ML20151Q775
| ML20151Q775 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1988 |
| From: | Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Stohr J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8804270131 | |
| Download: ML20151Q775 (1) | |
Text
~_
[' q Federal Emergency Management Agency k
Washingtola D.C. 20472 APR l 91988 MEMORANDlM FOR:
J. Philip Stohr Acting Director Division of Radiation Protection and D7ergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cannission W
FROM:
.c rd. Krim Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs
SUBJECT:
Clarification of Two Issues in the Federal Fnergency
?hnagement Agency's (FE'M) Response to the Perry thiclear l
Power Plant 2.206 Petition 5
l Re purpose of this nenorandtri is to clarify FDM's position regarding two issues addressed in our response to the Perry Nuclear Power Plant 2.206 petition on the &nergency Infomation Handbook. Re first issue involves the receiving schools and evacuation procedures involving school children.
Ee second issue involves the placement of instructional signs in Lake and Ashtabula Counties.
It is FSM's position that the existing school evacuation planning procedures involving the receiving schools should be reviewed to consider alternative planning appn> aches, as outlined in our Febnlary 26, 1988, response to the I
Nuclear Regulatory Comission (ITRC).
In our view these approaches should be considered for incorporation in the next revision of the offsite plans for Perry.
In our February 26, 1988, review we were trying to emphasize that we l
believe this issue is important enough to warrant having all affected parties, the State of 110, the local jurisdictions, and the Cleveland Electric Illuni-nating Company, revisit this issue within the next four months with a goal of either arriving at a schedule for implementing plan changes or adopting a position on the issue.
Regarding the placement of energency infomation signs, FDM does not concur I
with the current approach of storing the signs in Dike and Ashtabula Counties because of the potential for vanda11m. W e difficulty of installing then at the time of an accident overrides the storage approach.
01r position L
l remains that the signs should be installed within the next four months or a schedule should be provided for their installation, i
i P
8804270131 080419 PDR ADOCK 05000440 F
PDR I
i
\\
b s
nw l['M l
, _.