ML20155D682

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Providing Further Info in Response to Nonconformances Noted in Insp Rept 99900836/87-01. Response Should Have Included Ref to App B,Criterion IV Re Procurement Documents to Identify QA Program Requirements
ML20155D682
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/09/1988
From: Brach E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rudis M
ROCKWELL ENGINEERING CO., INC.
References
REF-QA-99900836 NUDOCS 8806150371
Download: ML20155D682 (2)


Text

n.

.l.

  • c u:

I o

UNITED STATES 1

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20665

  • s.,...../

June 9, 1988 Docket No. 99900836/87-01 Mr. Mark A. Rudis General Counsel Rockwell Engineering Company, Inc.

13500 South Western Avenue Post Office Box 58 Blue Island, Illinios 60406-0058

Dear Mr. Rudis:

Thank you for your letter dated April 21, 1988 which provided further informa-tion in response to Inspection Report No. 99900836/87-01. The response was adequate and no additional infonnation is required. However, while your response to the Notice of Nonconformance (NON) Part A (87-01-04) correctly referenced the audits that are required to be perfonned to verify approved subvendors' QA programs, your response should also have included reference to Appendix B, Criterion !Y which requires that procurement documents identify the QA program requirements applicable te the order.

All of the items identified during the inspection are considered closed and the corrective actions will be reviewed during future NRC inspections.

Sincerely,

,f

"/

E. William Bra h, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 9 09 886M'9AESNNP

?

, o 99900836

Mr. Mark A. Rudis June 9, 1988 DISTRIBUTION:

< RIDS ~ Code:IE:09c VIB Reading' DRIS Reading BGrimes EBrach EBaker CAbbate l

(Ndk

/h

]

VIB:DRIS ASC/VIB:DRIS C W:DRIS i

CAbbate:tt EBaker EBrach 5/pg88 g/p/88

/f/88

.