ML20151R470

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Cycle 4 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Rept,Per Tech Specs Section 6.9.1.9
ML20151R470
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek 
Issue date: 08/01/1988
From: Withers B
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
WM-88-0200, WM-88-200, NUDOCS 8808120185
Download: ML20151R470 (3)


Text

,..

--. =.. : : = =:

=-

=:

LF CREEK

~

W4) NUCLEAR OPERATING CO

~

l Bart D. Withers Prow and Ctuet Execueve Omcor August 1, 1988 WM 88-0200 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:

Document Control Desk Mail Station PI-137 Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Docket No. 50-482 : Wolf Creek Generating Station Cycle 4 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report Centlemen:

Enclosed is the Wolf' Creek Generating Station Cycle 4 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report. This report is being submitted pursuant to sec tion 6.9.1.9 o f the Wolf Creek Generating Station Unit No. 1 Technical Specifications.

Very truly yours, Bart D. Withers President and Chief Executive Officer BDW/j ad Ecnisoure ec:

B. L. Bartlett (NRC), w/a D. D. Chamberlain (NRC), w/a R. D. Martin (NRC), w/a P. W. O'Connor (NRC), w/a (2) 8808120185 880801 PDR ADOCK 05000482 l

P PNV i i RO. Box 411/ Burtegton, KS 66839 / Phone: (316) 364-6831 M Equal Opportun4y Enveyor 64FHC.YET

Enclosura to WM 88-0200

, Page 1 of 2 Wolf Creek Unit 1 Cycle 4 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report This Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.9 of the Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

The F XY planes for Cycle 4 shall be:

1.

F less than or equal to 1.80 for aim planes containing bank "D" control rods, and 2.

F less than or equal to 1.65 for all unrodded core planes.

These F (z) limit were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor F (z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:

F ( z )< {'2.32 } (K) z) } for P > 0 5 and Q

~

Ti~~

F (z)f {4.64} (K(z)} for P i 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control banks B, C,

and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power l

distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8403, September, 1974.

Therefore, these Fg limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA l

I analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46.

l l

I l

See Figure I for a plot of {F P g } versus Axial Core Height

~

~, - -

$ closure to IN 88-0200 Paga 2 of 2 N

2.4 l

f

)

N

'~'

/

N a 1

1

~

j

(

(

2.0 l

\\

\\

F,

\\

\\

1.8 u

A

\\

o 1. 6 u

I L

l.4 4--

l.2

-IL n

l l

1.0

.80 0

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 CORE f(ICHI (FECI)

FIGURE 1 M AX (FO PREL) VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT l

DURING NORMAL CORE OPERATION l

l l