ML20155G940
| ML20155G940 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1988 |
| From: | Frye J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | NEW YORK, STATE OF, SOUTHAMPTON, NY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| References | |
| CON-#488-7227 88-579-06-OL-5, 88-579-6-OL-5, ALAB-901, LBP-88-24, OL-5, NUDOCS 8810180127 | |
| Download: ML20155G940 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _
7227 "L
h L.; Q Q p - O L-S
. : : ;i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
QM '.
~
John M Frye, III, Chairman W O N.
I ;. d.,
'r" Dr. Oscar H. Paric Frederick J. Shon SERVE 0 0CT - 71587
)
In the Matter of
)
Docket No. 50-322-OL-5R
)
(EP Exercise)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
)
)
ASLBP No. 88-579-06-OL-SR (Shoreham Nuclear Power
)
Station, Unit 1)
)
)
October 6, 1988
, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On October 4, Suffolk County, the State of New York, and the Town of Southampton moved *or'a postponement of the deadline for filing contentions related to the June 1988 exercise, or, in the alternative, for an extension of time.
The deadline for filing contentions was established in a Memorandum and Order which we issued on September 22 following the remand of this matter to us in AI.AB-901, 28 NRC September 20, 1988.
On the day following our Memorandum and Order, the OL-3 Board issued its Concluding Initial Decision on Emergency Planning, LDP-88-24, 28 NRC
, September 23, 198; That Initial Decision dismissed these Intervonors from t..
proceeding and authorized tr-issuance of an operating license.
1l 0
6 0910100127 001006 PDR ADOCK 05000322
'Q C
PDR 3
Clearly, the OL-3 Board dismissed these Intervonors not only from the OL-3 proceeding, but from the OL-5 proceeding u
as well, and Intervenore have raised the question of that Board's authority to take the latter action before the Appeal Board.1 However, at this time, Intervonors are not parties to this proceeding and are not entitled to file contentions.
For this reason, we will not consider Intervenors' notion now.
Should the Appeal Board revarse the OL-3 Board's dismissal of Intervenors from this proceeding, we will promptly take up Intervonors' motion.2 In that event, we direct that LILCO and Staff deliver their responses to us within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of their receipt of the Appeal Board's i
Order.3 It is so ORDERED.
For the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING B ED-(
(
' John'H Frye, III
(
i ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland October 6, 1988 IIn a Memorandum and Order of September 27, the Appeal Board granted the Intervenors' motion for expedited treatment of this issue.
2Should the Appeal Board affirm the OL-3 Board's action, we will promptly dismiss this proceeding.
3 Intervenors should bear in mind that we are unlikel) to favorably consider granting a larger extension of time than the period required for resolution of this issue by the Appeal Board.
l I
1 l
. - _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ --- _