ML20154G353

Order Denying Hampton,Nh 860221 Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Contentions on Evacuation Time Study & Establish Location for Public Hearings.No Evacuation Time Study Received.Served on 860306

ML20154G353
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	03/06/1986
From:	Hoyt H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:	HAMPTON, NH
References
CON-#186-335 82-471-02-OL, 82-471-2-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8603100001
Download: ML20154G353 (2)

Text

. . .,

$.3 YJ l ,

ERVfL MAR-61986 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCHETED U5NRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges

Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperson ge . .. ., ,

' Emmeth A. Luebke hpg,dDriid 0C Edd'i.

Jerry Harbour BRANCH t

In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-443-OL 50-444-OL t

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (ASLBPNo. 82-471-02-OL) 0F NEW HAMPSHIRE, e_tt a_l,. (Offsite Emergency Planning)

(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) March 6, 1986

(

ORDER (Ruling on the Motions of the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire) i

1. On February 21, 1986, the Town of Hampton filed (a) Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Contentions on Evacuation Time Study, and (b)

Motion to Establish Hearing Location for Public Hearings. One response was received from the NRC Staff on March 4, 1986. The NRC Staff opposed i

both Motions and urged denial.

2. The Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing is denied. Neither the Board nor any party to the proceeding has received any evacuation  ;

time study from the State of New Hampshire. We decline to either advise parties or grant relief on a matter not properly before us.

3. Motion to Establish a Hearing Location is viewed by the Board as urging the Board to select the movant's home site to the exclusion of other considerations affecting a hearing site selection. The Board's l

4 9603100001 860306 l

PDR ADOCK 05000443 0 PDR 3SoE

y P

_a 2

selection of a site is governed by the provisions of 10 CFR I 2.703(b) andAppendixAI(a).I The Motion is denied.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENS NG BOARD

- ( > mir1 Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperson V Administrative Judge 1

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland.

1 The Board does note, with agreement, those factors specified by the Staff in their response at page 4 In addition, the Board points to its statement in a letter to Congressman Norman E. D' Amours on April 20, 1983 that "A facility in which to litigate this licensing proceeding must afford the parties reasonable space and comfort to conduct their case without unnecessary physical handicaps, possess appropriate judicial decorum, ar.d be readily accessible to the public."

__ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _