Text

Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Urges Enactment of New Rule as Soon as Possible
	ML20155D771
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	06/02/1988
From:	Hinds R; AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
	FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00316, 53FR16435-316, NUDOCS 8806150406
	Download: ML20155D771 (1)
	v • d • e

4 i

D00XET NUMBER m PROPOSED RULE 3d1d __

i h.

NY&

e.,

Ray A. Hinds, Jr.

b i

RFD 3, Box 102A

'88 J!A

.T 1 -:,

Hopkinton, NH 03229 I

prim 00cs %,,

, O; EM: te June 2, 1988 Secretary of the Comission Attn: Docketing and Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555 l

Dear Sir:

I understand the Commission has under consideration a proposed new rule that would clarify the emergency planning requirements new nuclear i

4 power plants must meet before low power testing is conducted. The new rule i

i.

will make it claar that off-site emergency sirens do not need to be in plate prior to low power testing.

2 This is to inform you that I fully sLpport the new rule.

It is important to us in New England that Seabrook Station start low power testing without further delay as the next step toward comercial operation.

(.

Seabrook's power is urgently needed!

Experts agree that sirens and energency plans certainly do not need to be in place in order for low power testing to take place.

I urge you to enact this new rule as soon as l

possible.

Sincerely yours, /i

/}f /

l I

pgj6JJ406080602 "O 53PR16435 j

pon i

I DJ/d

!