ML20151U980

Forwards Status Rept on Certain Items in Commission Decision CLI-85-06 Per 851206 Memo.Annual Plan Revs Received Since 850801 for Three of Four Counties Involved in 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone Contain No Ltr of Agreement

ML20151U980
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	02/05/1986
From:	Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Jordan E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20151U984	List: ML20151U980 ML20151U997
References
CLI-85-06, CLI-85-6, NUDOCS 8602110165
Download: ML20151U980 (3)

Text

,. , _

~ .

p g Federal Emergency Management Agency I Washington, D.C. 20472 l FEB 5 1986 l

1 MEMORANDLM EUR: . Edward C.. Jordan I Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and l Engineering Response I Office of Inspection and Enforcement I ulatn Ccanission pg, Nuc gg OarV g q ._ -

--,.., u j

Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs SUBJEX'T: Indian Ibint Special Proceedirn Decision (CLI-85-06) I l

'Ihis is in response to your mercrandum of Deconber 6,1985, requesting )

a status report on certain items mentioned in the Ccmnission decision on the special proceedirg on the Indian Ibint Nuclear kbwer Plant (CLI-85-06). 'Ihe following items remained unresolved at the time of our August 30, 1985 memorandum:

1) Letters of acreement for reception centers and corgregate care centers in all four counties in the Indian Point 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ),

2) Iatters of agreement with bus conpanies in Westchester County, l

3) Procedures for route alertirg in all four counties, and

4) Procedures for disposal of contaminated waste water when the l county (rather than the State) is in comand and control. l Attached is a status report prepared by Region II of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Since August 1985, annual plan revisions have )

been received by Region II for three of the four counties involved in i the Indian Ibint 10-snile EP2, i.e., Westchester, Rockland and Putran )

Counties. No revisions have been received for the Orange County plan.

1) FEMA has received some letters of agreenent and found them to i be acceptable. However, pla revisions submitted since August 1985 for Westchester, Rockland and Putnam Counties contain no new letters of agreement regarfing reception centers. No 1985 plan revision was submitted for Orange County. To date, FEMA l has not received all of the necessary letters of agreement with respect to the availability of facilities for use as congregate care centers. As a result, FEMA's position on this iten, as stated in our August 30, 1985, memorandum, renains unchanged.

FEMA concludes that letters of agroanent are still required with  ;

schools and other facilities designated as reception and congregate I care centers in each of the four counties. Until letters of agree- i ment are submitted to FEMA and found acceptable, this issue renains j unresolved. j g KOO F

.'E c, '

2) FEMA has received no additional material since the August 30, 1985 report with regard to letters of agreement with bus cor,panies in Westchester County. As.we said then, the issue of letters of agreement with these conpanies remains unresolved until all necessary

~ documentation establishing the existence of these contracts with bus conpanies is provided by the State.

3) A sanple of route alertirr) was evaluated in all four counties in the November 28, 1985 Indian Point exercise. In addition, the plan revisions in the Westchester, Ibckland and Putnan County plans are adequate and close the issue of route alerting for these three counties. f m en the route alerting a ssage is formally inserted in the Orange County plan, this issue will be closed.

Until the Orange County plan has been revised, this issue will remain unresolved for Orange Cbunty.

4) FEMA's position remains unchanged on procedures for the disposal of contaminated waste water when the county is in consnand and control. The New York State procedure is acceptable for situations when the Governor declares a state of emergency.

However, further clarification is needed for situations when the county is in ecmnand and control (i.e., no State declaration).

FEMA's Region II is continuing to work with the State of New York.on these outstanding items. However, due to the fact that the State nust work with the Counties to obtain the remaining material required to' close out the open issues, it is not possible to make a firm estimate of the time required for completing the necessary corrective actions.

At the present ti:ne, New York is actively moving towards a resolution i 1

of all open issues mentioned above. We hope this information is useful to you. If you have any more questions, please feel free to call me at 646-2871 or Robert S. Wilkerson at 646-2861. '

Attachment As Stated L

Federal Emergency Management Agency H' 5 Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Febnnry 3,1986 Memorandum For: Richard W. Krimm.

Assistant Associate Director Of f Natural f& je hnological Hazards usO2 From: Phi M. mci t r Chief Natural & Technological Hazards Division

Subject:

Status Report on Indian Point Special Proceeding Decision (CLI-86-06)

Enclosed please find the status report on the offsite preparedness for the Indian Point site. Although New York State has made progress since our August 20, 1985 status report, additional work needs to be done before all outstanding issues can be closed. Due to the fact that the state must work-tnrough'the counties to obtain the remaining material required to close out the opened issues, a firm estimate of the time required for completing these remaining corrective actions cannot be made. At the present time, New York State is actively moving towards a resolution of all open issues.

If you have any questions, please call me at (212) 264-8385.

Encl.

,