|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20205E3781999-03-29029 March 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73,allowing Implementation of Safeguards Contingency Plan Reflecting Permanent Shutdown & Defueled Condition of Brpnp ML20154E0241998-09-30030 September 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q) Re Facility Request for Exemption from Certain Portions of 10CFR50.47(b) & App E to 10CFR50 to Allow Brpnp to Discontinue Offsite EP Activities & Reduce Scope of Onsite EP ML20198F9781997-12-30030 December 1997 Exemption for 1997 Offsite Emergency Preparedness Exercise, 10CFR50,App E,Section IV.F.2.c.Exemption Granted ML20059J3141990-09-10010 September 1990 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(ii) Re Use of Simulation Facility,Per 900404 Request ML20155A0851988-09-30030 September 1988 Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w) Requirements Re Increase in Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required to Be Carried by Licensees ML20155A0781988-09-30030 September 1988 Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w) Requirements Re Increase in Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required to Be Carried by Licensees ML20212M6751987-03-0202 March 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50.71(e)(3)(ii) Schedular Requirements Re Submittal of Final Hazards Summary Rept.Final Completion Date for Rept Update Extended to 881231 ML20141H3561986-01-0808 January 1986 Exemption from App J to 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Airlock Doors ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20129K1141985-07-17017 July 1985 Exemptions from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Re Installation of RCS High Point Vents ML20129A8891984-10-0404 October 1984 Exemption from Schedular Requirements of 10CFR50.48(c)(4) Re Alternative Shutdown Capability.Deadline Extended to End of 1986 Refueling Outages 1999-03-29
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212M0721999-10-0707 October 1999 Notice of Reconstitution.* Board Reconstituted by Appointing Administrative Judge GP Bollwerk as Chariman in Place of Administrative Judge Pb Bloch.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991007 ML20210E4621999-06-24024 June 1999 Comment on Draft NUREG-1640, Radiological Assessment for Clearance of Equipment & Matls from Nuclear Facilities ML20205E3781999-03-29029 March 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73,allowing Implementation of Safeguards Contingency Plan Reflecting Permanent Shutdown & Defueled Condition of Brpnp ML20154E0241998-09-30030 September 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q) Re Facility Request for Exemption from Certain Portions of 10CFR50.47(b) & App E to 10CFR50 to Allow Brpnp to Discontinue Offsite EP Activities & Reduce Scope of Onsite EP ML20198C5671998-01-0505 January 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities. Order Re Finding That Dt Rich Deliberately Falsified Radiological Survey Records at Plant on 960720 & 0915,by Recording Radiological Survey Results W/O Performing Survey ML20198F9781997-12-30030 December 1997 Exemption for 1997 Offsite Emergency Preparedness Exercise, 10CFR50,App E,Section IV.F.2.c.Exemption Granted ML20138J0581997-03-0404 March 1997 Transcript of 940304 Public Meeting in Charlevoix,Michigan Re Decommissioning of Plant ML20059J3141990-09-10010 September 1990 Exemption from 10CFR55.45(b)(2)(ii) Re Use of Simulation Facility,Per 900404 Request ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20248D2831989-09-28028 September 1989 Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q2661989-09-26026 September 1989 Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20248C8751989-09-13013 September 1989 Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl ML20246C7141989-08-18018 August 1989 Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 ML20246K4801989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20244B3241989-04-10010 April 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20247A2971989-04-0404 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246M2771989-03-20020 March 1989 Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321 B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel1989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel ML20246N9471989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20236B4641989-03-0808 March 1989 Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility ML20235T3581989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague ML20235V8541989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint ML20235T1861989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989 Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices ML20235L5921989-02-0606 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation ML20247R4091988-12-31031 December 1988 Transcript of Commission 881221 Press Conference in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-31 ML20196A5991988-12-0101 December 1988 Transcript of 881201 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Pp 143-152 ML20196F5831988-12-0101 December 1988 Memorandum Memoralizing 881129 Telcon.* Applicant & NRC Agreed to Submit Joint Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Served on 881202 ML20196F5981988-12-0101 December 1988 Notice of Hearing.* Notifies That Hearing to Be Held in CP Application Proceedings on 881221 Cancelled & Rescheduled to Commence on 890104.Served on 881202 ML20206M9181988-11-22022 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881121.* Discusses Board 881121 Telcon W/Counsel for Parties Re Prehearing & Scheduling Matters.Served on 881123 ML20206J3701988-11-21021 November 1988 Transcript of 881121 Telcon in Bethesda,Md Re Alchemie. Pp 70-100 ML20206M5321988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program ML20195H0331988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug Testing ML20195H0111988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20206C6321988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C6131988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C3271988-11-10010 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881109.* Licensee Request to DOE to Extend Deadline for Receipt of CPs Until 890131 Not Officially Passed Upon.Further Prehearing Telcon Scheduled for 881121.Served on 881114 1999-06-24
[Table view] |
Text
-
7590-01 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION In the mat',er of )
)
CONSU G S POWER COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-155
)
(Big Rock Point Plant) )
)
EX EP."" ?N I. l 5
Consumers Power Company (the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. OPR-6, which authorizes operation of the Big Rock Point Plant. The license provides, among other things, that the Big Rock Point Plant is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) now or hereafter in effect. ,
The facility consists of a boiling water reactor at the licensee's site
. located in Charlevoix County, Michigan. .
II. I On August 5, 1987, the Commission published in the FEDERAL REGISTER a final rule amending 10 CFR 50.54(w). The rule increased the amount of on-site l property damage insurance required to be carried by the Commission's power l reactor licensees. The rule also required these licensees to obtain by ;
October 4,1988, insurance policies that prioritized insurance proceeds for stabilitation and decontamination after an accident and provided for payment of proceeds to an independent trustee who would disburse funds for decontamination and cleanup before any other purpose. Subsequent to publication of the rule, !
the Commission has been informed by insurers who offer nuclear property ;
insurance that, despite a good faith effort to obtain trustees required by the l rule, the deconta'mination priority and trusteeship provisions will not be able to be incorporated into policies by the time required in the rule. In response 0010050200 GG0930 fDR ADOCK0500g"5 g
4 to these comments and related petitions for rulemaking, the Commission has proposed a revision of 10 CFR 50.54(w)(5)(i) extending the implementation schedule for 18 months (53 FR 36338, September 19,1988). However, because it is unlikely thn this rulemaking action will be completed by October 4, 1988, the Commission is issuing a temporary exemption Trom the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(w)(5)(i) until completion of the pending rulemaking extending the implementation date specified in 10 CFR 50.54(w)(5)(1), but not later than April 1, 1989. Upon completion of such rulemaking, the licensee shall comply with the provisions of such rule.
III.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, "The Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the ,
requirements of the regulations of (10 CFR Part 50), which are ... Authorized
[
by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security." Further, Section 50.12(a)(2) provides inter alia, "The Commission will not consider granting an exemption unless special circumstances are present. Special circumstances are present ;
whenever ... (v) The exemption would provide only temporary relief from the [
applicable regulation and the licensee has made good faith efforts to comply t
with the regulation." ,
Despite a good faith effort to comply with the provisions of the rule, i insurers providing property damage insurance for nuclear power facilities and ,
i licensees insured by such insurers have not been able to comply with the 7 regulation and the exemption provides only temporary rr. lief from the applicable regulation, j
=
(
As noted by the Commission in the Supplementary Information accompanying the proposed rule, there are several reasons for concluding that delaying for i a reasonable time the implementation of the stabilization and decontamination l prinrity and trusteeship provisions of Section 50.54(w) will not adversely [
affect protection of public health and safety. First, during the period of '
delay, the licensee will still be required to carry $1.06 billion insurance. ;
This is a substantial amount of coverage that provides a significant financial !
cushion to licensees to decontaminate and clean up after an accident even '
without the prioritization and trusteeship provisions. Second, nearly 75% of the required coverage is already prioritized under the decontamination liability and excess property insurance language of the Nuclear Electric Insurance ,
Limited-II policies. Finally, there is only an extremely small probability of a serious accident occurring during the exemption period. Even if a serious l accident giving rise to substantial insurance claims were to occur, the Commission would be able to take appropriate enforcement action to assure ,
adequate cleanup to protect public health and safety and the environment.
Iv. i, Accordingly, the Commission has determined, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), ;
that (1) a temporary exemption as described in Section III is authorized by !
law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security and (2) in this case, special [
t circumstances are present as described in Section III. Therefore, the r Coenission hereby grants the following exemption:
a
- i
s Consumers Power Company is exempt from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 (w)(5)(i) until the completion of the pending rulemaking extending the implementation date specified in 10 CFR 50.54(w)(5)(1), but not later than
- April 1, 1989. 3;Jn completion of such rulemaking the licensee shall comply with the provisions of such rule.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not result in any significant environmental impact
( 53 FR 38118 ),
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 30th day of September , 1988.
l FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION yay W Gary M. Holahan, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, and Special Projects
- Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
)
i i
l l
- 1 i
i.
i
.i
__-_wT-,