ML20153B547

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Risks of Using E-Brite 26-1 as Nuclear Power Plant Components. Forwards App B Document.Documents Also Available at PDR
ML20153B547
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/16/1988
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To: Palast G
UNION ASSOCIATES
Shared Package
ML20153B553 List:
References
FOIA-87-849 NUDOCS 8803220257
Download: ML20153B547 (2)


Text

._

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION teac eoia pioutst %wein si Fa 7 n - S Y-W W

[f.e s.

.k

$45#0%5E TYit f#

5 RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF X

I I "'

Rh (e

[/

lNFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST 03

-,, -.... na 1 e =

se..

ItcutSTER JMN b.

k 0

0 PART 3.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bones)

No agency records subs ct to the roovest have been located.

e No additonal agency records subpoet to the roovest have been located.

Agency records subpect to the roowst that are ioentifed in Appendis are already ava, table fo. pubhc irspectson and copm e the NRC Publ< Document Room.

1717 H Street N W., Washegion. DC.

Agency records subr ct to the request that are identifed in Appendix h

are beeg inede avadable for pubt.c espection and copying in the NRC Pubhc Document e

Room,1717 H Street. N W., Washegion. DC, e a folder under this FOIA number and requester name The nonpropretary verson of the proposaits) that you agreed to accept e a telephone conversaton eth a member of my staH e now beeQ made avalable for pubbc especten and coying at the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N W, WasNngton, DC, e a folder under this FOf A number and requeste' name.

Enclosed e information on how you may obtam access to and the charges for copyeg records placed e the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washegton, DC.

Ageecy records subrect to the request s'e enclosed Any appacabin charge for copes of the records provided and payment procedu es are noted in the comments secton r

R$ cords subr ct to the request have been referred to another Federal agencytes) for review and direct <espor'se to you.

e In view of NRC's response to the request, no further acten a beeg taken on appeal letter dated PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certa n informaton in the requested records e being ethheld from public dsclosu e pursuant to the FO' A enemptons described in aM for the reasons stated in Pa t it, sec.

r tons 8. C, and D. Any released portens of the documents for whch only pa't of the record es beeg ethbeid are being made avadable for pubhc inspecten and copying c the NRC Pubw Document Room.1717 H Street N W., Washengton. DC. e a fonder under the FOIA number and reouester name.

Comments 4

i

$'G%

LPE D'8E;toa OYSOs CF PVit A C RECCa0*

?Ldb

/

fW

\\

8803220257 880316 PDR FOIA PALAST87-849 PDR NAC FORM 464 Pvt u do

u..,..,.

y>,,. w

,7

/

Re: FOI A-' a7.nao APPENDIX B

RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE POR UNDER THE ABOVE REQUEST NUMBER NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1*

3/27/87 Y. P. Soong R. R.0leck, Jr, Internal Mame 3ubject:

Niagara Mohawk Niagara Mohawk Comments on Hadco's Letter -

Warning About the Risks of Using E-Brite 26-1 As.

Nuclear Power Plant Components. (6 Pages)

~

,,,m..

N' w

g

',.. - UAION A550CIATES k

64 Second Avenue, New York, New York 10003

. chop er.d New York city (212) 505-5566 s

k S

December 14, 1987 Y

y Mr. Donn1A H.[Grimsley FREEDOM OF INFORMADOM Director Division of Rules and Records -

ACI REQUESI,.

kC) M -f J-p y f Office of Administration U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission I

O # d /2-U-/ 7 Washington, D.C.

20555 RE:

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST f

x

Dear Mr. Grimsley:

This request it made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S. C. 522, as amended.

UNION ASSOCIATES submits this request to the Nuclear Regulatory Commissiou (NRC) to obtain documents regarding the following:

V8NDOR LISTS FOR THE NINE MILE POINT 2 NUCLEAR PLANT AS l

COMPILED BY NIAGARA MOHWAK POWER ("fMO) OR ANY NIMO l

CONTRACTORS BETWEEN 1975 AND 1978, ALONG WITH l

DOCUMENTATION REGARDING THE USE OF "E-BRITE" AT THE I

NINE MILE POINT 2 HUCLEAR FACILITY.

1 l

In your response, the NRC should consider "documents" to mean any and all forms of written communication, including internal NRC staff memoranda.

Your response should also include, but not be limited to, the following:

reports, studies, plans, graphs, charts, diagrams, memoranda, correspondence, test results, working papers, meeting notes and minutes, computer records and print-outs, notes and summaries cf conversations and interviews.

These documents are specifically requested from, but not limited to, the following offices of the NRC:

Office of Investigations Office of Inspection and Audit Office of Nuclear Reactor Research Office of Inspection and Enforcement Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data Operating Reactors Branch of the Division of Licensing.

UNIONASSOChATES requests the NRC to provide all docuwents prepared or utilized by, in the possession of, or routed through nvov,-wgu /

2' 4

Page 2 Mr. Donnie Grimslay December 14, 1987 the NRC containing any and all information related to the following.

1.

Any co$p4,y which supplied materials to HIMO or HIM0's contractors for use in building the Nine Mile Point 2 nuclear plant.

2.

Any documentation in which the use of "E-brite" was at Nine Mile Point 2 was documented.

3.

All documents from the NRC to NIMO regarding E-brite use at Nine Mile Point 2.

4.

All docu onts from NIMO to the NRC regarding E-brite use at Nine Mile Pein 2.

In your response, pivase identify which documents correspond to each request itemized above.

If any of the material covered by thi; request has been destroyed and/or removed, please provie all sarrounding dccumentation, including, but not limited to to a dese totion a the action (s) taken, relevant date (s) and just ification (.)

for the action (s).

For any documents or portions of documents you deny due to a

)

s;,scific FOI A extaption, please provide an index itezazing and describing the documents or portions of documents withheld.

Pursuant to Vaunhn v. Rosen (I), 484 F.2d 100 (D.C. Cir. 1973),

cert. denied, 415 U.S.

977 (1974), the index la required to provide a detailsd Justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption and an explanation of why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document witthold.

V4 look forward to your answer within ten days.

Thank you s

for your attention to thim natter.

Sincerely, k' N hb Gr go A.

Palast Senior Associate GAP /s1 f

_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _