ML20154B453

Lilco Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Testimony.* Util Requests That ASLB Grant Leave to File Supplemental Testimony on Remanded Issue of Role Conflict of School Bus Drivers

ML20154B453
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	05/06/1988
From:	Lengers M HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20154B458	List: ML20154B453 ML20154B462
References
CON-#288-6232 OL-3, NUDOCS 8805170200
Download: ML20154B453 (2)

Text

ff 33 L utCO, May 6,1988 y

9 00CKETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USNRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'88 MAY 10 P7 :21 Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boarchytcg 9; g . u,;y 00CHEimr, +, carvicr.

BRANUi In the Matter of )

)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3

) (Emergency Planning)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) (School Bus Driver Issue)

Unit 1) )

LILCO'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY LILCO hereby moves for leave to file LILCO's Supplemental Testimony on the Remanded Issue of "Role Conflict" of School Bus Drivers. This supplemental testimony provides the Board and all parties with the latest update of LERO's procedures that bear on the school bus driver issue. Specifical)y, this testimony replaces Attachment M (draf t pages 11-19 through II-21 of the plan) and Attachment N (draf t OPIP 3.6.3, At-tachment 14) to our earlier testimony on "role conflict" with Attachment O (Revision 10, pages 11-19 through II-21 of the plan) and Attachment P (Revision 10, OPIP 3.6.3, Attachment 14), respectively.N The testimony also explains what changes have been made to the earlier draf ts and discusses other minor changes in Revision 10 that affect LILCO's school bus driver program.

LILCO believes that its supplemental testimony should be admitted into evidence because the changes addressed in the testimony are not significant and because the par-ties are not prejudiced by updating the testimony at this time. The principal justifica-tion for allowing this update, however, is so that the Board will have the most current information before it when it evaluates LILCO's school bus driver procedure.

1/ Revision 10 of the LERO Plan will be distributed to the Board and all parties within the next two weeks.

8805170200 T

UR 880506 ADOCK 05000322 h

PDR s

r 3

O-O Conclusion For the foregoing Nasons, LILCO respectfully requests that this Board grant leave to file LILCO's Supplemental Testimony on the Remanded Issue of "Role Conflict" of School Bus Drivers.

R espectfully submitted, (2At/ sahA la Counsel for Long Island Lighting Company Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P.O. Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 DATED: May 6,1988 l

l I

i