ML20151W522

Forwards Replacement Page to License Change Application 169, Submitted on 880812,which Revises Surveillance Requirements for ECCS Check Valves in Tech Specs.Page Provides Conclusions of Safety & Environ Evaluation Performed

ML20151W522
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	08/16/1988
From:	Cockfield D PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
NUDOCS 8808250014
Download: ML20151W522 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -

o E m E:

David W. Cockfield Vice President, Nuclear August 16, 1988 Trojan Nuclear Plant Dockot 50-344 License NPF-1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555

Dear Sir:

Replacement Pago to Licenso chango Application 169 l Attached is a replacement pago to Licenso Chango Application (LCA) 169 l submitted on August 12, 1988 which requestod amendment of Operating l Licenso NPF-1. This LCA revisos surveillance requirements for Emergency Coro Cooling System check valves in the Trojan Technical Specifications.

The replacement pago provides the conclusions of the safety and environ-mental evaluations performed for the proposed licenso chango which woro inadvertently omitted from the original LCA.

Sincerely, Attachment c: Mr. John B. Martin Mr. Bill Dixon Regional Administrator, Region V State of Oregon U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Department of Energy Mr. R. C. Barr Hr. Michael J. Sykes NRC Resident inspector Chairman of County Comissioners Trojan Nuclear plant 8808250014 880816 f PDR ADOCK 05000344 PDC (pi 8 P

e _._.-

q.

\

LCA 169 Page 3 of 3 "A change that constitutos an additional limitation, restriction, or control not presently included in the Technical Specifica-tions, eg, a more stringent survoillance requirement."

Based on the above evaluation, the proposed change does not pose a sig-nificant hazard.

SAFETY / ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Safety and environmental evaluations were performed as required by 10 CFR 50 and the Trojan Technical Specifications. This review deter-mined that an unreviewed safety question does not exist since Plant operations remain consistent with the Final Safety Analysis Report, adequate surveillance is maintained, and there is no conceivable impact upon the environment.

.