ML20155G272
| ML20155G272 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/07/1988 |
| From: | Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gody A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8806170231 | |
| Download: ML20155G272 (2) | |
Text
-
June 7, 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Anthony Gody, Branch Chief Performance Evaluation Branch Division of Licensing Performance &
Quality Evaluation FROM:
Daniel R. Muller, Acting Director Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Specia' Projects
SUBJECT:
DRAFT OFFICE LETTER ON SALP The revised Manual Chapter reports some change in the manner in which SALP reports will be prepared, some change in the format, and some changes in the items to which NRR will contribute.
In view of these changes we recommend that the office letter specify only the new items that NRR management wishes to be the focus of the SALP process.
For instance, the functional areas have been revised.
An explanation of where the NRR input is expected would be helpful.
Also, the PM's are expected to provide broader input in more technical areas.
An exp W a-tion of these expectations would be helpful.
We recommend that the proposed draft be replaced with a clearly prepared office letter that would simply inform the PM's and PD's exactly what NRR Management expects of them and what differs from previous SALPs.
If "Office Letter" the boilerplate is needed for the record, refer to the previous Office Letter on the same subject (NRR Office Letter 44, Revision 1, December 22, 1986).
original signed by Daniel R. Muller, Acting Director ProjectDirectorateIII-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects DISTRIBUTION Docket Files.'
NRC & Local PDRs PD31 memo file GHolahan g
,\\
"U
,y 0FFICE:
PQII 1
P J
I SURNAME:
RI am D
ler DATE:
06/
8 06/ 6 /88 h
k 8806170231 880607 PDR ORG NRRB
i o
UNITED STATES
^
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
{
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 g
June 7, 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Anthony Gody, Branch Chief Performance Evaluation Branch t
Division of Licensing Performance &
Quality Evaluation FROM:
Daniel R. Muller, Acting Director Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects
SUBJECT:
ORAFT OFFICE LETTER ON SALP i
The revised Manual Chapter reports some change in the manner in which SALP reports will be prepared, some change in the format, and some changes in the items to which NRR will contribute.
In view of these l
changes we recommend that the office letter specify only the new items that NRR management wishes to be the focus of the SALP process.
For j
instance, the functional areas have been revised.
An explanation of
)
where the NRR input is expected would be helpful.
Also, the PM's are expected to provide broader input in more technical areas.
An explana-tion of these expectations would be helpful.
We recommend that the proposed draf t be replaced with a clearly prepared office letter that would simply inform the PM's and PD's exactly what NRR l
Management expects of them and what differs from previous SALPs.
If "Office Letter" the boilerplate is needed for the record, refer to the previous Office Letter on the same subject (NRR Office Letter 44, Revision 1, December 22,1986).
Daniel R. Muller, Acting Director Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects
- -... -.