ML20154P320

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Office of State Programs Would Concur in Initial Response Drafted for Dircks Signature on 1821. Office of State Programs Believes That Separate Authority Would Be Beneficial in Long Run
ML20154P320
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/26/1979
From: Bunting J
NRC
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
References
TASK-TF, TASK-URFO NUDOCS 9810220290
Download: ML20154P320 (2)


Text

- , . _. .. . _- _ . - _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . -

[

.,f i

DI$TRIBUTION ile WM r/f DEC 2 61979 NMSS r/f i . Y J0 Bunting l ' REBrowning JSurmeier

! M MORANDUM FOR: John B. Martin, Director Division of Waste Management 1

FROM: -Joseph 0. Bun' ting, Jr. , Chief

, Licensing Process.and Integration Branch l

SUBJECT:

l

. C0!9IENTS ON S.1821: DISAGREEMENT ON ESTABLISHENT t < 0F A NUCLEAR WASTE AUTHORITY The Office of State Programs would not concur in the initial response drafted _

for Mr. Dircks signature. They believe that a separate Authority would be. ,

1

beneficial in the long run to solving the nuclear waste management problem that now exists and will not concur unless thMr' position is stated in the response. . As you know, John Surmeier and I believed that an organizational-change would be productive. This was reflected in our original draft. . In John's discussion with you, we used the Office of Naval Reactors ~as an example.

Are we inconsistent in implying to Greer that DOE needs an organizational

' change to overcome the problems you perceive associated with its decentralized-

' management structure? -

l 1

Joseph 0. Bunting,'Jr., Chief Licensing Process and Integration Branch Division of Waste Management u

e

.) y '

I J

_l.' ' /

.j

, y; j j

,~ ,

/ ,/'

~

9810220290 791226 l PDR ORG IdOMA PDR w.

. A 0

4

.. ...WMer ..... .......Wm.......... ...................... .......................... ........................

. . ---. ...J,S,u,rm,e,,,,,r,i,p rh,,,,,g,g,B unt1 ng

. . .W oS M c.... u m m .... ..: w $.a.9...... ........................ ... ....... ..........

. m -- .u. * . ..... ... . . ................. --

J

ef. W nufm

% pg UNITED STATES 2 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7,, ;E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

/If3 7l '

MEMORANDUM FOR: John B. Martin, Director Division of Waste Management FROM: Joseph 0. Bunting, Jr., Chief Licensing Process and Integration Branch

SUBJECT:

COMMENTS ON S.1821: DISAGREEMENT ON ESTABLISHhENT OF A NUCLEAR WASTE AUTHORITY

< The Office of State Programs would not concur in the initial response drafted for Mr.'Dircks signature. They believe that a separate Authority would be p) t beneficial in the long run to solving the nuclear waste management problem that now exists and will not concur unless thsir position is stated in the .

response. As you know, John Surmeier and I believed that an organizational change would be productive. This was reflected in our original draft. In John's discussion with you, we used the Office of Naval Reactors as an example.

Are we inconsistent in imp 1vina to Greer that nnF nopele an nennn4va+4nnm1 change to overcome the problems you perceive nunciated with its decentralized mana_gement structurer-N. - /[ c4 1 y

[JLicensing ph 0. Bunting, Jr. , Chief Process and Integration Branch Division of Waste Management O j),t d A y@ " 14 I7%

/ M W fW P ap g 7 J% pk np . yr v pn p g c (,q

~ g ,

h ,'

,' q. #] p gn My a y l dx y, 49 p1,,-

"M7 d ([phh

, 9 W yJ QQ h'i