ML20154Q325
| ML20154Q325 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1986 |
| From: | Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Guild R GUILD, R. |
| References | |
| CON-#186-477 OL, NUDOCS 8603210129 | |
| Download: ML20154Q325 (1) | |
Text
- - - _.
Q g ywONDt:.NGt-DISTRIBUTION:
\\
JEMoore EIchan Docket Nos. 50-456 j
50 457 b
GABerry DOCKETED SATreby USNHC MKarman MRothschild E
tenbury March 17'$dL95R 20 P3 :33 j
1 JLieberman l
0FFICE 0; a..u a.
ELD FF (2) 00CKETihu e. :1.avlu JStevens-110 Robert Guild, Esq.
BRANOi BBerson-RIII j
109 North Dearborn Street DMB-PDR/LPDR Suite 1300 0/C a
Chicago, IL 60602 Chron l
Dear Mr. Guild:
This letter is in reference to the document you requested during 1
}
Mr. Keshishian's Deposition of March 11, 1986.
The document is entitled
" Regional Construction Inspection Program Assessment - Braidwood j
(R-III)" and relates to assessment of implementation of the NRC inspection program by Region III at Braidwood Station.
I have determined that the i
document does exist and have reviewed its contents. As discussed below, i
the Staff maintains its objection to the production of this document.
I As you are aware, requests for Staff records and documents are governed j
by 10 C.F.R. 5 2.744 of the Commission's regulations.
Pursuant to that j
section, it is necessary for you to demonstrate the relevance of the
]
document.
As is indicated in the title, this document relates to the conduct of regional inspection activities at Braidwood, rather than to the j
Licensee's quality assurance program.
The region's performance is not an
{
issue in controversy in this proceeding.
After reviewing this document
]
the Staff has determined that it is not relevant to your contention.
}
Further, production of his document will play no role in reaching a proper decision in this proceeding.
As indicated above, the region's i
performance is not an issue in controversy in this proceeding and thus, this document would have no bearing on the resolution of your quality j
assurance contention.
For these reasons, the Staff maintains its i
objection, stated by Staff Counsel during the deposition, and declines to l
make the above-entitled document available.
t Sincerely, 1
Janice E. Moore l
Counsel for !!RC Staff i
j cc: Service List l
t l
06032101290$h56
"
EQ~7. f q~.~
G i
i
\\
NAME<b_ -__
_-___l___
. ____l___?__
-l_____----___-l____________--l______-_____
h?k I
EMoore
- SATNtly
- EChristenbury x.
- ?
x-n n a m n n w m n z n n
m n
o m l x
n a