ML20151W553
| ML20151W553 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/1988 |
| From: | Chan E NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Harbour J, Linenberger G, Smith I Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#388-6955 OL, NUDOCS 8808250024 | |
| Download: ML20151W553 (1) | |
Text
f155 fl Kf 0g k
Io,,
UNITED ST ATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
.E'
,,3
%*****/
AUG 2 31988
'88 AW 23 P3 :55 Gract,,
1 han W. Smith Esq., Chairman G ustave A. Linenberger, Jr. 00cnr ar;,, yQ S N C" Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.
N uclear R eg ulatory Commission Washington, D C 20555 Washington, D C 20655 Dr. Jerry Harbour Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D C 20555 In the Matter of PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL.
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-443, 50-444 Off-Site Emergency Planning - O b
Dear Judges:
In an effort to timely submit the "NRC Staff Pesponse to Applicant's Motion For Rafferral and Intervenors' Cross-Motion In the Alternative" of August 22, 1988, errors were made in the wording of footnote 2.
The first sentence of the footnote should read:
"The presumption created by the recent b
amendment to 10 C.F.R.
E 50.47(cl(1) forecloses -1' claim that lack of legal to, implement an adequate plan, standing
- alone, is a
har_ to authority o_
licensing." The penultimate sentence of the footnote should read:
"The Board has made it clear that in order to prevail with any claim that a particular response is better than an adac,uate utility plan, the nature of the alleged sur-or response must be established "
Sincerely, ho[iOON$$0 3
4 0
Elaine 1. Chan Counsel for NRC Staff cc: Service List
._-