ML20154R687
| ML20154R687 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1986 |
| From: | Sinkin L CHRISTIC INSTITUTE, Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, INC., SINKIN, L.A. |
| To: | Bechhoefer C, John Lamb, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#186-591 OL, NUDOCS 8603310142 | |
| Download: ML20154R687 (3) | |
Text
59/ -
Wednesday, March 26, 1986 00LKETED USNRC Charles Bethhoefer, Esquire Chairman gg gg pg g Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.
S.
Nuclear Regul atory Commi ssi on Washington, D.C.
20555 0FFICE cf h 00CHET1% 4 H s m.,'
BRANCH Dr. James C.
Lamb, III Administrative Judge 313 Woodhaven Road Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Frederict J.
Shon Admitilstrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.~S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wm-h i n a t c.n.
D.C.
20555 Re: Houstor, LichiIno and Pm:er Co.,
et al.
South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-498 OL, 50-499 OL Deer Memoters of the L<oard:
Durino the prehearing conference on March 21,
- 1986, the Doard ruled that it would not accept CCANP's allegations of preferential treatment of Operati ons Department personnel in the druo detection and prevention programs at STNP unless CCANP pr ovi ded t he identity of the individual making the alleoation and an expreskion from soid individual of said individual's willingness to testify.
CCANP informed the Board that based on voice identification, CCANP believed it knew who the al l eger was and that CCANP would contect the alleger regarding the conditions imposed by the boetd.
CCANP was cor r ect as to the identification of the alleger. 'Said person declined to he i d~ nt i fi ed to the Board or to testify.
The e
alleger did confirm that the persort not fired were Wackenhut personnel who would have implic.e d Operations Department personnel and did supply add t 7 r al information on the allegation, but CCANP does not h.<-
istantially more to present s'
to the Board in terms of a basis f u,
- ,tigating this allegation.
Based on the conditions imposed by the Board and the decision by the
- alleger, CCANP will not pursue the preferential treatment allegation any further at this' time.
Having reviewed the Applicants Motion for Summary disposition of Issue F in the' light of the Board's rulings on the drug issue and other information available to CCANP at this time, CCAMP will not be responding 'to sai d motion.
The NRC Staff was informed orally of this' decision.
B603310142 86032 PDR ADOCK O q
PDR Q
{ (hO h
e
. e Members of the Board Page Two March 26, 1986 At the moment, CCANP sees no potential Phase III issue having i
anything like the seriousness of the allegations and substantive proof provided in Phase II.
Since the Board will either disqualify the Applicants senior management based on the evidence in Phase II or will permit them to continue to construct and operate the project despite the case put on by CCANP in Phase II, CCANP considers the other matters of concern to be either irrelevant in the face of license denial or not worth litigating in the face of the Board's decision not to deny despite Applicants' behavior to date.
Consequently, CCANP will not be submitting any response to the Applicant and Staff affidavits on preparation for operations.
Sincerely,
/.
La A.
Sinkin-Christic Institute 1324 North Capitol Street Washington, D.C.
20002 Counsel for Intervenor, Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, Inc.
c.c.
Service List 2
0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD h% 1 In the Matter of
(
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND
(
Docket Nos. 50-498 OL 16 Ng pg gy,.43 POWER COMPANY, ET AL.
)-
50-499 OL (South Texas Project,
(
Units 1 and 2)
(
[ohdbh,] + +""<
ggAMC GEBIIEICAIE DE SEBVICE I hereby certify that ccpies of LETTER FROM LANNY A.
SINKIN TO MEMBERS OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD DATED MARCH-26 were served by-hand (*)
or by deposit in the U.S.
Mail, first-class. postage paid to the following individuals and entities on the 26th day of March 1986.
4 Charles Bechhoefer, Esquire Brian Berwick, Esquire Chairman Asst. Atty.. Gen.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board State of Texas
.U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmtl. Protection Washington, D.C.
20555 P.
O.'Eox 12548, Capitol Sta.
Austin, Texas 78711 Dr. James C.
Lamb, III Administrative Judge
.Oreste Russ Pirfo, Esquire 313 Wocdhaven Road Office of the Exec. Leg.. Di~r.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Washingten, D.C.
20555 l
Frederick J.
Shan Administrative Judge Jack R.
Newman, Esquire-t U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commiss' ion 1615 L Street, NW,_ Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20036 j
Melbert Schwar=, Esquire Bake,r _and Botts Mrs. Peggy Buchorn 300 One Shell Pla:a-Executive Director, C.E.U.
Houston, Texas 77002 i
Route 1, Box 1684 Brazoria, Texas 77422 Atomit_ Safety and Lic. Bd.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Diane Curran, Esquire Washington, D.C.
20555' i
Harmon, Weiss & Jordan 2001 S Street, N.W.,
Suite 430 Atomic Safety and Licensing
. Washington, D.C.
20009
' Appeal Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulator.y Comm.
Pat Coy Washington, D.C.-
20555 j
5106 Casa Oro
. ~
San Antonio, Texas 78233..
Docketing and Service Section Office of_the Secretary Ray Goldstein U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Gray.and Becker Washington, D.C.
20555 901'Vaughn Bldg.
807 Brazos
- Austin,
{xas 78701
_ h M ____ ___________
Lanny[3inkin p,
an.,
- - ~.