ML20155J980

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion for Leave to File Instanter Encl Answer to Applicant Motion for Reformation of Commission 860505 Order.Reasons Included Applicant 860505 Motion Filed 45 Days After Svc of Commission 860321 Order & on Eve of Evidentiary Hearings
ML20155J980
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1986
From: Cassel D
CASSEL, D.W., ROREM, B.
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20155J982 List:
References
CON-#286-223 OL, NUDOCS 8605270267
Download: ML20155J980 (2)


Text

.__-

z o 5/22/86 g, p g },75 -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b BEFORE THE COMMISSION gy {c; -

h[

ll% -

1 In the Matter of: ) -

/

) D*^*' ' . s

~U COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-456 Aj % ,M

) 50-457 U V (Braidwood Nuclear Station, )

Units 1 and 2) )

INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER INSTANTER Intervenors Rorem et al., by their undersigned attorney, pursuant to 10 CFR S2.730(c), hereby move for leave to file instanter the attached Answer To Applicant's Motion For Reforma-tion of Commission Order filed May 5,1986. The grounds of Intervenors' Motion are as follows:

1. Applicant's May 5 Motion was filed some 45 days af ter service of the Commission's March 21 Order, which Applicant's Motion seeks to reform.
2. Applicant's May 5 Motion was filed on the eve of the evidentiary hearings in this case, which began May 6. Inter-venors' counsel were fully occupied by the evidentiary hearings that week. Intervenors' counsel have since been so occupied by depositions, factual preparation for the hearings scheduled to resume May 27, and other matters, that we have been unable to file the attached Answer sooner than today.

B605270267 860522 1 PDR ADOCK 050 4]6 C

v bD 'l

3. No harm to Applicant and no delay to the proceeding will result from granting Intervenors' Motion for leave to file the attached Answer. Applicant's Motion To Reform, and Intervenors' Answer thereto, concern only the reasoning of the Commission's March 21 Order, not its result. No matter how the Commission l

disposes of Applicant's Motion, the ruling will have no effect on the course of this proceeding.

4. Applicant's counsel has advised Intervenors that Appli-cant has no obiection to this Motion for leave to file instanter.

WHEREFORE, Intervenors respectfully request leave to file the attached Answer instanter.

DATED: May 22, 1986 Respectfully submitted, h - -

^

Douglass W. Cassel, Jr.

One of the Attorneys for Intervenors Rorem, et al.

Douglass W. Cassel, Jr.

Robert Guild Timothy W. Wright, III 109 North Dearborn Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 641-5570 2

_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _