ML20155G314
| ML20155G314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/26/1988 |
| From: | Thadani A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Janecek R COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155G292 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9811090017 | |
| Download: ML20155G314 (1) | |
Text
, , - ,- -. . . . . . .
s o
p er , i f,
,c, UNITED STATES SEP 6 W
- l. ' ( '; NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
t,
- w Aswmo tow. o. c. nosss g ,
j l l 4
Encio'sure 1 Mr. Robert I.. Janecek, Chairman EWR Owners Group Comsnwea lth Edison Corapany
-Post Office box 767 C' ; s, Illinois 60690 l
Dear "r. .Janecek:
SUBJECT:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (GE) TOPICAL REPORT NE0C-30936P, "BWR OWilERS' GROUP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION IMPROVEMEriT HETH000 LOGY (WITH UEMONSTRATION FOR BWR ECCS ACTUATION INSTRUMENTAT!0N), FART 1" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the BWP Owners' Group by letter dated November 14, 1985. We have found that the methodology in the report provides an acceptable generic basis for supporting l plant-specific Technical Specification changes related to the emergency core l cooling systerns (ECCS) for plants using ECCS. The enclosure to this letter provide s our Safety. Evaluation Report (SER). Our evaluation applies only to the tutters described in the report.
In accordence with procedure; established in NUREG-0390, " Topical Reports Review Status," we request that the GE/BWR Owners' Group publish accepted versions of t.he subject topical report, both proprietary and non-proprietary, within 3 months of recetri of this letter. The accepted version should (1) incorporate this letter. aric the enclosed Safety Evaluation Report between the title page and the l dbstroCt, and (2) include an -A (designated oCCeptance) following the report
'ider.t ifica t ion symbol.
Should our acceptance criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the reports are no longer valid, the BWR Owners' ,
Group and/or the applicants referencing the topical rePert will be expected to -
revise and resubmit their respective occumentation, or a bmit justification for the cor.tinued applicability cf the topical report without revision of their '
respective docurnentatiori.
Sincerely, t
?
it - ';
Ashok C. Thadani l
.,. Assistant Director for Systems '
Division of Engineering & Systems I Technology Office of huclear Reactor Regulattor; Encles; re: (
. Saf t t) Evaluaticc Report
- j 9811090017 981105 ""
91/w900/9