ML20155H007
| ML20155H007 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/13/1988 |
| From: | Grimsley D NRC |
| To: | Boley K Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155H010 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-838, FOIA-88-A-20 NUDOCS 8806200168 | |
| Download: ML20155H007 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,_. .
- S.NU REGULATORY COMMISSION Nac poiA atoutsY %vvst
#"% If FotAWM37fr.oiA 6 6 A-d8)
/ %.
RESPONSE TC' FREEDOM OF gg l '^^' usassi tvet M " ' l S i l "" INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST JUN 131988 (evos.. / DOCatt Nvveta 5' is ecpecem it0VilT14
@o t. s q, NENN5TH j PART 1 -RECORDS RELEASED OR %OT LOCATED (See checaed bonest No agency records subrect to the request have been located No addrtonal agency records subrect to the roovest have been located.
Agency records Abrect to the request that are contifed e Append. are already avsitatwo for pwuc especten and copying e the NRC Pupc Docwment Room. 1717 H Sueet. N W , Washegion. DC Agency records sucgt to tne request th.it s'e identifed .n Append.a h C k4.b_ _ s'e berg ~43e J adata for pwuc enspecton ar4 copying e tN NPC Pwu c Docu ment Room,1717 H Street. N W . W ashington. DC, e a fo6 der un der t Oik nua te a- 'equester ea*e The nono opigtry we<sca of the preposause that you agreed to accect en a te'ec v e . --venat.cr um a memte of mi sta+t a now t+ng made avadao;e for pupc espection and ccyeg at the NRC Pupc Document Room.1717 H Street. N W . Washingtoe X , .n a fo6 der wr eer the FOIA number and reqwester name. Encioned e eformataon on how you may obtaen access to and the cha ges for cocies c.wds placec e tN NRC Pupc Document Room.1717 H $treet. N W., Wasmegton, DC. Agency records Abrect to the request are enclosed Any apohcat9e charge for coces t' tN recorcs provn3ed and cayerent procedur es are noted e the commeets section. F.ecords subrKt to the roovest heve been reierred to another Federal agencytesi foe e.e* and d. rect response to you in ve* of NRC's response to the request. no further actH)n 4 beiro taken on ar'.e+ e er cated PART 11 A-INFORMATION Wf7HMELD FROM PUBLIC OISCLOSURE Certae eformaton in the requested recores e be ng wrthheld from pwpc dec6osv e tvswant to the FOI A enemotons descreed e and for the reasons stated e Part 11. sec, tons B. C. and D Aey re* eased portons of the documeets for which only cart of '*w -ecord is beeg n'tnheid are being made avadab6e for pwuc especten and copyeg e the NRC Pupc Documeet Room.1717 H Street. N W., Washegton. OC, e a fo.ce .noer this F01A numter and requester name Comments . ' .
' uc> A, C , D .mL E .
I 8806200168 880613 PDR FOIA DOLEY88-A-20 PDR 0 5 AT et D.mictoa Orv$ C autts a%D a(CORDS b %s f / ' r_ h k i NIC FORM 464 e 4 i 9 C2
Re: F01A- 87-838 ( T;in S t. A ol o ') 1APENDIXA
- 1. 2/18/83 SECY-83-72, "Results of Operator Licensing Exaininations".
(4pages)
- 2. 5/23/83 SECY-83-72A, "Results of Operator Licensing Examinations For First Quarter FY 1983. (2 pages)
- 3. 3/10/88 SECY-88-75, "Results of Operator Licensing Examinations And Requalification Program Evaluations For Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987." (13 pages) 4.. 4/27/88 Examination Region V Facilities Results Cumulative NRCVOperator for all Region Exams Licensing (Updat (1page) e
APPENDIX B FOIA 87-838 l.f o s a 9 7 A 2. 0) DATE DESCRIPTION ACCESSION
- 1. 12/5/86 Requalification exams administered by Region IV, 8612160307 Wolf Creek, 50-482
- 2. 7/2/86 Requal exams administered by Region IV, 8607070264 ANO-2, 50-313/368
- 3. 9/1/86 Requal exams administered by Region IV, 8602040250 Fort Calhoun Station, 50-285
- 4. 9/16/86 Requal exams administered by Region IV, 8609190063 Cooper Nuclear Station, 50-298 5, 7/1/85 Requal exams administered by Region IV, 8507080161 Fort St. Vrain, 50-267
0; APPENDIX C DOCUMENTS TO BE RELEASED F0IA REQUEST NUMBER 87-838 (Foi A . 9 f. A ot.o) DATE~ ORIGINATOR RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION Undated R. Gallo, T. Szymanski, NRR, NRC Memo
Subject:
Requal [* Region I, NRC ification Information (18 Pages) NRC Administered Requalifica. ion Examination Results Summary - Calvert Cliffs (2 Pages) 3~ NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Beaver Valley 1 (1 Page)
$' NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary -
Indian Point 2 (1 Page) 5' NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Millstone 2 (1 Page) (o , NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Oyster Creek (2 Pages) , 7' NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Peach Bottom 2/3 (1 Page)
$. NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary -
Salem (1 Page) l NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Three Mile Island 1 (1 Page) 70, NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Summary - Yankee (1 Page)
/ /' Non-Power Reactor Facility Exam Results Summary - Requal Exam -
Cintichem (1 Page)
/ y' Non-Power Reactor Facility Exam Results Summary - Requal Exam -
SUNY Buf falo (1 Page) Non-Power Reactor Facility Exam Results Summary - Requal Audit -
/ 3- University of Maryland (1 Page)
APP.ENDIX' D FOIA 87-838 DeletedPortioEsdu{sideScopeofReauest DATE DESCRIPTION 1, l11/6/84 Power Plant Examination Results Summary Fort Calhoun Station (1 page) 2.. 4/1/85- Power Plant Examination Results Summary, Comanche Peak (1 page)
- 3. -3/18/86 Power Plant Examination Results Summary Fort Calhoun (1 page) 4 4/15/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary, Requal.
ANO-1 (Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1) (1 Page)
- 5. 5/20/86 Sanitized Power Plant Requal & Licensee Exam Results Summary Fort St. Vrain (1 page)
- 6. 9/23/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary Comanche Peak (1 page)
- 7. 9/23/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary Comanche Peak (2 pages)
- 8. 11/4/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary, Requal.
River Bend (1 page)
- 9. 11/18/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary Fort Calhoun Station (1 page)
- 10. 11/86 Power Plant Exam Results Summary Fort Calhoun Station (1 page) r
APPENDIX 0 F01A 87-838 Release
- 11. 3/3/87 Power Plant Exam Results Summary Fort Calhoun Station (1 page)
- 12. 6/15/84 Requal Exam Results ANO-1 (1 page) l i
l l
APPENDIX. E .FOIA 87-838-NOTE: DELETED PORTIONS ARE OUTSIDE SCOPE OF REQUEST- (, o 4. g9-A 40) l DATE DESCRIPTION 1 .- 9/16/86 Power Plant--License Exam Results Summary. i Fort St. Vrain, 50-267 (1 page) i
-2. 6/3/87 Power Reactor License Exam Results Summary
-Fort Calhoun (1 page)
'3. 3/9/88 Individua1'Results Sheet
. Fort Calhoun Station
-(1 page)
- 4. Various Dates NRC Administered Requalification Examination Results Sumary (25Pages)
I 1 f s i
~. . s ;
O s 4 *%.../:= m.. ! p Lebruary 18, 1983 POLICY ISSUE secy.83.n
- p. (Informationt For: The Comissioners l From_: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations W
Subject:
RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXMi!DATIONS
Purpose:
To inform the Comissioners of historical and current rates of license issuance and examination failures for Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operator, f' , t The enclosed tables report licensing action results, I Discussion: such as license issuances, denials or withdrawals and
'. ' l pass / fail rates (per.centages in parentheses) for t each HRC licensing examination component. These results are reported for two periods: fourth quarter FY 1982 t
(Table 1) and for all of FY 1982 (Table 2). 4 i The total number of licensing actions processed in the
' fourth quarter was slightly less than for the third quarterFY1982,(SECY82-460). The pass / fait rate remained consistent during the overall period. Written l
examinations continue to contribute most to the failure rate.
-{
The basic features of:the computerized administrative system are now operational. The tasks of testing and entering tne backlog of data are underday. Willia Dircks Executive Director for Operations
'l y'
'[7
~
Enclosures:
See next,page 4 n f/) %%5 u fm :,//ow -
*+
Contact:
H, t.. Thcason, HRR, 49-29595 h-(
/ ,,,+
. . .. vw . <-
~,
.,.o ro m-et tue a
~w , ,, ,
. g
U , , l
*N ' e - _,.--, w r e . :_,.: 2;
-~v,
.. .l . . ..
- v. ,,3;,74 v .' ~
t t 9
+ 1236 315 07EA&TCt LIC23315G *1ACKI.14 3!3 25 .233 J 2/15,' 6 J JU1224:LI $7ATUS 327087 1ST J*.2 F!82 TdIU CJH a!M Q:1 fid2 l otAL SI3cLA208 m
VIITIIs
.tr u t m m m m 73 J92 / J8 257 / 10
*227:AL - AJ 352 /
32.31 / 17.21 91.21 / d. 8 % 96.J1 / J.7% , 18 192 / 11 107 / 13 560 178 / i 90.4 8 / 9.21 94.61 / 5.81 49.2% / 10.4% ; 4 7# / 3 to / 13 l 6LPPLICAT*035 - a0 64 /
- 1. 11 / 5.31 90.2% / 9.4% 78.01 / 22.01 30 la / a 46 / 4 J5 /4 67.51 / 12.51 92.J1 / 6.01 69. 3 / 10.3% i lie / 6 40 / 5 U NI A:t - S A0 92 / 19 d 2.91 / 17.11 95.0% / 5.01 94.11 / 5.9%
;0:1L - 3C a16 / 77 466 / se J03 / 2.3 44.41 / 15.o1 91.01 / 9.01 92.9% / 7.11 Sao 198 / 41 352 / 21 222 / 22 s7.91 / 12.11 94.4% / 5.61 91.0% / 9.01 8:357!D # 23I23 _t vi n t t a n
- hi*:1L - AG - 376 99 28 320 - 20d Je 11
- >52 Cast - 3 2 1
- ' L73 310 - J 1 0
- Yc E1PPLIC ATIV>$ - 20 - 71 39 2 y 330 - J3 25 1 g ;33: 0167 L;; 310 0
1 0 1 0 0 U M 24*1 - 330 - 94 25 0 N T r.! A . - to - as7 138 Ja 330 - 339 84 . 12
. DS: CERT - J .) 1
'* 0
'*3 Sac- b 1 h
1 t id EW AL - 30 - 76 0 0 330 - 196 1 1 i-185T cit? - 0 0 0 L L 350 - 1 0 0 m t i t
,i .
;k,
.N.
e 023k1 Tot LicIssiso T2ACKIEG $2522s 3-1236315 CUL22ERLI STATUS 117012 31:23 02/15/83 4!M QO11:11 F182 s 01LL 3230LAT o t utI;fE3 11.All , 1112.1 11111s if.ll.I if.l.I.' illI.I 7 52 / 2 69 / 12 73 / 3.7 IstT;;1L - 10 91.31 / 8.71 96.3% / 85.21 / 14.41 35 / 0 28 / 3 sto . 35 / 1 100.01 / 0.01 93.31 / 6.7. 17.21 / 2.81 4 / 1 4 / 1 1E LP PLIc a:10 u3 - 30 15 / 1 80.01 / 20.0. 93.81 / 4.21 48.91 / 11.11 o
$ / 1 e / o 4 /
l 3 30 43.31 / 16.11 100.01 / 0.J1 100.0% / 40 13 / 1 8 / 7 11 / 1 7.1 y~ 0 2G RA DL - S ko 91.71 / 4.31 92.91 / 13.J1 / 46.75 4 4 56 / 3
- 4% / 13 41 /
T CT LL = 30 91.01 / 9.01 14.11 / S.1
'M 86.61 / 13.41 J
#~ . 1 30 / 1 45 /
sto to / 33.41 / 6.2 44.21 / 15.us 94.01 / 2. 01 31ssnq n o n nip.n ' 111 tut 1111 , 4RRM, s %s 95 44
- h-
- ' 4M s 43t 4 %
4 4 4 tit tnt
- i 1 % %
tu sto - 30 - 24 1 0 uutticattons - 1 2 0 sto - 0 0 0 1851 C2Mt - 0 2 ,
$1D 4 to
- 4 0
%4Wh%,s 44b s % 1t % +
41 9
!e - 1RPt8et, s %s i%
% % k
- -e m1
; 4Mt 94H s 4 4 %
1 % %
' Lu sto =
10 0 0 Szstsat - at - 0 sao - 24 0 0 0 0 1531 C231 = 0 0
. LtD 380 = 0
?
I t'
. e g
._e .
*' *
- M p d'D +4e = e. e e. ,g,, Yh2
NN bT' The Comissioners , 5 '
?
Enclosures:
- 1. Table 1 - Operator Licensing Tracking System Quarterly Status Report
! 4th Quarter FY 1982 i 1
j 2. Table 2 Operator Licensing Tracking System f Quarterly Status Report , j 1st Quarter FY 1982 Through Fourth Quarter FY 1982
! i r
i
=
Y . l h I f; .
! 4 S
k, s:
, I 4
e i
>4
=- - - - .-. . . _ . -_-_ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
s
..'s 4:e a ~
,,...... , .g <.f 4
... s .
- m. -
- 1 t A.
4 ; . i
?
- m. ,.
. ..,, . r./a l
POLICYelSSUE
. J...
dl (Information) l I i 4 May 23. 1983 SECY-83-72A l , I \ I p' . I II For:
- !,i The Commissioners -
.s W From: William J. Dircks
'] Executive Director for Operations N Sub.iect:~ RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXMINATIONS FOR FIRST i0 QUARTER FY 1983 d.o Purpose! To inform the Ccmissioners of examination and licensing d .
activities for Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operators d ag. for October 1,1982.through Decernber 31,1982, t I t Discussion: The enclosed table re' ports licensing action results, including i $ 4 F issuances, denials or withdrawals and pass / fail rate for each y HRC licensing. examination component. 5 The total number of licensing actions processed in the first quarter FY 1983 was less than for the fourth quarter
. U >
FY 1982, (SECY 83-72). The pass / fail rate remained con-l sistent during the period. Nst of the failures continue p to occur on the written portion of the examination.
. 1
\$ -
t / V' k- . Q t William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations Enclosure.
- 1. Operator _LicTnsing Tracking .Sys . ,
.Qu6terly Status Report 1st Quarter- a3
?
i ((d7M ~k , f ReMMhk y
'i Ce tact
- D. kham,x24868
'h wV
/ N.\ (q, 5 " g m h *h ,
' L
. w .r..
gV
..~... .
e . . , s ;ffm.. t ' *)
- ,i .
g s- . i 1 s ee as ,4 .M ' e'M N e o a se
>= at et N @ P m3 i i O 1 s *
- M<, I
, /
. I s
t 1
&f at H H H H H m ** p . ~ o a' >= e p *= o N e N P1 un . e e e e o e OW N as en e f f M
>= es * =
eC
-d \\\\ %%%\ \\ \\\\
- H
, $$' H H H H H H T mW e en f> e emeo eo 83 e d >e
.* e64 f
- e *
- N * *M
- J ej e. o e o e ao e r A. em e a) *o e e P
=>
6 e 1 i C W -e
>= l>
M N og j O ba N l Z at a .J ' ; et H H H H H H
- re D e w sArwa s e == ri a e m ** **
me e. N ac * *
- e e e e e n.
e UWN L. N e M S @ Pi m n f i aC Sg
- es *= Fi O j i ,1 s N ed s l \
PM2 4 \\\\ \\\\ \\ \ \ \ %, g l l D iS et ' , l OwD o H H H H H H H l
=40 ar* PMNO NNao de aden M p= cut e d *N
- e e f e N ed e MM= at Ps o e e M t # 2" E >= L e0 en e n e up e *
.T
" W >= # *= '
4 UMN er
. Pe e e 50 D 80 d
- O N*ea e oW=e eeee eJ D % ' = *=
M *= . o=
! W >= a .**
s ous 't [ ><a b,
< .=
SC [ W \' c= d O '. g e Q H H H H H H H W ; z - ea N N. *= ee6 e e e O. . d ri. NPNd M >'m
- N e N*Oe e PPNO w
***ee E NN ac p e N e e N e=
W e e es a= 4.9 e 80 W t me ce s= N O W sk
>= \\\\ \\\\' \\ \\\\
>=
e=s H H H H H H H or 61 . N ep a n *o*O N P= Maee f 3e es N e *
- ne d e Pe =
e
} < MM e o #
- Q A N P e e so N P WI en e= en p se m o en en om em e e e gg m a= Naoo e e ri e MN **
O w e, I I I l l 0 l l l l l l l $ Il $1 O O D= 0 O O b= O O D O 6= 1"I D O k= 0 i N DC M st 8C N M at et M DC C M as N et M i 6fl W M OWW ett MWH MWH , d U U V j
.Q. O A O t
(4 * > >= 6= p. p p. T C O OO O O O @ ed @ ed n ed n ed
- E SC er af W 8C CC 'E E E '
T. H e M M L*e M pe / ** 1 1 $ l 1 l l ) i T , .* + W a a e w e a og ag = 12 est an, M Q ap; aC g w p aC e- M Q at 6= 3
>= M et O >= M cc W e= e n= 0 >= M >= 0 D.
p , =
=
i nN
- et A X *C l= W
.= n me M
U D M W M
'l3 e
' JC Pi e q ed es m e. S. Sie 8.
.NW w p. 4 I'C=
a 4 et W W DC Q M . N L knee.
,:. QQg. n. . .. m e.~ . . .e4
- Le 4.
m m,8. ..~ll4 7 4ne ; ,e
.. . - . . - . .__m--*. .n...
-,-.\ ..-,-- ._. -- _ .--. - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- , ~ < ,
L f~ T
....f.t s ,
- l. .
March 10, 1988 POLICY ISSUE secy-es->s l For: The Commissioner (lnfOrmatiOn) f From: Victor Stello, Jr. 1 Executive Director for Operations
Subject:
RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS AND REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALVATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS 1986 AND 1987
/
Purpose:
To provide the Commission the conual sumary of examination, licensing and requalification activities for Reactor Operators j and Senior Reactor Operators.. ,The last such annual sumary , was provided by SECY-87-2.
+
Di scussion_: The enclosed graphs and tables report national operator licensing results and regional requalification program evaluation results for FY 1986 and FY 1987. There was some improvement in candidate performance between
\ FY 1986 and FY 1987. This taprovenent could be the result of a number of factors, such as better training, better license screening or improved job related candidate testing.
Gince our last report, the simulator and oral portions of the operating test have been combined and are being reported as one component. The examination results, broken dcwn by license type and examination ccrrpons,it, for FY 1986 and FY 1987 are presented in Enclosure 1. FY 1987 examination results for each region are presented in Enclosure 2. Generally, the pass rates of all regions were consistent., The largest deviation was the pass rate on the Reactor Ope.t etor written examination, which ranged from 77 i percent to 93 percent. However, evaluation of specific data s among the five regions indicates no consistent trend for any l individual region for an/ aspect of the examination process i or trends between FY 1986 and FY 1987. As part of our oversight function, we will continue to evaluate examination results for trends and inconsistencies among the regions. During FY 1987, the regions participated in phase 11 of the pilot program as .an-altertratWeapproach to requalificatien examinations.Jhirteen f acilitiesN e evaluated. f 6[JY//O r CONTACT: Theodore L. SzynanskihNRR 49-21042
~
~ hN p.n ayf /4pp' p .3
-p . -
p - . The Comissioners > i , Also, during this period, requalification programs at twenty-five facilities were evaluated in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examiner Standards." As of the end of FY 1987, twelve programs were. satisfactory, .. a five were marginally acceptable and eight were unsatisfactory.
^
Included in these results are two facilities which used the pilot program approach as a follow up means of program evaluation. Facility program resits, by region, are presented in Enclosure 3. HRC requalification examinations administered in accordance with ES-601, Revision 4 of NUREG-1021, were suspended on September 11, 1987, because of concerns about adverse impact on licensed operators and .he potential for degraded plant - safety as'a result. Revir ed requirements and precedures. for requalification examinations were developeo based on a discussion provided to the Commission by SECY-87-262. The NRC administered \requalification examinations to two crews of licensed personnel during the week of December 14, 1987, at the H. B. Rot nson nuclear power plant using the revised approach. The report on the results of this examination was issued on January 12, 1988. The next NRC requalification examination, using the revised approach, will be administered at a non-plant specific simulator facility (Ft. Calhoun) in March 1988. The hkC requalification examination prcgram is currently expected to fully resume by the end of FY-88. O
,e
/
/'f &'.v
/p 4
7ictor Stello, . Execut'te Director for Operations
Enclosures:
- 1. Examination Results, FY 1986 and FY 1987
- 2. Examination Results, Regions I I through V, FY 1987
- 3. Requalification Program Evaluations, by Region l
DISTRIBUTION: l Cormnis sioners l OGC (H Street) OIA GPA 3
-EDO ACRS SECY l
1 i 9
l f ENCLOSURE (1) EXAMINATION RESULTS, FY 1986 AND FY 1987 l l l l l l
EXAMINATION RESULTS e t .t s
- : ; , , .. : A. . VI-:f<. .t IS EXA!.i 1Yt E
.\! .l . I t '. .lON:,
l'ISCAl . Yt 'At< 1986 FISCAL YEAR 1987
, oo . _ _ 200.. . . . . .
90- ,_ 90- 3 q m I
! 0 2 ao- l
! eo. t tl s 'il y .
y .y .e ' e 70' 70-3 ! E : E - . J f y n l I so' i so. . ,- L i .__ l .- i 1 3o _ . . . _ _ __ .
. _ . . 30.____..._._.
Ho LHO RO SRO LEGEND EZI WRITTEN E3 OPERAnMi,
ENCL.0SURE (2) EXAMINATION RESULTS, REGIONS I THROUGH V, FY 1987
~ EXAMINATION RESULTS . i: 1. . . . . . . i .i. . VEle'a l:, EXAt. I Ye E It'Als 1067
. - 1. ..it.
REGION 11 REGION 1:1 f REGIO!!!
, oo , _ _ , .
__.j .._._ .__ ._ .
. _ _ .. _. .q t i i G l P i
~"
n.: $j I I l i.f i. ! 0 m f.o ! ! .. , y;: : ! . [. 2 g ec- i :. , ,ej I . j a- jf] .o-. 1
}' . .)
;; l i ! d e.,
- j w.
; 23.J _j ,,_
L2 so. - - - RO SRO RO SRO go 590 i i I RLGIOf : r/ un c;o;; y f
- ia -
; ioo . .
i I' l ,,
.___ l LEGEND i
! cm -
l 6 ,o }l .5
- t I
S WRITTEN y : ;. - 1 l ,
- > ' a cesann ,
l-- . [. e N g , so - i gl . _, , , , , , , , , 4 RD SRO Ro suo
ENCLOSURE (3) REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALVATIONS, BY REGION 9
l I REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATIONS During FY 1987, twenty-five facilities were evaluated in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operstor Licensing Examiner Standards." In addition, phase II , of the pilot program on requalification examinations (SECY-87-142) at thirteen facilities was conducted to allow for further assessment of the feasibility of evaluating requalification programs by reviewing and auditing facility-administered written examinations and operating tests. The Examiner Standards require that NRC-prepared, written examinations and operating tests be administered to 20 percent of licensed operators and senior operators. (Revision 4 of this Standard, dated May 26, 1987, placed the minimum sample size at twelve operators.) For these twenty-five facilities, determinations of satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory were made in accordance with the Examiner Standards. The results for the twenty-five programs evaluated in accordance with the Examiner St'andards and ' the thirteen programs evaluated in accordance with the pilot program were twenty-three satisfactory, six marginal, and nine unsatisfactory programs. 1
F
.l REGION 1- , RE0VALIFICATION EVALUATIONS FY 1987 FACILITIES EVALUATED RESULTS Reaver Valley 1 Unsatisfactory Fitzpatrick Marginal Unsatisfactory Salem 1/2 PILOT PROGRAM Haddam Neck Satisfactory Indian Point 2 Satis factory Millstone 2 Satisfactory Pilgrim Sat'i s factor.v Shoreham Satisfactory Three Mile Island 1 Satisfactory,
. . -. . . - . _ = -
REGION 11 REQUALIFICATION EVALUATIONS FY 1987 FACILITIES EVALUATED RESULTS Browns Ferry Unsatisfactory Crystal River Sa tisf actory* Farley Satisfactory Grand Gulf Marginal Oconee Satisfactory Sequoyah Marginal Turkey Point Unsatisfactory I i
- Determined using pilot program approach as follow-up. Initial evaluation was marginal.
i j - l-l l
, , . - _ - . . _ _ . _ - - . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - - . _ . , .- , . . . _ . , _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . . _ . _ ~ _ _ .
REGION !!! REQUAllFICATION EVAltlATIONS FY 1987 FACILITIES EVALUATED RESULTS
- 0. C. Cook Unsatisfactory Oresden Unsatisfactory Duane Arnold Satisfactory Lacrosse Satisfactory LaSalle Satisfactory Palisades Satisfactory Prairie Island Unsatisfactory Quad Cities Marginal Zion Satisfactory PILOT PROGRAM Byron .
Unsatisfactory Point Beach Satisfactory 4
I l 4 1 l REGION lY REQUALIFICATION EVALUATIONS FY 1987 l 1 FACILITIES EVALUATED RESULTS Comanche Peak Marginal Fort Calhoun Unsatisfactory River Bend Satisfactory PILOT PROGRAM o Arkansas Nuclear One 2 Satisfactory Fort St. Vrain Marginal Wolf Creek Satisfactory ~i e re,>, -
,,,e - *
- vg y r -e- . --=<myvy r -v ---y-r14,ww,. -m, -- y w -.-,-v. -e- vyy.- , -,v.,-- =
t REGION V y ' I ~ REQUALIFICATION EVALUATIONS FY 1987 4-
-FACILITIES' EVALUATED RESULTS Palo Verde Satisfactory
- Ranchr> Seco Satisfactory San Onotre 1 Satisfactory PILOT PROGRAM Diablo Canyon Satisfactory WNP-2. Satisfactory t
- Determined using pilot program approach as follow-up. Initial evaluation wa's marginal.
l 1 V -
-1 m y- et-e9 7-y -
1- q P e --y.g,.- -,---g- y +yge--. - - - -- , s e. v w-, --5 -y w * ?y--ee-- r we-e --ew e-= e wmw t--e-*v ew =+e--a ----m - --w, ---- -e9m 't s' r7^-- w%}}