ML20153G189

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That 851025 & 1216 Submittals of Rev E to Swsqap 1-74A, Std Nuclear QA Program, Acceptable Per 10CFR50,App B Criteria.Rept Should Be Ref in SAR for Use in Future License Applications.Replacement of Requestd
ML20153G189
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/06/1986
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Kelly R
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
Shared Package
ML20153G186 List:
References
REF-QA-99900509 NUDOCS 8602280101
Download: ML20153G189 (2)


Text

-%

8

'o UNITED STATES s

[\\ g Q NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7,; J

.E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o g la e

g s., j

)

FEB 6 1986 Docket No. 99900509 Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation ATTN: Mr. R. B. Kelly Vice President and Quality Assurance Manager P. O. Box 2325 Boston, Massachusetts 02107

SUBJECT:

NRC ACCEPTANCE OF REVISED STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL REPORT

Dear Mr. Kelly:

We have completed our review of Revision E to Stone & Webster's Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, SWSQAP 1-74A, transmitted by your letters of October 25, 1985, and December 16, 1985.

This revision updates the topical report to reflect recent organization and title changes and a change in (7

f-

)

Section 10 regarding welding inspection in the current Stone & Webster

'~

Engineering Corporation's Quality Assurance Program.

Based on our evaluation of the proposed changes described in Revision E, we find that the revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is therefore acceptable.

This acceptance is based in part on your commitment to comply with the quality assurance related regulatory guides that endorse the ANSI /ASME N45.2 standard and daughter standards.

Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this topical report are invalidated, we will notify you.

You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire.

To use the topical report in future license applications, applicants need only reference this topical in Section 17 of the Safety Analysis Report.

Should it be referenced in a Safety Analysis Report for a new nuclear power project, the basis of our evaluation will be the guidelines in the latest revision to Standard Review Plan Section 17.1 (currently Revision 2).

Appropriate changes may, therefore, be necessary.

Please replace our letter of August W, 1983, with a copy of this letter, renumber SWSQAP 1-74A as Revision E, cad forward one signed original to the (O

8602280101 860221 PDR GA999 EECSWE Lg 99900509 PDR

b.

Stone & Webster Eng. Corp. '

Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

20555.

The report.should. highlight the changes by use.of a black bar in the margin where a change is made and the revision number should !, tCjacent to the bar.

Should you have any questions regarding'our review or if we can provide assistance, please contact Bill Belke on (301) 492-4512.

Sincerely, 1

N h

fdA -

Gary. Zech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement 4

i O I

t 4

O 1