ML20151H693
| ML20151H693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/15/1983 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Keyes M BAILEY CONTROLS CO. (SUBS. OF BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151H696 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900224 NUDOCS 8305050237 | |
| Download: ML20151H693 (3) | |
Text
r.-
ppp i t "M Docket No. 99900224/83-01 Bailey Controls Company a McDermott company ATTN: Mr. M. A. Keyes President 29801 Euclid Avenue Wickliffe, Ohio 44092 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. L. B. Parker of this office on February 14-18, 1983, of your facilities at Wickliffe and Eastlake, Ohio, associated with the fabrication and the equipment qualification testing of sensor and control systems and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. G. M. Kohl and members of<your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made as a result of:
(1) a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report by Consumers Pcwer Co.npany concerning wiring errors in the emergency core cooling actuation system at Midland Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; (2) a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) concerning stress cracked and glued connectors and support brackets used for printed subcircuit boards in the plug in modules of the reactor protection system and the engineered safety features actuation system at Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; and (3) a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report by TVA concerning blown fuse alarms in aux-iliary control circuits at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
In conjunction with the foregoing, an inspection of the equipment ' qualification program was conducted which consisted of:
(1) a review of the quality assurance procedure manual and supplementary manuals and proce-dures; and (2) the verification of the implementation of the QA requirements and l
procedures.
In this part of the inspection all 18 criteria of 10 CFR Part 50, l-Appendix B were covered.
1 This inspection was made to confirm that in the areas inspected your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others. You chould, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents, nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
i-RIV
[6ri M
k,fLBParker/~masPIBarnes CI:R& CPS AF SC:R& CPS BC:VPB[
D:D I
I povs RB t
U UPotj/83 0(/h 83 4- //f/83 i e /d /83 8305050237 830415 PDR GA999 EMVBAIL 99900224 PDR
Bailey Controls Company a McDermott company Areas examined during this inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examina-tion of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel,~and observations by the inspector.
Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to i
meet NRC requirenents.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this
. letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. 'If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR' 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request. for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are.available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information scught to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to
. discuss them with you.
Sincerely, 5'OrI3keI c' ncd by
- u. pocu a.s~
Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch
Enclosures:
l' Appendix A - Inspection Report No. 99900224/83-01 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Data Sheets (15 pages)
Bailey Controls Company-a McDermott company bcc:
JTCollins, RIV RLBangart, RIV JEGagliardo, RIV EHJohnson, RIV MIS Section (J. Perry)
VPB Branch Chief VPB Section Chiefs VPB Inspector DMB-IE:09 SDRichardson, 0IE-DRP RFHeishman, 0IE-RCB VSNoonan,NRR-EQB WSFarmer, RES LDBustard, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico l