr;i1ric con ~01, i:arbng and safety pol1C1es, ru cs ao1 regu lions - Misusing or ret, ng fro

premises, out pro::,e.r w - en autnorrzabon, Company property, recorc ot r matena Falsiflea' -'" of turms, ecoro;), ll, e carJs or reports Wor Jrig nu af ma ner l at could or does re utt n ~u to )'Oll se' or ot er~

Committing or t reat n1ng an) act of *10 ence, engaging m ig t ng, bra ing, orsep'a or d sorde~y conduct on Company prem s s Reporting far wo, n an un'it p ) \\ cal cond,ton na 'e to sa'ely pe orm assigned job dut s TI e aoo e ru1 s o' co duct a*e 'Oi a mclus

e a d ay ot 1den*

a 'arms o1 naccep'ab e emplo ee conduct, 11 ma ! stJfy d sc p ne or term at1on ProJect rues are *n:eno d for the v-.elfa*e o' all persor el a:-1c our coope at1on LS expec eo and app*ec a:~ We lo ;. torv.ar~ to wor 'mg oge* er toNard our mutual be e:it on t s P o,ect ( 'AME) Maxb ng a ~ Pro1ect.'anager Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 26 of 81

sue W1acon11n £1 cine Po111w* Compaftt P9 Unit 2 StHm GeneratOI' "-Pl*c*~t MANAG£Mftff SYSTEMS PROCEDURE. HARASSMENT OF PROTECTED PERSONNEL Proo~,., No MSP 2.0 1 0 SCOPE Pa

1 nf 5 Relfta.on Det*-----1 11-Se *96 This proced;.ire states the SGT ltd pobcy concerning harassment and/or int1mldat1on of protected personnel and the Cc,mpany s position in handhnQ violations It also provides directions for emplc,
es regaraIng their recourse options when they perceive that th1:y are being or have been harassed or intimidated It should be noted that harassment and/or 1nt1m "'~*ion of employees at facilrties operating under uciear Reg:..latory t;....nmrssion license is a violation of federal law.

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2 1 Sitp Project Manager {SP~ The Site Project Manager is responsible for ensunng 1mplementat1on of this procedure a11d dl$posiboning aJI Protected Personnel Harassmer,tllntimidation Reports. 2 2 Business Mar,ger (BM) The Business Manager is responsible for investigating aU Protected Personnel H,m">Smentllntimidation Reports 2 3 Pr~lect Managera, Superintendents, Supervisors, and General Foreman It 1s the responstbtlrty of all Pro*ect Managen:, Supenntendents, Supervisors, and General Foreme:, to t'.nsure the establishment and maintenance of a non-hostile w en ironment. 3 0 DEFINITIONS 3 1 Harassment For tht: purpose of this proceoure Harassment shall be defined at the act of annoting, aggra at1ng, or 1rrrtating an md *idual to the extent w ereas rt interferes with that,ndrvidua!s ability to perform his/her WO!} (th1s deftn;t,on includes sexual harassment). Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 27 of 81

.......... y,,,_ sw e .... C0n$lO Unn 2 StH MA AGEM SYSTE JS PROCEDURE HARASSMENT OF PROTECTED PEASO,,NEL 3 2 Intimidation 33 33 332 333 334 335 40 Intimidation s, al' '">e de med as the act o' affecting an mdr idua s actions t rougn threats or by 1olence in such a ay as to fnghten, d scourage or suppress at indrviduat Protected E~loyee sna be defined as any empJoy~ engaged 1n performmg protected actr. rtres as oefined by federal low and indudes the following person~ Health P ysics personnel Sa'ety personnel on-Des ructr.ie Exam na n ( DE) personne Authonzed udear lnspectOf ( I) Qualit, Assurance personnel POLICY ~ 1s the pohcy o! SGT ltd. t at Harassment ar,d I midation of prote ed personnel s al not be tolerated e -.,lac.e. Comm1ss10n of actions that can eac tot e de etopment of a v.o enwonment that is perce ed as sti e or *ciht1 ng* shall e a\\oided AA

personnel found by SGT Ltd to ha e !larassed or in 1m dateo a pro*ected person shall be subject to appropna*e d sapl na act on rang ng om a warning placed m his or her file up to and mclud ng tenn ation Reta! ating Of d1scnminating against an employee for in, a g a compla nt concerning arassment and/or ant midation ts grounds for mmed a*e tenrunat10n Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 28 of 81

W1-consin O.Cinc: Po wer Compan P8 U"'1 2 Steam GMWr&tor *J)(ac-t MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PROCEDURE Proc 9CIIK* Ti

HARASSMENT OF PROTECTED PERSONNEL 5 0 PROCEDURE ContrKl No 4425

!'roe: eclua Pli o MSP 2.0 5 1 Identification of Harassment and/or Intimidation Conditions P&

3 of 5 11-Se -96 Any protected personnel who belle es or percei\\:es the>f a~e been t e subJect of harassment and/or intimidation should report this alleged conduct 1

echatety to iheir Superviston. Howe er the emplo ee may use the ProteCied Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Report for any of the foOowing reasons. 5 1 1 If tr,e employee does not wish to communicate the alleged conduct with their 1mmeo1ate supervisor;

5. ~ 2 Tr e empk>}'ee has discussed the alleged conouct Nrtn their Immedrate superv1s1on and a satisfactory response has not been obtained, 5 1 3 Emplo,ee*s superv1sion determined that the al eged conduct should be formally documented; or, 5 1 4 Emplo ee e ects to remain anonymous in the submrttal of e complain 5 2 Generating Prowcted Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Reports 5 2 i \\/\\'hen documenting the concern, the employee snoulo use the Protected Persc,nnel HarassmenVlntimidation Report (PPH/IR)(Form o MSP 2 0-1).

As an opt>on the emplo ee may report an complaints directly to the uciear R~ulatory Commission (NRC) ote. Pro!ecteo Perso nel Harassmentllnbmldation Report forms may be obtained at vanous !c-:ations on the job S!'" or from e Business ianag r 5 2 2 '\\'hen comp etin.~ the PPH/IR form the empk>yee shall perform t e folio *ng a <?-1"~~ a ~mp ete oeta1 ed oescn t1on o' the alleged mcident mc.,udmg the da*e that the incident occurred, and.

b.

Sign (opbonal) and date e form Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 29 of 81

W1teonsan E lnC Powe, Company P8 Unit 2 StHm GeMrator Replacement MA AG :.ME T SYSTEMS PROCEDURE f'roc.clt.M* Ti HARASSMENT OF PROTECTED PERSONNEL C0t1trect No 4425 Pttge 4 of 5 5 2 3 Vv'hen the form 1s compete:, the employee may g 2 t e PPH/IR tot. e 9us1ness.4anager (B vi) or place the form in an mteroffice en elope addressed to the Business Manager 5 3 Dis positioning of Protected Perso~nel Harassment/Intimidation Reports 5 3 1 The B.1 shall bnng al Protected Personr, ?I HarassmenVlntimidation Reoorts immed1atety to the attention oft e Srte Project Manager.

-, 3 2 The B~ shall initiate an immediate confic..:ntial mvestigation of all Protected Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Reports.

t5 0 IN DOC TRINA TION 6.1 lnooctnnation of al employees shaU anclooe their rights to express wo

otace co nee ms without fear of repnsal.

6 2 All supervisory employees (including union foreman and general foreman) s all be trained to the :equ1rements of this procedure.

7.0 REFERENCES

7 1 10CFR 50.7 **Employee Protection" - Regulation which protects the ngh~ of employees when they perceive tney are being required to work in an unsafe wo

pt ace.

7 2 29CFR 1903.11 - OSHA regulation that prohibits discrimination against an employee who has Jed a complaint or ts in otved in pu~uing a complaint 7 3 Morrison Knudsen Project Management Bulletin No. 2.9 - Bulletin wh1r.h es abhshes Corporate Pohcy concern ng Harassment and In *mioat,on and tden es crrtena or development and implementation of srte speo c Harassment and lnb:nidatton procedures 7 4 10CFR19.20 " Em lo ee Protection" - RC regulation which pro 10 ts 01scn:nmation against emolo;ees for engaging m protecied act *rues Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 30 of 81 l

sae W11eon1W1 Dlctnt Po.,.M Comp11ny Pl Unit 2 StHl\\'I Gen~ato, "-piace,T.-nt MANAGEME T SYSTEMS PROCEDURE HARASSMENT OF PROTECTED PERSONNEL d O APPROVAL BY CDllttK1 4425 l'tK-.. MSP 2.0 Pa

S of S Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 31 of 81

l ~OCRCli,11t Tfs-Aorida Po., &. Ug.t Coms.,a11 MA.NA.GE'.1ENT CO vTROL PROCEDURE St t.uo S:Hm Generator Replacement HARASS I.ENT OF PROHCTED PERSON.EL I Cont *ct No 4621 fl.CP 1. 1 "* 'on o,*, 17-Jul-97 1.0 SCOPE This procedure s:ates the SGT Ltd. poltcy concerning harassment and/or ir1t1m1deti01, of protect~d personnel and the Compan 1' s position in handling violations.,t also pro ioes d1rect1ons for employees regarding their recourse options when they oerce,ve that the* ere being or ha *e been harassed or int1m10at(irl. It should b~ noted that harassment and/or intimidation of employees at f aciht1es operating under Nuclear Regulatory Commiss:::,n license is a violation of federal law. 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site e~ Moooger CSPMl 2.2 2.3 The Site Project Manager is responsib e for ens*;nng imp ementetion of this procedu:-e and disposition of all Protected Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Reports. Busine~s Manager '1 The Business Manager 11 responsible for investigating ell Protected Personnel Ha,.assmen lntimidetton Reports. PrQ)ect Mooogers. Superintendents. Supervisors. AW1 Geoecol foreman It is the responsibility of all Project Managers, Superintendents, Supervisors, and General Foremen to ensure the establishment ar,d maintenance of a non-host, e woo environment. 3.0 DEFINITIONS

3. 1 Harassment For th purpose of t is procedure, Harassmen 1s oe med as t e act of annoying, aggra at1ng, or untaung an individual to the exten, ~ e eas,t interferes with that md1v1dual's ab1ht to perform histher fl/Or'* (this aefamt,on incluoes se t:al ha assmentl.

3.2 Intimidation lnt1midatton 1s de med as t e act of affect ng an md1v1dual's actions through threats or b violence in sue a way as to rig ten, discourage, or suppress that ind, *,dual. Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 33 of 81

SLI G Proc :,
l ypc Rodda ~ow* &

t Comiianv MANAGEMENT CONTROL PROCEDURE 3.3 St Lua* Steam Generator aplacemen* HARASS iE. 'T Of PROTECTED PERSON 'EL fie"1S10:1 C tr 17-Jut-97 Protected Employee Protect d Emplo ee is cefmed as any employee engaged in performing protected actr11t1es as cefmed b

federal la end includes the following personnel:

e. Health Physics Personr **

b. Safety Personnel;

c.

on-Destructive Examinetion ( DEt p<<.rsonnel;

d. Authonzed Nuclear Inspector (ANI); end,

e. Quality Assurance PersoMel.

4.0 POLICY It 1s t e polic of SGT Ltd. that Harassment and Intimidation of protected i;ersonnel shell not be tolerated in t e workplace. Comm1ss1on of actions that can lead to the development of a wor environment that i perceived as hostile or *chilling* £hall be avoided. An personnel found by SGT Ltd. to have ha assed or int1m1dated a protected person shell be subject to appropriate discipliner action ranging from a warning placed in his or her file up to and including termination. Retahating or discriminating against an employee for initiating

complaint concerning harassment and/or rnt1mi~at1on 1s grounds for immediate termination.

5.0 PROCE.:>URE 5.1 Jdeoxificatiop QJ Hocos::roeot AO!'hll lotimidotioo Conditions An..,, protected personnel w o believes or perceives th~y ha *e been the Sl1bject of harassment and/or mttmioat,on should report this alleged conduct 1mmed1atel I to their Supervision. Howe *er, the employee may use t e Protected Personnel Harl!ssment/int1midat1on Repon for eny of the f ollo ving re3sons: a If t" e emplo ee does not 1sh to communicate t e alleged conduct with their 1mmedu1te sup el\\ 1s01;

b. The empJo ee has discussed the alleged cond:.Jct v1th the r 1m:nec1ate superv,.

n and a sausf actory response hi:!S not been obtained; Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 34 of 81

. Stal e Aorid* Po...., &.. t C~*n I St lude St** Cienef9tcn ~ acem nt MA,AGE _.E T CO.:TROL PROCEDURE HARASSME T OF PROTECTED PERSO Et.. I Proceeui *

0 J:CP L 1

~VISIO!I 0* r 17*Jul*9 7

c. The em 10..,1ee's superv1s1on determined tha: the a lleged conduct should be formall documented: or,

d. The emplo :ee elects 10 rernatn anonymous m t e submma! of the comple1n1.

5.2 Generating Protected Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Repoas 5.2.1 V\\'hen documenting the concern, the employee shoula use t e Protected Personnel Haranment/lntimication Report (PPHnR) (Form MC.., 2. 1-1 t. As en option, the employee may report any complaints d1 ec 1y to t e 'uclear Regulatory Commission ( RC). 5.2.2 ote: Protected Personnel Harassment/Intimidation Repo:-t forms may be obtained at various locations on the job site or from the Business Manager. 'hen completing the PPn/lR form, the e plo ee s all perform the following:

a. Gi e a complete detailed description of he allegeo inciden: mcludmg t e date that the incident occurred; end,

b. Sign (optional) date the form.

5.2.3 , hen the form is completed, the amp1o ee ma ~ gr e the PPH/IR to the Business Manager (B ) or place e form an an rntero!fice elope aoaressed to t e Business .-1anager. 5.3 Disposition oJ. Protected Penoooel He,rassroeotnoxiroidotion Repoas 5.3. 1 The B shell br ng all Prctected Personnel Harass ent/lnt1m1dation Reports to t e anent,c. n of tne Site Projec: t zmeger. 5.3.2 The 8 ~ shall ina:rate an 1mmed1ate con 1oen.1a1 in.*est1ga.1on of all Protected Persor,nel Harassment/lnt1m1catton Reports. 6 0 I OOCTF:I 'ATIO 6

General 6.1.1 lndoctrmauon of all emplo eer shall mcluce the r rights 10 e press,. o** olace ccncems., 1thout ear of reprisal.

Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 35 of 81

Proced"'* Tt~

- Slil e Florida Po111r er la Ught Company St Luc;11 StHm G1n11ator F\\*plac1m111t MANAGEMENT CONTROL PROCEDURE HARASSr, ENT OF PROl ECT£0 PERSONNEL Contr1ct No 4621 P1gt 4 ol 4

6. 1.2 All,uperv1sory employees (Including union foremen and general foreman) shall be trained to the requirements of this procedure.

7.0 REFERENCED FORMS

e. Form MCP 1.1-1 8.0 REFERENC~S Protected Personnel Harassment/lnt1m1dat1on Repon

a. JOCFR ll..2 *emotoxeo Ptotcctjon*

Regulation which protects tt,e nghts of employees when they perceive they ere being required to work in an unsafe work piece.

b. zac.f.B.1903.11 OSHA regulation that proh1b,t1 d1scnminat1on against an emplo *ee who has fifed a complaint or is involved in pursuing e complaint.

c. Morrison Knud91n ProJrc:t Moooocment Bulletin ~

U Bulletin which establishes Corporate Pol11::y concerning Harassment and lnt1midauon and dent1f1es criteria for development and,mplem ntat1on of sne specific Harassment and lnt1m1dat1on procedures.

d. 10CFRJ9.20 "'Emploxee Protectioo*

r~RC regulation ~h,ch proh1b1ts d1scr1mmet1on against employees for engaging in protected activities. 9.0 APPROVED BY ~ Project Mooooer Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 36 of 81

Form ~oure, e Aonda Po"""' & Ught Company MA AGEMENT COf TROL PROCEDURES S1 Lue* $1nm Generator R1pl1eement PROTECTED PERSONNEL HARASSMENT / INTIMIDATION REPORT I Name lopllOt\\811 J T e.aP"C)M No (opt,ona I CO'ltrlie' NQ 462l I 1

0tm1',;i MCP 1. 1*1 7 Tod*r* Dalt.

MAIL VIA INTEROFFICE ENVELOPE OR DELIVER TO SITE BUSINESS MANAGER Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 37 of 81

RECORD OF lNDOCTRINA TION

Ocf t on o O al ty 0 Ou* t\\ ~ r tveme t S,s*e r,, 11'\\C ;I U C Or~r
1 1 0 U

S ~ * :, ~ A.,t*.or t, s (b)(7)(C) Comm* 11 I I QUALITY lX(CUTK>N ~OCCC>i..'k[ o.,. "er ffi

f...... 0 Mt OE, 4 1* 1 26 A 96 CT~ o

~ *.* ~*":)ow. l t T -J_ I I """'(b.,-,! ) (7)!"!'(C'!!'!")- ----,1 \\~ (p I (b)(t){C) Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 38 of 81

SGI O OUAtm* E. F.CUTIO PROCEOURF Convat:

RECORD OF I DOC TRI A 1"110 4621 ,:'.(If f OEP ~ 1 1 lb - C) lndivid1,1 arr.e 4 um!> 1~Wl1CI Org n UtJOt'I Gro p _.5 Post on ~,:, - O.A E CO.~PLE ED HOU S It STRUCTOR

Oef rutron of ~al b. Qua if\\ " enagem
S s*em Ptmaple d Orgaruui-t0n Author*

g nd C enness f t on er nme Po iq G 10 CFR 50 Ap-p nd., (D)\\1)(CJ V lnma s Witnnsed By 7 -

7 Page #s adcled during F81A review - - Page 39 of 81 l

'ltt&eOOMn 0.Ctnc P0111iet Company .AANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PROCEDURE Pl UM 2 Steam "'lecement Proc t T t,t EMPLOYEE OPEN COMMUNICATION AND CONDITION EVALUATION REQUESTS Convect 1-o 4425 9 Ma\\ 96 1 0 SCOPE This procedure identifies the processes ava1lab e to the emplo}ee an regaras to reporting adverse or potentially adverse conditions on the pro1ect site It should also be used to Identify any improvements that could be made to the SGT programs and/or processes. This procedure 1s applicable to all SGT regular, temporary, and subcontract personnel 2 0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2 1 Site Project Manager {SPM) The Site ProJect Manager is responsible for ensunng implementation of the Open Communication Pohcy 2 2 Project Quality Manager {PQM) The PrOject Qualrty Manager 1s responsible for the processing of all OC/CERs The PQM shall ensure that a!I OC/CERs are processed an a timely manner 3 0 POLICY It 1s t'1e intent of the company to maintain an "Open Door" pohcy relating to the ab,~ of the employee to discuss concerns relating to

ir ea h, safety, and/or welfare with proJect management nus progr I not intended for, nor ~hall be used to communicate personnel probLms (anclud,ng harassment and mt1m1dat1on) attempt to mrttgate a d1sc,phnar1 acuon or negate respons1b1h '/ of an emplo~ee s act,on for which he she 1s accountal>

Retaliating or d1scnminating against an employee for reporting an ad erse condat,on or arec1 of improvement 1s grounds for 1mmed ate erm nation Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 40 of 81

!l' JC,U__

Sid'(;) Y.ISC0n9lfl , A. AGe T S STEMS PROCEDURE PB U 2 Stum Gc,,-ator Proceo..re TI

EMPLOYEE OPEN COM UNICATIO I A D CO DITIO, EVALUATION REQUESTS Contr 4425

"'oc~* o SP 1.0 4 0 INTROOUCTIO Al Team oersonnet ar respons !or repo ng cond Lions t at ar ad erse o qual,, 1n product or se ce. PQ!>e an mm e or potent al msu t to

tm iron en, or affect the ea safety, or w I ar of e mplo ees Personn I are a so urged to K>entify arets for pro ements m e quat, of p ocedure, process product. or seMCe, and m e practice~ or conditions that be f or en ance the hea

. safe\\ arldfor we are of 1,lplo ees 5 0 PROCEDURE 5 1 Identification of Condition P rson eJ should first address an lmpro em_ t or adverse cond on With t eir cmmedaate Supervssor or am mber o T am Qua H eJ r l e e p ma, use t~ Open Commun n I Conort>On Evaluation Req st or an o' t ~ ot ng reasons 5 1 1 e e pie ee does not h to commu rov m nt or ad erse condrJon immediate supe rsor 5 1 2 Th m o has add essed t e unpr emem or ao rse condition w h eir rmmed1at s pe isaon and a d o on was not ach ed to e e p o s sabsfaetion, 1 3 Emplo s superv1s10n cietermined l at he concern should oe ormal docum ted or 5 1 4 Em o ee eects to rema n anon mous n es m a o t concern 5 2 Generatin O en Commur,ication I Condition Evaluation Re uests 5 2 1 v. document ng t e concern e e o ee s ou o us t e O en Communcato / Cond on E*.aluauo R st(OC/CER)(Form o \\"SP 1 0-1) ese ma be ob a ned rom an Team Ouatr rne t>er As an op 10 an conce* s ma be epor._d direct o

e *~uc ar Regu :on Comm ss1on ( RC) b contact ng an* PB President RC msp or Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 41 of 81 s

~A AGE 'ENT S STE.MS pqQCEOURE PB EMPLOYEE OPEN COMMU !CATION AND CO DITIO EVALUATION REQUESTS Contret1 Ne 4425 5 2 2 en oo. p ng

OCICER form 1 em lo ee sha I pe orm 0

folo ng a Gt e a complete d s uon of e rtem or s stem at 1s a"ected b Re erence an drawing or wo pac age numbe~ c G e a comp'ete descnpt10-n of t e details of e cond :>n using addrt.ional pages as necessal'), ana, d Sign and date tie form (opbonal) 5 2 3 Nhen e form 1s completed he emplo ee ma gr e the OC/CER *o an~ Team uah member or p ace the form m an mtero ce envelope addressed to* e PrOjed Qua,ty Manager For a>ncems regarding 1mm1ne t danger or urgent need, the emplo ee s all hand carry t e OC/CER form to Team Quality. 5 3 1 All OC/CERs shaU oe forv--ard to e PrOjeCt Quality ~~anager (P ~) The PQM reviews e OC/CER for abd ' and tai, es e fotlJ"IUJ,...,, act,on a Emers e OCICER mto t e tra ung log ano assign a trac 1ng

number, Ide tifies the manager responsible for responding to ; e OC/CER and c

Fo ards t e OCICER :o e resoons1b e manager 5 3 2 The res ns e manager s a re 1e t e OC/CER and oe orm e ol crmng steps ot_ In a I cases v. e an e lo ees xpressed ad ers cone o a -ec1s compa, pohc. and o procecure respons Departmen

anag r shall,,o.et S,e ProJ ct 'l.anager tn ere ew in es iga o a uaoon a tdation and d1spos.10 process Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 42 of 81

Pr-Dcea.,i**'t'IMI MAI AGEMENT S't'STE -1S PROCEDURE EMPLOYEE OPEN COMMUNICATION AND CONDITIO EVALUATION REQUESTS a ln-.estigate to det rmine if a oond uon d erse o a a, actua -AlStS lnterv w1 h the emp o ee if the name 1s ~ nown Assure that ere rem!:>utions ta en iubm ed. II be no retal atton, arassment. repnsal or lh the employee as a resu of e concern d Assure at mmed ate act,on 1s ta en to negate an adverse cond1ti0n at a ects e ea h, safety, and/or welfare of emolo ees or Quality in product or service e T respons1b manager document a d spos,on on t e ()C/CER. sign and date and return the OCICER to Team Ouat, 5 4 Review and Closure of OCICERs 5 4 The POM shall perform e fol owing a Re ew e results of the tnvestigatlon and the proposed d1spas1tton L~ in estJgabon reveals that concern as atid. the concern.viii oe processed in accordance w. QEP 15 1 Control of De Ia!1ons b Pro ide a cop of the drsposruoned OCICER to t e emplo ee w en ldent1 ied c Update t OCICER Tra ng log d a nta n drsposn10ned OC CER so fi 6 0 REFERENCES 6 1 ~=-~=~::.:.:..:cc;.:.::::J..:~----'--'='~c"""'ti'-"'o"'-'n'-"

RC'..,:J at1on IC pro ects tne ng pe ce e he* are be ng requ red ~o.o*t n an unsa 6 2 10CFR19.20 " Em lo ee Protection* RC regulation,*,h1ch pro t> lS d scr mmation aga nst e loyees or engag ng n p ot cted act ues Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 43 of 81
SM e MA AGE!, E S STEMS PROCEDURE EMPLOYEE OPEN COMMUNICATIO A D CO DllilO EVALUATION REQUESTS 63 2

- OSHA r gu ation

at pr an o as fi d a comp a t or c.ompla nt 7 0 APPRO AL BY nauon aga nst o ea rn pursu ng a Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 44 of 81
S&I Q M AGEE S STEMSP OCEOURES OPEN CO

. U IC.A TIO CO OITIO EVALUATIO REQUESTS OCICER NO. Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 45 of 81

I Florid Po~tr & light Compnv St Lu e !am G l'ertor Ar.tc.,m nt EMPLOYEE OPEN COMMUNICATIO A 'O CONDITION £VALUATION REQUESTS MA AGEMENT CONTROL PROCEDURE 1 0 SCOPE This proc dur 1dent1f1es the processes available to th employe in *egards to reporting ad, ers or poten,ally adv rse cond uons on the proJect sI:e. h should also be used to 1dent y any improvements that could be mad to th SGT prog*ams and or processes. Th,s p*ocedur 1s apphcabl to all SGT regular, temperer

and subcontract personnel.

2 0 RESPONSIBILITIES Th Ste P10Ject Manager Is responsrbl for ensuring Implementeuon of the Open Comrr.un,ceuon Pohcy. 2 2 f!21~ Ouali ,Mar,ager The Project Ouahty Manager 1s responsible tor the processing o all OC CERs. The PQM shall ensure that a I OC CERs are processed ma timely manner. 3 0 POLICY It 1s th intent of th companv to maintain an

Open Door ft policy, laung to t e ab1ht;* of the emplo, ee to discuss :-:cncerns relating to ti e1r health, safetr. and o* we fare v.I proJect management. Th s program~ !lQ.t intended 1,Qr. 1lQ! filllill Q£ ~

to commun cate pe*sonnel prob em.. (lnclud ng harassment and mt1m1dat10n), at*emm to mtttgate a d sc1pltnary ec~Ion, or negat respons b1hty of an emplo\\,'ee's action for,*,h1ch he she,:, accountab'

Retahat ng or d1scr mmating aga nst an emplo, ee for report ng an adverse cond hon or area of improvement 1s grounds f, 1mmed1a1e 1erminatton.

4 0 HHRODUCTION .bJI Tetm pe*sonnel are responsible for repo*: ng cond tons that are aove se :o quality in product 01 s rv1ce. pose an imminent or potential msuh :o t: env *onm n:, or effect the health, safety, or welfare of the emplo e~s Pe1sonnel a*e also U1ged to 1dent 'y areas fo* improvements m the qualrty of procedure, p1oc ss, p oduct, o* serv ce; and m the practices or condrt1ons that b nef: or enhance t e ealth sa4e: and or 'Velfare of emplo ee!. Page #s added during FOIA review *

Page 46 of 81

I & UghtCom:,any St t.u a10t Reptaoem n1 Pr A 'AGEME H CO flROL PROCEDURE Proc;e::sare E JIPLOYE£ OPE CO I. U ICATIO A O CO DITIO EVALUATIO REQUESTS 5 0 PROCEDURE 5 1 Id ntlficet,on 2! Cpnd t1ons 5 1

1 P rsonn 1 s outd 1rS1 address an pro ement or dverse cond t on th * -tr mmed ate Super sor or a m mber of SGT Qua t Ho ** e r, t

_ ma us the Open Commun cation Cond 1100 Eva ua. o R qu st an, o~ :t ing reasons 1 he m lo\\ does not -. sh tc. co:nmun cat t e rmpro\\ emem o? adverse cond t on v 1th l err lmm date su r sor;

b. Tne emp o.

has addressed t e 1mprovem nt or ad erse cond. on superv1s1on end a d spos,on ~as not ac eved tot _ emp o d a!e

c. Emplo

e*s super 1s1on determined *hat t cone *n s ould be orme I documented or.

d Emplo ee e cts to rema n anon mous m the subm aal o the conce*n 5 2 1 V en docum nt ng t e concern t _ ~"'lplo e s ou d use t e Op n Commun cat on 522 Condrt on E a uat on Requ st (CC CER (Form MCP 2-t T e obta n d from an SGT Oual t member As an opuon, an* cone *ns ma, r port d d r ctl to ;he iuc ear Regu1ator Comm ss on { RCt b contact ng a FP res dent JRC \\\\ en com;,let ng t OC CER orm *h po e G, a comp ete descr p* o4 1 e tern o s,ste , a s a' ected b Re r nc en d av. ng o* wor pac age nu c G ve a com;" et descr pt on of t e det& s of t e c,md t on us ng add t one pages as n c ssar and d S gn (opt ona and te e form 5 2 3 N n the orm s comp et d, the emplo ma give e CC CEA o an SGT Qua t memb r or pace the orm m an n1 rot ce e ve ape add*esse::1 o tne Pro1 ct Qua t Manag r i:or co c rns regard ng,mm ne t danger or urg

need mp o ee s a hand car
u OC CEA fo m to SGT Qua t Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 47 of 81

53 S 3.1 532 5.4 5 4 1 Rorida Pa"'1 St l.ucie Stftaffl G n M,, AGE.'E T CO ROL PROCEOU E Er PlOYEE OPE c on u tCATIO A D CONDfTIO EVALUATtO REQUESTS Al OC CE s s a I be forv, a d to the Pro ct Qua 1t OC CER for va d t and ta es t fo lo III ng ect C'n* ag r PO JI The PO ~11 rev1c ~s th a Enters *h OC CER nto t

tracl mg log and ass gn a t1ac, ng numbe ;

b ldentrft s th manager espo sol for resoondsng tot e OC CER and c For \\a:ds : OC CER to e 1espons e manage. The respons b managers all rev,e,., th OC CEA and p rform t e 'ollov.,ng steps. ote: In e I cases ** e:e an emp o

s e pressed ad *erse cond non a' ects compan pohc and or procedu!e, :h r"?spons ble O partment *~anager shall involve!

St ProJect ~anag ran.her,1e.-.., mves:,gatton e,*aluat on va dat o end d sposn. on process. a Investigate to determm I a cond t1on ad e*se to oual, actua e.usts;

b. Int r 11111?w e emplo ee 1f t e na e 1s no ** n,

c.

v, 111 be nor tal auon, arassment, repr sa. or ret* but on al n " t t e su t of the concern suommed, d Assure that mm date act on s ta en to n gate an adv se co d *,on.~ at a fects t heat, safet *, and or ~el' a o emp o

roduct c s r ce* and e

Document a d1spos ton on he OC CER s,gn and date t e fo*m and etum the OC CEA o SGT Oua t *. The PO -1 shal perfo m tne ollo r.mg:

a. R re t

n est gat on and t e proposed pos t on If tM mvest gat1on reveals t at t ce a d, t e conc~*n psocessed n acco*danc

- th OE 15.1, "'I uon end Control o Dev at1ons" o

Pro de a cop of t e d spos t1oned OC CER to

c. Updat the OC CEA Trac, rng Log and d

a nta n d spos toned OC CER son e e p o e., he dent d Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 48 of 81

I St A 0 REFERE CED FO , S orm C 1 2 1 7 0 REFERENCES 8 oc Cr gu at o f QU red to v. n b ICATIO REQUESTS Op n Com cat pro b ts d scr m na* o 03 11 OSHA r gu at on hat p o ts d scr com a nt or 1s m o d n 8 0 APPROVED B f A AG t.Etrr CO OL OCEOURE C.l d t on E a at on R u st p C lh ng g nst mp o es or ngeg :19 m an S I d 8 S gnature ___________________ _ Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 49 of 81

.AA AGE.ME.NT CO rfROL PROCEDURES EMPLOYEE CHECKOUT SHEET Soc a Secur i Co pan L st d b ow a, th ch c outs r qu1r d w n comp t ng ass gnm nt et th St Luc Pant \\ BC Compl t and Tl.JO Returned S gnatur _____________________ Oat Jouf S curt} and lnruate th ~s: Luci Ace ss 1 rm nation Ch c hst" S gnatur ____________________ Oat Cell id 3863 to sch du e an Exit Int rv e.'\\ 0 Ch c*. bo 1f Sp a, Out s not a a ab a tht. :un of t rm nat on S1gnetu1 ---------------- Oat 0 Conduct fan Int rv w Sgnat Co ct Date s ssu d to t e term nat ng mp oy S gnatur ____________________ Oat ____________ _ At no dg c pt of C c out Sh t and Ex t Int rv w S gnatur Oat Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 50 of 81

l 2 3 for I Florida Po-<< A AGE.ME T CO !TROL PROCEDURES ffl nt SUPERVISOR'S EXIT I TERVIEW m I Soc a S cur ty u ber Do ou hav any un*eso v d Oua t Concerns? If s I st th cone rns Do ou av ny um so v d I dustr a Sat t cone rns7 I y s I t cone rns Do ou hav an um so d Rad at on Sa et cone ns? es I st t cono r es __ _

Ye!. ---

cs __ _ Pr,, 1 11 Date* r o __ _ o __ _ o __ Emp s S gnature _____________________ Oa, Sup sor s S gnature ____________________ Oa _______ _ red to any o4 t above a Cond n F a uat on R rt CE !>,a oenerated Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 51 of 81

8

,o,_,., l.

g t COff\\PVI St luct Steam GeMrato, Rcplac rnent OPE r~ U 'ICATIO / CO DITION E ALUATIO REQUEST 0 .R:..- ANAGE ~E 'T CO TP.OL PROCEOURES 1ronmen:.il I u ~-~ Op IC

Ad erse Cond tton

/.0 od.'£~

0 ~ (3. l,.J L S Sa ct I

I A

4)* ~ .r-q)~;- 9 7-sf~ /,. /.f /7 f 1 /t r.ff'} r 7)(C ,I.. L------------' Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 52 of 81

I ;;,, m s flu d1 Po... i:, e L Q'11 Cc i,nn, St luci* s,~,m <ien~ra1:i, P.,-plar, ~ SUPERVISOR'S EXIT INfERVIE 'I Form N:, lflt Mr.p 4 1 2 14-0ct 9:7 II .. _E_n_o_io_v_c_e_J~a-m~*:-:~,;bl:(7J;(c;~===========--71--------:~ ____ J~~-~-:e_'~ 2 ,/_"'_?_

Compan,

_/ ____________ -c,-______ I Job T r:le 1q_:::: J Socral Sec r, " ~. (b) (?)(C)

1.

no oo havt! anv unresolved Oualu 1 Concerns)

Yes If es I st he concerns 3

Do ) ou have an unresol eo lndus!11al Safet*, concerns, Yes ~ I o '1 ~f'; st tl,e concerns* ._J - ~ -...f::'£C- _ ff,He & A~Vt..s ~ )J ll.. _ _ _ _ l,p l,x e2 ;t,v 6 'r.~.;--{d\\..\\ R Bo ¢Iv r-* Do ou I a e an, uni 0 sol.-ed Rad auon Safo:~ c.,nc ms If,es " <<he cooc *rs . (b)(7)(C) 'I es ---

Comp 1

2.

3 4 nor ~r,,.. l.l S1 lu e Steam G l\\t*utor ht Com. an, I c-pl:i ernern i E PLOYEE GHEC.<OUT SHEET "A ~AGE.. E. T co* lROL p OCEDUR[S r (7)(C) he ct ec outs requ red **.,n mp e* g ass en* c; , e S1 Luc e Plan et me o 1 t na* o Oa* M2::.,.c_;/4_::::)-+----_ I I /7 T S Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 54 of 81 1

~ SGI Q Th St am Ge eraung Team ltd 0 ~om Decem 18, i997 A ~ponse *o Cond ton E au ton Requ_st II is ncourag,n; to see er: emp o ee: in ng.!bout pro, ct,mp O\\:erneni. n ~.re

1 alv.ays bee ort mad to us.e se er p*od cts and,hat de.!~

s t e s.u c; pr ~uct Ca med m

eight f1b rglzss abr c

~ pe matena) Jletenal *Jsed prior to this medium.~e g ! "er;lass *ab*,c t pe rna! ual coma ned asbestos, s 'lat co d caus a ser1ou~ I ness. tus *ep ace em ma~er a can be an rr tam to th e*,*es and s*.. n T e manu'act*Jrer#! -~at 11a Sa : Da!a St t ( J.SOSI I sts sp c1a pro ct1on nforma*1on as follows: R s;>trato Protec on. nt1laLtOn Prote:ctrve Glo es: Eve P,o:ect on: ton R qu *ed r ormal on At.qtmed ~ ei, glasses C!I t>e orn Tr, MSOS also lists t e fol o,ng f rst t. d P: oc dures

1. C ean s n,,. th mild soao and ~ater at roo temperature

2. Ii ftoers shoutd get mt'l e *s. cleanse Should yoc a e a*1-,* fun er Q stion, please *eel re to coma;:t m at A ens1on 7717 cc I'""' IC)

Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 55 of 81

~ SGI G The Steam Generating Team Ltd. INIEB:OEEICf CORP,ESPQNPENCE O*** 25-Sep-96 To Otstnbuuon ~fo:T, lbK7)1C] locatff>n. Point Beach SGRP OCfllOtl Point Beach SGRP SGRP EXIT/TERMlf ATJON PROCESS Rev1s1on 1 The anached *sGRP Exit/Termination Process* Revision 1, 1s appltcab!e or all employees and tubcon rector personnel ending tnett ess,gnment at the Po1:11 Beach SGnP. Section 5.2.3 has teen revised to include a not1hcauon to SGT security in-processing personnel and Atta* ttment 7. 1 hu been mod1f ed to ref ~ct this change else,. If you have any questtons concerning 1mplementat10n of this poltcy comac*r l(ll(Cl ~ Tra,niog C:>ordmator, at x6041. HP 96 276 Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 56 of 81

Point Beach, :Uc car Plant STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY: SGR-HP-002 "SGRP Exit/Tennination Proc~--" Revision 1 b)(7}{C) Prepa d by: Date: -IC' z:,(.J /0 Appr ed by: Date: 1~~1*~ Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 57 of 81

BEST AVAILABLE COPY SGR IUJiA.GEMENT POUCY SGR-Ml'.()02 * *SGRP E.ut/Tennl &:K>n Prouu" 1.0 OBJECf.rlE n:~ obJectJve of 1s poliC)1 s to pro ide c:.:idefo-es as!.OQat!'d th tne proces.s1ng o' person et or ExiVTermination from e Point Beach Unrt 2 Steam Generator Replacement Project. 2.0 SCOPE This ins ruction is app cab to a person el exrung the Poi t Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Rep ace.iient ProJ ct (SGRP). 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 ~.o RESPONSIBILITIES ~. 1 Project Management Ensure

at pet'$on under eir s perv1Sion comp e t e exit p ocess.

4 2 Exr;mg Personnel 4 1 Com t:1e e e nano p*ooess as ans ruct d e do or pro"' s g ot sec,, and pe o e.it od

co nts S:::.ece e: e comv eteo ex: erm atro pa;,e.. ~o... ssue" a c ec, and " e e co:n;>le1e~ 'orrns Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 58 of 81

SGR MANAGEMENT POLICY SGR~P-002 - "'SGRP E.xi1/Ter.n nation Procns" s.o INSTRUCTIONS s 1 E:npto~ee 5.1.1 OBTAIN an *Employee C eci*out Sheer from your superv,sor or rrom Health Physics. 5 1.2 ENTER your name and Social Secunty umber on e

Employee Checi'out Sheer.

5. i.3 RETURN TLO, Se Reading Dosimeter anc POCC o e

Dosimetry Office. 5.1.4 OBTAIN an exit \\Nhole Body Count. 5.1.5 COMPLETE an eXJt interview wrt: your supervisor/manager. 6 SIGN ANO DATE e *supervisor's EYJt Interview".

5. i. 7 0EUVER the competed *EmplO)'ee Chee cut S eet* anc the *supervisor's Exit Interview-to Business Office.

5.2 Heatth Pn~:sics/Qosimetry 5.2. 1 ACCEPT thP TlO, SRO and POCC from the exiting e:nployee and a

O't\\1edge by your signature and date on the *Employee Checkout S eer.

5 2 2 PERFORM an exit wno e bod>' ~unt on e terrnmatin~ e pto)1ee 5 2 ~ OTIFY SGT Secu I p ocess ng perso..,:1el i-at an employee,s terminating. 5 2.4 OTIFY Secu 1 tei erminate a~ss badge 5 2 5 NOTE t, e name oft, e pers:.i no!,ed anc the t me ~* :.: notif catson o t e *E oloyee Cr-,eckou, Snee " Page* f ( Page #s added during FOIA review *

Page 59 of 81 I

Poi:11 8cac.h. *uc es Pimt SGR IU.JtAGEME.h'T POLICY SGR~P--002 * *SGRP Exi't1Termin1bon Procns" 5 3. 1 COMPLETE an e:.;;rt n*e--.,,e,., w

e tenninat1ng employee us1"l~ Attachment 7 2 5 3.2 SIGN AND DATE the *s per/sor's Exit lnterYiew"'.

s 4 Business Office/Paymaster 5.4.1 ENSURE that the Exit/Term, aaon requirements are presented to all project personnel ounng the hiring process. 5 4 2 ISSUE the final checl: aner the "Employee C eci:out Sheer and the *supervisor's Exn Interview a e comp eted,

6.0 REFERENCES

6.1 one 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7.1 "Emp oyee Chec.:out Sheet" 7 2

supervisor's Exit Interview Fonn*

Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 60 of 81

?01111 8cacli Nuc car PLlnl SGR MANAGEMENT POLICY SGR-HP-002 * "'SGRP Exit!Jtrm nation Proc.eu * ~ SGI Q The S am Gene~ Tu m Ud. n,.,u.omcr COB,R&Sf'OXDESO: t.MPLOYI:E CHECKO :T SHI.IT AtticbrnenU..1 £.pl

amc*

Socw Saam, ?'Ii t mber: C.epur. _____ L\\Ald arc cic Ocplin::len1 U2 SGRP HcaltbA!ysia u.it 'BCCom;,1clt nD'S U>IPOCC t'tUrMt ~ otif'acd SGT II,.~ bi-p!'C!Ctt: S \\111!) N . IIIDC af pa')OC =ti(,od.; Sipimr:* HPSS'Oosimnry()"' remiri 1(:a: II) De: Sipwvrc HJ'SS'i)o&imnryn1"1mu:: 1 0..,..,, Tm.co! DOti!icauo;i Der 3 1kpanacm Su;,c:n-u:,: &h IJna\\i s~ (Cit s ~~ -------------- "'OT O:S\\L CJC:::Ji "lLL,QI Bl lSC'.\\'ID l \\TO. nu: th{PLO\\ rt CHID+OL'.l U C,l>MPLtU.D Page Sc* 6 Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 61 of 81

Proce:116 1 VP" 11 A \\ _.,, I.Ill MA AGE t.E T CO TROL PROCEDURE n1 SGRP PE.RSC El I PROCESS! GA n OVT PROCESS! G 1 0 SCOPE 20 2 1 Tills pohc Is ppl cab! to a SGT Ltd p rsonn I end subco:urector p rsonn I proc ss ng n or out o th St Luc P ant TI s pol c pto d s gu1d nes for n--oroc ss ng and out Subcontr ctor p rson ccordanc nh Flor da Pow

Admm1str a11v Pr oc dur I o 001 0 509 RESPO SIBILITilES ss ng SGT Ltd and SGT, Ltd g t Compan
St Luc P ant It IF ProJ

comp, spons b,y 10 n ur th t p r onn I und r th r up r Is on m nt of th pr~c dur 2 2 SJiI Subcontrocw

23 It *s SGT Subcontractor ~anagem nt st spon b hty to ensu t et p rsonn I und r th r supervision comply with th~ requ ments oft s ptoc d r Is the r Pro ct P r onn I to comp t m-proc ss ng and out proc d

ng 2 4 1 T Tran ng O partm t hes th r spo s b ty or t fo ov: ng 2 5 2 5 1 a Cootd nat dos m tr proc ng out proc s mg or SGT tre n ng end SGRP o gen za on h t pant s curt b r:oord na* r g out p:oces ng tor SGT p rso artm n ma ager or d s gn ss ng out proc ss g or SGT per onne t Bus n ss l .'la ag r'Pc:, a er O panm t a or ."a ag r are Page #s added during FOIA review * - Page 62 of 81

II\\,, t '.f,. orida r & Lig l Com:,eny A AGE.,e CO TROt PROCEDURE St LuCltl Steam GeneratOf R ac~m SGRP PERSO EL I PROCESS G A O OUT-PROCESS! G a ~ot v Tran ng O panm nt *.h n ne p rsonne ar for process ng* and pected to a* at St luc P ant b o, f t Trammg D panment ~ n SGT pe*sonn a* t r nated from the 10b 3.0 DEFINITIO 5 one 4 0 I SlRUCTIOi S 4 1 la*Procening 4 1 1 Th Tra ning Department coord nates 10-:p*oc ss ng and pant access tra ing for all SGT p rsonn I and subcontractors 1th t appropriat St. Luce Pam organ zat1ons T e m-processmg s, a be accompl shed n accordance r. th St. uc Pan* Admin stram. e Procedur o 00,0509 "Pe sonnet And ~ater1el Control* 4.1.2 T e Bus n ss ~1anag r aymaster Departm m ~1anager Subcontracto* Manag r st all OTIFY the Tran ng Departm nt as soon as a determ nation 1s mad~ t ot an md1v1dual ~al requ re access to the St. Luc Pant. b pro ding 1 p rson' s 1u1 name Soc al S curn num,, and most recent nuclear plant un scorted access If an 4 1 3 r Tran ng D partment sc due SGT personn I or process ng overse s comp et on of ac ground paper

or r personnel for f nge*pr m ng *fnn ss For Out
FFO) test ng sccur ty photo and and geome r, enro m nt as app cab r qu red ua rnng, dos1metr q

or t.adg ng sc edu es p cal testing IA,1PI) c st ps rnc ude* a CO PLETE th pep rv.ou to not f t e badg ng off c t at an SGl person *.i I be r qu ring access tu t ~ St Luc e P ant SU Ta comp ted

b quest PAAR tom to th Badg ng Off T c Badg ng e

and return an "Aco ss Proc ss ng orm to us g r req red tra n ng and p ocess g N.:>TE: If suffic ent mformat1on 1s available, th Trarning Department ma ini,ate an

Access Proce sm<J Tra e er* pnor to the PARA being submitted to th Badging Office c

PREPARE a ac, o' documems at e n"v. arr a ~ be requ ed to comp et based on prev ous uncsco'1 d access at a comm c a nuc ear po

er p ant rf any Secu t P1ctur Badge I 4o*mat on" Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 63 of 81

..Jo;*

~7, AGE '-E IT CO* TROL PROCEDU~

,1, -'f -~ II .._,,,...1 tir,,lt SG P PERSO R I PROCESSI G A O OUT OCESSI G Page 3 1 5 Oa,i, 14 Ocl 97 2 B ag ng R pon T':! t h An "t port L tt r 3 P.. son r na r Un sc da s la t un <:Co t d ace ~s t (5 <30d nc >3 5 ,30

plant a co m re a m.. a, d S O t pa
t.:>

nd 1dua or com: ton or HOLD for co p t comp I n t Ea t S t ough i: 1 3 Oc(S to dg ng 0 44 c 1n 4

3 Oc('3)

'\\ ho Bod Count posu1e mo mat on to 1 r cord pro d d 1 4 l Ind dual r qu 4 2 ~ 2 1 4 2 2 a COt PLETE r QU d 8 FOLJLO t 0 ess sc du ng proc s nt as so ed a s or So a S lr g D panm t or r w and ro d d b t Tr n ng D partm nt a nd1 due p s n s Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 64 of 81

,.,11 a il.1t-h. JIA 'AGE E T CO ROL. PROC DURE St SGRP PERSO El 11 PROCESSI G A O OUT-PROCESS& G 42? b If a t rm nat on ta, S curt S n Tran ng D partm a S Luc Pan* t p rs nne ar unava ab 7004{7005 (1) Doc** cat on on Luc Ace ss T rm nat on C com a o4 the ch

w 14 Oct 97 NOTIFY 21 Luc Ac ss T ~m na1 on C c

i mor t an or 1m

and, 3

FORWARD *st Luc c Ace: ss i m auon C c comp ton t e Tr a ng Depar m n or OTE: Th *Date o longer Aut onzed~ 1n Part 2 ould alwe s be Will th ied" an Part 2. It I a nt *1otution if we hav are no longer authonz~ to hzive access. c E SURE t p s tt nd n t at Flor da Po PEA 'OUT,s una

JIUCLEAR S UT locat ed at
d COMPLETE the *s sor s at t h St Luc Pl a

c ,ssu d) and FOR to th OTE: An exrttng mplo E it lnterv1 y. requ an accord n nd ng the ass gn nt been,s.u d SGT or FPL concern whir.: ar docum nted dunng the Superv1sor'5 s t e completion oi a Condition Evaluation Report (CER) ~cP 1.2. e E rm g s OBTAI an ft had ad C a d RETU o t e 1.. Tre nt s a Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 65 of 81 I

<\\, a1taihk Florida Po r MA 'AGEME T CO TROL PROCEDURE St Lua St,..sm nt SGRP PERSO NEL I PROCESS! GA D OUT-PROCESS! 'G (11 DOCUMENT th not1f1ca: on on Ace ss T rm nat on Ch c I st" b comp eung Parts 1 2 o th c C21 USE Pag 2 o' the *st Luc e Access T rm nat on C c I st" tf more than one p rson,s be ng termanat d at ! ~ same t me NOTE: Skip Step 4.2.2.1 1f Security has alread been,otif1ed. b FORWARD t

St Luc Ace c T rm nat on C c

st~ to the SGRP O partm nt H ad or d ,gnat d at mate for s o**uitu and c Aft r t SGRP D p rtm nt H ad s gnc: t "St Luc Ac : ss T rm nation C 1ed hst" FORWARD it to t Baca ng O fie NOTE. Th *st. Luci Acces t " must r act* t e Badging Office within three wor termmauon. 5 0 REFERE CF.O fORMS a Form MCP 4 1-1 C c out S et b Form ~CP 4 -2 6 0 fiEFERENCES 70 7 72 a FPL - St Luc Pant Adm n s rat Proce~ur No 0010509 *p rsonn And I.at ria Control APPROVED B ' Sgnat ------------------- Oat ______ _ S., at *c Da* Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 66 of 81

P , Bue !-,l uc ka: Plant SGR MANAGEMEh'l POUCY SGR.iHP~2 *.. SGRP Edt/Termlnat10n Proces," ~ SGl 0 Th* S1r1 Gene-rat.in; TH Lm £.MPLO\\C " c..::our HttT An,c brototl...l

pl,,,
1'1ae.

~ 0)(7)(C) Soc-I,~ n(! **w r )(7)(C) Ge*p111r .c.c.r

a.z,1:,

~ ~ lhc i-ow ~t:u!.. mc-n, a: P'o1 8adt u, SGRP .r (\\..,) 1 H lU'S~ fT

ftc, O...t ~JD ':

2 Seaait) s Sll' -II r ' art1r* of pc' Tmit ofocwfi Oil 0cc I.. ;;

l 3 - 2~

3 Dq,anmcn1 -.s.w u.n lmm--lt'"' s~ CJ ~ -I'""' ( t om tg, 13.£Ji

Oa!t P

o! Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 67 of 81

Poin1 Btat uclra, Pla.nt SGR W.A AGEMENT POLICY SGR HP~l)2 * "SGRP Ex:lt/Termlnallon Proeen" SGI G Ar,1r; tntl Tho Stum Generating Team Lt<.: UillkQII..,.._~"" SUPCR 'ISOR S EXIT INTUl\\:1£1'!' Jo Title s<<1'.r Com any* _,.c,.:.,c.,__..;......,_.t':.'-AJ:;_ __________ l(b)(7)(C) 2 I Do you ha

ll'l'f unrnoh,ad Q.,i~** l.11Utanc. concema'P ti YH list the oonc,e,N' Do you ~.,. atty uNuohtcl lndu1trla s,r.ry concem,,

11 yH tt, cancemt.: II y, 1111 tt

c:oncern,.

[ mplo-ut I r. gria fUH f& e 6 or t. Yu __ No.,X__ Y,, _ No~ Datt Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 68 of 81

Ct ~F.ST AVAIIABLE OOPY I >I> c....., E,c-.c,_,..,, Comr:.*"'I' Pe urnt 2.S'U"T' G*"*rat:ir Flleplactmrrt'I PROTECTED PERSONNEL MANAGE!.U SYSTE'_.S PROCEDURE

onv*n ~*

.u,s HARASSMENT/I TIMIOATION REPORT 1 rtr w J Of'l :) a,* ----..; , o.*,,* -26 .,. \\\\bl {I] IC: / 4- _ ~ )(7)(C) }...,,_,o:...:../....:A:..,"-<- ,,:=... __ ;__.e.,.,_.1.-, .... 1, I t--... TY--.~ -~ f.J_ ,,,.,,..,.. [ Lb-)(7-)(C_) __ ___.l

..: -.,.,--,-----,,----.-::l.1:1

-~ -~~-,----- ---- TO BE COMPLETED sv THE RESPO SIBLE MA .... I (b)(7)(C) -.,-,.. -tc....,H (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(C) 'I O, (b) (7) (C) ..,.. r"-"*"-' l(b)(7)(C) ] _,...._ -- tl',J. (b)(7)(C) I ED r'°1 \\ (bl (7) (CJ J{c...,1~ f /,'/"lk.,../"*- .._.,,L. .,,-1.,f.<4. _i.l #Ck c.- ,_.,. _ _.,/ ~.

I...-

.0,. =----~.d_L l

w.-~ ~

MAIL '1A I iEROFFICE E ELOPE OR DELI E TO SITE BUSINESS MA*~AGER Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 69 of 81

(@ MORRISOZ\\T I<NUDSE POr1 rr BEACH NUCLb.R PL\\.'\\'"f CORPORATION t,~JT lJ STIAM GE."-:Eil-\\TOR R.EPLA.CTMt.'\\'T 66 H, 'uclcar Road Two Rhcrs, \\\\1 54241 (414) i554635 (414) 755-66i3 fax CO~"\\'tRSA TlON RECORD Datr: Time: Locatioo: SubJC"ct: Puticlpant ummary No\\cmbu 10,1996 l.)0P.1 I SGT M&:11gcmcnt tnik* l(b)(7)(C) office TI-CL :c~ !"Clll&rks o, er> eMd r b)(7)(C) I-JiP techni.ao Co:-uact 4425 I (b)(7)(C) I I (b)(7)(C) I Today, l 1/10 96.L_':'""7'" __ ____,!Ban!c-n fC' tccl., notifec-'""~=':"":'7,...!HP ~,er, about \\'arious tommc:.t! and thrca:cuna remark, oirceted at him as a rt~u;t cf,ut v.-ecu lC:mul!tJon of a ctL..'i '-*or.~ for I rad bou."lcary \\.io!ation. l (b)(7)(C) I ._ ____ ;amc to my o ~ 11 m.e.na cmt.nl', request to discuss t.l-ie matter. He spo 'C freely about the n,. c.c"lt. He S'.&!ed tr.*,c didn't "Int to cause any trouble, but he \\\\'U concemc~. Qn \\\\

et;,ne<d,. I 1 06 9!: I (b) (7) (C) ~cportcd a hldl rad boundary,iolatio:i by a crd\\ worker,

!(b)(7)(C) r After ft\\" c \\j, and cuacussfon with t.be worker, 0l.1Qa&C?Dt"llt elected to tcnni:-.ate Lm ~i.t to ti:c 1',_ n1n:c of the 1ni...oer.t The f oUowin day, 1 1107 '96 ~ "-'IS in the CAB brt e.k room dt!rin& lunch. soa::nime bct\\1\\1:C'l'I 11.00AM and 1 C' P~" He 1., not :.urt f the ~t tir-tc While,wed at I t&ble, heard Joud mz:tt.J,-.~,- a* bun by a eroi:p or crat\\ worlen The mmrlcs ~ ere b&!lcally that uic "'HP th 1 r (b)(7) i &oini to,c, hi !(b)(7)(C) lstt.!es U:..;.; he 1vored the coi:r.:ncnts, he kc;-: r... s u.k tu."ned aoc! mmdcd h.s CW"') b'.U. (b)(7)(C) ...!d r.ot ide::tify or de. cnbe the illdh duais m.eJcin the rcm.ar nor cou1d be rr;n ~"'., V.'a! " '1th h.1.'?l at the t&t1I ~r ne11b) tr.at "ou]d ha,e o-.crheud He t&tc. tht.1 he~ the v.-or~ wr:ejwn "bJ011,in off,um." H,. s } be di 00: freJ fr.rcatcned by this, but he wu uncocifcnable. Aftrr thiJ, there t ere no otha remarks o: th:eate,-,'.- :.,_, dents. I (b) (7)(Cj I (b) 7)(C) 0:1 S ndu* m'""'Jns, J l/lQl96, mothe; HP tei..t. L-:---".""'":--::-'. t~ d.__ __ u.. t be hez:d 3 er... \\ *, er, t!?e c!.-e... ou: Ilea mali:.e a r~ i. tbaut ** u:e tall HP ~'!ti.Di At this po-.: !(b)(7)(C) r ft ~ Jd ootif) tomec:ic: aho-.:: lt, He H)'S that he is not S' *t what sho** d be 1.. ~e ' * *. : t (b)(7)(C) think, it p;obabJy is no b1g ceal cc hope~.. Jy \\liill bJo*.i. o, er He

* *
c HP ;:'.. "lce~..:e th!tj st woi* cnec? odey p:~bably r.i:-rcd ti.e:n up agc.i."1.

J asked hie :o co::aa:1 a!e i.fbc re~e:nbe:cc \\\\!l cay lmc bee:,...,,t.'l him io the br-:u ro"~ C~-ir 8 " lt-s: inddcot or if l!;crc ~ ere aoy ou,e, ::mrk>1,r tmu:es diretteC et hi::, llbWIICI r.ated tha: he "Oulc Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 70 of 81

10RRISQ,N I DSE PO! IT SE.A.CH. a.JQ.£.~ PL-'-:T v~TI IJ STf...\\! 1 G!.. ~TOR RE?L~C£l 1E.. ~ 661.; :--, de.a: Road T -o Rivers, \\'Vl 5~2.; l CORPORATIO (414) i55-4~35 (~H} i55*66 3 bx CO. iVERSATIO. ~ RECORD Datt: . *o ember l,L Time: l :! OP 1 Louuon: ... ubj<<t: P ni pa.nu (L(b-W-l(_CJ ________ \\-111> :.ecll:tl:: amm&J') ..::-..n1 my in!C!"\\1C\\\\ !(b)(7)(Cl ~ nemed 'l :1-ri (7) (C) ll.ll tndlv11 l(b)(7)(C) bm L--------* e to my offi~ openly &bout hat he he: He ~cs ~t toe y, Sr*,,.'i-ty, 11110 6, be V.'trrh.--.g in the ~e.u OU! L-U. He was iOi::i o* e: the nc-,.;* PDCC c.. d_s 11.tb th: worl.m. They "C'!e cr.:CS"i.10!ll.n& biI:l es to v.

1:1d so fo:-Ji He told them be \\\\ just dok.g his jot Ac c as loo'
dovm. h: heard c~ woi*u y,.. Doing cner job fr.

th!.t 1, f _in HP. b: is gci..:1 to pa~ rus du.es!' When e looked up, *,. _e,. c --,. s= :,raft 10: m ~th p-ern r.r.pcs on tbei: a:-:d halJ (boiler::ial:c-! !(bJ(7)(C) I ys he <<nlld not sin le om C".a.de tti.c rc.a:J.lik &D.d be c :!Id n01 A""crn,. the.:~t-e ...

j,ers H.

.:iem if e

t!lc:n

!(bl(7)(CJ l ~... e. * * ~ pc. - !(b)(7){CJ ..::~:he f-:P, did not er ilie re-mu'* As ~~----((b_J_(7).,(CJ j.. *s e ~.:\\(b)(7)(CJ I -h&! h: 1C rd just a v.-a.-m 11 l(bJ(7)(CJ I ) h: bu *ard a-Ji.er ~' ers "t'lm.plaminc ~.It UlC clisc.c.u---c fostl~*

pc."'Cc1,"Cd d cnmin ticm.::i:e fem.cle L re: v.-as r..ot termin.tted :o: t 'bo!l:ld:.ry n

tlun in tb mu:.i ~a)

r 0-:h:: than ili!s me.de:

hi:n con* ~ me if h~ o:- dhattsh!.c d o o~er \\.'l? ~ co:mner.ts ~: cc:pllUDts I,::-d _-OD': :.ce he rd 2.:l)-..r:i.ir.g O! \\\\:~ th:*ce.'ened 1D C ; :n::1.-:::- Page #s added during FOIA review -

Page 71 of 81

10RR1S0 1 DSE POI. ~ EACH ~'VCtEAA Pl.. 4.: ' :- U1 *.T 11 STI.A.\\1 GEJ "ERATO. REP:.ACE.ME..'1 ~5H Nudca.: R.o,d Two -er,, \\\\'l S42 ~ l CORPORATION (~14) 755~635 (4H) i55*6673 lax CO. ~VERSA TIO *. R.£CORD Datt:

o\\embcr 12,1995 Tunt:

2.00PM so-M e:ne:1: ~-ttlcr *l(b)(7)(CJ lo!n:e LOC2t!'lD: ubj ct: R~\\ ""' Cl\\ es-Jgr.ion t.:lC fmc.=gs l (b) (7)(C) I Pirticipt.nl L. _________ ___. - HP t~chcieian Summal") .... l(b-,l(7"'"')(~ C)----,l Mn \\I, :.r _ B~Jett 1--:? te,b, to rt\\'itv-* our ia\\-cstii£".icn of his re,.cn file: 11/10. fL----- ,.!..!;;:=;.,..~~~~;................-..i*-L---=.,..---t==~:..=:.~~:..-..-....,_,,...----:-_ c.::..:.:.::.~---:-------::-.------::--7' I ~,ci b:: th.t* b.. ~oc eC'. ~.. to tce urue e:.d th~* r..me t.a.&t th~ is r.ot a p::oblc.""C..L-!.... r"""e),......,,,~= *e=-u= ~=-=.!.:".::CC~...s ~et there is no in!cct to 1-.!:ass HP. I Ie\\'l~et u;pc: man&ge:neat', :e,'i~* o! the u:.. :.er. cc. o, e: <fr.: u--Jo!lJ tuQ to deal with ue ca~er. l:: &.ddition to tac ir.:m1~!, I tc- -- !(b)(7)(CJ I ~out !!le dL"tcted rcno,-.J of ftlc ha:d.:~ be.... : b:ea.k room, the IOC issued rer;_=u:.c ~e ec:..;,czy policy apins: intl:r.icz..tion c... j(bl(l)(CJ ! me:tln& v.iui l er gene. fare:na:J to rdnfo:ce c-..e policy. I in!on:::ed him L'°lt.

e fe
tbe 1S!~ E.S bee:: ce t \\\\~th d 'Wlll no: e, tozr:.Lll'JUll problem. I

.tted him~ u 1~ t'Jc!

re.""tcwt ~: i.:;vol td punc "Culd ~ dis:ipHnSJ) act.Ion and ponib!e ter.r.!r.auc. l(bJ(7)(CJ !. '1..! retlC\\ c:o ilh ow fi:.:. c uv.-z.ys th:,-.:g'ht they ere J.:..t

b?ov.1n c!f stca:J1",

-~t c "1l5Il't sure. wt's inc:1dc:r.! swc,: :th~ re::nc' bebi.:lt hy he :epcm.c~ it. He seys there bA\\-e been no comme::.u or c undzy. He *t! tl'le.nkf of O'.I:' cffo..-.s ui:-. \\t.'U tl-to l: \\'t it Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 72 of 81

loc:z:.or,. s.. eect Dispositia.'l: l l/J0/96 11/) 1/96 ~-~--.-----,_""'."::"'._,::-::-, :--:,..._-;::::- The St.lam Generating T*am Ltd. ,I/ ~ ~'"' . ~ !'!~e-Id

r, 1598 0,, n.

File Po1r.t Beach SGR Loc:a~on l(b)(7)(C) I Cc.tt:"tct '1622 1"1.o Rh c:1, ~1 Harusmni~nrimidation Report 11/10196 ~m~ 1~m~ 12:30 PM h-,.,,..,,,,,.-"T"""'.__,dtscus! c. W1lh L_ ----:-----;-:---:-:--::---- (b)(7)(C) ab01.n ~-=-::-:=:rt:1'n n:;.c,abo:i - .d fedm1s, 1:10 PM l*SOPM 2:1S P~ 7:3OA.\\i I *30?. 1 pcs 1blc tttal etc (b)(7)(C) ys ~e is net I\\\\Ve of any probic:ms. He will c..scuu tt.e Ul'\\.e '41Ul hiJ foreman to make sure (b)(7)(C) ,._(b __ W.... HC~) _ _,LDtu\\iew ",thil::-:-::;:-::::;---~ Cl'.L"Mlll)' r.achec!) (b) (7)(C) mi er'\\'leW ~ (b) (7)(C) ( IJJJ".J::W')' a.rta.che: J (b)(7)(C) 1--r:-:=-:~:::=::-:-r:.m,c-w findmg, llld ilSi!C mu.l~~r) I (b)(7)(C) lSCU.U COW'!e cf a.et.on: Tet:20\\'C 'harcihLt Ill brca.k &.""U. lOC to !wpeni.:on; d!sc--..s oo v.ith boilermaker j(b)(7)(C) I (b)(7)(C) Ci. SC\\:,nes is_:ie ~th (b) (7)(C) (b)(7)(C) ije ~~:~~~-----:;--;-Ct:1--. lurch::-; \\i,!J JJSt a JC'ke. Both he and..__ __ U.t.) the matter and thm no int PIJJ HP perscnncJ. IOC rcicford..,a discr..:ni:..e.tion, ha:a.scment, i::ili:aciati n poJicy isr: cc! o manrigemcm, s pcn"i!ion, fore:.c:r. and *.:bcoo1r1c1ors, l(b)(7)(C) lce-cun1 '-'ith all craft,e era! fom:1e.'l reitcri:e po it:*, r.:ess :.pcril..:)cc to cot.:;t!l)' L'ld no toler~cc for C:e\\-'lAt on. 1?/?296 200PM l(b_W_Hc_) __ h et ::lL.jtb_l(7_)(_ci ___ l

o "'l!\\'lt'W t!le rnr.c:.

Page #s added during FOIA review ** Page 73 of 81

SGI Q T e Steam Gentrating T11m Ltd. lliltR.or:r:,ce co*~rsPcespENcE C,*t 1~1(7)[CI ou* or Pclnt Buch SGRP Lont,o

Respon,e to Con01t on fiepon Re'*rrncu i. WEM 86*0832, "'Condition Repon Radiation Barrier V1of1fon*

2. SGRP Huitt-. Phyalc1 Rad'o/oglc, Oburvat or, Repcrt t ROR*O 3 J, HP*9e*3i 2, *RCA,,.,,d High R1d1tt o. Arte Aec111 Control Rtqufr1m1nt1*

Tn I me o ft I rupor-, tc rcf erenet 1. l (b) (7)(C) o-, Nevemb*r e

9e6 (b)(7)(C) bol'tr,reker, v-.:11 cburveo t.iL--,~:-----,...

iit~g@~~~~~~~~;~~~~;;;~~~~~~~~~~~t;:n tht ac, of t en M over

h1gl-r ad1etion barr er

"" 0c1:e ., Un t 2 cort, r,m,rt O'l t 1..e Se elev111on l(b)(7)(C) I m1d1 th11 observ1tf cn v,a t 1,,,

on rr on tor fro the Hu 1t Ph~* Cl co~trc; ~o nt ocetecf on the 66' 1l1v1tlori.

l(b)(7)(C) liml"l'led ate Y eo.. tactrdl(b)(7)(C) I l(b)(7)(C) L.,., 1 ;ntd In on a rto 1:,0 111,,:)*~ s:,e,,.,., 'Pl for the aru Ho~e..,r cor.trery To PB"-P c,roctdural reoui*eme 1*1 l(b)(7)(C) ]c d n ~ "'- h,,. gt cos mt*ry req., *ed for tn ry "1t ,., rt11* or, area Add tor I '/ (b)(7)(C) t-1d not CO"itl:ttd f,;t,..£.!,.~~--- 7 ~~""""""I

o,.;11t'cn fort*** 1**0 1

rr,,.;.:;;:;~1:.(b.:.:)(7.,;,,i(;_; C) ____ r' CC"'~ - *I-(b)(7)(C) o *t,ttc (b)(7)( t.i:;.:..:,;,-r,.:,,e:--::0-=,:Tt~-====irll'iir.i'TTl';l,--1"7.'.::-',l""'!"!".,...,,,...,."'n.'io;;g;:;e::;1i:"1'e;:;;:;:;;;;~ .... 1 1

tc
F d C.bur ct 2)

(b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(C) I l(b)(7)(C) I ,.. s r.te 11

eo t O 1ting the ar **.-.

J.(b~ )'!'!(C'!"") --,-:-,,:r:: ecfged: ri, c 'r,,-~~v.T'!':':: 1 ~-:&-::- r,.:,17":":'\\l\\'.O"lQ ull lea ec O\\-tr tt-r "';n ac at O'" t::a*r er. HP,SC314 Page #s added during FOIA review.* Page 74 of 81

2. Upon I ve~t,.. lit eccus *o PS P d al -espor:s :J e fo, t

"'tq-* :"'ltf

c i:.-u;e:

e:o SG CA t;ound

ter t

be o l'I: e::;e * - e~ re ec: Hee. ~- Re 4e*e ca 3 Cine:: eel :ves issue:! e, : em_u ~. i e~6. ec.,ue...,e t 2 cc t&, cd h u1erence 3 i I l, 0 o e *~cus con: c;I to * ; a: et or: erns. C: I (b) (7)(C) ~ Slile Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 75 of 81

l D , 01-t!CnphOD C

wHn' J :}CD:, ___

~. ~p,~¥~* I.,. c **,1.,., -r, -Z,J,e* r ** -.,..c.;.i:.,...,.c~.J ... *-..,~-=-----~..:~..:-;..J&,..;,;.;"...:.1.a.li_..;...;....:;...;;. *.._.;.... __

l. lDirial Corrcc:i\\ r AcriG~: -----

i J. Rt!crencts:. _________________________ _ b?.- M c::::::,;,...., e i;,---. f r:, -::::r 5Z.&S?, ,.... p,.....-........x.:,CYfr a..,c~./*t,,*C A rl AC,;, ( f 4' !-:Vil y j-C,,C: r::-.c:7.C::S: (b)(7)(C) Date:

6. Pcnon Rt'Sp on e f ;.r P.csoh:lk.,

l(b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(C) Date: H&d C:,,t1¢ ~ ,,-'.?" ,1,A-~ Page #s added during FOIA review -

Page 76 of 81

J

?....e P..P es e: c e ~5* t t 12 ~5, i..:rn' loohd u tte

a.: ~

.~. the* iauon >--:.a a*c o;,c: c

A;zu t: e e

es.. i."':" lo a .. ::e_ Ul C! m.o:med ;i:n t: ,o 11* 1n 1h a, ~t L"l R '? ur:1 hi t:y. We (HP) .. p.n .. ~n A:e1 is.. cd ~ :ny s,,'Cf\\: sc: cf t:.e Si . \\(b)(l)(C) L

-C i___--

1:: ---------

or£: \\\\'o: er us* c~ *non a R u
o ld 1o,,:ceu lo I Hi&h R.t.diz." c:1 kc sttbeumtcf* cin::*~ent. Ho evcr,l-:n;,-u:io:

-:rgHi.. Ju:. c dosimetry. .... ) p0:l m-;1:r.*

, he C

dicio L~ bo... "ld&.")' 1i:0ur.:: *a* u c . *;.._;..,.:..,~~..... --, \\\\ ld ,,,_. rthcd him not to do

((bl

.. 1d n .-,tc:. ndi no. c!' H ncc:n!d,bo llite' Page #s added during FOIA review *. Page 77 of 81

e The Steam Generating Team Ltrt. Tc Fde 1~)(7)(CJ Lout P6NP r-o*n: Sue SGRP Oocu ena!tlo of elep one Convcrutfo 'II '"'l(b)(7)(C) B01lerm*.-;u Reprt-ntettve

1. SGRP Hu t Phys. c, Rad clog eel Ob1erv1tlon tport I ROR-013 At *pprcs **e, i 'fi on Jh date. I rtctrved

telephone c1U from a min rtpre entrng H lf s !(b)(7)(C)

I Bo, erma *t repruenta ive from M,t vau ec. e following dc;ci.:~e,.ta t e H *tnt po u o t e conve astio. "'(b-)(7'!!!')-.(C!""l __.,.sought tn!0<m1t on regerdir g t e rec..-nt disc arge of e boi ermake,. ~ (b)(7)(C) L.----,---;,;:-:'I v,

r ooJeCl o*
F *c o oo r*' ()" serv at1oa r pon (RO!!) generated on e

1 SP13 (red r nee 1 !(b)(7)(C) J-,.. a, observed to eve v10 ated

t-gh rao 1tlon are Darrier. Upon i.. er ge~ Or" of t!"'t PO~. it wet deter- ~ed t u lrbH?HCl ngt
d v.tl 'ully vlo11te0 t t b ier. Co UQuen*, !(b)(?)(C)

Fad t--, 1 _ * ~ :

z
C"' *or access to t Rediologicel Co. rot Area rt o *d S.. baequr* t l(b)(7)(C) l(b)(l)(C)

I"-!' d. c **ged y SGT eo 1uuc~ion management. t rd~ th e1 Ol e* pe ~on el on c te ad beer c: i I c,f n o rgcd. 1 rt ponded t. c* IL.(b--)(7.;..)( __ CJ ___ _, t o ullty o no i gly t d v.illf.. ",.. r * ; e r t t t Id bet o er r*d1olog1cal vlol1t o I t ' at cos qu ncf.! Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 78 of 81

-~--~ 1~~~ I !(b)(7)(C) I< n,!~td b),tatinQ tnat L-----...,....... 'm ght go tot, e NRC.

My rrpr.,...*~,.._,

,v~ *~r,._ 1 wu mur:1 to b,

thtut., rupe ded r.,,, the law *cen1 nly a*torded (b)(7)(C)

!(bJ(l)(C) lu*t t ;h to go tci the liC en ar. c0nc1rn." At th I point, ot.r co vuut or cone uc!1::!. CC r b)(7)(C) Pe;e 2 o* 2 Slife Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 79 of 81

BEST AV AILABU~ COPY (@ MOR RISO K UOSE CORPORA TIO ro AU ProJec-t ~ment. upen sors Foreman Point Beac GR ct Han. mtat, lntimida,ioa and on ca n ti&

\\~-~r n. 1996 F

r _)(7)- (C_) ____ __ L<<*l'IOh Contra t 22 T"o Rhe

Wl 1omsoo Knudsen Corporation GT doc not d1SCnm1 tc ainst an.. person i11 1be wo *place on the
s of

e. color.. rclicion. sc,

c. rum naJ on m hand1ca or status 01 nmination 1 so interpreted to m lude sment. c<<rt'ion and mumidation.

GT \\\\ill not tolcmtc sment. 1num1dauon or coerc1on of an) cmplo) ee for any reason in the

wor plncc Harassment and intunidauon of ) rmplo)<< t fi 1l1ty opcratm under,uclear R..

1 tory Commission li:.cnsc 1. a \\'iolation cf cdcral L Supen,sors are responsible for assunn th t tht) and all emplO) tCS compJ) v.ith ~s pohC) Vaol tion of this ()l.1rc) "ill result m disc1pl1IUU) lion up to and in Judin termirumon. ib)!,JIC) cc GT Subcon tors Page #s added during FOIA review - - Page 80 of 81

MEMORANDUM TO: Jon R. Johnson, Director lb, Octobee, 1997 FROM: Division of Reactor Projects, Region II John A. Zwolinski, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT {TIA 97-020) ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE QUALIFICA!IONS AND APPLICATIONS OF WORK PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEAM GENERATOR WELDMENTS <TAC NO. M99770) During an inspection at Point Beach, Unit 1 (97-010/50*266 and 50-301), the NRG inspector identified an unresolved issue with a welding procedure developed by Morrison-Knudsen Corporation (MK) for steam generator (SG) girth welds. Independent of this inspection, a concerned individual sent to the NRC a list identifying potential problems with 14 of 18 HK weld procedures used on Point Beach's replacement steam generators.

One of the potential problems was the same identified by the NRC inspector.

The MK contractors that worked at Point Beach on SG replacements are now involved with St. Lucie SG replacements. There is concern that the potential problems identified with the weld procedures for Point Beach may be carried over to the St. Lucie job site. The NRR staff requests that Region II perform a review of the welding work procedure specifications and associated procedure qualification reports used for St. Lucie SG replacements. The review should include the ACTION items listed in the attachment. This TIA request was discussed between Paul Fredrickson, Region II, and Cheryl Beardsl~e. NRR on October 8, 1997. The results of the review can be included in an inspection report. It is requested that the inspection report and. any supporting documents be issued by November 24, 1997, to support a timely resolution of the allegation. The attachment to this'memorandum is. considered "NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE." Note that the identity of the alleger is not included in the attachment. Docket No. 50*335

Attachment:

Review of Point Beach SGRP WPS's cc: C. Hehl, Region I G. Grant. Region III T. Gwynn, Region IV original signed by J.Zwol i nski. i

Contact:

Don Naujock, NRR (301) 415*1495 DISTRIBUTION: (NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE) Docket File J. Zwolinski T. Liu STLUCIE Reading F. Hebdon., L. Wiens M. Boyle (e*mail MLB4) D. Naujock B.. Clayton J. Johnson, RII E. Adensam(A) M. Miller, RII llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll f>P.f v 2 C e I PECB Branch Chief J. Lieberman B. IBoger J. Lieberman DOCUMENT NAME: G~\\STLUCIE\\TIA To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" :::z Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" c Co ij' with attachment/enclosure "N" c: Noc NAME DATE 10/ /97

MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:

SUBJECT:

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 16, 1997 Jon R. Johnson. Director Division of Reactor Projects, Region II() \\ ~ n () John A. Zwolinski. Deputy. Director ;'{~ ~Jl.>l Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT (TIA 97*020) ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE QUALIFICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF WORK PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEAM GENERATOR WELDMENTS (TAC NO. M99770) During an inspection at Point Beach, Unit 1 (97-010/50-266 and 50-301), the NRC inspector identified an unresolved issue with a welding procedure developed by Morrison-Knudsen Cor.poration (MK) for steam generator (SG) girth welds. Independent of this inspection. a concerned individual sent to the NRC a list identifying potential problems with 14 of 18 MK weld procedures used on Point Beach's replacement steam generators. One of the potential problems was the same identified by the NRC inspector. The MK contractors that worked at Point Beach on SG replacements are now involved with St. Lucie SG replacements. There is concern that the potential problems identified with the weld procedures for Point Beach may be carried over to the St. Lucie job site. The NRR staff requests that Region II perform a review of the welding work procedure specifications and associated procedure qualification reports used for St. Lucie SG replacements. The review should include the ACTION items listed in the Attachment. This TIA request was discussed between Paul Fredrickson, Region II, and Cheryl Beardslee, NRR on October 8. 1997. The results of the review can be included in an inspection report. It is requested that the inspection report and any supporting documents be issued by November 24, 1997, to support a timely resolution of the allegation. The attachment to this memorandum is considered "NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE." Note that the identity of the alleger is not included in the attachment. Docket No. 50-335

Attachment:

Review of Point Beach SGRP WPS's cc: C. Hehl, Region I G. Grant, Region III T. Gwynn, Region IV

Contact:

Don Naujock. NRR (301) 415-1495

i*,,

Art.lchmcnt l e.

OFR*No. C*96-022,0l BEYJEW Ill m !0Jb'I BEACH~ ~1!511 lf\\ response to QFR No. Ol fllued as the re1utt oi the annw ffl1Jl18em:DI revbw No. C*96-022, all.('°'41 of 18) ASME Section ill Point Beach S0RP Wcldlni Proeedute. Spcciftcatlona (WPS,t) diatrlbut,d by tbra proj~t ha\\-e been m-iewcd. Bucd on dl1a revitw. the follawf"i WPS'* req_uln tome fom cf'actlon. Thl1 rtvltw v.-u PQrformM\\ under 1he 1e0pc of ASMB Sotilon IX.. 1995 edition with no addenda and ASM£ ~C'tion W

19i6 tr.tiaon whh no addenda.
LO WfS.No. FC/1,l*l PB (Rev. Nt, O, dared 9/11196) 1.1 Thb wPS le marked w!th an X" to pcrml1 ltJ UN undtr tbe scope of ASME

~~on III, but tho thi~* Jall¥11 llmh. as n:qulffii b)' 1"B/NC*2311(a). i1 nat dc3t.ribed, ACTION* The project ls to ldmufy if thll WPS wu wed undu tl,e ~pe of ASM8 Stcdon In, If u1ed on ASME JU work, confinn thJt the thieknca.s renees af tbe mau:rinl whcr~ the WI'S vrM used (ba.,ed on tho &pplic4blc PQR) w= whhln Code Um.it,. t.2 ~ 5JJer metal AWS Cln.ul.6cation No. JL,~d on tho 'WPS ts E7J*Tl. B?lT*l b the Jl10pei filler motAl dD;Slgnatlon described in the appondix of the SFA-5.20 weld filler mew sptdO~ona. Th!, ii s:i.dilorial ml,iw wbkh. do~a nol.u:npact the iDlqiry ofth: weld(,). ACTION-Tbe project is to c0Cflrm that thl1 WPS ts co Jcnacr 1n ~- 2,0 WPS..No, PC/1.S.1 PB (R-Y. No. O. d1tod 9n6/9') The PQR*R1:v, Na, 1 i1 damf 2{25/96, r.nd ~ WPS Rev, No, Ob~ 20 6(96, The revision date of th-e WPS should either be the samo date as the PQR. or later. Thl1 ls an editorial mi&talto ~hlcli doc& notlmpaet th, inte;nl)' afthe weld(*). ACTION* Th~ proJcot ~ to~ that th.it WPS le no loop hi we.

p11ge 1 of 8

"""'*-*00-1,r.ia>>l:'Tl' .. ill!'llhi ::a:::.....-.U-,"lii.l!-:-,1 Ji --

b 'r Atta:hment J 3.0 WJ>S.No. FC/3.J.J PB (Rtv. No. O, dated P/6/96) l.1 Al an essential variable, ASME Section IX QW-4D6.l permits a decnne of-1O0°F. from the prehut tern?Orature us.ed dwfaa prc>C(dure qudlflc:auon. The nwdmum ~ualiflcd preheat, u recordf.d on tM PQR. ii 268 *p. Therefore, 1he mhi\\mum preheat pem,itted io bt UN4 wilhoul req\\illl&adon of&hll WPS la 16S'f, *Note 1 of~ WPS pennfu the me ota minimum i,rebtatot l,o'P, AC'ION* Tbe J)?Oj~t ii to conflmi that this WPS wu not used or, ifusodi that ibc mlnJmu:mpzeheatwu not lower lhan 168°F. 3.2 Thc:rc ls a conaJct ~ w cont4ot tube to wor.Jr. "1i.~ (CTWO) runsCJ or 318" to 314" (a ncnosiontlal 't'lrlt.btc 11quiNd by ASMB Section 1X, QW-410.8) and tbt tlectrode,tickout nriao or1/2" to 1" {not r,:quil'cd 1>)' ASME IX) dcscrlbcd in this WPS. CTWD Js defintd In ASME Section IX, QW--490 (which references AWS 3.0). es the distance beiwcen the end or the ccntact N~ (ua\\lnlly Jocat&d inside 1hc gu noa:l~) to the worplcu. me,trod* atlokout I* dcfwid a.a the dJatucc b~n tho end ct'lhe gu noulo and tho tip of'lho flux-eottid wiro. All elcetrod~ JtJckout or 1" exceed* the mwmum CTWI> of3/4". This 11 a nonessentlal variable in whlch, ch4n&e mey be made in tho WPS witho~ nq\\Wifi~Or\\, AOJQN* The pioJ~, ii io coDflrm thai ih!& WPS Js no longer 1n we. . Page 2 of 8 H a Morri1cn Knudaen f'\\

- u........... U,.Jt'r'lm&,Jltiit('1ii'fr.. a,

.._9 Wfs-Nu. FC/1,l*l PB (Re\\', No. o, d*t.d l>/1'196), FC/1.8-1 PB. (Rtv, ~D. o, d11td 9/16/K), GM/l.l.$ fJi (Rn. No. O, dated 9/1'7/96), Hd GT-SM/1.~1 PB (Rev. 'No.,. dltd U/23196) ASME SIC11on m NBINC*:131 l(a) rtqulrt1 notoh toY~* tutinii rtll' wbon. ticel lhJ cknwei groat<< 1ha:,. 518", u i supplententuy menu al \\viable. TM above proJ~t WPS*, were qU&llfied wl\\hout notch i0uihnca1 requlnment,, u lndiw;d in the m~i:dvc *~ PQR(s), One. or a combwtlo.11 of weld Jolot fiaU?ea $ and 9 ui au\\rkod with~ "?C", and Ihm fiaW'H pmnh the use of lhea1 WPS'* on hm')'woll b\\itt Jalau whh thlekneue, a,eater than 314'. WPS*No. FC/1,8-l PB, GM/1,1.5 PB a:1d OT*SM/l.8*1 PB ll\\d1cate thickneu maca orl/16'* I", 1116"* 3/4",nd 1/1~"* r. reapoolivoly, fbr ASME Sc~on m. ACUPl:i* The J)r'Ojcct a to cwlnn 1hat the above 4 WPS'* were JtOI uaea on ttucbeue* ~ th& 5/1~, 11 ~!Bed ln NB/NC,231 J(a). !.C WPS-No, GT-SM/1,1*1 PB (Juv. No, 4, datod Ufl8196) S, 1 ASME SectlM m T1bl11 NBrNC~62Z,7(b)* l oxemptl PWHT fot thJcknHica of l 1/4* and less. 1h11 WPS wr.s rtvt&ed to ~rout waldlna Cfl cuboil atoal whh or witbou, I.be

of PWHT, The W~S pmni~ w,ldlni on th.lck.n~ ot3/16" to 8". 1m WPS t&ila to tcdi~te that c~emp1inn &om PWH1' only ~li~ {or

&luckncuoa of 1 K" W lest. B~ Cod&, PWHT tor ~ai,c;a owr l W' ban ~tW variable. AC:UQN* The ptoj~t la~ oonfhm that lhi1 WPS wu not used on thlcknnses ~eater th.An 1 1/2*, Wf~ the use of P\\VHT. S.2 Rovbion 3 "1.d ear Iler revisio~s cf tbls WPS (with no PWHT) ~quired a ~Im.um boat input of 21.1 kJllA. for ihc OTA W proceta fer UllckntateS brcwctn SIS" and 1 ~*. Tbe OTAW portlon afthe 'WPS for R.tvl1l0114 bas maximum be.al Ul~l valuu of 43,2.44,8 and47.4 kI/ln. ror thlckntma between 51811 and l W' for appJICldons to be: uled wl\\h or w:hhout tho Ult otf WJ.tt. When a WPS ia tn bt ~ for bo!h PWHT condltloc., (ewi a, easerui&l vwble), the WPS m'Ult deeerlbc zbo JiJrJt&dons of beth PWHl' and no PWHT appU~tion,, RcvlJIOD 4 cf th.It WPS £1111 to indu:e.11 tho maxirnwn h.e1t lnputllmhatlon or28,I kJfla. fot the OTAW procm to be u,ed on th!ckneutt bctwc:n 5/8" and l W' wlthoU1 the uae of P~. ACJ]QN* Tho project 11 u, confirm rbal. thi* WPS wu nol used with. heat inputs hlahcr th.In :za.w t.1/lll, en thlcknc1HO b.lwsCD s;a* 10 1 Va withoui PWHT. Morrt1on.Knud11r, I 1 0 ~ r 10 i ~ I o O h I r.. ; \\, ;. io,-.. ~*-lt*-*. -\\...._: l

Attadimont I 4-0 WPS-No. CT.SM/1.S.1 PB (R.ty, No, lt dared 1112"'6) The filler mcl4J SMAW~ A WS CJ1j5lficadon Nwnbe~ ltsttd 0ti the WPS arc E309 or E309L. £309°1! or-16 and £3O9L.U or *16 ait lht p10ptt 1jll11 mtial designation described in the SFA*5,4 weld filler metal speclfiCl&tlons. This is an editorial mtttako *b doe, not Impact Jbt lnieiflty of the weld:(S), ACUPN* !be p;oject b to COAfirm that th1s WPS 11 no lqer ln uso. 7, 1 ASM:E S~ion nI Table NB/NC~OT..l,7lb)-1 cxcmpu PWHT for thicknceaes of 1 1/4" Ind wn. Thia WPS pcmuu welding on wbon stnt without the UK of PWHT * . The ~s pennica wtldl:>a oD thlckncsaea in lhe range or 1/16" to S". Tho WPS fails to indicate that cxsmprlon &om PWHT on!>' &ppll~ forihiokncaJos of 1 1/2" and Jess, PWHT tor th!~ne,ses over l 1/2 11 fa an cu.ential Vll'labl~. ACTION* n. proj~t ls to oonf'um 'that du, VIPS \\lo/II not UNd on tbiclo:ui1q1 8'ft.a1er man 1 W with.¥1beuac cf_l"WHT, 7.2 1bl1 proJec\\ WPS was pot prepared baled on a corporate WPS ln "cor~ with MK'* QAM ~h 3.2.4. Fur prosmm ~znpllw;(s purpo,cs, '°ntlnu~ tao or thls WPS ca I S'OJcct will require development or, GO?pOH,to WPS and n,vlJion of thia W?S~ AC1J~- Tht projett ii to r:on!lnn chat lh1a WPS Js not beina uaed. Corparale ii io -~

~

WPS, I.O

~N~ GTM/1.1-3 PB (lov. No *. 1, dated 12103"6) 1.1 ~ t.m rtpo:i D0,13244P datod Nc;>vtsnh.r 27, 1996 to: PQR*'No, GT-SM/1.l-QS indb.Jca tha1 the w*tdina pro<<duro qua!lfici&Lion tcrt apcolmena ~re tested by Bodycote TIUloll&, I~. B<idycoto'TaUlll&. lnC. WU not 0n MK.'1 Approved S~U,n Lilt, u ffi.l~ by tho MK QA..\\1 ~anpplu 5.2.1 and 9,2,3. ACOQN* Ct1Tfl0f.11D la 111 l)effoni,.,, ancnmmt af Bcd)'C(Q rau,..li, Inc. to v.wri~ that tho)* bave ~lm.:cd impl1mentaticn of'tht Tauuia'* QA proa,am. Morrl10n Knudun {"I 8,2 M:. PAul Evnns ce~ticd.PQR.*No. OT*SMlt.lo,Q5 lur Mr. !uaen~ Ootden on 11127/96. Ccrtifie&tion of \\his PQR was pttformed befo~ the 1215196 *., dolcgatioo IOC*No. M-QM*96.091 thlt delegated Mr, Evw \\ho auchority by the Oroup Weldin; En&Ioeu. Thia toe wu 1'.que&ted to be l11u.d b)* tho OQD on 12/!/96. Deleption ls permlttod by MK*s QAM pcr&araPhs 9.2.*,nd Stetion 0,4 for "lndividlJ.41 Tltlca,** but ~fon ot A PQJt lhould be petfbnned alur completion of tho written deleantlon letttr. *This is a propam control Juuod etd zwt a &ecbnlcal WUt, bCIJObJ. Tbc project ii to eonfinn dl1t thi1 WPS It not belni u,ed, l,J Thi tcsl ~port sio.13~9 wdtwn by Body~~ Ta\\lula, J.nc, indl~te11 thal 5R70S*2 nuer mclll ~ used WiUI the 0TAW pro~ for weldllli tho test coupon. Thlt i, coDltlI)' to iht BR70S*6 Dile:.me\\&l. whioh J1 rtC<ltded on PQR*No, 0T*SM/1,l*QS (Rev.O) foctbe OTAW~n1, \\ ACTION, The proj~t nceda to obtain a corrected test report from Bodycotc Tuus11a, me., ~ aubmit lho corrcc~d test repon to the Group QUA.lit)' 1)~. 8.-4 Th1s proje¢1 WPS wu not p~ bued ~ 1 corporate WPS in ~rdm\\oe with MK'* QAM ~l, 3.2.A. The Gro11p Q\\l1Uty Olrtetor (O~D) ar.d Oto~ Welding Engineer (OWE) have not approved thia combuution cf WPS and PQ~ AClIQN, Tbls prcj~ wPS And orisintJ PQa need to bo 1ub1nb1ed to tho OQD tor proc~lna, For proft.m corapll.an~e purpose~. U\\ls WPS w1 PQR c.ombination will be approved by lht OQO and OWE prior to clomta*~(QFR.*01 for Mwa=ent Rmew No. C.96.022, 8,5 PQR*N0, OT*SM'l. t*Q5 rcrcrwe, pzoj"t 1pcdfie WPS*No, OT*SM/1,l*l PB, UAknown a\\ th! time otthe 1996 mwiemDnt as~performod on lV!O* 31196, WPS,No, GT*SM/l,1*1 PB WAJ revised on 11128/95 to lnchw th.ls PQRu a rJpportlni documeni f01 permitdna PWHT (a~ P6Ri?IJ)h SJ. Abovo), 1t U:not . ffllWA&! IO hlvt II PQR. nmcnoin, all of tba \\l,'PS'* lbtt lt ta *upponbii, Tb9 PQR ii a=cptablo II writcc:n. No action ls rcq"1red on ih!s item. Page 6 of 8 Morrl10n Knyd11n

e* 8.6 1\\3 requcrtcd in thi Ibo~ JOC.. No. M*QM*96-09J and QA1*1 l.2 pva. 4',,.l. lb: projli'Cl has not Rlbcn!tttd a copy or the project', ~ha,e order and test * -wt~nt d4ta slmt, u*pplicable. A med top)' ottha fndtpendm test llbo~ry report li,.11 beanramlvad. 4CIIQN-The proJc;l 1110 ~bmll lbf1 lntonnadon 10 cho Oru11p Qullit)' Olrootor 1n ace~ wi1h MK's ASM£ QA zmn:ulll pva;ra,a 3.2.4 and QAl*l 1.2. 9.D WPS-No. FC/1.1-1 PB (Riv. No. 0. dated "11196), FC'l.8-2 PB*(Rft'. No. O, dee.cl M~. GM/1,l-! PB (lffl'. No, O, 9/l?/96). GT-SM/1,1*1 PB (Kw, No. 4) Wiil l!R7DS-2 or J &t HO clull'p,-J' -~.-. GT-SM/1,8,l PB (Rev. No. J, dated 11/23/96)1 ud GTM/l.1*l PD (Rev. No. l) ott(y,ua. g.~ flPfll#fo, JUUi tt*,JdtltN,ot 9,1 ASME Section m NSINC-231 l(e) n:qutru noicb toupe111e.s1fng to, pipe diam.e1en &roaleJ than. 5* NPS... All" pipt diamc:eus n ~lt~d to be welded \\\\'11b these WPS'** The,e WPS'* ~ quallfied without notch touabneu fl!ialrmm\\t& for carbo:11\\ecl, Thl1 b a tupplemonw, incntlal ~lt that la n;,plkable m mis lmtmcb. ACDPH* The project 11 to ~=rm that thc>>e '1f'PS*, were not~ oa dlammra arcaicr lhm6"NPS, ~.2 for ~mpancnt., otw than vca~lat ASMB Soction 111 Table NB/N~22,'l(b)-1 pmults ~miptions ft-om PWITT fl)t goriain fillet weld throat tht,lw5ao depmdini. on ll0m1Dal UilckN1sea (Jee NB/NC-4622J), nwdmwn tarbon contoat, w mln.imum prchca1. "'All" f\\llct \\\\~Jd sitds ~ ~tted to _be wcldc:4 with these WP.S's. These WPS'* an: quallfled without pottwo!d bee tlealmont (PWH'I) for R1bon steel. 'these WfS 'a perm ii wtldl~ fillet wild th:oAi thieboaaca 'ar=tar tlwm chat pormfflOd 'by ~lll>lc iAdioat4 abovt, ACJlON.. Th* proJi,c:t ii lO~nHrm tbattbeec WPS*awcri noiuMd cnflUotwc1d threat . lhJcmaes atcam 1han that pcnuitted by _Table NBINC-462l.7(b)-1. Morrl10n Knudsen

io.o WPB-N,, CT/8,0.l P.B (Rrv, No. 0, d11ad S>/J?/96), GT.SM/~3.43-1 PB (R,v. No, 1, dtttd 111%MG), and GTM/,3,43~1 PB (Rev. No, 01 dtitd 11122/96) In tctordanct with ASME Section IX. QW-104.! (Jut pa:av,ii,h). the A-number da[anadoa rii~ mo bi by m'ctOftN to th, A WS clauiilcalicl\\ (where such =tt), lhe n:aanufacturer*a trw dealpation (In th1s i:eae, Jnco 52 and l $2), or other ~l,sbed procutcment ~\\UUCntS. no A*num~er dtslamtJon fur thc,o WPS',

hould be 'add:t:taed. and not as clther "None" 01 "WN'. In th.b cue, it Is requited tfw tht! filler mttal rtwiu.fa..."tW'Or's trade d:sljna1jon of"ln<<) 52 and 152. u applli:4bJe* be w,ed on V\\tff \\\\1PS ** tor A-number detlifl!.l!cn. This e.rror does not

~t the int.eirity of Mids madt wl1h these WPS',, bnt for procram and Codt complianee purpoo~, CCfltlnuer.\\ me or tlmc Yr'PS 's OA & proJo~ will ffll~~ ~Clti0ttoftlle$c WPS't to f\\llly complf With ASMBSectloaIX. ACTION* The proJcot ii io mu'mn that thete WJl91t ii no lonaer in use, n.o WPS-No. CT*8M/1.J..1 PB (Riv, No, 2, dattd U/H/96), GT.SM/3.3*2 PB (Rev, No, 1, dattd 11/J&,6>, and OT-SM,BU/1.3-1 PB (Rev, No. l,datt.d 111'l3/96) MK*s QAM, pmpph. :,.2.4, ~s that proJee1 speclflo WPS* s ht pre~ "~ o~ the c.orpcratl 'WPS'\\ Th!lefore, a corpo:&tl WPS '"~m~ed eAC!l of the PQR.*1 that were submitted to the proj"t. CUrml1ly and )Wt MK PQR. fon;n1 do not ldentb)i the UJ-e of all cornbinatlon* of applicabl* eJSOntlal and 111pplementary nsenud variables established by the PQR.. For thi1 ict000, since 1989 MK has ~upl~ WPS', with the appUeablo 1upportina PQR. When nolc:h tou~ b required, the mwmum ~ inpui vatu.e, ertabluibed by. the corpe,raie 'WPS o.od by qu&liflr;ation ~ eonsidmd supp!emema.ry ca,onti&l vlrlablco. The tnMimum but input value described in the corpor1to \\VP6 11 wcrt ~cd £or QM or*t. c.om.blutloA ctwaldlna procctae5 on ca.oh ofth: above proje~t WPs*a. Project chanacs to ~seniial varinbln and 1upplcinent1l"Y tuential variab~ require fCCRl,Allncadon. A) Tot SMAW ho1i lny.stt cf83.7 and e,.1 kJ/ln. for WPS-No. OT.SWt.3--1 PB -.OMd 11': nwthnum haat ir.put,*alue of82.9 kJ/in. described in tho corporate WPS-Ne. OT-sM/1.3-1 (supported by PQR.-No. OT*SM/1.3*Ql), ACJCN* The project ii io c.omirm that thb \\\\'PS is no lo11ger tn U$0 (~ NO\\t 1. below). M0rri1on Knud1en i' f

QFR-No. C-96-022*01 B) TM GTAW Nlnt lnputa. of 67,2 wS 73.3 k1/io. lor WPS~No, QT0SMn.l~ Pl3 ~ th~ maximuin heat lllp\\lt value or 64. 7 kMn, dotaibed ln thi: QOl'J)Ora~ WPS-N~. OT*SMf.J,3*'. {supported by PQR.*No. GT*SMl3,),Q2), ac:nCN* lhe proJOC1 JI io QODfinn d:w ihls 'WPS Ja ao lonacr 1n use (see Noto 1, below), C) The OT AW bett fnpuu or 17.6, 67.2 and 73,3 Wm. cw SMAW hat lnpw ol

79.2, 83.7and85.81:1/ln. exce<<l the awdmuin bear Input value of 43.3 k.1/ln, fer OTA W and $4.3 kJ/io. for. SMAW described in 1ho corporate WPS*No.

OT*SM*BVll.l-1, In thl, cut_ the I\\IJ)porting PQR-No, Gi.SM*BU/lJ.(ll has 10\\\\-ff h=i iDpUt values tor both GT AW &Dd SMAW proec.,1e1 thnn ihat described cia me proJ-= wn. AClJOl1* The proj~ ii to c.onflrm tMt wPS*No. OT*SM*~U/1.3*1 PB waa noH1tee1 on the Point S~h SQRprojoct. Nrne 1: Toe uuvc ptQjo,;l WPS'* have a DllppO~ PQR. wttb a hlahti ~ input value than 1hal d~cribed by the corporate WPS (Qctpt i0r WPS-No. OT-SM*BlJ/1.3*1 PB), The project WPS heat input va1uc, an below some of the l=t input,-alues listed an the PQR. but arc hJabor than the val\\let Usud lD th, ~rporete WPS. lhe reuon fer lbl1 dll,rep&nt)' ft wht~ corporate 11elcoted tbe h111t input value u, be uaed vmus whc~ the proje~t sclc~ted the val\\l.t to be used, The corporste maximum heat LD&,ut values were aelc=i by the OVJB ~ ac,ccrt!an"° whh ASME Section m, NB/NC-4330 ualna the prc~durc qu.alifieaUcn tOS't wcldm=t data ahttts.. and dlt=lori provlded by lnterpretatloo No, IX*92~9. Bu~ 00 lhc hu1 mput in the removal lowlcns of tht witldlna p:ocen wdd pe.uea temd, tbc OWE.elected the nwdmum he.at input indluitd cm euh 0fthe ~rpoi&te WPS'1 to bo used when aeneratlna i,:o.)ect ~o WPS'** For w 1986 Edition lm.d wllr.,r vmioiu of ihc Code, it could ht b\\urprtt.d tlnt . the Codt did not clearly def~ where the maximum hi,at Input va1ue Uid to be electtd. AJ an "intenl" b\\quil)'. Jnterp~Ution IX.. !7-Mi9 doos provldo the

equbed clarification and It ii aood practice to ~ompty with Sl>Cb lnqulrie11.

How"1et, Codi lntc:ptNtlon JX*92*69 i, no, pan ot1he 1986 Codo and compltrmu with ft 11 ~ rtqU1,t4. Morrison Knudaon

~*

.... ""'1n111r.,.,,w..,l:%1caa11a:11 :m,~

i I I. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: October 10, 1997 Frederick J. Hebdon. Director Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II original signed by Robert Hermann for: Edmund J. Sullivan. Jr.. Acting Chief Materials and Chemical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT (TIA) - ST LUCIE 1 - REQUEST REGION II REVIEW THE QUALIFICATIONS ANO APPLICATIONS OF WORK PROCEDURES SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEAM GENERATOR WELDMENTS During an inspection at Point Beach, Unit 1 (97-010/50-266 and 50-301). the NRC inspector identified* an unresolved issue with a welding procedure developed by Morrison-Knudsen Corporation (MK) for steam generator (SG) girth welds. Independent of this inspection. a concerned*individual sent to the NRC a list identifying potential problems with 14 of 18 MK weld procedures used on Point Beach's replacement steam generators. One of the potential problems was the same identified by the NRC inspector. The MK contractors that worked at Point Beach on steam generator replacements are now involved with St Lucie steam generator replacements. There is concern that the potential problems identified with the weld procedures for Point Beach my be carried over to the St Lucie job site. The NRR staff requests that Region II perform a review of the welding work Rrocedure specifications and associated procedure qualification reports used for St Lucie steam generator replacements. The review should include the potential problems listed in Attachment 1. This TIA request was discussed between Paul Fredrickson. Region II. and Cheryl Beardslee. NRR on October 8, 1997. A response 1n the form of an inspection report and any supporting documents is requested by November 24, 1997, to support a timely resolution of an allegation. The attachment to this letter is considered "NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE."

Attachment:

As stated cc: J. R. Strosnider L.A. Wiens DISTRIBUTION ttre:.C.fillt:eu EMCB RF DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\NAUJOCK\\ST LUCIE.TIA To receive a copy of this document, fndicate in the box C*Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E*Copy with attachment/enclosure N

No co OFFICE EMCB:DEtfir C

(A)SC:EMCB:OE N N NAME DGNaujock DATE JD/* 197 . mR~ flllf ~fEKYTIER ~W 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 i I I I 0 I

UNITED STATES' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D,C, 20$.SS-0001 -October 10, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick J. Hebdon, Director Project Directorate Il-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II FROM: a_Jl ~~dmund J. Sullivan. Jr., Acting Chief ~ ~~terials and Chemical Engineering Branch 0 Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT (TIA) - ST LUCIE 1 - REQUEST REGION II REVIEW THE QUALIFICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF WORK PROCEDURES SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEAM GENERATOR WELOMENTS During an inspection at Point Beach, Unit 1 (97-010/50-266 and 50-301). the NRC inspector identified an unresolved issue with a w~lding procedure developed by Morrison-Knudsen Corporation* (MK) for steam generator (SG) girth welds. Independent of this inspection. a concerned individual sent to the NRC a list identifying potential problems with 14 of 18 MK weld procedures used on Point Beach'.s replacement steam generators. One of the potential problems was the same identified by the NRC inspector. The MK contractors that worked at Point Beach on steam generator replacements are now involved with St Lucie steam generator replacements. There is concern that the potential problems identified with the weld procedures for Point Beach my be carried over to the St Lucie job site. The NRR staff requests that Region II perform a review of the welding work* procedure specifications and associated procedure qualification reports used for St Lucie steam generator replacements. The review should include the potential problems listed in Attachment 1. This TIA request was discussed between Paul Fredrickson. Region II. arid Cheryl Beardslee, NRR on October 8. 1997. A response in the form of an inspection report and any supporting documents is requested by November 24, 1997, to support a timely resolution of.an allegation. The attachment to this letter is considered "NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE."

Attachment:

As stated CONTACT: Don Naujock. NRR (301) 415-2767, E-mail DGN

Attachment l

e.

-OfR-No. C-96-022-01 REYJEW QI'ALI~ PQINJ' 1lEACH srn m*, In response to QFR No. 01 issued as the re1ull of the annual management rev!ow No. c.. 96-()22, all (total or 18) ASME Sectio11 W Point Beach SORP Weldlni Procedurs Speciflc&tiona (WP S's) distribut,d b)' ml, proJ~t ha"e bcm reviewed. BaRd on ma review, the fotlowina WPS'* nquln tome fomi. ohctJon. 11:us review *wca porfo~ ~ 1he ~~ of ASMB Soc:t!on IX* 199.S edition with no addenda and ASM£ Section 11I

J 9i6.wticn wi1h DiO t.ddcada.

1.0 WPS-No. FC/1,1*1 fB (Rev. Ne, o, dated 9n7196) 1,1 Thh wPS it nwkcd with an '?r' w permli Its UN un.dc tbc scope of ASME ~~on m, b\\lt ~ th.k.km,a ran11a lhult. u rcqulmS b)' ~"B/NC*2l l l(a), la nc, de.,eri bed I AC1ION* The project ls co ld'°tify if th1a WPS wu wed undtr tl,e tea~ or ASMB Section In, 1f used on ASME Ill work, confirm that the thicknca3 nineos or the ma.tciDl "'here 1hc WPS WN ~cd (ba.sed on tho appUC4.ble PQR) wen whhln Code limit.i. 1.2 The filler metal AWS CJasslfication No, lbted on tho WPS ts E71-Tl, E?lT-1 la the propc: f11ter motA! d~lgnatlcn deurlbed in the appendix of the SFA-$.20 Mid filltr me~ ~flc:&do111, Thi, is un odi.torW ml,~ wblck don not impact 1M m\\tirit)' of the weld(,). At"DCN-The proJctt i$ to ca:l&m th&I ih11 WPS Js oo lon&or 1n use. 2,t WPS.No, FC/1,S.1 PB (luv, No. O, datod 9/Um} TbcPQR*Rev. No, l ia11awl 2l25{96. and th: WPS Rev, N~. o bdlJ:si9(l6(96, The ~vlt!on date of the WPS should either be the samo d1to as the PQR or liter. 1h11 fJ an editorial r:nl&lako wblch doc& cot lmpa.ct tha in1e3rity otthe weld{*). AC'IJON-fie project g to ccnfum that thb WPS le no lobp Ja. ~. Pago, 01 8 1 0- W ¥ii*.>,,mp. -m:;Tl,'liiii':T!:.I ) £d ffll

QFR-No. C-96-022-0l l.O ~*No, FC/3..J.l PB (Rtv, No, o, dattd P/6/96) 3.1 As an e:ise0tl1l v&riible, ASME Section JX QW-406.1 permits a dcercne of*lO0 11F. &om the pzebw temperature used durina p~dure quaJillcrtion. The nwdmum qualwcd preheat, aa recordtd on the PQR. ii 268°F. Therefore, the zninimurl1 preheat penn~ '° bt UNd withtM ~11&11.&auon oflhil WPS,la 16B'F, *Note l ofcbc WPSpmnlta thGU1Cofaminimumprdl.at0tl50*P, ACJION-The J)?Ojeet ia 1() conflnn 1bit this WPS wu not wed or, lf usod, tbat w atlrumum i,iehoat 'WU not lower than l6811F. 3.2 There i* * '°ntlJct ~ mo ~on~ct tUbt to Yn)u. ~l.W1~ (CTWD) i~i;: or3/8" to 3/4" (a nonossentlal variable Nqulred by ASME Settlon 1X, QW-410.8) and tbe electrOde stir:kout ranao or W' to 1" (not required by ASME IX) described in thia WPS. CTWD ls defimd in ASME Section IX. QWa490 (which ref'csrences AWS 3,0), m the dlstan~ betwun 1bc end of the contae: tu~ (us\\lAlly loca.t&d insidr; 1hc su Doa:!e) to ihc warptec.c. Ele~trodo 1tiokout l1 defi=d oa ~ dlstucc b~ll tho cn-i of Che gu nou!o and tho up of 1he f1ux-cored Yiiro. Anelc:~trodc ltlckout otl" exceeds the mwmum CTWD of3/"4". This 11 & nonessc:ntial variable in which i change rmy be made in tho WPS without ~~Seauon, 60JQN* Tbc ptojcct is \\0 co~rm \\hat ihit WPS Js no longer 1n we. Page 2 of 8 Morri1cn Kn1Jdaan . I I i WIL!ltlt&WWW.lmDl'J;i'fi:.-:a II

~----. - ---. 4.9 WPS-Na, FC/l,1*1 P.8.(Rn-, No, o, dled P/t,196), FC/1.8-1 Pl (Rev, ~o. 01 dated 9/16196), GM/1,1*5 P~ (Rn. No. O, dated 9/17196), 111d GT.SM/l.S,1 PB (Rev, No. l* dU1d 11123196) ASME Sidon m NBINC-23 l l (a) rtqwrt1 notoh iousbn,est ~*tin a rnr carbon 11cel thickness~ groat<< ifu "'", u i,upp!ementaz)' essential variable. The above proj~t WJ>S ** wn qU4llfied whhout notch toujhncl, requlmnont.,, oa indicated h\\ the mpectivc *~ PQR(s). On~. or a combwdo11 or weld jol11t flaurca 5 and 9 ue marked with an 'T', and thm fiaW'es pcnnh the use or lhcae WPS's oi, hm,woll b\\i.ttJolnta whh thlcbusu greater than 314'. WPS-No. FC/1.8-1 PB, GM/1.l.5 PB a.id OT*SM/l.8*1 PB lndic:ate thicbos1 ranae11 of3Jl6*- l. 1116"* 3/4" and 1116* r. rcapootivc,ly, for A.SME Scc:tionl!I, ACjJIDl. Tbc _project ia to confum fhat 1he above 4 WPS'a wen: JlOl uscCI on thii:bcue1 gro,i.r thao 5/8". 11 specified in NB/NC-231 J(a). S, l ASME Section ID Tablo NB!NC-4622.7(b)*l oxmpU PWHT far thf ckneuca of 1 3/4* and lcS3. This WPS wu revised to J)ermit woldina on. c11bon 1toal wJth or witbouL lbc uor. of PW}IT. Tbe WPS ptnniu welding on thJckn~ of3/16° tc

I". The WPS faila to wlicaie 1hat C)(etnp1inn f'tom PWHl' only cpplica (or lhkknes,oa of 1 W' W1 les11. By cccse, P'WHT fbr lhwknc~ over 1 W' Is an ouentW vwble.

AC::002:i* ~ proj~l U to oonnmi thll this WPS WU not used on thlcwsses greater 1hAn 1 1/2*, wfthaut the~ ofPWHT. .S.2 Revision 3 and cm Her revision, of thls WPS (with no PWHT) n:~ul~ a ~,clrn11m heat irtput of 28.& kJ/ln. for the OTAW procetis ronhiclcneascs betWcen $/&'" and I ~*. The OTAWpcrtion of the \\VPS for R.tvlsion4 bas maximum beat input value* cf 43.2., 44.8 and 41... kJ/ln. for thlckzlN,oa bciween 5/811 and I Y,* for ~ppllcatlons io ~ \\lscd with or without \\ho Ult otP'Wltt. 'When a WPS (1 to be ~ fer bolh PWHT cond11fom (each u casentitJ variable). the WPS must doscri~ the lurjtations of beth PWH'l' &nd no PWHT appU~dom, R~vJsJoi, 4 0tthJ1 WiS' f,n, to indicate tho muinlum heat lnput Hmiiatlon 0!28.8 k1/lo, fin th~ OTAW ~ea lo be used on thiekr.esm between 5/8" and l W' without th11 uae of PWHT. ACTION-Tho projcot la 10 confirm that lhi* wPS wu nol ~ed with heat inputs hlaber UwJ 28.~ kJ.'la, oa ~r;:.knea1ee b.lw.= 518* to 1 V.11 without PWHT. Morrlaon. Knud11n

~O WPS-No, CT-SM/1.8*1 PB <Rn* No, 1, dat"1 11133/K) The filler mtlAI SMAW~ A WS CJ~lfimlon NU!Dbc~ llsttd on the WPS ~ E309 01' £309L. !309-15 or -16 and E3O0L,15 or-16 are th, pfflp,t t'll111 m,ral dcsignatlon descrlbcd in th~ SF A-5,4 Ml d fl 11 er metal speolfiCAtions, Thls Is an cdl!Drial ml nab which doe, not impact th, lntegrlt)' of the weld;(S), ACJJPN* ~ J)C'Oj~ b kl~ that &hi! YIPS ii no lonpr Jn u,o, 7,1 ASMB Section m Table NB/NC*4czi.7lb)-1 cxcmP'il PWliT forthickn~eaes or 1 V." and ~... Th!s WPS penuiu welding on wbon s~I without dlc u.e of PWHT, . The ~s permiia weldl0a on \\bic.kncne1 in the mat of 1116 11 to 8". The WPS ruts ~ indir:ato lb&\\ cxempilon from PWHT onlt a,ppllc., for ihi,~s~ of 1 1/2" and less. PWliT !01 tblo.knems over 1 w* Js an enential varlAbl~, ACTION.. Tbt proj~i I* to conflft?l 1hAt ~5 WPS wu not uud on tblckneo,ii ~ than 1 Y,* with:N; 1he wie ct PWHT. 7J lhls pr0Jec1 WPS was not prepared ba.te4 00 a corporo~ WPS ln ~cor~ with MK'* QAM P"BIJ'IIPh 3.2.'4. Fur prosrarn l:Qmpliarwc pLJZi)OKS, ~ntlm.1~ \\110 or lh!s W~ 00 a project will rcqwre development ora oorponto WPS ~d tevuion of ihi, WJS~. A<tlIQN* The project is tc c:onfiim that \\his WPS is not beini uaed. Corporate ia \\0 ,~ a oo,pom~ WPS. U WPS-No. GTM/1.1-3 PB (Jiev. No, 1, dated 12/03196) 1,1 1hc tffl rtpon.110.1)2449 da'" Novtinb.r 27, l PP' fo: PQIVNo, GT-SWl. 1-Q5 lndkale1 that the w,ldlns procedure 4uallfic1&1ion test rpeclmena ~re tested b)' Body,oce Tauaai-, Inc, Bodycote'TaUNJi, Inc, wu no1 on MK.'11 Approve<l Supplier, Lilt, ta 'iuued by th~ MK Q.A.M ~anpphs S.2.1 and 9.2,3, ACJ10l/* Camoraie ls 1n J)Crlonn a11 auet1mmt tif Bodyctila Taut.tit, Inc, to vl!'ify lh.at tbb~* bavt COCJ~od impl*m.ent&Uon of the T1u11ia'* QA prcaram, M0rrl10n Knudsen ("' -~---....., ** -.... --;s;:,$'."'~itat:.t!u~:mnrn:*. bl Ill

Anacluneni I 8.2 Mz. P11uJ Evr.ns "nificd.PQR.*No. OT*SM/1.1-QS fur Mr, f!uge~c Ciotdcn on 11127196. Certification of \\hi, PQR wu performed ~to~ the 1215196

do!egatfoa IOC.No. M-QM*~91 iha1 delcpted Mr, Evans tho sutbority by th:

Oroup Welding Eniinett. ';('hil roe WU feq\\Selted to be !Uutd b)* tho OQD on 1215/%. Dtleptlon ls permitted by MK's QAM pcrtgraphs 9.2.4 and Section 0,4 for 11Individ~ Tltle3,11 but ~Ion ot A PQR. lhould be petfbrmed aft.er completion of tM written deteaedon letttr. thi1 is a propam control J1.1uod end not a~aiwu,. ACIJON. The project ii to confirm mat thl1 WPS la not beln1 und, a.~ The ten ~pon no.13~9 written by Bod.r~e Tauula. ~. Indicates thel SR70S*2 nuer ni.ew was~ With th: or AW proce"S3 for we1d1q tho test ~upo11. This 11 cotUtary to the ER70S,6 filler metal. wbioh 11 recotdcd on PQR.*No. OT *SM/l.1-QS (Rcv.O) foc1beOTAWproce11, ACTION. The project oe.eda to obtain a c0nutcd 1C3t report from Bodyrote Tnu,sla1 Inc., &Dd 1utnnlr 1ho c:orrccr?d test report to the Group Quality I)~. 8.4 Thls proj~ \\\\'PS wu not prcpand bued Oil a eofJ'Otlte WPS in AC<<,rdm\\ce with MK'r QAM ~!\\ 3.2.4. The Group QtJ1Uiy Dlrteior (OQO) and Oro~ Welding Engineer (OWE) have not opprov~ thia combillltion ofWPS and PQR. hC:OON° Tbls project WPS and orisir.al PQJl need to bo 1ubmit1ed tc the OQD !or prccmini, Fer pro~tm i:ompU.ance purposes, thi& WPS and PQR ~mbination will be 2PPfeved by thrt C'iQO and OWE.prior to clorurl! orQFR.,01 for Mw.acmcnt Review ~a. C-96.022, 8.S PQR*No. OT*SM/1. 1*QS ~ferenccs p10j"t apc,Uic WPS*No. OT*SM/l. l*l 'PB. Unknown at the time o!1he 1996 rnw1:em11nt as~pcrformed on 121'30-JJ/96. WPS.No, OT*S~t/1.l*l PB was revised on \\1128196 u, ineludf thi1 PQR ai a sup~n~ document for pcrmittlng PWfrr (*~ peRSl'IJ)h !.3, cbovo). It li*.Mt nqwnd '° bAve A PQR 111fcienoin1 alloftM WPS'1 \\hot h'll supponiq, ThePQR i1 a:ceptablo u wriucn. No action is Rqclred on th!s item.

Pege 6 of a Morrlaon Knudun

..,..--T-:-r::n.-.,... zWWWH!4, ** JH ?--.,-.~.:rnlallll.

Ati&chJnffll 1 8.6 As rcqum:d bi the abo~ lOC*No, M*QM*96e091 ud QAl* 1 l.2 pw. 4.5,L. the proJ~t has not submitted a copy or the p~'* pure~ order and test ~ldment ~ta wet, u -appliwle. A faxed copy oftht fndependcm ttst laboratory report~ bean mieiv.4. AC'JJQ?.i* The projCIO\\ !ti &o lJUbmJt lhJ1 lntormadon CO dJ.O Oruwp QullUt)' Oimtor In Dcrdanco with MK'a ASM£ QA manual prasrapb 3.14 ilXl QAJ.l 1.2, 9J) WPS-No. FCJl.1*1 PB (Rn, No. o. d1ttd M7/96), FC/1.8-l PB*(Rrv. N'o. Ot dar.d M~. GM/l,1-! PB*(RCY, No. O, 9/l?/96). Gt..SM/1.l*l p~ (Kev. No. 4) WI/A Elt70S-2 01' J 4 no cltorpy.Y GT..SM/1.&.,J PB (Rrv. No, J, dat= 11/l3196)t and GTM/1.1-2 PB (Rev. No, l) only f'll'O. ~,,,,,ri.1011 /Jll*t h'ud tMHI 9.1' ASME Section m NB/NC-231l(e) requlru noi:b toughne111c,1in3 tor pipe diam.eten greater than 6 11 NPS. "All" i,lpc dwn=zs are pern,Jtled to be welded with thc,c WPS'** 'Ihe,e WPS't ~ qUAllfltd without notch tDuahncsa n'lu:imnffl\\l for cubo:i ~1. '11ils 111,upplemontll} tnentlll ~le th1t ii applk:able In thia instance. ACIJQN* ~ projoot i1 to ecnfirm that thtae WPS 's were DOt ~ 00 dlamattra srcaicr thm6"NPS, 9.2 For ~mpoaents other than vcs.cl4t ASMB ~tlon 1ll Tablo NBtN~22.7(b)-1 pmnl~ Qmi_ptjonJ from PWHT f l)r oonain fillet weld tbmt thi,ki\\o&.,c:1 ~ns. on nominal thlck~.11see (~ NB/N~622.3), nwc.lmum carbon conto11t. wt mlnimun\\ preheat. "All" ftll~t \\\\~Jd 1ltds 1R pennincd to be wclltcd witti U\\c:io WPS's. These WPS'e arc qualified without pottwold bc.u t?tetment (PWHT) for ~ 5tcel. These wPS'* permic w,ldllll fillet ~ld thrOAS thk,knoaaa*~t,r 1hAD chat porm1cod 'c,y ttM \\able wliOlt14 above. AClCN* Th* project i1 to C(lnftnn that tbe1e WPs*, we~ n01 used en flllot wold throist thlcknesae.s ~ 1lwl that pcnultted by.Table NB/NC-1622,i(b)-1. M0rrl10n Knudsen

a..

..;,,;1,1.11..W/illrffl*I,. ;f:*~-WI ft

Anachmtnt I 10,0 WP~Ne, GT/8,4~1 J!B (Rev, No, 0, dated 0/J 7196),

GT-SM/43.43-1 PB (Rtv.No, 1,d1Ctd 11/%319G),a1td GTM/'3,43;1 rB (Rtv. No, O* dated J 1/2l/96)

In accordance with ASME Section IX. QW-404.5 (Jut p~ph), the A*inmiber dafpa~ozi m~ ~ be by mcronoc to th, A WS clauUlc:atioft (where $uch e,titl), the manut&dW'cr** trade deaisnation (In thb cese, lnco 52 and 152), or other establilbe4 ~ dtXumcnts. Th~ A*numt>ar dttlgutlon for the,o WPS*a

hcu!d be 'addretlod, and not as oltlut "None.. or "NIA**, In thb Ute, it Is required that the filler metal num*tw"Or'
trade designation or "lnco 52 and t $2. u apptic4bJc* bt wtd on WM WPS'a !or A-number deslil\\!1!.on, This error does not

~t ~ intcarit)' ot.wilds made with these WP S's, but for pro,nun and ~ fompli&n" purposes, CQl:JUnUetl use orllu:a~ \\\\-'PS's oA Aproje~ will required modification of tbe$e WPS 11 lO fully compl~ with ASMB Section IX. ACnO~* T.hc projeoc b to,ontmn that tho,e WPS'* i& no lanaer in use, U,O WPS-No, GT-8M/1.)-1 PB (Riv, No. 21 dattd tVU/96), GT.SMl.lJ-2 JIB (Rev. No, 2, dated 11/181!16),.ad OT.SM.BU/1,3*1 PB (Rn-, No, 1, dattd 11/23196) MK..'s QAM, parapph 3.2.4. requlrcs that project specific WPS' s bt i,re~ 11wed OA the c.or;,orate WPS,., Thetc!ore. a COtJ)Ol&te WPS ac~ompanied each of &he PQR. 11 that were submitted to the project. Cumntly and past MK PQR. fon:n* do not identify the use of all <:ombinatlori* of applicablo cwntial and aupplemenwy es&clllial variables establi!hed by the PQit For this l~D, since l 98~ MK 1w ~upl~ WPS't wllh the applloablo aupportin; 'PQR. When nolch tau~ is required. the maxtmum hMl lnpvt vatue, ettt.b~ hy, w c:orpora1e WPS ood by qUA.llfkAtion 6re co!Uidcred supptcmemary c,Jonti&l vlriablco, The maximum halt input value demibcd ln the corporate WPS'1 wen cx"cdod for one or - conu,b1,.tlon of wtldlna proce:sacs on uoh of tM.above proje~t WPs*s. Projeci changes to ~Jemial var~ltt and supplcmentll')I e11entlat Vlri&bles roquire teq'QAllfi;ation

A) 1bc SMA.Whoa1 lnpuu of83.7 atid 85.Sk.J/ln. rorWPS*NO, OT*SM/1.3-1 PB

.xottd the m.axlznum haat ir.put ~alue of82.9 kJ/in. doscribed in tho corporate WPS-No. OT.SM/1.3*1 (Supported by PQR-~o. OT*SM/1.3*Ql). AC]JON* The project i1 io co~ ihat thh \\VPS ism> loJ1gcr tn use (see Note l, belOW), Morri*on Knudsen

c:nra1CS:11111'l,.~..,.,;F1fiT&1'\\?'ilf]~ia'.JIIII

Attachment l QPR-No, C-96-022*O1 B) lhc OTAW h.oct ~,of 67.~ and 73.3 k1/in! Coi WPS:No, OT*SMl>.3-2°PB ~ the maximum h.eat input valueof64.7 kMn. dotcribed 112 the corpora~ WPS-Nt>. OT*!>MIJ.~.. ~ (supported bt PQR.*No. GT*SMl3.3-Q2), c\\CDCN* The project la lO coll1lnn dw ihb WPS b no tonier ln use (sec Noto l, below), C) lbe OTAW belt inpltl orSl,6, 67.2 and 73.3 lcJ/iD.,md SMAW heat lnpw ot

79.2. 83.7 and 85.8 kJ/ln. exceed the nwdmum he.as input value ot 43.3 kJ/ln. for GTAW and,4.j kJ/iD. for SMAW described in 1ho cotpmt~ WPS*No.

OT*SM.BlJfl.l*I,* b tb!scue, the supporting PQR-No, Oi.SM-BU/1.3.(ll ha., lower h=i input values tor both OTAW and SMAW procc,sc1 thaft thai _du~bcd oc me proJ"' W!S* ACTION. The proj~ ia to ~Dfirm ihe.t wPS*No. OT*SM*BU/1.3*1 PB was notusec1 on the Point Bt4Ch SQR.projcct. Non 1: ~ above prQjo,;t WPS"* hav~ a i,uppoma; PQR. with ahJpr~ mput value llwl thaJ deacribed by the corporate WPS (cx;cpt !ar WPS-No, _OT.SM*BtJ/lJ*l PB), Th~ proj~ WPS hw input values m below,omc of the heat input \\'al~ U~cd on the PQJl, b\\.1 l:'C hlabor lhml th, valY=* Uttod ill th, corpomte WPS. The reason for 1h11 cUJcrcpa.ncy t, whDr; ;orpora1c Kl coted the h-1 input val\\lb to be uacd vmu, where the proJeot aclcctcd the value to be uaaf,

The corporate maxtmum hoai lnput values were hlcmd by the oym ~

acw:ordcn~ with ASME Stcdo11 nt, NBINC-4330 ualn& tbc procc,durc quallficatfon test welt1ment '11m ahc-ets, 1Dd d~iori provided by lntcrpretarion No, IX*92-ti9. BUOd on lhc ~l mput hi thr: l"CO'QVM Jo~ns orw wcldlna process weld pe.,m tested, tbe OWE ael~cied the maximum he.at input indicated. OD uch orthe ~?Jk)flltc WPS's to be used when acncrat1na project spodflo WPS't. For tbe 1986 Bdldon,md e.rUor vmions of ihc Cod~. it c-owd ht inul'J'rtted th,t the Code did not clouly defiu: whero the maximum h"at lnput value bad to be aele-ctld. AJ an ~en,*' Inquiry, Jnterpr;tatlon IX.. 92.t;9 dccs provide lhc ,equltt:d clarification and it ia iood pni~ice to ~ornpty with such i~u!rics, How over, Code In~tion lX*92*69 ia not pan a£ the 1986 Code and cornplim\\Ce with tt l1 ~ rtqU)rcd, Morcl10n Knudon

D.lffltn,i.,1.,.,,.wtkJ1 a,11iit,!1?J.1H rd~;;:piftlllg

.,}}

ML20178A254

Contents

Text

Subject:

7.0 REFERENCES

6.0 REFERENCES

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Contact:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Contact:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Navigation menu

ML20178A254

Text

Subject:

7.0 REFERENCES

6.0 REFERENCES

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Contact:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Contact:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

SUBJECT:

Attachment:

Navigation menu

Search