ML20154K146

Provides Summary of Current Status of Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Compliance Plan Issues,Per 980930 Telcon Request of M Galloway & Y Faraz

ML20154K146
Person / Time
Site:	Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Issue date:	10/09/1998
From:	Toelle S UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORP. (USEC)
To:	Pierson R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
References
GDP-98-0214, GDP-98-214, NUDOCS 9810160130
Download: ML20154K146 (19)

Text

.

.USEC A Global Energy Company October 9,1998 GDP 98-0214 Mr. Robert C. Pierson Chief, Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS)

Docket No. 70-7002 Current Status of Compliance Plan Issues Closure Review

Dear Mr,

Pierson:

In a conference cali on September 30,1998, with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) representatives, Ms. Melanie Galloway and Mr. Yawar Faraz, the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) was requested to provide to NRC a letter describing the current status of Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS) Compliance Plan Issues. Specifically, PORTS was asked to include the results of reviews or self-assessments previously performed, discrepancies found, actions taken, justification for continued operation and assessment status for other issues. The information requested is provided in the enclosures.

As a result of our earlier reviews, PORTS has determined that a 100% review of all remaining Compliance Plan commitments is prudent. This review will take place in phases and will focus first on those commitments determined to be safety significant. Details are discussed in the following paragraphs. provides a summary status table of all PORTS Compliance Plan Issues. The table shows a total of 373 commitments. This number was determined through a review of the

" Justification for Continued Operation" and " Plan of Actions and Schedule" sections of the Compliance Plan. The remaining columns in the table are described below:

Number of Commitments Contained in Each Issue Each Compliance Plan issue was reviewed and individual commitments were captured.

This colunm indicates the number of specific commitments contained in each Compliance Plan issue.

f 9810160130 981009 1

PDR ADOCK 07007002 C

PDR y

j 6903 Rocidedge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817-1818 Telephone 301-564-3200 Fax 301-564-3201 http://www.usec.com Offices in Livermore, CA Paducah, KY Portsmouth, OH Washington, DC

Mr. Carl J. Paperiello

' Octob' r 9,1998 e

GDP 98-0214, Page 2 Number of Commitments Reviewed to Date Two reviews of Compliance Plan commitments have been performed to date; 1) The a

" Compliance Plan Closure Review" described in the PORTS letter to Mr. Pat Hiland of l

Region III dated July 8,1998 (GDP-98-2031) which involved the review of 50 safety i

related commitments, and 2) The "Near Term Review" of the 41 commitments which were open at the time the review was undertaken.

Number of Commitments to Be Reviewed by 10/31/98 As a result of the discrepancies identified during the performance of the two reviews described above, a 100% review of the remaining 270' Compliance Plan commitments has been undertaken. This review will take place in three phases: Phase one will focus on safety significant commitments which have not yet been reviewed (a total of 21 commitments) and will be completed by 10/31/98. This will provide information to respond to Dr. Paperiello's request that PORTS provide specific status of safety significant Compliance Plan commitments to him by 10/31/98.

The specific commitments which fall into this category are identified in Enclosure 2 of this letter.

Number of Commitments to Be Reviewed Between 10/31/98 and 3/26/99 The remaining 249 commitments will be reviewed by 3/26/99.

Current Issue Status This column contains the completion status as of the date of this letter for each Compliance Plan issue. " Complete" indicates that all required actions associated with this issue have been completed and there are no known discrepancies. "Open" indicates that one or more actions remain open. " Discrepant" indicates that discrepancies were found in one or more commitments and corrective action has not yet been completed.

Compliance Description This column contains a short description or the state of compliance as identified by any one of the reviews described above which may have been performed. If a Compliance Plan item has not been reviewed at this time, the column will be blank. If only a subset of the total number of commitments contained in the Compliance Plan item has been reviewed, the column will reflect the status as it is known at the time of this letter.

I provides a detailed summary of the two reviews completed to date (Compliance Plan Review [ Review A], and Review of Open or Near Term Actions [NT Review]).

l

'USEC has determined, through review of NRC Inspection Reports, that 12 commitments have been reviewed by the NRC and documented as being closed. These commiu tments will not be included in the 100% review. Also, any commitments that are dosed through subsequent NRC Inspection Reports will be excluded from our review.

Mr. Carl J. aperiello

'Octobhr 9,1998 GDP 98-0214, Page 3 A preamble to the specific information tables provides an explanation of the review methodology and results.

If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact Dave Waters at (740) 897-2710.

Sincerely, A

5. A.

I; ~

Steven A.Toelle Nuclear Regulatory Assurance and Policy Manager

Enclosures:

As Stated cc: NRC Region III Office NRC Resident Inspector - PGDP NRC Resident Inspector - POR FS 1

f

'- (

1

~

j GDP 98-0214 Page 1 of 6 i

ENCLOSURE 1 -

SUMMARY

STATUS FOR PORTS COMPLIANCE PLiN ISSUES'

-I Issue -

' Issue Title L Number of!

Number of -

. Number of.

. Number of -

Current Issue Compliance

. Commitments Commitments.

. Commitments Commitments Status Description.

- Contained in' Reviewed to to be reviewed to be reviewed Each Issue '

. Date l by 10/31/98 -

between

.10/31/98 and 3/26/99 l

1 Transition from DOE I

O O

1 Complete Transition regulation to NRC completed.

Regulation.

2 Update the Application 15 6

0 9

Open SARUP program Safety Analysis Report underway.

i 3

Autoclave Upgrades 30 16 0

14 Open Upgrades on schedule 4

X-705 Evaporator lleat 2

0 2

0

. Complete.

Exchanger Modifications 5

X-705 Isolation valve 2

0 2

0 Complete Testing 6

X-705 Microfiltration 4

1 3

0 Complete No non-Influent pil Shutdown compliances System Replacement identified to date 7

IIEPA Filter Systems Testing 5

2 0

3 Complete No non-compliances identified to date 8

Nuclear Criticality Safety 4

0 0

4*

Discrepant NCS Program to Approval Documents review.

9 Nuclear Criticality Safety 10 0

0 10' Discrepant NCS Program to Approvalimplementation review.

i i

~

Enclosure I GDP 98-0214 Page 2 of 6 Issue -

Issue Title Number of ':

. Number of -

Number of Number of.

Current Issue Compliance

' Commitments

- Commitments ~

Commitments Commitments

.Statusg Description Contained in Reviewed to.

to be reviewed -

to be reviewed

Each Issue :

Date

by 10/31/981 between -

' 10/31/98 and 3/26/99 10 Nuclear Criticality Safety 2

0 0

2 Complete NCS Program to Training for Managers review.

l I

11 Exceptions for Criticality 6

1 0

5 Complete No non-Accident Alarm System compliances identified to date 12 Radiation Protection 2

0 0

2 Complete Procedures 13 Posting of Radioactive 3

1 0

2 Open Site Materials characterization Program being j

completed.

i 14 NVLAP Certification 1

0 0

1 Complete -

l

[

15 Fire Protection 1

0 1

0 Complete Compensatory Measures 16 Fire Protection Sprinkler 1

1 0

0 Closed Previous Violation Testing

- Hoses on trucks -

i 4

not being tested.

Now in l

compliance.

17 Fire Protection Procedures 5

0 0

5**

Complete and flot Work Permit Program j

f

(

~

GDP 98-0214

.. i Page 3 of 6 Issue

Issue Thie ~ -

' Number of.

T Nussber of

. Number of -

[ Number of.

Current Issue

, Comipliance ?

2 Commitmeets '

> Commitments -

Commitments -

Consmitaients.

Status.

Description ;

Contained in Reviewed to to be reviewed to be reviewed ~

Each Issue;

- Date by 10/31/98 ':

between -'

10/31/98 and 3/26/99 18 Emergency Packets 10 10 0

0 Discrepant Discrepancies found in packets (7

. commitments).

Full Compliance on 4/15/99. See Encl. 2.

19 Packaging and 1

0 0

1 Complete Transportation 20 DOE Chemical Safety and 5

0 0

5 Complete Third-Party Use of flazardous Chemicals 21 Management Controls 2

0 0

2 Complete 22 Safety Committees 1

0 0

I

. Complete 23 Plant Changes and 33 2

4 27 Discrepant NCS CAP review Configuration Managemen' 4 of the remaining

[

27 actions (18,19, l

20,21).

t 24 Maintenance Program 44 18 4

22 Complete 3 implementation l-(see items identified )

post-reviews.

't 25 Operations Program 9

3 0

6 Complete No non-compliances

{

identified to date

+

i I

r

. a. -. ~.

Enclosure !

. GDP 98-0214 i

Page 4 of 6

~

~

Issue '

Issue Title

" Number of Number of

' Number of:

Number of.

Current Issue

- Compliance Commitments -

' Commitments Commitments Commitments ~

Status

' Description Contained in Reviewed to --

~ to be reviewed to be reviewed Emeh issue.

Date by 10/31/98

. between 10/31/98 and 3/26/99 26 Systems Approach to 12 4

1 7

Complete NCS training Training qualification discrepancies corrected. No other non-compliance identified to date.

r 27 Assessments 1

I O

O Complete Apparent F

discrepancy in t

implementation of l

self-assessment i

programs corrected. Now in compliance.

28 Event Investigations and 3

1 0

2 Complete No non-Reporting Program compliances identified to date 29 Records Management and 24-7 0

17 Open Fugram seems on l

Document Control Program track to attain compliance.

30 Procedures Program 24 1

0 23 Open

1. Concern l

identified to ensure PORC review of l

procedures within the 5-yr period.

2. Re-examination initiated due to PR PTS-98-6905.

i i

6

[

GDP 98-0214 :

Page 5 of 6 Issue -

Issue Title Number of -

Number of Number of Number of-

, Current Issue :

' Compliance Commitments Commitments Commitments Commitments States.

Description Contained in '

Reviewed to to be reviewed -

to be reviewed -

Each Issue.

- Date -

i by 10/31/98 betwetn :

10/31/98 and 3/26/99 31 Q-L-est 0

0 0

0 Defeted N/A I

i 32 Quality Assurance Program 5

3 2

0 Complete.

Training Implementation completed after due date. Found to be in compliance.

33 Emergency Plan Support 1

0 0

1 Complete Documents f

34 Training for Emergency 3

2 0

1 Complete No non-Preparedness compliances l

identified to date t

35 Quality Control Program for 1

0 0

I Complete Low-Level Waste Disposal l

36 Depleted Uranium 3

0 1

2 Complete Management Plan 37 Administrative Controls on 2

0 0

2 Complete Overtime 38 Decommissioning Funding 1

0 0

1 Complete 7

Program 39 Chemical Safety Mechanical 1

1 0

0 Closed No non-Integrity Program compliances i

identified to date 40 Operational / Safety System 3

0 0

3 Complete Trip Redundancy f

4i Codes and Standards 1

0 0

1 Complete

i GDP 98-6214 Page 6,of 6 Issue -

Issue Title -

Number of Number of J Num.ber of -

- Number of.

Current Issue;.'

. Compliance l

2 Commitments Commitments -

Commitments Commitments -

1 Status;

-Description -

[

Contained is -

. Reviewed to to be reviewed.

to be reviewed t

between i

' Each Issue DateT by 10/31/98

.10/31/98 and.

t 3/26/99 ~

i 42 UF. Leak Detector 2

1 1

0 Closed Discrepancies have l

Sensitivity Testing been corrected.

43 l0 CFil2 n+:cnun'ng 0

0 0

0 Deleted N/A l' c,cedurc; 44 Criticality Accident Alarms 7

1 0

6 Complete Alarms for non-

[

for Nearby Buildings occupied buildings checked.

l i

A.1 Material Control and 35 0

0 35 "

Complete Accountability Manuals and Procedures i

I A.2 -

Receipts Based on Measured 13 1

0 12 "

Open 7

Values l

A.3 P4Ca ^. !ndcgnden:

0 0

0 0

Deleted N/A

." ;;;;.;nx.;;

i A.4 Possession of Uranium 30 6

0 24 Open 2 Concerns with Enriched to Greater Than schedules for l

10% "U cylinder cleaning.

[

2 No deficiencies to

}

date.

[

t A.5 DOE Materials Stored in 2

1 0

1" Complete l

Leased Space c TOTAL COMMITMENTS

-373 91 21' 261.

i t

• These commitments will be reviewed as a part of the NCS Corrective Action Program and therefore will not be reviewed as a part of this effort.

" Total number ofitems to be reviewed will be reduced due to NRC closure of Compliance Plan Actions.

[

i

[

l GDP 98-0214 Page1of10 l

RESULTS OF PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED SELF-ASSESSMENTS

SUMMARY

Previously completed self-assessments include a review of 50 closed commitments or actions (Review A) and a i

review of 41 open or near-term actions (NT Review). Both reviews included preparation of an audit sheet for each l

action with the action description, acceptance criteria, and its Business Prioritization System (BPS) tracking number, if applicable. Commitment Management files (BPS files) were reviewed for each action and field verifications performed where determined to be appropriate. The audit sheets were completed, signed and dated by the individual perfbrming the review and a report was prepared summarizing the results of each investigation. Discreparcies were l

documented on a Problem Report per site procedures.

" REVIEW A" SAMPLE SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT The CP issues sampled for Review A were chosen primarily based on safety significance and secondarily by whether they had received an independent review by DOE prior to transfer (those not reviewed by DOE were more likely l

to be chosen). A " smart sample" of 50 actions was then chosen from those issues. The smart sample included at least one action from each issue. The chosen actions were either representative of remaining actions or were a

" downstream" action (i.e., an action which resulted from completion of others such as training which results from identification of training needs or preparation of training modules).

• NEAR TERM"(NT) REVIEW SAMPLE SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT Issues reviewed for the NT Review included all those with open actions as of April 1998. All open actions were reviewed to ensure that they were being closed correctly or had a programmatic process set up to ensure closure.

For those actions that were completed before the overall review was completed, the adequacy of closure was assessed in a manner similar to Review A.

RESULTS Attachments A and B show the review results for Review A and NT Review, respectively. Due to the fact that many i

Compliance Plan Tasks contain more than one specific commitment and that the Justification for Continued l

Operation section may contain com.mitments, individual commitment numbers have been assigned internally and are shown in the first column of both Attachments A and B. For ease of reference, the corresponding Plan of Action and Schedule Task ID numbers that are used in the Compliance Plan Status Report submitted to the NRC l

are shown in the second column of each attachment.

i 1

GDP 98-0214 Page 2 of10 Attachment A - Results of Closed Action Review A (see Legend at end of Attachment B)

_. l Identified -

$TaskID

~ 5 EvidAnce OK?.i

!Information added to' JStatush

~ '

,i

,[. ~

I

'f'

Commitmenti

': Numberi

](Yes/No)?

': package??

s ECOMMENTS J

^

JNumberi

~~

~

~

~

m 3-06 Yes OK Autoclave - JCO - High steam trip set points reduced.

3-12 Yes OK Autoclave - JCO No longer applies since c.

valve testing installed.

3-15 X03.022 Yes OK Autoclave - Fail-safe containment valves installed on 1" AC 3-16 X03.022 Yes OK Autoclave - Programmable logic system modified on 1" AC 3-20 X03.04 Yes OK Autoclave - HP containment shutdown controls always existed.

3-21 X03.05 Yes OK Autoclave - UF cylinder pressure transmitters 6

modified on 1" AC 3-22 X03.06 Yes OK Autoclave - Operational alarms installed on I" AC 3-23 X03.07 Yes OK Steam supply & condensate removal systems modified on 1" AC 3-24 X03.08 Yes OK Autoclave - Head /shell sealing surface restored on 1" AC 3-25 X03.09 Yes OK Autoclave - Code interpretation for Paducah obtained & sent.

GDP 98-0214 Page 3 of 10 '

JIdentified'.

' Task ID,

. Evidence OK? ?

iInformation added toi

Status ~

~

i Commitment /

Numberi (Yes/No).!

~-package??

COMMENTS-Number -

3-26 X03.09 Yes OK Autoclave - Evaluation of ASME Code Case completed.

3-27 X03.09 Yes OK Autoclave - Submittal of ASME Code Case done.

3-28 X03.11 Yes OK Autoclave - Completion schedule for other 12 autoclaves provided.

6-04 N/A OK X-705 Microfiltration - Field Verification confirms fix is effective.

7-01 X07.01a Yes Yes OK HEPA - Fvidence supplemented.

7-03 X07.0lb Yes Yes OK HEPA - Current PM system info wus substituted. Originalinfonnation was OK.

16-01 X16.01 Yes OK Fire Protection Sprinkler Testing-Hoses on (Violation)

Fire Trucks not being tested ( procedure in draft). Early testing may cause retest period to be exceeded (previously written PR-PTS 05422).

GDP 98-0214 l

Page 4 of10

Identified 1

$TaskID ?

1 Evidence OK??

!Information added'to?

IStatasi,

_1

~

-w

~

TCommitmenti-

?NamtkrL p(Yes/No);

package?f f

~

[COMMENTSp

Namtsrf ^

^

/

^

f

^

s I8-01 XI8.01 No Discrepant Em. Packets - (PR-PTS-98-5225). Review of 11 facilities found 1 or more of the following i

18-02 X18.01 No Discrepant discrepancies in each packet: information not current, layout drawings not present, critical

[

18-03 X18.01 No Discrepant action equipment not listed, electrical utility i

service not listed, facility emergency 18-04 X18.01 No Discrepant equipment not listed, compressed gases not listed, tenant organizations not listed.

4 18-05 X18.01 No Discrepant f;

j Emergency Packets will be evaluated and g

18-06 X18.01 No Discrepant discrepancies dispositioned by 12/15/98. Final I

corrections to Packets, as needed, will be 18-07 X18.01 No Discrepant completed by 4/15/99.

l 18-08 X18.02 Yes OK Em. Packets - Combustible fire loading analysis completed.

l 18-09 XI8.02 Yes OK Em. Packets - Training of building custodians completed.

[

l8-10 From Yes OK Em. Packets - Combustible loadings provided f

description in pre-fire plans-PR-5225 (Recommendation i

ofnon-noted in PR) compliance i

24-08 X24.02 Yes OK Maint. - Guidance for cleanliness control developed.

{

24-16 X24.04b Yes OK Maint. - Q items with PM are listed.

I r

f

.-p GDP 98-0214 i

Page 5 of10 l

s l Identified TaskID?

L Evidesee OK??

Information added to:

_ iStatuss

~

1. 9@/f

~

Commitament iNumber <

{(Yes/No)).l '

(package?'

.' - ] ~ lCOMMENTSI

' ~ '

7

.: Number t

24-18 X24.04c Yes OK Maint. - Other AQ items with PM are listed.

I 24-19 X24.04a,b, Yes OK Maint. - PM procedure establib formal t

c mechanism for changes.

[

24-26 X24.06a Yes OK Manit. - Procedures were prepared, reviewed and corrected.

l 24-30 X24.07 Yes OK Maint. - TSR training was conducted.

24-40 X24.10 Yes OK Maint. - Vendor manuals were identified.

Recommendation made to have vendor manuals

{

submitted from work areas l

(PR-PTS-98-5328).

25-01 X25.01 No Yes OK Ops Procedures - Those for all program elements not in file. May have missed date.

I' Update to file to be validated by Ops.

PR-PTS-98-5349. Action completed.

25-03 X25.02 Yes OK Operations - Cascade Operator T & Q evidence

{

in Issue 26 e

25-07 X25.02 Yes OK Operations - Ops Mgr T & Q evidence in Issue 26 l

l 26-03 N/A OK Training - JCO - Instructor qualifications records appear adequate.

26-06 X26.02 Yes Yes OK Training - Detailed training schedule not i

prepared by CP date. (PR-PTS-98-05329).

[

Now in comphance.

t

2

. i GDP 98-0214 i

Page 6 of10 i

iIdentifiedi iTaskID '

Evidence OK?J

Information added tot:

Status V

~ l ?'

l

! Commitment -

Numberl

'(Yes/No) l package?1

~

1COMMENTSi

[

7 d

_ ~~

.m f

' Number -

m 3

26-11 X26.04 No Yes -

Discrepant Training - NCS Program to resolve qualification discrepancies.

27-01 X27.01 No Yes OK-Org. Assessment Program - No evidence of org l

self assessments in file -(PR-PTS-98-5314 ).

[

Schedule provided for self-assessments 28-03 X28.01b Yes OK Event Notification & Reporting - Training f

documentation OK.

l 32-01 X32.01 No Yes OK QA -Required reading completed after due date. No training located for UE3-QS-QS1071 (PR-PTS-98-5312). Training not required by effective date & QS1071 did not

[

require training.

t 32-02 X32.01 Yes OK QA - Procedures & training for QAP i

effectiveness audit are OK.

l 32-03 X32.02b No Yes OK QA - Audit of QAP efTectiveness -Procedures f

cited for procurement, handling & storage L

do not mention AQ-NCS (PR-PTS-98-5311).

UE2-QA-QS1070 training late. No evidence i

of training for UE3-QA-QS1071. PR-PTS l 5312 - Resolved and additional training

}

information added to files to complete.

34-02 X34.0lb Yes Yes OK Em. Preparedness - Training evidence f

l supplemented.

I I

GDP 98-0214 Page 7 of 10

- Information added to.

IStatus1 2

. Identified J

-Task IDE-

- Evidence OK?

Commitment "

L Number; L(Yes/No);

. package'l

.LCOMMENTS -

~

Numbe'r 34-03 X34.01c Yes Yes OK Em. Preparedness - File OK. Clarification evidence added.

39-01 X39.01 Yes Yes OK Chem Safety - Some components added to PM after due date. PR-PTS-98-5308. Now in compliance.

42-01 X42.01 No OK UF. Detectors not tested to revised methodology after 7/3I/97. PR-PTS-98-0914 was written to identify non-compliance. Corrective action plan had extended schedule for detector testing. Identified as a non-compliance issue by h1C on 9/3/98. Subsequent testing to restore operability was conducted using revised methodology. Now in compliance.

A.5-01 XA5.01 Yes OK DOE Materials - Procedure issued for DOE areas.

TOTAL'.

13 Nos -

z9:

.-12 DISCREPANTACTIONS'OUT OF 50.WITHIN 6 CP -

ISSUES OF THE 15 CP ISSUES REVIEWED --

t GDP 98-0214 Page 8 of10 t

Attachment B - Results of NT Action Review (see Legend at end of table)

-Identified Task ID

. Evidence Info Added?

ACTION STATUS Commitment Number OK?

Problems?

COMMENTS -

. Number L

02-01 N/A Pgrm. Closure JCO - SARUP Chapter 3 program underway.

j 02-02 N/A Pgrm. Closure JCO - SAR used as current safety basis.

l 02-03 N/A Pgrm. Closure JCO - SARUP 3.8 identifies additional safety systems 02-04 N/A Pgrm. Closure JCO - 76.68 & 76.9(b) being followed. Improvement recommended for 76.9(b) review.

I 02-05 X02.01 N/A Pgrm. Closure Not in BPS. Additional commitments provided in SARUP l

02-14 X02.05b N/A Pgrm. Closure Not in BPS. Annual update includes 76.68 changes made.

l 03-17 X03.02b Open Yes Pgrm Closure Schedule for actions added to BPS & PSS.

7 03-18 X03.02c Open Yes Pgrm Closure Schedule for actions added to BF3 & PSS.

03-19 X03.03 Open Yes Pgrm Closure Schedule for actions added to BPS & PSS.

Il-06 XI1.02 Yes OK Operation relocated eliminating need for this action.

i Enforcement discretion requested.

[

13-03 X13.03 Open Pgrm Closure Site characterization program underway OK.

[

t 23-32 X23.06 Yes OK Training program for AQ appears OK.

j 23-33 X23.06 Yes OK Configuration mgmt. training provided.

I 24-11 X24.03c Yes OK Work control procedure upgraded.

24-13 X24.03a,b,c Yes OK Work control procedure upgraded.

I i

~

GDP 98-0214 Page 9 of10 Identified Task ID Evidence Info Added?

ACflON STATUS Commitment Number OK?

Problems? -

COMMENTS Number 24-14 X24.03a,b,c Yes OK Training on work control provided.

24-15 X24.04a,b,c Yes OK Memo from TA Boss describes performance indicator program.

24-20 X24.04c Yes OK IIistorical basis provided for PM.

24-21 X24.05a,b,c Yes Yes OK M&TE & process eqpt calib procedures in place.

Reference to 3 main procedures added.

24-24 X24.05c Yes OK Calibration procedures for AQ developed.

24-25 X24.05c Yes OK Training on calibration requirements for other AQ &

M&TE provided.

24-33 X24.08c Yes as Yes Pgrm Closure Maint procedures for other AQ-supplemental Supplem.

information provided & new BPS action added.

24-38 X24.09c Yes OK Training modules for AQ were developed.

24-39 X24.09c Yes OK Training for AQ appears OK.

l 26-12 X26.05 Yes OK Training modules for AQ were developed.

29-12 X29.01a Open Pgrm Closure Nearly all of 2700 ft' of records have been received by RMDC.

29-14 X29.01c Open Pgrm Closure Fire rated cabinets ordered & will be checked 29-16 X29.Old.2 Open Pgrm Closure Managers attested that computer codes and data have been turned over.

29-20 X29.02.4 Open Pgrm Closure Documents independently identified.

29-21 X29.02.4 Open OK Turnover backlog No longer exists.

GDP 98-0214 f

Page 10 of10 Identified '

. Task ID

' Evidence Info Added?

-ACTION STATUS Commitment Number

! OK?

Problems?

- COMMENTS

- Number 29-22 X29.02.4 Open Pgrm Closure Turnover of documents is ahead of schedule.

29-23 X29.02.05 Open Pgrm Closure Document index being prepared.

30-23 X30.12 Open Red Flag Open Reviews proceeding but process not in place for

[

assuring PORC review ofin-hand procedures in 5 years.

[

44-07 X44.01 b Yes OK CAAS horns & lights verified in field.

I A.2-13 XA2.03 Open Yes Pgrm Closure Sampling program being modified. RAC-98-X0126 &

CAR initiated to eliminate reference to modifications of I

sampling autoclaves.

[

I A.4-24 XA4.14 Open Red Flag Pgrm Closure HEU cylinder cleaning behind schedule. Date extension submitted to DOE for approval.

A.4-26 XA4.16 Yes OK HEU refeed completed

[

L A.4-27 XA4.17 Open Pgrm Closure Detection of U* > 10%

A.4-28 XA4.18 Open Pgrm Closure Tumover of X-326 process / plan in place.

A.4-29 XA4.19 Open Red Flag Pgrm Closure HEU cylinder cleaning behind schedule. Date i

extension submitted to DOE for approval.

A.4-30 XA4.20 Open Pgrm Closure Turnover of X-705 41 10 items -

TOTALS-LEGEND:

Open (In

• Evidence OK?" column) = lssue is still Open; therefore, evidence would not have been provided.

N/A (In

• Evidence OK?* column) = Not Applicable (Applies to JCOs which would not have had BPS actions specifically assigned.

Prgrm Closure = Programmatic Closure (satisfactory program is in place to ensure closure)

Red Flag =

Program is in question or behind schedule, or closure evidence review has not been completed due to volume of data.

I

- - -