ML20153H305
| ML20153H305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1988 |
| From: | Long R GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| C311-88-2061, NUDOCS 8805120232 | |
| Download: ML20153H305 (4) | |
Text
,
s GPU Nuclear Corporation sippany, New Je ey 07054 201-316-7000 TELEX 136-482 Writer's Direct Dial Number:
C311 2061 May 6,1988 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen :
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1 )
Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Response to Inspection Report 50-289/88-04 In response to your recomendation in Inspection Report 50-289/88-04 dated March 7,1988, GPU Nuclear Corporation met with members of the NRC Staff on April 26,1988.
As discussed during that meeting, GPUN has revised Corporate Procedure 1000-ADM-1291.01 "Procedure for Nuclear Safety and Environmental Impact Review and Approval of Documents" to provide guidance to reviewers in the detennination of whether a document or change has the potential to adversely affect nuclear safety or safe plant operations. The guidance incorporated into the approved revision 4 of the procedure is as follows:
"Question No. 3 on Exhibit 7 addresses the potential adverse affects on nuclear safety or safe plant operations.
In answering this question, broad consideration should be given to the proposed change with respect to its likelihood to affect nuclear safety or safe plant operations.
For example, one should consider whether the proposed change is likely to affect the operation of safety-related components or equipment.
In addition, one should consider whether the proposed change has the potential to increase the probability of occurrence or the consequences of any accident or malfunction of safety-related equipment, or reduce any margin of safety."
0 8805120232 880506 i
PDR ADOCK 05000'289 I
g Q
\\
6742f/0170f GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsdary of Genera! Pubhc Ut.tt.es Corporation m
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 In addition, we intend to incorporate this guidance into our training program.
GPUN would like to reiterate that Question 3 and this guidance are separate from that portion of the Safety Review Process which ensures compliance with 10 CFR 50.59.
As discussed during the April 26 meeting, with issuance of this revision to the corporate procedure, all Divisions of GPUN intend to fully implement the two step Safety Review Process. There is no need for further NRC review of the Safety Review Process as requested by the referenced letter.
Sincerely, rdf:X R. L. Long Director, Planning & Nuclear Safety RLL/SMK:fg cc:
W. Kane J. Stolz R. Hernan A. Dromerick L. Bettenhausen C. Cowgill R. Conte Ref.: GPUN Letter C311-88-2025, "Safety Review Process" dated February 26, 1988.
l l
l l
6742f/0170f
N
~
c 05/04/88
'13:17 Tril-OSF Bi EG/717 943-8262 002
?
7 m
',' I THI-l NUCLEAR LICENSIM; REGULA70PY f.0"F500M)ENrf CHEr.K' HCET i
!.TTYiE c.
.b
'. 4 !.
.. ~. - -
_ -.'/.: / '. '4_.
FINAL DilE DATE:
$UEJCC ; j;j; &.s w 12 Yv fj%
.. L t..2 ]
- h ;1_. G ' _
INPt!1RECE!VdCTRON:
COGNIZANI LICENSING ENGINrr!sto kD:.i.L u-
,,L.
- L.'! Y -
q PROCF.t.s!NG INSTDUCT!CNS:
Rf. VIEW $hi.t T INSTRUCTIONS:
N.li A k i /.t h !
M
' RETURN COMMENTS BY:
Q( ___
SA E E T Y E V AD~ _,
C HLC r b hMT ~~~
~
A/
$END TO THESE REVIE N.
- UV ATTACWEhi3
~
xi,
~1 x)[.j.S&gj..
N uugjgg._ _,_
CLOSE Al's (1' ct 8'O A./,,..
P _ OM s
_._2 i2..:.9 %.:
A..;
~
~
~ ~~
SPt.C f4I IISTRIfCTI II'.e. m illny, telecopy. etc.) s ~
e DJDJT5 w/0ATC3nt.
~ ~ ~ '
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
Ch0 % PEFERfAdE A:,_
, {_
[ ],~] ] ] ~~
~~ [ [ j' [
OfArf REl.EASEC BY LICLhSINc.
PoG PEYl(W'CoyENT,
t_i qna tu re V"
s DCPARTMChlAt MPROVALS:
r COMMEN15:
OPF RA T IGN
[-
YN c.-
11 gnature Oste p
F Si nature
' Fate
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TM E T.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ' ' ' '
~~ ~ " ' ' ' '
b
- nature Oate k t La.
AJAl.!L 0(H g Q _.
.~
vet,..
tt '
I! h tt' 0FFl.
$1 j AG 9hatura
~ Ntc
~'
- OCPf, 7 The LTare DitY
~ ~ 7..~ ~.._ ~.. '~. ~ ' ~.. ~ ' _ ~ ~.~ _ ~ _ ~ '
~ _ ^
~ ~ ~ ^
f3 ch. a t p e Da t.T DLUT.
~ ~ ~
~~ ~~~ ~
' ~ ~'
LICCN$lhG RE50 LOT.'UN m All COMMENTS ann rINAl. LICENLlhG ADDROVAL:
~Tignature ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~-- ~ ~ ~~ ' TTv. 5 -
CCRNr.*,r.,N rec t fIw a y
- Mes I.411 Y[$
NO
.......g mm anc.g n.s F4No ets e.v n uc. nne. nomm m era w, m ar u -. -.
r, q.,
q i'"
z
~
THI-1 NUCLEAR LICENSING REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE CHECKSHEET LETTER #: 5211-FINAL DUE DATE: f/6/ffI
SUBJECT:
POup4E W&k $49-f SD-p Tc9/W-0/J
'y y
'y i
INPUT RECEIVED FROM:
COGNIZANT LICENSING ENGINEER (S):
P uJdh J &Mw y
PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS:
REVIEW SHEET INSTRUCTIONS:
NOTARIZED?
k RETURN COMMENTS BY: f/9/
SAFETY EVAL?
A/
SEND TO THESE REVIEWERS: /
CHECK & AMT?
lLA M
I)M2SDK) s) //UE/U-
- OF ATTACHMENTS AA P
t>/ Ens P GEPHs) A/
CLOSE AI's (list #'s)
A/
SPECIALINSTRUCTIONS(i.e. mailing, telecopy,etc.): A/
e COPIES w/0RIGINAL:
CROSS REFERENCE #:
DRAFT RELEASED BY LICENSING FOR REVIEW / COMMENT:
Signature Date DEPARTMENTAL APPROVALS:
COMMENTS:
OPERATIONS:
Signature Date PLANT ENGR:
Signature Date-TECH. FUNC:
Signature Date OTHER:
$ 5~ tiki d, sh/n I
k 3bhh DEPT.
Sign'ature
/ 'Date DEPT.
Signature Date DEPT.
Signature Date DEPT.
Signature Date LICENSING RESOLUTION OF ALL COMMENTS AND FINAL LICENSING APPROVAL:
Signature Date CORRESPONDEN}C SIGNED Y:
- NEW LAIs
[E YES LMNO 9"" #
- CTS REQ'O M YES k N0
- LIC. ENGR. REQUIRED TO ANSWER THIS ITEM.
MANAGER CONCURRENCE 0036C)
(9/87