ML20155F520

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Commission Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Rockville,Md Re Approval of Order Requiring Applicants to Provide Documentation of Plan Providing Reasonable Assurance That Adequate Funding for Decommissioning Available
ML20155F520
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/1988
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
CLI-88-07, CLI-88-7, M880922, NUDOCS 8810130284
Download: ML20155F520 (2)


Text

e.

c anc

~'

,"*, UNITED STATES IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 8- n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REFER TO M880922

, [,

.l W ASHING T ON, D.C. 20555 "t., . . . . . ,/

"fpfs st I v* October 6, 1988 t

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 9 FR0M Samuel J. Chilk,Secretarf)f a  !

SUIL7ECT: AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION AN Q)V:TE, 11:30 A.M.,

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1988) COKMISSIONERS' i CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

I. Commission Order on Seabrook - Partial Decision on Financial Oualification Issues The commission *, with all commissioners agreeing, approved an

, order which requires the applicants for Seabrook Nuclear j Station, Unit 1 to provide the commission, within 30 days of the date of this order, adequate documentation of their plan [

and appropriate commitments under that plan to provide reason-able assurance that adequate funding for decommissioning will be available in the event that low power operations have occurred and a full power license is not granted for Seabrook, Unit 1. The Order also sets the schedule and scope for parties wishing to challenge the applicant's filing.

(Subsequent to the this meeting, on September 22, 1988, the Secretary signed the Order (CLI-88-07).)

J i

[

l i

  • Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec.

! 584), provides that action of the Commission shall be detsruined by a majority vote of the members present. Chairman Zach was not present when this item was affirmed. Accordingly, the formal voto of the commission was 3-0 in favor of the i '

Chairman Zech, however, had previously indicated decision. '

that he would approve this paper and had been present, he would  ;

have affirmed his prior vote.

gjj lgR10130204 001006 IQ p ADOCK 05000443 )

, PNU L

. l In the matter of the certified petition for waiver of certain aspects of its financial qualification rules and other financial qualification issues addressed in ALAB-895, the Commission has not yet completed it deliberation.

I cc Chairman Zech I commissioner Roberts  !

Commissioner Carr I Commissioner Rogers OGC j EDO GPA PDR - Advance DCS - Pl-124  ;

i r

I l

l 1

I i

l i

l 4

I i

1