ML20151Y477

Forwards Matl Presented at 880805 Meeting Re Util self- Assessment Restart Program.Findings Planned to Be Compiled in Rept on 880923

ML20151Y477
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	08/15/1988
From:	Corbin McNeil PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	Russell W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8808260404
Download: ML20151Y477 (7)

Text

~ . _ _ . .

l

.4 p *,

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY

. 2301 M ARKET STREET a

l P.O. DOX 8699 '

PHILADELPHI A. PA. '9101 1215) 841 4221 C. A. McNEILL. Ja. l CMECL/TIV E VICE PRESIDENT

• NUCLE A R l

August 15, 1988 j Docket Nos. 50-277 '

50-278 License No. DPR-44 45 i l

l Mr. William T. Russell, Administrator Region I US Nuclear Regulatory Conmission Washington, DC 20555 -

ATTENTION: Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Restart Review Panel Dear Mr. Russell '

i

' On August 5, 1988, membere of the NRC staff met with Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) to discuss the status of the Peach Bottom restart review. As part of that discuasion, we presented an overview of the PECo i self-assessment Rest. art Review Panel (RRP). Following up on that discussion,  ;

and provided below is a description of our restart Self-Assessment Program. '

The material presented on this subject at the August 5, 1988 meeting is j provided as Attachment 1.

The RRP was establishe' to provide a comprehensive review of the status of plant and organizations in conjunction with line organization assessment.of '

readiness. This review will la reovided for PECo management's consideratior.

prior to declaring Peach Bottom ready for restart.

The restart issues have been complied into the functional areas listed in Atttchme'2t 2. It is planned that the RRP will set forth its findings in the form of a report on September 23, 1908. The objective of the RRP is to ensure that the organizationa and people are in place and ready, that proper planning has taken place and that there are no safety significant open items or other

, reasons that place restar*. und operation in question.

j The self-aosessment process includes a series of six steps. As shown in Attachment 1, this process involves setting forth the identified restart i

issues, describice the tasks inndertaken to resolve the issues, describing the status of task completion, listing evidence that a p,sitive result has been #

achieved, sstitcg G y the positive result is sufficient, and 1.isting the evidence. that the p:>sJtive result will continue.

yBP'kWggggsg, PDC .

f

Mr. William T. Russell Au8ust 15, 1988 Page 2 A series of three RRP meetings are planned, as follows:

In the first meeting, held on August 11 and 12, 1988, each functional area presenter described to the RRP their plan to address readiness for restart and items to be covered within the functional area assessment. In turn, the RRP gave direction as to additional considerations and areas of interest, which they believed should be addressed.

In the second meeting, presenters for each functional area will-describe the status of PBAPS with respect to readiness for restart. The RRP will question the presenters to establish that the organization and people, physical plant, planning, safety, and other relevant issues are described and understood, that appropriate corrective actions have taken place, and that positive results achieved are sufficient and can be reasonably expu ted to continue.

The third meeting will allow the presenters to comp 1. ate any previously uncovered material, to describe tasks undertaken to resolve additional issues identified during the RRP process and task completion status.

Management readiness for restart and operation is also of importance.

This area will be assessed by the Nuclear Committee of the Board (NCOB) based on presentations by Senior Management, Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA) and the Nuclear Review Board (NRB). The NCOB will report its overall assessment to the Board of Directora.

Should you have sny questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to 1 contact me.  :

Sincerely, l

cc: Addressee M l i

T. P. Johnson, Resident Site Inspector l Robert Martia, Licensing Project Manager, NRC

DISTRIBUTION:

J. F. Paquette , Jr. , S 26-1 C. A. McNeill, Jr., S 26-1 l J . S . - Kempe r , S 25-1 E. J. Bradley, S 23-1 J. W. Gallagher, S 25-1 S. J. Kowalski, S 25-1 G. M. Leitch, LCS, MC200 l D. M. Smith, PBAPS, SMO .

! D. R. IIelwig, S 7-1 E. P. Fogarty, S 7-1 W. M. Alden S 7-1 l J. A, Basilio, S 10-1 W. ~ C. 81 rely, S 7-1 l P. Blackiston, S 10-1 M. Miller, S 10-1 G. F. Daebeler, PBAPS, A4-1S D. Davis, S 10-1 R. L. Forman, S 13-1 S. M. Gawthrop, Elkton Office T. Graham, S 10-1 '

G. Lipscy, PBAPS, A4-4N N. T. McHugh, S 13-1 J. Renfroe, S 10-1 B. Rogers, S 10-1 '

D. C. Smith, S 7-1 D. Vollmer, S 10-1 l H. Kiscer, S 10-1 L. Burkha rd t , S 10-1  ;

I M. McCormick, S 13-1 B. Bilanich, S 24-1 R. S. Stoddard, PBAPS, AX1-1 R. A. Kankus (Fax), PBAPS,(x4373)

C. J. McDermott, S 13-1 R . Ha rpe r , S 13-1 l

R. Ilorne, Coatesville Service Building D. Pa r ke r , S 7-1 ,

B. Norton, S10-1 i J. Martore. N4-4 l E. Blackwood, S 10-1 l

l l

1D#103%

l'

RESTART REVIEV/ PANEL SCHEDULE .

??

n if i~

AUGUST 11 & 12 INITIAL MEETING -

l AUGUST 24 & 25 SECOND MEETING SEPTEMBER 8 & 9 FINAL MEETING e

1 I - ,

i

RESTART RE'/IEV/ PANEL BRIEFING SHEET PROCESS

1. Set Forth Problems Previous y identified

2. Descriae Tasks Unc.erta<en to Resolve 3roblems

3. Describe Status of Tas<, Completion

4. List Evidence Tlat a Positive Pesult

-las. Been. Aclieved.

5. State Why t7e Positive Result is Suf"icient

6. List Evidence That t7e Poeitive Result Will Continue

.__________--_i****1._. -

I RESTART REVIEV/ PANEL MEMBERSHIP C.A. MCNEILL, JR. - EXEC. VP, NUCLEAR J.S. KEMPER - SR. VP NUC. CONST.

G.M. LEITCH - VP, LIMERICK D.R. HELWIG - GEN. MGR., NQA E.C. KISTNER - CHAIRMAN, NRB S. LEVY - NCOB ADVISOR E.P. WILKINSON - NCOB ADVISOR L.BURKHARDT - CONSULTANT O

e 4

4 S

a

. 1 .

ATTACHMENT 2 FUNCTIONAL AREAS BEING ' REVIEWED BY THE RRP u i Nuclear Quality Assurance Corporate Personnel Policies-4 Site Overview (Organization & Administration Security, Emergency -s

Preparedness, Unit 2/3 Interaction)-

t Plant Overview (Organization & Administration)  !

l Operations l

4 Training & Qualification l Maintenance i i Plant Services (Rad Waste, Health Physics, Chemistry)

Plant Support (Surveillance, In Service Inspection /In Service Testing, Operating Experience) 4 Commitment Tracking 4  :

Industrial Safety / Fire Protection t t

j. Document Control Configuration Management ~

Modifications (Design Engineering, Implementation, Drawi'ng- Control) '

Outage Management i Procurement & Material Power Ascension  !

I q

1