ML20155A882
| ML20155A882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1986 |
| From: | Selman M CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. |
| To: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8604100103 | |
| Download: ML20155A882 (2) | |
Text
,
Murrey Selman v co Presco1 e
e Consolviated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Indan Prent Stahon Broadway & B'eaHey Ave Buchar an, NY IC511 Te.eohone (914) 737-8116 tiarch 17, 1986 Re Indian Point Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-247 Dr. Thomas E. Murley Regional Adr.inistrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cceniscion Region I 631 Park Avenuo King of Prussia, PA 19406 Dear Dr. fturley Enclosed is the sixth napplemental monthly report of the Radiation Pro-tection Ovnrnight Coretittee covering its activitita during the nonth of February 1986 If you or your staff have any quections regarding the connitten's or the station's radiation protection activities, please contact no.
Very truly yours, 7
^ ^~ #
~
/
,n s,
16.191.3.12.1 Attachment cci tir. Jamen Taylor, Director offico of Inspection and Enforcenent U.S. Nuclear Pequlatory Comminnion Wanhington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Ronald R. Bellamy (2)
Chittf, Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commincion Region I 631 Park Avenuo King of Prusnia, PA 19406 Genior Recident Inspector U.S. fluclear Regulatory Comminnion P.O. Box 38 nuchannn, N.Y. 10511
\\
0604100103 060317 PDR ADOCK 00000247
,,\\
unn p
\\
~
T j
Indian Point Radiation Protection Oversight Committee Report to the Vice President, Nuclear Power for February 1986 The Comittee met at Indian Point on February 19, 1986. The major Committee activities included:
1.
Report from the Committee's Radiological Assessor 2.
Discussion of the Transition of Oversight Function to the RSSC 3.
Discussion with:
Nick Luzzo 4.
Plant Tour by T. Peterson (Feb. 20, 1986)
Committee Findings and Recommendations:
1.
The Comittee members discussed with Peter Freudenthal the proposed new organization and proposed modus operandi of Con Edison's Radiation Safety sub-Committee. The Committee agreed to hold a joint meeting with the new RSSC on March 27, 1986.
2.
Based on its discussion of recent event where there was concern about the control of access to a high radiation area, the Committee recommends that Con Edison strengthen access control procedures to ensure that when a person is assigned to guard the access to a High Radiation area, he not be assigned any collateral duties.
3.
The Committee reviewed the outage exposure tracking report, and was surprised at the general discrepancy between TLD and self-reading dosimeter results.
a.
We recomend that more attention be focussed on understanding the causes of the generalized discrepancy.
b.
The Committee recommends that the dosimetry group consider closer liasion with the Rad. Engineering and Rad. Protection groups to develop a better understanding of the causes of systematic dosimeter discrepancies like those seen for the steam generator man-way stud renoval work.
c.
When investigation determines that the reading of the dosimeter-of-record is not valid, detailed documentation should be provided to uupport that conclusion and the validity of the substitute dose assigned.
g Adopted (y the Coalmittee, February 28, 1986.
I-T k>__
s H
(Chairma/
J. P. Davitt, m -.
.