ML20155G008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes 880428 Meeting W/Util on Site to Discuss Emergency Response Facilities.Util Believes Existing Facilities,Including Technical Support Ctr Acceptable
ML20155G008
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/1988
From: Shelton D
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 1532, NUDOCS 8806170136
Download: ML20155G008 (2)


Text

7

/

TOLEDO

%es EDISON A Catenr Energy Cow DONALD C. 8HELTON E9N37" Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1532 June 9, 1988 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Vashington, D. C.

20555 Subj ec t : Emergency Response Technical Support Center at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant

Dear Gentlemen:

On April 28, 1988, a meeting was held at the Davis-Besse site between Toledo Edison and representatives of the NRC from both NRR and Region III. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Davis-Besse Emergency Response Facilities (ERF).

Included in this discussion was the Plant Control Center planned improvement to enhance in-plant response for potential events including both transients and classifiable emergencies.

A tour of several facilities, including the Technical Support Center (TSC), was also conducted.

During the course of the meeting, the fact that the location of the TSC deviated from the guidelines set forth in NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 was discussed. This is a result of the centralized accident management concept developed at Toledo Edison for emergency response.

During the course of the design and construction of the ERF, which occurred prior to NRC guideline publication, Toledo Edison met on several occasions with various representatives of the NRC to keep them appraised of our decisfons and justifications.

Since completion of the facilities, numerous emergency response exercises have been held.

Evaluations of those exercises made no indication that the location of the TSC in any way hampered the plant's ability to cope with the simulated emergency.

The NRC representatives acknowledged that the communication links between the plant and the TSC vere exceptional. This continued positive performance further validates the acceptability of the original concept and location.

Exceptions for TSCs outside the ovner controlled area have been granted by the NRC for several other Licensees.

8806170136 880609 I

PDR ADOCK 05000346 F

DCD

\\D THE TOLEDO E0iSON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO. OHIO 43652

(

f' Docket No, 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1532 Page 2' Toledo Edison believes its existing Emergency Response Facilities, including the TSC location, are acceptable. The discussion provided in meeting our response tc NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 (dated April 15, 1983 Serial No. 933) and its referenced documents should provide acceptable basis for your review and approval.

Very truly yours,

/

KLBatlt cc A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator (2 copies)

DB-1 Resident Inspector l

1 i

{

I i

l l

l l

l l

l l

l i

d