ML20154B959

Summary of 860206 Meeting W/Util in Arlington,Tx Re Status of Comanche Peak Response Team (Cprt) Program Plan Activities.Results of Senior Review Team Review of Quality of Const Program Submitted.Transcript Encl

ML20154B959
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	02/25/1986
From:	Vietticook A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20154B963	List: ML20154B959 ML20154B965
References
NUDOCS 8603040521
Download: ML20154B959 (7)

Text

. 'e 4 -

1. WA Mfy*o , UNITED STATES P "t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h ,

WASHINGTON D. C. 20555

.....* FEB 251986 Docket Nos.: 50-445 ,

and 50-446 FACIl.ITY: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station APPL.ICANT: Texas Utilities Electric Company

SUMMARY

OF MEETING HEl.D ON FEBRUARY 6, 1986 - STATUS OF COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM (CPRT) PROGRAM Pl.AN ACTIVITIES On February 6,1986, a public meeting was held at the Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas with representatives from the NRC and Texas Utilities. This was the third CPRT Program Plan status meeting. This meeting was transcribed and the transcript is provided as an enclosure. The list of attendees at the meeting is included in the transcript.

Texas Utilities (TU) announced the following management staffing changes: Gil Kelley was named Manager of I.icensing, John Streeter replaced Jim Wells as Director of Quality Assurance and Ed Brabizon is joining the Quality of Construction (QOCI program as lead for safety significant evaluations.

TU discussed the preliminary results of their review of the heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) support system. TU has identified discrepancies between the input to the seismic analysis for HVAC supports for ,

Unit I and the as-built'HVAC supports. In addition, some supports that are supposed to be bolted or welded to the HVAC system were not. The corrective action program at this time calls for one hundred percent reinspection of HVAC supports in the diesel generator rooms, control room and all supports which were to be bolted or welded to the HVAC system. Based on these inspections, the program may be expanded. Unit 2 is not affected. .

TU stated the Ebasco effort to develop as-built data for the cable tray supports was reorganized, that procedures were changed, field tested and will receive Ebasco/TU QA approval. Inspection teams are being trained for the reinspection effort. The reinspection of all supports on the cable trays on Unit 1 is scheduled to recommence Fcbruary 24, 1986.

A representative of Stone & Webster described the status of the piping and ,

pipe support review effort.

TU stated that Revision 3 to the Program Plan was sent to the NRC on January 27, 1986, that Appendices D and E were transmitted on January 31, 1986 and February 7,1986, respectively, and that the Test Program Issue Specific Action Plans (ISAP) will be sent March 1, 1986. TV stated that any changes to ISAPs will be reviewed and approved by the Senior Review Team and submitted to the NRC staff. TU has written an additional ISAP dealing with vendor inspections performed by TU. TV then provided the status of individual issue specific plans.

8603040521 PDH 860225 ADOCK 05000445 PDR

L t

W. G. Counsil Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Texas Utilities Genirating Company Units 1 and 2 cc:

Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq. Resident Inspector / Comanche Peak Bishop, libernan, Cook, Nuclear Power Station Purcell & Reynolds c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatroy Commission 1200 Seventeenth Street, N. W. P. O. Box 38 Washington, D. C. 20036 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Robert A. Wooldridge, Esq. Regional Administrator, Region IV Worsham, Forsythe, Sampels & U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wooldridge -

611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 2001 Bryan Tower, Suite ?500 Arlington, Texas 76011 Dallas, Texas Mr. Robert E. Ballard, Jr. lanny A. Sinkin Director of Projects Christic Institute Gibbs and Hill, Inc. 1324 North Capitol Street 11 Pen Plaza

Washington, D. C. 20002 '

New York, New York 10001 Mr. R. S. Howard Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Westinghouse Electire Corporation Citizens Clinic Director P.O. Box 355 Government Accountability Project Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 1901 Que Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20009 Renea Hicks, Esq. David R. Pigott, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe Environmental Protection Division 600 Montgomery Street P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station San Francisco, California 94111 Austin, Texas 78711 Mrs. Juanita Ellis, President Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Citizens Association for Sound Energy Trial lawyers for Public JJstice 1426 South Polk 2000 P Street, N. W.

~

Dallas, Texas 75224 Suite 611 '

Washington, D. C. 20036 Ms. Nancy H. Williams Nancy E. Wiegers CYGNA Spiegel & McDiarmed 101 California Street '

1350 New York Avenue, N. W.

San Francisco, California 94111 Washington, D. C. 20005-4798 Robert P. Lessy, Jr.

Morgan, Lewis & Bokius 1800 M Street, N. W.

Suite 700, North Tower Washington, D. C. 20036

S f Texas Utilities Electric Company Comanche Peak Electric Station Units 1 and 2 cc:

Resident Inspector - Comanche Peak c/o V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 1029 Granbury, Texas 76048 Mr. John W. Beck Vice President Texas Utilities Electric Company Skyway Tower 400 Nc-th Olive Street, L. B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Mr. Jack Redding licensing Texas Utilities Generating Company 4901 Fairmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 William A. Burchette, Esq.

Peron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell Suite 700 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20007 Mr. James McGaughy Southern Engineering Company of Georgia 1800 Peachtree Street, N. W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30367-8301 Administrative Judge Peter Bloch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Elizabeth B. Johnson Administrative Judge Oak Ridge National laboratory P.O. Box X, Building 3500 Oak Ridge, Tennesse 37830 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom, Dean Division of Engineering, Architecture ,

and Technology Oklahone State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 Dr. Walter F. Jordan 881 Outer Drive Oak Ridge, Tennesse 37830

~

FE8 g5 ngy 2

TV provided the results of the Senior Review Team review of the Quality of I Construction (QOC) Program. This review resulted in three primary recomendations:

1. To review all quality instructions (QIs) and revise them as necessary. This review was to be conducted by the engineers inne inspectors.

2. To retrain and exercise a d'ual walkdown prior to implementation of any revision to a QI and to increase the internal overview inspection rate, particularly in areas where there had been i+.

excess of one percent descrepancy between ERC results and NRC or TU overview.

3. To emphasize that the highest priority in the program is accuracy and completeness.

ERC provided the status of the QOC program.

Finally, TERA presented the status of the design adequacy review.

TU is focusing their efforts on implementation of the Program Plan. They plan to have the investigation phase of the CPRT complete no later than May 1986 and completion of action plan results reports by mid-1986.

f,,

94%( , LLLulU. /C.

- ,- t c Annette Vietti-Cook, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR I.icensing-A