ML20153H127
| ML20153H127 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/14/1986 |
| From: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Chandler J SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153H131 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8602280651 | |
| Download: ML20153H127 (2) | |
Text
i'
, February 14, 1986 Mr. J. C. Chandler, Reload Manager Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Post Office Box 130 Richland, Washington 99352
Dear Mr. Chandler:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT XN-NF-825(P),
"BWR/G GENERIC R0D WITHDRAWAL ANALYSIS, MCPRp" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the
_ Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc. (Exxon) by letter dated April 8, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Exxon publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Exxon and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
DISTRIBUTION: Sincerely, I Central File; TWBrooks
" SSPD'Rea' ding REmch PDR DCS Original signed by PNoonan Herbert N. Berkow, Director HBernard Standardization and Special H8erkow Projects Directorate RDiggs Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosure:
As stated r) li-
^
DPA R:SSPD SSPD DP -
DPWR4 '$'TSSPD ,
Pho iP.s c HBe6 HB r w 02/ly /86
. Of/) _ 86 02/h/8 v f
8602280651 860214 h
PDR TOPRP EfWE C ;
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ l
/ 'o
,, UNITED STATES 8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- .p W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
% ,,,,, # February 14, 1986 Mr. J. C. Chandler, Reload Manager Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.
2101 Horn Rapids Road Post Office Box 130 Richland, Washington 99352
Dear Mr. Chandler:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT XN-NF-825(P),
"BWR/6 GENERIC R0D WITHDRAWAL ANALYSIS, MCPRp" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc. (Exxon) by letter dated April 8, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report. ,
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Exxon publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Exxon and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely,
)g ],I Director
/
/
/ .rbertN.Be!kow, / ,
Standardization and Special .
Projects Directorate -
DivisionofPWRLicensing-B'[ -
Enclosure:
As stated i
i r se - ,-
a ,,,,-,,-,,rnn-,---,,.,.e,_,,,--
- ,, ,......+,.~~--,_..m_..n- ,--.-~~,---~,n- - , - - -------a-