ML20151W412
| ML20151W412 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1983 |
| From: | Constable G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Madsen G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151W406 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-25 NUDOCS 8808240093 | |
| Download: ML20151W412 (6) | |
Text
.
4-84-043 f * " *.,
- )
untno suns
/..
C:UCLIAR REGULATORY COMMitSION h
f, I
D acciov iv t
p su RTAN PLAZA oRM. Surn 1988 h
\\,
anuwoTom.TaxAs Mn1 g
N b
July 8, 1983 h
g ff MDt0 T0: Glen Madsen, Chief, Reactor Project Branch 1 THRU:
W. A. Crossman, Chief, Reactor Project Section B FROM:
G. L. Constable, Senior Resident inspector SU6 JECT: LPAL INVESTIGATION INTO DRUG USE ALLEGATION As requested by Bill Crossaan on July 7,1983, the following is a sequence that describes the infonnation I received from LPAL concerning the above allegation. This information has been discussed with Region IV management as it was received. John Collins, during his June 28, 1983, visit to the Waterford 3 site, was briefed by me on the f.ew information given the day before (see below - 3 p.ps June 27,1983). John Collins stated that in the future he wanted to be informed by the SRI directly regarding drvo related probless of this nature.
Unless otherwise directed, it is not ry intention to doctament this infonnation in an inspection report since no acCual inspection or F.
investigation has been conducted.
May 11, 1983 b.
I received a call from Ross Barthurst, plant manger. He set in his office a few minutes later and he advised me that LP8L had received an allegation that several operstars had used morfjuana, %
at a party offsite. The allegation was made by an in-law of one of the~ individuals alleged to be involved. Ross asked if MRC 1
had any specific advice or recermandations regarding their pursuit'on of this issue. I told his that, in general, NRC expects that they follow their own company policies in such matters and that he should
}.,
brief me en the outcome.
Called Paul Check (see nota) to discuss what NRC posturt was for such cases. After some discussion, he said LPAL's drug abuse policy appeared to be in line with those of other utilities. Since NRC had not addressed drug use via specific ulations, LPAL should e
folles their own ecgany policy. I also call Jim Kelly and n a 8'
briefed him on the situation. I ne 8
__usually would) but 1 don't recall y have called Eric Johnson (!
Bill Crossaan was informed o
Friday, by 13, 1983.
~
p$7 n
o Note: Ry initial call was to Bill Crossman who, as ! recall, was out of the office. Glen also was not available.
I called Paul g
because he had been onsite March 3,1983, and disc.d.hed LP8L's n
8 drug abuse policy with them at that time.
gg m a.m J.
- 3%
0*
-A
~
M c m & m n sc J~
,j 4-84-043 Elen Madsen.
Monday, June 27,1963. 3 p.m.
Meeting with Ross Barkhurst to update May 11 information. Ross said that enough information was discovemd during their pmlisinary inquiry to warrant further investigation. LPR Security individually
. interviewed all of the individuals involved plus some others selected to avoid too such attention beinq drawn to those individuals. Of the five suspect individuals, all in' tially denied using marijer.a.
Three of these agreed after questioning to prow their innocence via a lie detector. During this test.'all thme admitted to mgular use of marijuana.
No harder drugs were believed to be,1jvolved One of these indiriudals admitting using marijuana on the s te, one, about 18 months ago; however, the l' e detector indicated that the time frame was supect. This individual was sent to a drug rehabilitatica program and teminated.
The two other individuals who admitted to regular offsite use were suspended for a week and they were put through a drug rehabilitation program. As part of an agreement reached between these individuals I
and Lyn as a condition to their beinq allowed to return to the site was the signing of a statement that they would no longer use i
surijuana and that they would submit to' tests that prove this. It should be noted that LPE felt that these two individuais were among their best license car 4 dates. In addition to the above, LPR has developed a writtan policy regarding work rules in general that includes policy on drug / alcohol use. A 1 nuclear operations personnel will be requirdd 'to sign these stataunts at the concision of an ongoing training program on the same subject that states that they understand and have received a copy of the policy.
Ny conclusion is that LPE has acted responsibly in this' situation.
By clearly stating their policy to all nuclear operations personnel. I believe i
they will have fewer problems in the future. I intend to 4ttend one of the training sessions which are being held this month and Wforwarding a copy of the policy that is beinq s< gned. I bellew that adequate corrective action has been taken n this instance and that, for record i
keeping purposes, this matter may be closed.
-G. L. Ccastable 5enior Resident Inspector RC:rl Enclosures
'd
EXHIBIT (2)
G
--.,--_,_.1-w,,.
...,v_.,,-,,__
,.,-,__--.,m.._..,_.,_.,..,_,,m._,.__m
.,_,.-__--_,m,_-,__,-.__m.._-.-.
mac g ac7 ALLEPAT1HN DATA FORM u s NUCLEAR r.rcutatoav couvissio9 i
InStAAChonS06FL W @
RECEIVING OFFICE Dockst Number (if applicable)
- 1. Focility(les) Invo!ved:
IN.m i us mor. then 3 or n b J A r112 Co R D-T O50.66322 genene. ernts GENERICI TA l~ T 4f)U/ S/k1JA
\\
v i
- 2. Functional Ares (s) Involved:
icheck opproonets tmiesi i opsrations onsite health and safety N construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness
)
other (specifyl
- 3. Otacription:
[ Slf l Al T! *t i Tl I h/l fl l l l l 1 l l l l l l l l l l l II IIIIII I IIIIIII II II III III
- '"c*'"'
II I IIIII I
IIIIII I IIII I I I I Ii 16l41-Ifil/l-Inl411 I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- 4. Source of Allegation:
ichect sooroc<4t. demi contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media NRC employee I
private citizen organization aspecityl other (specifv) la e rn s a M MoviS 4
MM oD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
p g
TD=DN Nk
- 6. Name of Individual mrit two initi i. and i.: names Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Office:
g ACTION OFFICE O[
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
mrit two initiai..no i.. n m.
1
- 9. FTS Telephone Number:
p g /
g g
p Open. If followup actions are pending or in progress Closed. if followup actions are completed
- 11. Date Closed:
T2. Remarks:
l l l l l l l l l l l l l IIIIIIIIIIII}
ist to so -.e.
i# M 'lol t4 19lal-lo!u!31 1 I I I I I I I l l l l h OI/]- [ f ' c1 3 l
g}y
- j. grjp.A-ldoQIfl om.
v..,
- 13. Allegation Number:
I
i, it.
- i. >
,3li 4
- 3 i,
- i.' sI t il I.
i t-.
4
< ;t il
., : i !t
- .!ii !.
t.
i.,.i.
,e:..atl
- i.
I t, ! e l l e.'. i it r ti'..t ' -
i' 1 6. v i li'f :>
(:14 (t<
3 7 1 i 1.
fr _
',U 1 F ' t i..i n i n i Li.L. -. H it - t.u i r.le 19' hl 6.
i e
. *1n I
Loc al I f or Altcntion, home to 5Wi tct l
Capture Off e,L l_F G A T [ Otl NUMDER: R l '.'-8 4 - A -0075 EDURCE: 1 i Gk ME R L MT'l_O E E._,,,__.__
CONF I DE'll I Al.1 T Y GRANIED ((/tD : Y
!! UMBER OF COrlCERNS:
1_,,__
DAIE RECEl'ND:
'.N O %'7 f>EC1f l Etll : D D D R I E l l L L _ ____,_,_ _.,_ _. _,.
OFFICE: OIR4__
eV T ! ON Of F ICE Cl.rtlI ACI t DO HArEG FHoliE: F i S 7.'.'88110 5.FE T S 161 J 1 F li' Al JL E ti/N,Us: U BOARD I4011F IL:n f lull RECOMMENDED (y/tJ): _
51 Allis: C GCHEDULED COMPT.ETE: 9'5., ' 01 DALE CLOSED: 860929 1
6L t E Dril loil SUBS 16t111 Ai ED ( v /ll, P 's : h tiLLEGER NOTIFIED OF CLOSEOUT (Y/fJ):
(
If; "YEb",
01 REPORT 110 : 4-84-043 Ol
.( T (Ot t t i / t i.' :
i t (1!a :
}
.n
,, t t en t i r_iri, H om.-
to SWi tcli j
Capture Off l
Local
-s
,.i i e. /d 106 I t il lMi'F.R : RIV-34-A-009 '_
L b1:1. I t.L f d U L T.'.31 a e it L.
e,. t t U Li' f-01 l OW -UP5 DE L 1 til I E D TO,.
i
+ t i i. Pi,:
i.
ul i Lh5Ufl!!H.
.=
ee e
+-
i 9
ALLEGATION REVIEW Date: 09/30/86 CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-095 DATE OPENED 09/27/84 FACILITY NAFE Waterford 50-382 SUBJECT Alleged cover up of drugs SOURCE OF ALLEGATION OI Confidential Source NUXBER OF ALLEG.
ASSIGNED TO OI CROSS REF. NO.
4-84-043 I
ACTION SCHEDULED Pending HQ review ECD: 6/86 FIRST/LAST NAME D. Driskill DATE ASSIGNED 09/27/84 REPORT NLHBER lat:
i 2nd:
Lat:
FIS NLHBER 8-728-8110 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT N
ENTORCEMENT ACTION SORT CODE X
DATE CLOSED 09/28/86 ACTION OFFICE OIRIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS: Alleged drup cover up.
Ref. 4-86-A-043.
D. Driskill requests all alleger follow-ups be limited to 0I personnel.
l
4-84-043 TlW E DA7E CONVERSATION RECORD
- gpM, 3i
% g3 O VISIT O CONFERENCE
@ELEPHONE
"*"I**
COMING Location of Visit / Conference:
O OUTGOING
{,,y NAWE Or PERSON (s) CO'tTACTED OR IN CONTACT ORG ANIZ ATION (OM.c e sept, bur 6 sw.
TELt* HONE NO gp Lgw Q.1 Q -
{
f,,__
mMV U t_.kut/@W A gu.
%S. Gre, ouN k.
sa67
,g&
'"IQpe EgdL d.Juavgoauuachm A,-
M CQPP J
c,PSN c dd b %, ed her-or1U.. C ese,n. (AAnn22 cf-
)fM tuAh@.z-L.LJ3LC. CUVCECPtAM d
'l ta.A ELO LAA t Je t
y w
i
.a PW tr_'L'i o e -Ar$ i %
u3 bo iS b
,a - -
- LA.G s ON L )
D ca arb ecor e n--
G.r-c cfrWe q
v
,a to db36a aw2_.;
hceine_%. % 3 %[nm w actf.
5f6tfT i
t
$ M C7 GE"""
@ LA4A V) t U S 4 @ P s LA.3 ES La4 P (.AAA O 1 O Q O O 3 b &'
tlAa o f'OOE OR %
42.3 c'W D
6
't a) @ (A.3 4.)
l A J M 'tcc. ~ e o a e,c.ea d a', & GtDO ed a
,&ar na cQ.ot se.kunL K+iw A
o+
o a 26 w d a m A_
meu-Is & Cece(d A nm e a g LPmaL.
_ % c.u +Lis d:h d delewadib b
E e4 4(i d c, P Cis aTo<m.afcu_a. &e eiTau dod
-gingw.eas % % dca%,.s,L sad &
"RTr LL-eh Ghkr--S. I6s-;%daccaf '
1E cen sua WD.& 2,~ A..-. u. c,2JO M
M ACTION REQUIRED i
Mo@Noc-' erb C'tu te.a Q ust,5k Ich N uhtgr5I k g.
ve c.
Maut of PtasoN DocuutNTING coNytesATioN ATU DAtt ea%
6%
is % _e n ACTION TAKEN P
'- 3
?
I, SIGN ATURE TITLE Daft
#'8-808 CONVERSATION RECORD 7,'0,ja,L O"5r#$'t/Ib's'l e e int c. ni us itnn t
f f.
t M.),
f Q,1 f)
- U 'i
/.
/..
v
,, W /:
umie
_