ML20154Q325

Responds to Request for Document Entitled Regional Const Insp Program Assessment-Braidwood (R-III). Document Determined Irrelevant to Contention & Will Not Be Made Available.Related Correspondence

ML20154Q325
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	03/17/1986
From:	Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:	Guild R GUILD, R.
References
CON-#186-477 OL, NUDOCS 8603210129
Download: ML20154Q325 (1)

Text

- - - _ . - . . . - . _ - - . --. -- --- - _ . - -

Q , g ywONDt:.NGt- DISTRIBUTION:

JEMoore

\

! EIchan

! Docket Nos. 50-456 GABerry j 50 457 b DOCKETED SATreby USNHC MKarman MRothschild E tenbury j March 17'$dL95R 20 P3 :33 ,

1 JLieberman l

0FFICE 0; a ..u a. ELD FF (2) 00CKETihu e. :1.avlu JStevens-110 Robert Guild, Esq. BRANOi BBerson-RIII j 109 North Dearborn Street DMB-PDR/LPDR a Suite 1300 0/C Chicago, IL 60602 Chron l

Dear Mr. Guild:

1 This letter is in reference to the document you requested during  ;

} Mr. Keshishian's Deposition of March 11, 1986. The document is entitled *

" Regional Construction Inspection Program Assessment - Braidwood j (R-III)" and relates to assessment of implementation of the NRC inspection program by Region III at Braidwood Station. I have determined that the i

document does exist and have reviewed its contents. As discussed below, i the Staff maintains its objection to the production of this document.

I

As you are aware, requests for Staff records and documents are governed j by 10 C.F.R. 5 2.744 of the Commission's regulations. Pursuant to that j section , it is necessary for you to demonstrate the relevance of the

] document. As is indicated in the title, this document relates to the conduct of regional inspection activities at Braidwood, rather than to the j Licensee's quality assurance program. The region's performance is not an

{ issue in controversy in this proceeding. After reviewing this document

] the Staff has determined that it is not relevant to your contention.

} Further , production of his document will play no role in reaching a i

proper decision in this proceeding. As indicated above, the region's performance is not an issue in controversy in this proceeding and thus, this document would have no bearing on the resolution of your quality j assurance contention. For these reasons, the Staff maintains its i objection, stated by Staff Counsel during the deposition, and declines to l

make the above-entitled document available.

t

! Sincerely, 1 Janice E. Moore l Counsel for !!RC Staff i

j cc: Service List l '

t l

06032101290$h56 "

• M C. A ; 4 r PDR ADOCK 0 PDR Certfried f G

EQ~7 . f q~.~ i i

\ ,

h?k NAME<b_ -__ EMoore

_-___l___

SATNtly

____l___?__

EChristenbury

-l_____----___-l____________--l______-_____

: : I n- _

am_ ___n

_ _n: w_ m_ n_ z_n_ _ _ __ _n __m _ _ _ _n ___:____--_ __ __$_

o_ mx.

l __ _ ___x__

_ _ _ . _ _ _ - ?_ x- n_ _ _ _ . : _ _ - -a - _ _ . _ _ _ _ : _ _ _ _

_____n