ML20154K770

Assessment of Costs for Decommissioning of Alchemie,Inc Centrifuge Plant Demonstration Facility,Oak Ridge,Tn

ML20154K770
Person / Time
Site:	05000603
Issue date:	11/11/1987
From:	INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20154K388	List: ML20154K384 ML20154K770 ML20154K775
References
307148, NUDOCS 8809260011
Download: ML20154K770 (31)

Text

. ..

.e, ,

MBF" ASSESSMENT OF COSTS FOR DECOMMISSIONING 0F A1 Chem!E, INC.

CENTRIFUGEPLANTDEMONSTRATIONFACILITY(CPDF)

Oak Ridge. Tennessee Submitted by IT CORPORATION 312 Directors Drive Knoxville TN 37923 NOVEM8ER 11, 1987 307148 087X A es0926cotj 880922 hR ADOCK 05000603 ResonalOttge PDC /

312 Director 10nve. Knoxville.Tennauee 37923 615-643211

a

• * '- IN1T RNATIONAt. TECH NOl.4GY COR PORATION

' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,

11. DECOMMISSIONING  ;

J I A. DECOMMISSIONING PLAN <

8. PROJECT APPROACH

C. PROJECT ORGANIZATION 4

!!!. COST A. VARIABLES I

1. Machine Use i 2. Scrap .

< 3. Contract Type i 4

4. Concurrent Decomissioning TABLES  !

t

Table 1. Equipment Description '

Table 2. Exposure of Centrifuges to Feed Compounds Table 3. Decomissioning Plan Outline .

Table 4. Phase, Task and Subtask Descriptions Table 5A. Labor Hours - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 40 Machines Processing i RCRA Substances Table 58. Labor Hours - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 80 Machines Processing i 1

i RCRA Substances Table 6A. Shif t Manpower Loading - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 40 Machines  :

Processing RCRA Substances  !

Table 68. Shif t Manpower Loading - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 80 Machines j

),

1 Processing RCRA Substances l Table 7A. Decontamination Technician Work Breakdown (Phase !!!) - 120 Machine i

Plant in Operation - 40 Machines Processing RCRA Substances 1 Table 78. Decontamination Technician Work Breakdown (Phase !!!) - 120 Machine l

Plant in Operation - 80 Machines Processing RCRA Substances

' Table 8A. Cosi. Estimate - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 40 Machines Process-  :

ing RCRA Substances Table 88. Cost Estimate - 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 80 Machines Process-

• ing RCRA Substances l 2 Table 9. Scrap Value Table 10. List of Feed Components that will Leave RCRA Residue I Table 11. Sumary of Decomissioning Costs & Funding Requirements P

1 090X A.A. CON l

. :s

..'. INTERNATIONA!! TECHNOLOGY CORI' ORATION

.* 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A1 Chem!E, Inc., will soon begin commercial operation of the 120 machine  :

I Centrifuge Plant Demonstration Facility (CPDF) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, i using the gas centrifuge technology to enrich various stable isotopes for commercial uttilzation. The gas centrifuge equipment and technology at the CPDF will be received from the Department of Energy (00E). Before A1ChemlE receives this equipment, the DOE requires assurance that adequate funding will be available for the final disposition of all classified and uranium contaminated equipment and materials received from DOE. L The gas centrifuge equipment and piping includes classified material, '

uranium contaminated material and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act After commercial operations begin, this  !

(RCRA) controlled material equipment, and associated auxiliaries (described in Table 1), will become  ;

contaminated or be further contaminated by the feed compounds (see Table .

2). The product residue, in many cases, is a toxic material and must have  !

I 1 its disposal strictly controlled.

Decommissioning of this facility at the end of its life will require dis-pasal of parts of the process equipment and auxiitaries in one of the f following classifications

i j i

[ e Classified burial grounds  :

4 e Uranium contaminated burial grounds J

e Toxic materials burial grounds l j e t.andfill for industrial refuse.

h All classified equipment and materials must be buried in a 00E classified l burial ground, and although uranium contaminated materials are acceptable at the DOE facility, toxic substances are not. All classified items con-

! taminated with toxic material wi'l be decontaminated before burial, l

) In each of the respective commercial burial grounds, uranium contaminated

! and toxic materials can be received but not co-mingled. Uranium contam-

! inated materials emust go to the radioactive material burial ground and toxic materials must go to the toxic material burial ground. Finally, industrial landfills may not receive any classified, uranium contaminated l.

I 1

l l

• INTE NATIONAL, TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION or toxic materials. Therefore, a major port on of the decomissioning effort will involve segregating each class of material into discrete cate.

gories for final disposal while trying to keep the cost of the decomis-sioning to a minimum.

It should be noted that when the CPDF begins operations as a stable iso-tope enriching plant, the introduction of RCRA controlled substances will occur in two stages. Presently the 120 machines installed in the CPDF have low levels of uranium contamination internally. When operations begin, a cose de of 40 machines will be used to process various RCRA controlled substances. Approximately one year af ter operations begin, another 40 machines will begin being used to process materials that may

, leave RCRA controlled residues. Hence, the decomissioning scope, and therefore the cost, will increase with time. Centrifuge machines will also f ail with time. This in turn will reduce the total decomissioning cost at plant shutdown since these failed classified and/or contaminated machine components received from DOE will be disposed of as appropriate and as required at the time of failure. Thus, t stimates for decomission-ing and disposal of the classified and contaminated equipment received f rcm DOE cr contaminated by Alchem!E are listed in Table 11 under two headings in order to establish a range of costs. These estimates are for:

(1) 120 machine plant in operation employing 40 machines to process feed materials that may leave RCRA controlled residues, and (2) 120 machine plant in operation employing 80 machines to process feed materials that may leave RCRA controlled residues.

These estimates are given as "planning level" cost estimates for the decomissioning effort th4 will be involved in terminating operations at the CPDF in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. A complete plan for the appropriate stage of operation will be prepared during the engineering phase of the decomissioning.

l 1

l I

o N 3, '

..' INTERNATIONAL TECHNO!IGY CORPORATION

. 11. DECOMISSIONING A. DECOMISSIONING PLAN The decomissioning, as approp,; ate, of the A1 Chem!E, Inc. , CPDF facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, will be conducted in accordance with a decomissioning plan. The decomissioning plan will be prepared during the engineering phase of the decomissioning. The plan will i serve as a description of the history of the facility and equipment to the time of termination, an outline of the decomissioning methodology and a forum where the goals of the decomissioning effort are stated.

An outline of a decomissioning plan is given as Table 3.

B. PROJECT APPROACH ,

The decomissioning activities to be conducted at the Alchem!E, Inc.,

CPDF facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, can be conducted in four dis-crete phases:

e Engineerin; e Mobilization e Decomissioning e Demobilization Each of these phases will be made up of a number of chronologically related tasks and sub+, asks. An outline of tho tasks and subtasks for each phase is given in Table 4.

C. PROJECT ORGAH12AT10N The decomissioning of the AlchemlE, Inc., CPDF facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, will take about one year and will involve approximately 25 people. A breakdown of personnel types and hours for this phase of the decomissioning is shown in Tables SA and 58. In any event, the Phase 3 decomissioning activities will be conducted on a 5 day per l I

tvek basis. Shift structures for both conditions are given in Tables 6A and 68. A breakdown of the labor hours associated with these l activities is given in Tables 7A and 70.

' INTE RNATIONA1. TECHNotCGY COR FOR ATION

.' 111. PROJECT COST The cost associated with performing the decommissioning activities at the A1ChemlE, Inc., CPDF facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, is given in Tables 8A and 88. The estimates have been broken down by phase and cost cate-gory.

A. VARIABLES There are a number of variables that affect the cost of performing any decomissioning project. A number of these variables are discussed below. The result of how these variables affect the cost of the de-commissioning effort is reflected in Table 11.

1. Machine Use '

As previously noted, all the machines presently installed in CPDF have low levels of uranium contamination internally. However, during the first year of operation, two-thirds of the machinos will have only uranium or urr um and non-toxic contaminants present. This means urar)ium cont minated classif f ei equipment or ,..

material in this category will not need to be decontaminated prior to classified disposal. The remaining one-third of the machines will be further contaminated with feed compounds, as listed in 2 Table 10, that may produce RCRA controlled substances, in addi-tion, machines that will be involved in processing the SbH3 should be noted for special handling. Although this is not a RCRA con-trolled substance, there are added precautions that will be used in working with this substance and its residues, ,

It should also be noted that all of the toxic substances will be disposed of as "heavy metal" wastes. Burial grounds, such as '

ChemWaste Emelle of Emelle, Alabama, that dispose of heavy metal wastes do not discern between single and multiple contaminants.

Therefore, the machines used to process any of the feed compounds given in Table 10 could be intermixed, from a decomissioning standpoint.

During the decomissioning, those machines that contain mixed waste wi'l be decontaminated in a multi-stage process, if a mixed

INERNATIONA1, TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION o *.

- waste burial facility does not exist. This multi-stage decontam-ination will consist of a wash step that removes all contaminants from the equipment surfaces and then multiple steps to discretely remove the radioactive contaminants or the RCRA controlled contam-inants from the solution and finally to process the different waste streams for final disposal. Therefore, two discrete decon-tamination baths will be used for the decomissioning, one for uranium contaminated materials and one for mixed waste materials.

This will minimize mixed waste processing.

2. Scrap in segregating the unclassified waste, an effort should be made to set aside non-contaminated and decontaminated scrap. The scrap should then be gathered into discrete salvage bins that will be collected and hauled away to the scrap yard. This gives the double advantage of providing an income from the scrap as well as reducing the refuse transportation and refuse disposal costs.

Some equipment will have residual value to perform tasks for which it was designed. The mass spectrometers, pumps, and some of the electrical gear used in the facility will be able to be salvaged and sold for re-use. Table 9 gives the approximate value that could be realized by selling the scrap to an organization such as Southern Alloy of Rockwood Tennessee.

3. Contract Type ,

The contractor performing this decomissioning will have f,ome level of uncertainty in bidding this scope of work. Currently in the cost estimates there is a 155 contingency to cover this un-certainty, should the decommissioning be performed on a fixed price basis. Should the contract be changed to time-and-materials or cost plus fixed fee, the contingency would not be appropriate in the bid. However, the contingency will then need to be added into the contract administrators budget to ensure adequate funds l

are available to cover unforeseen costs.

1

i

' IN1E RNATIONAL, TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION o **

4. Concurrent Decomissioning l AlchemlE, Inc., will begin operation of a similar stable isotope separation plant containing up to 600 machines in Oliver Springs, j l Tennessee, within the next couple of years. The Oliver Springs facility will begin as a storage f acility for gas centrifuge equipment removed from the Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Process ,

(GCEP) facility in Portsmouth, Ohio.

Af ter initial storage at the Oliver Springs facility, the GCEP equipment will be used to construct a 120 machine plant for l~

As l

enriching various stable isotopes for commercial utilization.

demand increases, the plant will be expanded in approximately 160 l I '

4 machine increments until the facility reaches its design maximum 4 of 600 machines. ,

i J '

An assessment of costs associated with decomissioning the Oliver Springs f acility has been made and submitted as a stand-alone l However, should the need for decomissioning of the j document.

CPDF arise because Alchem!E, Inc., is insolvent, the Oliver  !

Springs f acility would most likely be in the same condition.

)

1 Therefore, the possibility exists for concurrent decomissioning  ;

J activities to be conducted at both CPDF and the Oliver Springs facility.

i in the case of concurrent decommissioning, a major portion of the >

l engineering, project management and to a lesser extent the equipment necessary for decomissioning would only need to be l f

' accounted for once. This document and the "Assessment of Costs Associated with Decommissioning the AlchemlE, Inc., Oliver  ;

Springs. Tennessee Facility" document are each written as  ;

stand-alone documents. A sum of the total costs given in the two f documents would overstate the true concurrent decomissioning l costs by approximately $300,000. Therefore, $300,000 could be i subtracted from a sum of the totals of the two costs for a l

! concurrent decommissioning effort.

4  :

i 090X A.A

i INTERNATIONAL TECHtCLOGY CORPORATON

Table 1. Centrifuge Sub-Assenblies and Other Classified ,

! or Contaminated Equipment Description at the CPDF ,

~

Final Volume Weight / Unit  !

Number (ft )3 (1bs) ,

Rotors 129 each 10 1000 Casings 129 each 15 8000

' 100 Heat shield 4 i 129 each Diffusion pumps 129 each 0.25 20 Scoop post 129 each 2 40 Scoops, feed ports & SPIS 129 each 0.25 20 i

Upper suspension 129 each 18 300 t Lower suspension 129 each 0.5 10 Lower drive and closure

• 129 each 9 400 Bottom yoke 129 each 13.5 100 t j Piping and manifold 129 each 2 100 Wiring harness 129 each 0.25 10

, Vacuum gauges 129 each 0.1 1 ';

i Flex connectors 488 each 0.05 20 Machine valve sets 120 each 0.1 200 j Aluminum pipe 1" 4000 feet 0.007 0.33

Aluminum pipe 4" 2500 feet 0.042 1.25 Steel pipe 4" 600 feet 0.042 4 Strsi pipe 3" 500 feet 0.037 2 ,

. Steel pipe 2" 300 feet 0.025 1.7 ,

1 Steel pipe 1/2" 300 feet 0.005 0.25 Aluminum pipe 2" 200 feet 0.025 1 MOP 130 each 3.0 100 i l MVIP 130 each 1.0 25 ,

Cascade isolation valves 200 each 0.1 40  :

i Sample valves 40 each 0.05 5 '

l Sensor valves 70 each 0.05 5  !

[ PV and EV valves 50 each 0.1 30 Portable carts 34 each 10 150  ;

Mass specs 2 each 1 500  !

RBCS & controls 1 each 405 10000 j

] Assembly stands 1 each 405 6000 ,

Recycle & Assembly tooling 2 each 50 2000 10 each 800 PV pumps 8 l

~

4 Chem traps 6 each 2 200 l Portable feed systems 4 each 0.1 5

. Portable withdrawal system 4 each 0.1 5 l

i j '-

i 4

1 090X A.A-T1 l

1 i

i i

I

• • INTERNATIONA1, TECHNotCGY CORPORATION Table 2. Exposure of Centrifuges to Feed Compounds!

A1ChemlE Proprietary Information Cospound Used' Humber of Centrifuges Per Year Feed Compound

• Exposed to Feed Compound (kg/ year) 20 500 TeFs (CH3 )3 Hg 240 44,000 CF 3C1 10 2,900 20 2,600 (Cit)33 Zn 20 750 StFg 120 65 Cr0 F33 20 276 Fe(CO)s

- 120 2,500 1 BF 3 10 25 GeFg 3 2 t.

SeF6 CF3 0r 3 355 3 2 WFs 3 2 .:

j VF5 3 12

) (CH)3 3 Ga HoFg 3 160 2 2 SbH 3 2 2 IrFs Pb(CH)g 2 2 l 3

Ru(CO)g 2 2 10 55 l lCH)3 3 Cd '

2 2 i (CH)3 3 In '

2 2

.; SnHg 2 2 TaF5 2 2 ReFg '

60 3,100 U H 3)3 Zn I Associate piping is elso exposed. There are small feed aNd withdrawal systems exposed tQ each compound.

2 Non-radioactive. ,

'Only some used each year.  !

l  !

l 087X A-T2

'I

l

' 1NTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORKf!ON Table 3. Decommissioning Plan Outline 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Site Descriptions 2.1 History 2.2 Physical 2.3 Radiological 3.0 Project Objective 4.0 Disposition Mode 5.0 Activity Descriptions 6.0 Waste Management ,

6.1 Volume 6.2 Type 6.3 Packaging 6.4 Disposition 7.0 Property' Disposition _

8.0 Safety 8.1 Industrial 8.2 Radiological 8.3 Emergency Response & Readiness 9.0 Cost and Schedule 10.0 Project Control ,

10.1 Management Organization i

10.2 Quality Assurance 10.3 Training l 10.4 Health and Safety i

e Industrial e Radiological l 10.5 Financial e Cost Control e Funding l l

=

1 087X A-FIG

INERNATIONAL ECHNOLOGY COR POR ATION Table 4. Phase, Task and Subtask Descriptiont.

Phase 1: Engincering ,

Plans Decommissioning plan ALARA plan Safety and health plan Survey and sampling plan Release of facility QA plan Security Procedures Work procedures Sampling procedures Survey procedures Waste packaging procedures Waste segrepation procedures Waste shipping procedures Decontamination Permits State of Tenncssee NRC City of Oliver Springs DOE Use of Burial Grounds Phas' 2t Mobilization Porscinel Site-specific training Physicals & baseline bioassays Equipment Rentals Consumables Soecial tooling Order long lead time items Assemble equipment at facility 037X A-T3

• ~

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR MRATION Table 4.

(Continued)

Phase 3: Decommissioning .

Pre-work survey Radiological Toxicological 080 activities ,

Dismantis machines Segregate waste types Decontaminate as necessary Package various waste forms Ship waste to appropriate burial facility Final release survey Radiological i Toxicological Third party check surve'y (0A)

Phase 4: Demo,i'O etion

?ersonnel Exit physical & bioassay Exit interview froipment Return Rentals Package & ship other equipment '

Conduct final site inspection 087X A-T3.1

INERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table SA. Labor Hours 120 Machine Plant in Operation -

40 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4:

Labor Engineering Mobilization Decom. Demob. Totals Project Manager 346 80 1560 120 2106 Shift Supervisor 346 80 1560 120 2106 ,

Engineer 692 80 1560 120 2452 Mixed Waste Chemist 173 80 1560 0 1813 HP Supervisor 173 00 1560 120 1933 l HP Technician 0 80 4680 120 4880 IH Technici A1 173 80 3120 120 3493 Maintenance Supervisor 173 80 1560 0 1813 Maintenance Technician 0 80 1560 0 1640 Decon Technician 0* 1440 14911 1440 17791 C'.erk 0 80 1560 120 1760 Secretary 346 80 15'60 120_ 2106 Total 2422 2320 36751 2400 43893 s

l l

l l

l 090X A.A-T4.1 1

....__,y-- - - , .-

INERNATIONA1. TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 5B. Labor Hours 120 Machine Plant in Operation -

80 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4:

Labor Engineering Mobilization Decom. Demob. Totals Project Manager 346 80 1560 120 2106 Shift Supervisor 346 80 1560 120 2106 Engineer 692 80 1560 120 2452 Mixed Waste Chemist 173 80 1560 0 1813 HP Supervisor 173 80 1560 120 1933 HP Technician 0 80 4680 120 4880 IH Technician 173 80 3120 120 3493 Maintenance Supervisor 173 80 1560 0 1813 Maintenance Technician 0 80 1560 0 1640 Decon Technician 0* 1440 16511 1440 19391 i Clerk 0 80 1560 120 1760 Secretary _346, 80 1560 120 2106 ,

Total 2422 ,

2320 38351 2400 45493 i

I i

l 1

1 090X A.A-T4 o

~

INERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 6A. Shift Manpower Loading 120 Machine Plant in Operation -

40 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 1 Project Manager 1 Shift Sup9rvisor 1 Maintenance Supervisor 1 Engineer 1 HP Technician 1 Maintenance Technician 1 Mixed Waste Chemist 1 IH Technician 1 HP Technician 1 HP Supervisor 5 Decon Technicians 1 HP Technician 1 Clerk 1 IH Technician 5 Decon Technicians 1 Secretary 8

F. '

090X A.A-T6

' ' INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 60. Shift Manpower Loading 120 Machine Plant in Operation -

80 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 1 Project Manager 1 Shift Supervisor 1 Maintenance Supervisor 1 Engineer 1 HP Technician 1 Maintenance Technician i Hixed Waste Chemist 1 IH Technician 1 HP Technician 1 HP Supervisor 5 Decon Technicians 1 HP Technician 1 Clerk 1 IH Technician 6 Decon Technicians 1 Secretary

~

090X A.A-T6.1

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 7A. Decontamination Technician Work Breakdown (Phase !!!)

120 Machine Plant in Operation -

40 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Man Hours Work Description ,

8385 Disassemble, decon/ dispose 129 machines x 65 mhrs 1000 Remove (8500') valves, connections, etc.

2500 Decontaminate mixed waste piping and machine subassemblits 500 Process mixed waste decon solutions to non-mixed waste status 13 HDP dispose 130 x 0.1 mhrs 13 HVIP dispose 130 x 0.1 mhr 400 RBCS and controls 300 Assembly stand 3

1800 Miscellaneous 14911 4

4 1 de i

I 090X A.A-T7 l l

1 i

a n - , - - - - - ,,--,,~,._,--,-~-a,-~ , , , , , - - , , , , --

a INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 78. Decontamination Technician Work Breakdown (Phase 111) 120 Machine Plant in Operation -

80 Machines Processing RCRA Substances Man Hours Work Description 8385 Disassemble,'decon/ dispose 129 machines x 65 mhrs 1000 Remove (8500 ) valves, connections, etc.

3500 '

Decontaminate mixed waste piping and machine subassemblies 500 Process mixed waste decon solutions to non-mixed waste status 13 MDP dispose 130 x 0.1 mhrs 13 MVIP dispose 130 x 0.1 mhr 400 RBCS and controls 300 Assembly stand 2400 Miscellaneous 16511 090X A.A-T7.1 1

TABLE 8A .

~

120 Machine Plant in Operation - .-

40 Machines Processing RCR4 Substances .

1Caea!E DECCan1SS10 min 6 21Chee!E, ! C.

0AI RIDGE, TEmaiSSEE PHASE 1 PMASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 ENGihEERING n081LIZAT10m DECORRISS10mluG DDOBILIZATION TOTES COST ITEN BATE 9UAmitTT TOTAL OUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL OdAETITY TOTAL 90ANTITY TOTE s/HR HRS s MtS s HRS

• NR$ s HRS S LABOR FROJECT RA USER s25:00 346 $8650.00 30 $2000.00 1560 s39000.00 120 $3000.00 2106 $52650.00 SHIFT SUPERVISOR s!6.00 346 $5536.00 80 $1280.00 1560 $24960.00 120 $1920.00 2106 $33696.00 Eh51mEER s15.00 692 $10380.00 to $1200.00 1560 $23400.00 120 $1800.00 2452 $36730.00 alIE0 HASTE ENERIST $30.00 173 $5190.00 80 s2400.00 1560 $46800.00 . O s0.00 1813 $54390.00 HP SUPERVISOR s15.00 173 82595.00 80 $1200.00 1560 $23400.00 120 $1800.00 1933 $23915.00 HP TECH'f!CIAN s12.00 0 $0.00 80 $960.00 4680 356160.00 120 $1440.00 4880 $58560.00 la TECHNICIAN s15.00 173 s2595.00 80 s1200.00 '3120 s46800.00 120 $1800.00 3493 s52395.00 nAINTDAEE SUPERVISCR s15.00 173 s2595.00 80 $1200.00 1560. s23400.00 0 $0.00 1913 $27195.00

.uluTD.ntE TECHNICIAs $10.00 0 50.00 80 $800.00 1560 515600.00 0 so.74 1640 sl&400.00 LEEDN TEChnICIAu st.00 0 $0.00 1440 $11520.00 14911 s119288.00 1440 $11520.00 17791 $142328.00 CLER 55.00 0 $0.00 80 $400.00 1560 57800.00 120 $600.00 1760 sB800.00 SECRETART 56.00 346 $2076.00 80 5480.00 1560 59360.00 120 $720.00 2106 312636.00 -

SU3 TOTAL $39617.00 $24640.00 36751 5435968.00 524600.00 s524325.00 m 1.3 551502.10 232032.00 k '

DVERHEAD 55&&758.40 831980.00 $682272.50 g S6A 0.12 s10934.21 $6800.64 $120327.17 h

56789.60 5144851.70 r-M TDTAL LAlca $102053.3t' $43472.64 $112:053.57 $63369.60 $1351949.20 0

_ g E-8 m

B m

5 Z

e

& A

r TABLE 8A (cont.) .

Alches!E CECCMISSICu!N3 AICheelE. INC.

CAK RIDGE. TEhuE55EE

.- PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PNASE 4 En61NEERIns MOBILIZATIDs DEtonRISS10 mils ben 0BILIIATION TDTALS ED5T ITER RATE QUANTITY TOTAL OUANTITY TOTAL DUANTITT TOTAL QUANTITY TOTE 00ANTITY TOTAL s/HR HR$ $ HRS s MRS s HRS S HES s IRA'dL & Livius PER SIER 30.00 0 50.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 50.00 $0.00 n! LEASE so.21 2497.69 s524.51 735 st54.35 20475 $4291.75 145 5195.45 s5177.06 AIRFARE $0.00 0 $0.00 0 50.00 0 50.00 0 80.00 50.00 SUBTDTAL 3524.51 $154.35 . 84299.75 $198.45 55177.06 E&A 0.12 362.14 $18.52 8515.17 s23.51 s&21.25 TOTIL T & L 5587.46 5172.87 $4915.72 8222.26 $5798.31 e

N.-.

E r

5~

8 w

3=

5 Z

j ' ~

, 0."

"o TABLE 8A (conto) .. .

1 AltheelE SEconnlSS10 mins AICheelE, IIC. ,

bd RIDGE. TENNESSEE PNASE I PHASE 2 FNASE 3 FMSE 4 ENGINEERING MOBILIIATION DEEDRMISSID41u6 KNOIILIZATION TOTALS EOST ITER RATE DuuTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL OUANTITT TOTAL 90ANTITY TGTAL

$/la lets s IES s HRS s IRS s IRS s NATERIES & S'JPPLIES SAAM.ES 175.C0 0 50.00 150 826250.00 1000 sl75000.00 0 30.00 $201250.00 E lUIPMENT & SUFPLIES s3900.00 s5938.00 8613132.50 85141.50 $629112.00 iDH'S!FEantTS sc.00 $37500.00 50.00 $0.00 30.00 $37500.00 SUBTOTAL $41400.00 $32188.00 578G132.50 5141.50 s966862.00 S&A 0.12 $4968.00 s3862.54 s?4575.90 ul6. E $104023.44 TOTAL N & S 578900.00 $321?8.00 5780132.50 s5141.50 s%4362.00 l -

a h.

e 0

5-8 m

B M

5 Z

~-

, .y

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR POR ATION

a. .

n! i W 8 8, 8 8 ;t s = S g et n ;g daaJ: -

a g a R 3 ~2 3 R = = = 3 s =  ;; =

gg====

=

3

=

n

=

=

=

m-0 d *-

E!E d" 8888888888 8 8 8 R

E

, =, cooooooooo

• =

1 S v.

1 BR d*

3 R

J 8 8'8 8 4 8 0 8 8 3 0 3 W

• Jaada J J J A 3' et3 E I' 2 3 = E S 3 = = +'

g ======== =

"=

= n = -

m = "

=

- W ~ :8*18CC"n 8 c ""E=g gwog m A., M-*, 2 C

- 3 e

o

a. a n w

u .-

d*

g -

N 8888888888 8 8 8 w

.J m E

• < =

n2C oooooooooo w"=

5 ui W

t =R E E d 8888888888 8 8 8 in

= '

W

$ oooooooooo m 5 v, SEE 8888838888 U

r. a wg gAdaga0. 3 " .*.,M.A... g a f. :a gs "

e u.

• g aWu =.

g. .E W W = E .aoouay :4 - t-5226 - h 2 3 - b. R = d m.5- s -

8 u

5 d *- d= 5W5 m.. _E W

$ -UWM& M m

G S

• • s-a 5 h 3 *- = ;y 5 2 $ 5h R

= - *

=5

- 5 W 5 a M E l

\ .-

TABLE 8A (cont.) .

AltkeelE DECCrutI551LNIm6 AICheelE. IIC.

CM li!LSE. TEhEESSEE FHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PNASE 4 EhElmEERIE 80BILIZATION DEconnISSIONIES BDIDOILIZATIDu TOTALS CDST ITEn RATE QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITT TOTAL 90ANTITY TOTAL QUANTITT TOTAL DUANTITY TOTA l, s/HR HR5 $ HRS $ HRS s NRS s NR$ $

PE0 JECT TDi&L s131540.85 595833.51 82130686.35 568733.36 s2476T94.0E CChTih5EhCY 0.15 $27231.13 s!4375.03 $319602.95 $10310.00 $371511.It FEE 0.1 52CE77.20 $11020.55 5245028.93

, 37904.34 s234331.32 313 FEICE 1229649.17 $121229.39 s2695318.2

$56947.71 33133144.51 M

a h

e n

I:

5 5

O m

w 5

z

a

. . INTERNATIONAL TECHNOIDGY CORPORAilON L 888288888888 8 3  :) 8 ddNNNNNNNNNd N n

NN

= s

a. d. a. s. R. N. n "c . a.

n = a. e E,  ; =

m" 23MCASCCS~S3 W MAMELSA: CCN a

~

~

d.

a 888888888888 8 2 S. S.

~

ggg2g3322$gg g g g g S === === =--

. =. a. .a a.

=

=> R22*RRR**SAR g.c "d -

~~~ ~~~

=~~

alla a $. 888288888888 8 3 O A e

,a w NNNNNN N N N N '

o, wo g

g,

==. n. 9..e n.n.

. n u==

.  ; NN ;b. NNN

= a y

n a

= =.

u j@ lal~

! WEE u -----.u ca--$

a

= . ,

M C m wm m =a ~

a e n s e

$ E8o a R.. Q.s sM.aC.8S sU.aC.s= sC= R :s s g0 R S. A

=

Wu C4 U .

Ea UW "M:

d" 3:2323322332 g *g . m A

a N $ l Ou NM ME angssance===

23o3M NA R c

~

O

=

E n

R

=-- ~~ ~

c c = =

5 *

~3. <=nmmommaoom w W i: AA%OO CO 3 r = ti m 5df

• 888888888888 O fJ :4 A

~

a g 9, =0a A ===:-

A A A d a y "J l j

aa

.d d Q 3 g.

a a g

• 2 a

E! = m

= -

1 E

, m O E nu u a d  ;

Sg= a m

e u.w s e5 -

w " ..

nn E gnahma ~u l ge wnu-cadW=

-as a =p m--3 Bee- nsG q-

== = -

gg"n -

n M

a W 5S$WWutgMg

.. . s u u a uus=it.n1udM mmm s =

TABLE 88 (cont.) ,

A!Chee!E M Conn 15510n!NE Alchee!E. Inc.

CAE alDGE. TEumESSEE PHASE 1 FHASE 2 MIASE 3 PHASE 4 En51EER!a6 MOBILIZATIDE KCOnslSSiguluG Kn00lllIATIOu TOTALS COST ITER RATE QUANTITY TOTE QUANTITY TOTE QUAuTITY TOTE OuthTITY T01R. 00AuTITY T3TAL slid 15tS s HRS S NRS s IRS s NRS s TRAVEL & LIVinG PER DIE 50.00 0 30.00 0 30.00 0 80.00 0 30.00 so.00

} NILEAGE 50.21 2417.61 s524.51 735 $154.35 20475 54219.75 145 s190.45 s5177.c6 AIAFARE 30.00 0 30.00 0 50.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.7 80.00 l l

l

. SU3 TOTAL $$24.51 s154.35 .

$4299.75 s193.45 s5177.06 S&A 0.12 $62.94 S18.52 $515.17 s23.81 5621.25 TOTE I a L 8587.46 s172.87 s4815.72 s222.26 s5759.31 E '

l I

n w

a h

e o

6 6

b 8

w 8

a Z

i i

o I l

TABLE 88 (cont.) ,-  !

i Al nestE K tannI5510mIm6

&lDeeIE. INC.

DAK RINiE, TEkmESSEE PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PWASE 3 PNASE 4 Eh61EER1mG MOBILIZATION DEtons!5510m!a6 BEB0BILIZATION TOTES CCST ITER RATE .- DUAnTITY TOTE QUANTITY TOTE 90ANTITT TOTE OUANTITY TOTE 9'JANTITY TOTAL 5/HE HR5 s itRS s HRS s MRS s HRS S MATERIES 1 SWFUES SanPLES s175.00 0 50.00 450 326250.03 1250 s218750.00 e so.00 524900.0c EDUIFE mi 1 SUPPLIES s3930.00 15938.00 $413132.50 s5141.50 s629112.C0 E u25/FEEMITS so.00 s37500.00 so.00 so.00 so.00 s37500.00 SUITOTE $41400.00 s32188.00 5831882.50 $5141.50 5910612.00 61a 0.12 s4968.00 53862.56 s19825.90 $616.18 5109273.44 TDTE a 15 $73900.03 $32188.00 s831882.50 s5141.50 s948112.00 l

le h

c-1 o

Z 5-8 m

=

5 z

.' .. _ , = INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

$ 2888848288

• s s'

~

niisiigig"i i i i n :2 = s- = - -

n "s.======

- R. Q =.

m-t M

E

- N

$" sassassssa a s s

• iiiiiiiiii i $ $

5

=

2 aooooooooo

'Eh

$$IE

$_ mg88828288

• a a 3

• a aa- a w, n $. n  : s  :

=====o a. g =~

H H =a g =a g g c a -

-  : R. u Nw "E2 9 "gCC"U"a mg- i n

s a.

c e a n a e M -

C O

V w gm

- 8888888888 8 8 8

$ # $$$$$$$$$$ i i i M

m e

< Q=

& Ny nooooooooo d

. 's m MB%

85$$$85$$$ $ 8 8 Saaaaaaana a a a 2

-f aoooooaaoa w]5_sm SBN 3888888888 0 aadagdfgga a 4

,, wg "O ",N....

gs "

=au W WW: sonuag g = m

' EdW=sa - .

~

5

=

$$N $$0*$ 0

• W

• us =s= - a '

d" d2g M we 8 -u.om a m N a m-s _,

w wJW n ma- = a 5 a b> sm e 11" = ~ a es ff" ~ $ W 5 was a aE

e TABLE 88 (conto) .

a! Dee!E DECWulI5510 mins A10ee!E. ItC.

OM R15EE. TEasiESSEE

.- MIASE I FMASE 2 PitBSE 3 FIIASE 4 DE1nEER1mE IIGBILIZAi!Du DECDiutISSION!uS 30icetLIZATIDE TOTES RATE QUAmitTY TOTE DUAsi!IT TOTAL QUANTITY TOTE subsTITY TOTE 90AaTITY TOTAL CDST ITER s s 135 s its s

.- sine nes s tels 14RS n0 JECT TDIAL sl31540.85 s95833.51 $2305473.55 s68733.36 s2651531.26 CDmTIhEENCY 0.15 s77231.13 s14375.03 s345821.03 810310.00 s397737.15 FEE 0.1 s20077.20 s11020.35 s265129.46 s7904.34 s304931.85 515 FAICE s221649.17 s121221.39 32916424.04 586147.71 s3354250.31 M

H

, s

! h e

1 5

8

=

=

H

.. =

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - - - - - - .._ -- . _ - . _ _ _ -- _ . ~ - - - - - - . . __

t, - 1 INTE RNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPOR ATION Table 9. Scrap Value CPDF i

Total Scrap Value Item (1bs) ($/lb) Total Value -

Plant Equipment --- --- $200,000 Steel 2,000,000 0.01 20,000 Aluminum 100,000 .20 20,000 Copper 10,000 .40 4,000 -

{

I- 5,000 .20 1,000 1.ead

$245,000 l

i

\

1 1

I 1

i 4

i ,,

1 1

1 090X A.A-T10 l

l i

i

. } ,' t

'* INERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Table 11. Sumary of Decomissioning Costs & Funding Requirements for CPDF*

120 Machine Plant 120 Machine Plant in Operation - 40 RCRA in Operation - 80 RCRA ,

Total Cost $3,133,144.00 $3,354,250.00 Scrap Value 245.000.00 245.000.00' Net Total Cost $2,888,144.00 $3,109,250.00 I -

Concurrent Decomissioning Savings 300.000.00 300,000.00_

Net Funding Requirements $?,588.144.00 $2,809,250.00 I

See Paragraph !!!.A.4. -

2See companion report for decomissioning of the A1 Chem 1E, Oliver Springs facility. The total funding requirements can be determined by combining those listed above with those listed in Table 12 of the new facility.

090X A.A-711